California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 243 — Medical marijuana.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 688, Statutes of 2015.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 74% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 10 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure enacted by the approval of Proposition 215 at the November 5, 1996, statewide general election, authorizes the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Existing law enacted by the Legislature requires the establishment of a program for the issuance of identification cards to qualified patients so that they may lawfully use marijuana for medical purposes, and requires the establishment of guidelines for the lawful cultivation of marijuana grown for medical use. Existing law provides for the licensure of various professions by boards or bureaus within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, as specified. A violation of that law is a crime. This bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture, the Department of Pesticide Regulation, the State Department of Public Health, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the State Water Resources Control Board to promulgate regulations or standards relating to medical marijuana and its cultivation, as specified. The bill would also require various state agencies to take specified actions to mitigate the impact that marijuana cultivation has on the environment. By requiring cities, counties, and their local law enforcement agencies to coordinate with state agencies to enforce laws addressing the environmental impacts of medical marijuana cultivation, and by including medical marijuana within the Sherman Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a state licensing authority to charge each licensee under the act a licensure and renewal fee, as applicable, and would further require the deposit of those collected fees into an account specific to that licensing authority in the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund, which this bill would establish. This bill would impose certain fines and civil penalties for specified violations of the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, and would require moneys collected as a result of these fines and civil penalties to be deposited into the Medical Cannabis Fines and Penalties Account, which this bill would establish within the fund. Moneys in the fund and each account of the fund would be available upon appropriation of the Legislature. This bill would authorize the Director of Finance to provide an initial operating loan from the General Fund to the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund of up to $10,000,000, and would appropriate $10,000,000 from the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund to the Department of Consumer Affairs to begin the activities of the bureau. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 266 and SB 643 of the 2015–16 Regular Session are enacted and take effect on or before January 1, 2016.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 688, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 13. Page 3207.).

  5. Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3194.)

  6. In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.

  7. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2764.).

  8. (Ayes 24. Noes 11. Page 2749.)

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  10. Senate Rule 29.3(b) suspended. (Ayes 23. Noes 8. Page 2744.)

  11. (Ayes 23. Noes 8. Page 2743.)

  12. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  13. Ordered to third reading.

  14. (Ayes 24. Noes 3. Page 2737.)

  15. Withdrawn from committee.

  16. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  17. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  18. Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  19. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  20. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 27).

  21. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  24. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.

  25. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  26. Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and E.Q.

  27. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  28. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 15. Page 1863.)

  29. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  30. Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.

  31. From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (May 28).

  32. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  33. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  34. Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  35. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. Read second time and amended.

  36. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.S. & T.M. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.

  37. Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.

  38. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended.

  39. Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and E.S. & T.M.

  40. From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.

  41. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Rendon · Cosponsor
  • Williams · Cosponsor
  • Wood · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 119 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Wood

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Rendon
  • Williams

Not signed on (119)

119 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 119 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 60 Yea · 13 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 541106
Democratic 4000
Republican 2201
Total 601307
% of votes cast 75%16%0%9%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Holden — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Not Voting
Mathis — Nay
McCarty — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Campos — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gray — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Brown — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Gordon — Yea
Burke — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Harper — Nay
Kim — Not Voting
Chang — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Mayes — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Baker — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Daly — Yea
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 30 Yea · 8 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28702
Democratic 2100
Total 30802
% of votes cast 75%20%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Block — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Fuller — Nay
Hueso — Yea
Beall — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Galgiani — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5002
Total 5002
% of votes cast 71%0%0%29%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Mendoza — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 60 Yea · 15 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 531403
Democratic 3001
Republican 4101
Total 601505
% of votes cast 75%19%0%6%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Harper — Nay
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooper — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Burke — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Gray — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Linder — Nay
Low — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Perea — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Williams — Yea
Wood — Yea
Campos — Not Voting
Kim — Nay
Mayes — Not Voting
Melendez — Nay
Baker — Nay
Chang — Not Voting
Obernolte — Nay
Steinorth — Nay
Gonzalez — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 13 Yea · 1 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10102
Democratic 2000
Republican 1001
Total 13103
% of votes cast 76%6%0%18%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Daly — Yea
Holden — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 6 Yea · 2 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5001
Republican 0201
Democratic 1000
Total 6202
% of votes cast 60%20%0%20%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Perea — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Salas — Not Voting
Dodd — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 243 do?
Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure enacted by the approval of Proposition 215 at the November 5, 1996, statewide general election, authorizes the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Existing law enacted by the Legislature requires the establishment of a program for the issuance of identification cards to qualified patients so that they may lawfully use marijuana for medical purposes, and requires the establishment of guidelines for the lawful cultivation of marijuana grown for medical use. Existing law provides for the licensure of various professions by boards or bureaus within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, as specified. A violation of that law is a crime. This bill would require the Department of Food and Agriculture, the Department of Pesticide Regulation, the State Department of Public Health, the Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the State Water Resources Control Board to promulgate regulations or standards relating to medical marijuana and its cultivation, as specified. The bill would also require various state agencies to take specified actions to mitigate the impact that marijuana cultivation has on the environment. By requiring cities, counties, and their local law enforcement agencies to coordinate with state agencies to enforce laws addressing the environmental impacts of medical marijuana cultivation, and by including medical marijuana within the Sherman Act, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require a state licensing authority to charge each licensee under the act a licensure and renewal fee, as applicable, and would further require the deposit of those collected fees into an account specific to that licensing authority in the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund, which this bill would establish. This bill would impose certain fines and civil penalties for specified violations of the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, and would require moneys collected as a result of these fines and civil penalties to be deposited into the Medical Cannabis Fines and Penalties Account, which this bill would establish within the fund. Moneys in the fund and each account of the fund would be available upon appropriation of the Legislature. This bill would authorize the Director of Finance to provide an initial operating loan from the General Fund to the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund of up to $10,000,000, and would appropriate $10,000,000 from the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act Fund to the Department of Consumer Affairs to begin the activities of the bureau. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. This bill would become operative only if AB 266 and SB 643 of the 2015–16 Regular Session are enacted and take effect on or before January 1, 2016.
Who sponsors AB 243?
AB 243 is sponsored by Rendon, Williams, and Wood.
What is the current status of AB 243?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 243?
Track AB 243 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 243

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 243

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →