Investigational drugs, biological products, and devices.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 159 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 159.
You're tracking AB 159
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 159 — Investigational drugs, biological products, and devices.
Last action — Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law, the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, prohibits a person from introducing into interstate commerce any new drug unless the drug has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . Existing law requires the sponsor of a new drug to submit to the FDA an investigational new drug application and to then conduct a series of clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug in human populations and submit the results to the FDA in a new drug application. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices and is administered by the State Department of Public Health. A violation of that law is a crime. The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law prohibits, among other things, the sale, delivery, or giving away of a new drug or new device unless either the department has approved a new drug or device application for that new drug or new device and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended or the drug or device has been approved pursuant to specified provisions of federal law, including the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The Medical Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California and requires the board to take action against a licensee who is charged with unprofessional conduct. The Osteopathic Act provides for the licensure and regulation of osteopathic physicians and surgeons by the Osteopathic Medical Board of California and requires the board to enforce the Medical Practice Act with respect to its licensees. This bill would permit a manufacturer of an investigational drug, biological product, or device to make the product available to eligible patients with an immediately life-threatening disease or condition, as specified. The bill would authorize, but not require, a health benefit plan, as defined, to provide coverage for any investigational drug, biological product, or device made available pursuant to these provisions. The bill would prohibit the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California from taking any disciplinary action against the license of a physician based solely on the physician's recommendation to an eligible patient regarding, or prescription for or treatment with, an investigational drug, biological product, or device if the recommendation or prescription is consistent with protocol approved by the physician's institutional review board or an accredited institutional review board, and would require the institutional review board to biannually report specified information to the State Department of Public Health, among others. The bill would prohibit a state agency from altering any recommendation made to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding a health care provider's certification to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid program based solely on the recommendation from an individual health care provider that a patient have access to an investigational drug, biological product, or device.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/04/15 - Enrolled Current pdf September 04, 2015
- Amended 07/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf July 06, 2015
- Amended 06/19/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 19, 2015
- Amended 06/16/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 16, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 04/28/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 28, 2015
- Amended 04/13/15 - Amended Assembly pdf April 13, 2015
- Introduced 01/21/15 - Introduced pdf January 21, 2015
- AB159 View text html
Action History
-
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
-
Vetoed by Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 2. Page 2799.).
-
Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2795.)
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2344.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & E.D. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 10).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B., P. & E.D.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 2. Page 1485.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 13).
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 21).
-
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 7).
-
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and B. & P.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee February 21.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Anderson · Cosponsor
- Brown · Cosponsor
- Daly · Cosponsor
- Tom Lackey · Cosponsor
- Obernolte · Cosponsor
- Olsen · Cosponsor
- Waldron · Cosponsor
- Lisa Calderon · Primary
- Robert Garcia · Cosponsor
- Travis Allen · Cosponsor
- Mark Stone · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 10 co-sponsors · 111 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calderon, Lisa Democratic
Co-sponsors (10)
- Anderson
- Brown
- Daly
- Lackey, Tom Republican
- Obernolte
- Olsen
- Waldron
- Garcia, Robert Democratic
- Travis Allen
- Mark Stone
Not signed on (111)
111 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 111 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 67 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 64 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 74 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 3% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 159 do?
- Existing law, the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, prohibits a person from introducing into interstate commerce any new drug unless the drug has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) . Existing law requires the sponsor of a new drug to submit to the FDA an investigational new drug application and to then conduct a series of clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug in human populations and submit the results to the FDA in a new drug application. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, regulates the packaging, labeling, and advertising of drugs and devices and is administered by the State Department of Public Health. A violation of that law is a crime. The Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law prohibits, among other things, the sale, delivery, or giving away of a new drug or new device unless either the department has approved a new drug or device application for that new drug or new device and that approval has not been withdrawn, terminated, or suspended or the drug or device has been approved pursuant to specified provisions of federal law, including the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The Medical Practice Act provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California and requires the board to take action against a licensee who is charged with unprofessional conduct. The Osteopathic Act provides for the licensure and regulation of osteopathic physicians and surgeons by the Osteopathic Medical Board of California and requires the board to enforce the Medical Practice Act with respect to its licensees. This bill would permit a manufacturer of an investigational drug, biological product, or device to make the product available to eligible patients with an immediately life-threatening disease or condition, as specified. The bill would authorize, but not require, a health benefit plan, as defined, to provide coverage for any investigational drug, biological product, or device made available pursuant to these provisions. The bill would prohibit the Medical Board of California and the Osteopathic Medical Board of California from taking any disciplinary action against the license of a physician based solely on the physician's recommendation to an eligible patient regarding, or prescription for or treatment with, an investigational drug, biological product, or device if the recommendation or prescription is consistent with protocol approved by the physician's institutional review board or an accredited institutional review board, and would require the institutional review board to biannually report specified information to the State Department of Public Health, among others. The bill would prohibit a state agency from altering any recommendation made to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regarding a health care provider's certification to participate in the Medicare or Medicaid program based solely on the recommendation from an individual health care provider that a patient have access to an investigational drug, biological product, or device.
- Who sponsors AB 159?
- AB 159 is sponsored by Anderson, Brown, Daly, Lackey, Tom (Republican), Obernolte, Olsen, Waldron, Calderon, Lisa (Democratic), Garcia, Robert (Democratic), Travis Allen, and Mark Stone.
- What is the current status of AB 159?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 159?
- Track AB 159 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 159
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 159
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →