Prisons: involuntary medication.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 453 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 453.
You're tracking SB 453
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 453 — Prisons: involuntary medication.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 260, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides that if a defendant in a criminal proceeding is found mentally incompetent, the trial or judgment shall be suspended until the person becomes mentally competent. Existing law provides that the court shall order that the mentally incompetent defendant be delivered by the sheriff to a state hospital for the care and treatment of the mentally disordered, as directed by the State Department of State Hospitals, or to any other available public or private treatment facility approved by the community program director that will promote the defendant's speedy restoration to mental competence, or placed on outpatient status as specified. Existing law further specifies commitment proceedings to include circumstances for the voluntary and involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication. Under existing law, if consent for antipsychotic medication is withdrawn or if the treating psychiatrist later determines that antipsychotic medication is medically necessary and appropriate, the treating psychiatrist is required to make efforts to obtain consent for that medication. Existing law provides that if the treating psychiatrist certifies that antipsychotic medication has become medically necessary and appropriate for the defendant, antipsychotic medication may be administered to the defendant for a maximum of 21 days, provided, however, that, within 72 hours of the certification, the defendant is provided a medication review hearing before an administrative law judge to be conducted at the facility where the defendant is receiving treatment. This bill would authorize the treating psychiatrist, if he or she determines that there is a need, based on preserving rapport with the patient or preventing harm, to request that the facility medical director designate another psychiatrist to act in the place of the treating psychiatrist for purposes of seeking an order for involuntary medication. If the medical director of the facility designates another psychiatrist to act, this bill would require the treating psychiatrist to brief the acting psychiatrist of the relevant facts of the case and would require the acting psychiatrist to examine the patient prior to the hearing.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/03/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 03, 2015
- Enrolled 08/27/15 - Enrolled pdf August 27, 2015
- Amended 07/08/15 - Amended Assembly pdf July 08, 2015
- Amended 06/23/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2015
- Amended 04/28/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 28, 2015
- Amended 04/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/25/15 - Introduced pdf February 25, 2015
- SB453 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 260, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2206.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2534.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 15).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 7).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B. & P. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 16).
-
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and B. & P.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 1021.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 11.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 730.) (April 21).
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
April 7 hearing postponed by committee.
-
Set for hearing April 7.
-
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 28.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pan · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Pan
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 0% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (14)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Low | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 92% | 0% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 453 do?
- Existing law provides that if a defendant in a criminal proceeding is found mentally incompetent, the trial or judgment shall be suspended until the person becomes mentally competent. Existing law provides that the court shall order that the mentally incompetent defendant be delivered by the sheriff to a state hospital for the care and treatment of the mentally disordered, as directed by the State Department of State Hospitals, or to any other available public or private treatment facility approved by the community program director that will promote the defendant's speedy restoration to mental competence, or placed on outpatient status as specified. Existing law further specifies commitment proceedings to include circumstances for the voluntary and involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication. Under existing law, if consent for antipsychotic medication is withdrawn or if the treating psychiatrist later determines that antipsychotic medication is medically necessary and appropriate, the treating psychiatrist is required to make efforts to obtain consent for that medication. Existing law provides that if the treating psychiatrist certifies that antipsychotic medication has become medically necessary and appropriate for the defendant, antipsychotic medication may be administered to the defendant for a maximum of 21 days, provided, however, that, within 72 hours of the certification, the defendant is provided a medication review hearing before an administrative law judge to be conducted at the facility where the defendant is receiving treatment. This bill would authorize the treating psychiatrist, if he or she determines that there is a need, based on preserving rapport with the patient or preventing harm, to request that the facility medical director designate another psychiatrist to act in the place of the treating psychiatrist for purposes of seeking an order for involuntary medication. If the medical director of the facility designates another psychiatrist to act, this bill would require the treating psychiatrist to brief the acting psychiatrist of the relevant facts of the case and would require the acting psychiatrist to examine the patient prior to the hearing.
- Who sponsors SB 453?
- SB 453 is sponsored by Pan.
- What is the current status of SB 453?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 453?
- Track SB 453 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 453
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 453
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →