SB 63 — Seaport infrastructure financing districts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 793, Statutes of 2015.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
1 primary, 4 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 8 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to establish an enhanced infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, for which only the district is liable, upon approval by 55% of the voters and to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance, including, but not limited to, among other things, environmental mitigation, military base reuse, low-income housing, and specified housing and transit projects. Existing law authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, pursuant to the infrastructure financing plan and the agreement of affected taxing entities. This bill would additionally include port or harbor infrastructure, as defined, among the projects that may be financed by an enhanced infrastructure financing district. The bill would require a harbor agency to prepare an infrastructure financing plan for a seaport infrastructure financing district, defined as an enhanced infrastructure financing district that finances port or harbor infrastructure. The bill would increase the vote threshold for a seaport infrastructure financing district to issue bonds to 23 of the voters, and would provide that for purposes of these voters, a "landowner" includes an entity paying possessory interest tax on state-owned land. The bill would prescribe additional procedures and requirements for the establishment of a seaport infrastructure financing district, including approval by the harbor agency and the State Lands Commission before the proposal is submitted to the voters for approval. The bill would require the harbor agency to reimburse the commission, for its administrative costs of considering the proposal, from bond proceeds, if any. The bill would specify that the commission shall retain absolute discretion over the determination of whether or not investment of local resources in port or harbor infrastructure, the actions of a harbor agency, or any other action taken by a seaport infrastructure financing district is consistent with the state's interest in tidelands and submerged lands. The bill would exclude from its provisions the Stockton Port District and river port districts. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 53398.52, 53398.62, and 53398.69 of the Government Code proposed by AB 313 that would become operative only if AB 313 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/11/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 11, 2015
- Enrolled 09/09/15 - Enrolled pdf September 09, 2015
- Amended 09/01/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 01, 2015
- Amended 06/01/15 - Amended Senate pdf June 01, 2015
- Amended 04/07/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 07, 2015
- Amended 03/23/15 - Amended Senate pdf March 23, 2015
- Introduced 01/05/15 - Introduced pdf January 05, 2015
- SB63 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 793, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
(Corrected September 10).
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 1. Page 2555.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 63. Noes 2. Page 2843.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 19).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 1250.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 1147.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
April 27 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 618.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Set for hearing April 15.
-
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Referred to Com. on RLS.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 5.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Bonta · Cosponsor
- Mike A. Gipson · Cosponsor
- Hall · Primary
- Lara · Cosponsor
- O'Donnell · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 117 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Hall
Co-sponsors (4)
- Bonta
- Gipson, Mike A. Democratic
- Lara
- O'Donnell
Not signed on (117)
117 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 117 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 85% | 3% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Not Voting |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 68 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 76 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 5% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Not Voting |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 29% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 63 do?
- Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to establish an enhanced infrastructure financing district, adopt an infrastructure financing plan, and issue bonds, for which only the district is liable, upon approval by 55% of the voters and to finance public capital facilities or other specified projects of communitywide significance, including, but not limited to, among other things, environmental mitigation, military base reuse, low-income housing, and specified housing and transit projects. Existing law authorizes an enhanced infrastructure financing district to fund infrastructure projects through tax increment financing, pursuant to the infrastructure financing plan and the agreement of affected taxing entities. This bill would additionally include port or harbor infrastructure, as defined, among the projects that may be financed by an enhanced infrastructure financing district. The bill would require a harbor agency to prepare an infrastructure financing plan for a seaport infrastructure financing district, defined as an enhanced infrastructure financing district that finances port or harbor infrastructure. The bill would increase the vote threshold for a seaport infrastructure financing district to issue bonds to 23 of the voters, and would provide that for purposes of these voters, a "landowner" includes an entity paying possessory interest tax on state-owned land. The bill would prescribe additional procedures and requirements for the establishment of a seaport infrastructure financing district, including approval by the harbor agency and the State Lands Commission before the proposal is submitted to the voters for approval. The bill would require the harbor agency to reimburse the commission, for its administrative costs of considering the proposal, from bond proceeds, if any. The bill would specify that the commission shall retain absolute discretion over the determination of whether or not investment of local resources in port or harbor infrastructure, the actions of a harbor agency, or any other action taken by a seaport infrastructure financing district is consistent with the state's interest in tidelands and submerged lands. The bill would exclude from its provisions the Stockton Port District and river port districts. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Sections 53398.52, 53398.62, and 53398.69 of the Government Code proposed by AB 313 that would become operative only if AB 313 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last.
- Who sponsors SB 63?
- SB 63 is sponsored by Bonta, Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic), Hall, Lara, and O'Donnell.
- What is the current status of SB 63?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 05, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 63?
- Track SB 63 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 63
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 63
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →