California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 313 — Enhanced infrastructure financing districts.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 320, Statutes of 2015.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or a county, defined to include a city and county, to establish an enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance, including, but not limited to, the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of low and moderate income for rent or purchase. Existing law requires proceedings for the establishment of a district to be instituted by the adoption of a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district, and imposes specified duties on the legislative body with respect to the preparation, proposal, and adoption of an infrastructure financing plan after that resolution of intent is adopted. Existing law also requires the legislative body to establish a public financing authority, defined as the governing board of the enhanced infrastructure financing district, prior to the adoption of a resolution to form an enhanced infrastructure district and adopt an infrastructure financing plan. This bill would require, after the adoption of a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district, the legislative body to send a copy of the resolution to the public financing authority. This bill would revise the duties of the public financing authority after the resolution of intention to establish the proposed district has been adopted, so that the public financing authority, instead of the legislative body, will perform the specified duties related to the preparation, proposal, and adoption of the infrastructure financing plan and the adoption of the formation of the district. The bill would also require the legislative body to establish the public financing authority at the same time that it adopts a resolution of intention. This bill would provide that if a resolution is adopted to abandon proceedings to adopt the infrastructure financing plan, then the public financing authority ceases to exist and the legislative body is prohibited from enacting a resolution of intent to establish a district that includes the same geographic area within one year of the date of the resolution abandoning the proceedings. This bill would authorize the enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of very low income for rent or purchase, as provided. Existing law authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to utilize any powers under the Polanco Redevelopment Act, which authorizes a redevelopment agency to take action to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes a local agency to take any action similar to that authorized under the Polanco Redevelopment Act. This bill would instead authorize an enhanced infrastructure financing district to utilize any powers under either law. Existing law requires the infrastructure financing plan to provide for specific actions if any dwelling units are proposed to be removed or destroyed in the course of private development or public works construction within the area of the district, including, but not limited to, causing or requiring the construction or rehabilitation, for rent or sale to persons or families of low or moderate income, of an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing cost within the territory of the district and providing relocation assistance to persons displaced by any public or private development occurring within the territory of the district. This bill would revise and recast those provisions, and would require the infrastructure financing plan to contain those provisions if any dwelling units are proposed to be removed or destroyed either in the course of public works construction or private development within the area of the district subject to a written agreement with the district or financed in whole or in part by the district. Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Article XIIIB) prohibits the annual appropriations subject to limitation of a local government, defined to include a special district, from exceeding its annual appropriations limit, but allows for that appropriations limit to be established or changed by the electors of that entity in conformity with existing constitutional and statutory laws. Article XIIIB defines "appropriations subject to limitation" as any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for that entity. Existing law allows the public financing authority to submit a proposition to establish or change the appropriations limit of an enhanced infrastructure financing district to the qualified electors of a proposed or established district, which is effective if approved by the qualified electors. Existing law also authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, pursuant to the infrastructure financing plan and the agreement of affected taxing entities. Existing law defines "affected taxing entity" as any governmental taxing agency which levied or had levied on its behalf a property tax on all or a portion of the property located in the proposed district in the fiscal year prior to the designation of the district, but not including any county office of education, school district, or community college district. This bill would repeal those provisions allowing the public financing authority to submit a proposition to establish or change the appropriations limit of the district, and instead provide that the allocation and payment to an enhanced infrastructure district of tax increment for the purpose of paying specified amounts incurred by the district is not the receipt by a district of proceeds of taxes levied by or on behalf of the district within the meaning or for the purposes of Article XIIIB, and is not the receipt of proceeds of taxes by, or an appropriation subject to limitation of, any other public body within the meaning or for purposes of Article XIIIB. This bill would also expand the definition of "affected taxing entity" to include a special district, as defined, if the special district is providing any portion of the funding included in the infrastructure financing plan. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 53398.52, 53398.62, and 53398.69 of the Government Code proposed by SB 63 that would become operative only if SB 63 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 320, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 2732.).

  5. Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2729.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2305.).

  8. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  10. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From Consent Calendar.

  12. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  13. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 14).

  14. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on T. & H. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.

  15. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  16. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and T. & H.

  17. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  18. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 1453.)

  19. Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.

  20. From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 6).

  21. Referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  22. From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.

  23. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Atkins · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Atkins

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 80 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 71000
Democratic 4000
Republican 5000
Total 80000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Kim — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chang — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Baker — Yea
Chu — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Low — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gray — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Medina — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 40 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 37000
Democratic 3000
Total 40000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Lara — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Bates — Yea
Block — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hill — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 78 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 68002
Democratic 4000
Republican 6000
Total 78002
% of votes cast 98%0%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Yea
Brown — Yea
Holden — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ting — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Salas — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Harper — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Kim — Yea
Burke — Yea
Levine — Yea
Gray — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chang — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Melendez — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Campos — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Medina — Not Voting
Mullin — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 9000
Total 9000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (9)
Member Party Vote
Alejo — Yea
Holden — Yea
Linder — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Gonzalez — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 313 do?
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or a county, defined to include a city and county, to establish an enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance, including, but not limited to, the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of low and moderate income for rent or purchase. Existing law requires proceedings for the establishment of a district to be instituted by the adoption of a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district, and imposes specified duties on the legislative body with respect to the preparation, proposal, and adoption of an infrastructure financing plan after that resolution of intent is adopted. Existing law also requires the legislative body to establish a public financing authority, defined as the governing board of the enhanced infrastructure financing district, prior to the adoption of a resolution to form an enhanced infrastructure district and adopt an infrastructure financing plan. This bill would require, after the adoption of a resolution of intention to establish the proposed district, the legislative body to send a copy of the resolution to the public financing authority. This bill would revise the duties of the public financing authority after the resolution of intention to establish the proposed district has been adopted, so that the public financing authority, instead of the legislative body, will perform the specified duties related to the preparation, proposal, and adoption of the infrastructure financing plan and the adoption of the formation of the district. The bill would also require the legislative body to establish the public financing authority at the same time that it adopts a resolution of intention. This bill would provide that if a resolution is adopted to abandon proceedings to adopt the infrastructure financing plan, then the public financing authority ceases to exist and the legislative body is prohibited from enacting a resolution of intent to establish a district that includes the same geographic area within one year of the date of the resolution abandoning the proceedings. This bill would authorize the enhanced infrastructure financing district to finance the acquisition, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for persons of very low income for rent or purchase, as provided. Existing law authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to utilize any powers under the Polanco Redevelopment Act, which authorizes a redevelopment agency to take action to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes a local agency to take any action similar to that authorized under the Polanco Redevelopment Act. This bill would instead authorize an enhanced infrastructure financing district to utilize any powers under either law. Existing law requires the infrastructure financing plan to provide for specific actions if any dwelling units are proposed to be removed or destroyed in the course of private development or public works construction within the area of the district, including, but not limited to, causing or requiring the construction or rehabilitation, for rent or sale to persons or families of low or moderate income, of an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing cost within the territory of the district and providing relocation assistance to persons displaced by any public or private development occurring within the territory of the district. This bill would revise and recast those provisions, and would require the infrastructure financing plan to contain those provisions if any dwelling units are proposed to be removed or destroyed either in the course of public works construction or private development within the area of the district subject to a written agreement with the district or financed in whole or in part by the district. Article XIIIB of the California Constitution (Article XIIIB) prohibits the annual appropriations subject to limitation of a local government, defined to include a special district, from exceeding its annual appropriations limit, but allows for that appropriations limit to be established or changed by the electors of that entity in conformity with existing constitutional and statutory laws. Article XIIIB defines "appropriations subject to limitation" as any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for that entity. Existing law allows the public financing authority to submit a proposition to establish or change the appropriations limit of an enhanced infrastructure financing district to the qualified electors of a proposed or established district, which is effective if approved by the qualified electors. Existing law also authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, pursuant to the infrastructure financing plan and the agreement of affected taxing entities. Existing law defines "affected taxing entity" as any governmental taxing agency which levied or had levied on its behalf a property tax on all or a portion of the property located in the proposed district in the fiscal year prior to the designation of the district, but not including any county office of education, school district, or community college district. This bill would repeal those provisions allowing the public financing authority to submit a proposition to establish or change the appropriations limit of the district, and instead provide that the allocation and payment to an enhanced infrastructure district of tax increment for the purpose of paying specified amounts incurred by the district is not the receipt by a district of proceeds of taxes levied by or on behalf of the district within the meaning or for the purposes of Article XIIIB, and is not the receipt of proceeds of taxes by, or an appropriation subject to limitation of, any other public body within the meaning or for purposes of Article XIIIB. This bill would also expand the definition of "affected taxing entity" to include a special district, as defined, if the special district is providing any portion of the funding included in the infrastructure financing plan. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 53398.52, 53398.62, and 53398.69 of the Government Code proposed by SB 63 that would become operative only if SB 63 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last.
Who sponsors AB 313?
AB 313 is sponsored by Atkins.
What is the current status of AB 313?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 313?
Track AB 313 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 313

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 313

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →