California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 1011 — Public officers: contracts: financial interest.

Last action — August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in a contract, as specified, made by them in their official capacity or by any body or board of which they are members, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law imposes a criminal penalty on every officer or person who willfully violates these prohibitions. Existing law identifies certain remote interests that are not subject to this prohibition and other situations in which an official is not deemed to be financially interested in a contract, including, among others, that of a parent in the earnings of his or her minor child for personal services. This bill, on and after January 1, 2018, would include within the definition of remote interest that of a public officer in the financial interest of that public officer's child, parent, or sibling, or the spouse of the child, parent, or sibling, except a public officer's financial interests would not include any financial interest of those other persons unless the interest is actually known to the public officer. By expanding these prohibitions, this bill would create a new crime, and thus would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. August 11 hearing. Held in committee and under submission.

  2. August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  3. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  4. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  5. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  6. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15).

  7. Referred to Coms. on E. & R. and L. GOV.

  8. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  9. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3430.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3335.) (March 30).

  12. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  13. Set for hearing March 30.

  14. Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  15. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 13.

  16. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Mendoza · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Mendoza

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 38 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 36001
Democratic 2001
Total 38002
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Hancock — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Allen — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Anderson — Yea
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nielsen — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Bates — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Yea
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Not Voting
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Lara — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety finance civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1011 do?
Existing law prohibits Members of the Legislature, and state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees from being financially interested in a contract, as specified, made by them in their official capacity or by any body or board of which they are members, subject to specified exceptions. Existing law imposes a criminal penalty on every officer or person who willfully violates these prohibitions. Existing law identifies certain remote interests that are not subject to this prohibition and other situations in which an official is not deemed to be financially interested in a contract, including, among others, that of a parent in the earnings of his or her minor child for personal services. This bill, on and after January 1, 2018, would include within the definition of remote interest that of a public officer in the financial interest of that public officer's child, parent, or sibling, or the spouse of the child, parent, or sibling, except a public officer's financial interests would not include any financial interest of those other persons unless the interest is actually known to the public officer. By expanding these prohibitions, this bill would create a new crime, and thus would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Who sponsors SB 1011?
SB 1011 is sponsored by Mendoza.
What is the current status of SB 1011?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 1011?
Track SB 1011 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1011

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 1011

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →