HB 94 — Criminal Accounts Receivable Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 29, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 26, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (1 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
87 added · 92 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 94 introduces a new provision that allows defendants to reduce their outstanding criminal accounts receivable by completing a court-ordered treatment program. This change is significant because it provides a way for defendants to alleviate some of their financial obligations if they engage in rehabilitation, potentially making their path to recovery easier. Additionally, the bill clarifies the process for defendants to petition the court for modifications related to their financial responsibilities before their sentence ends.
HB0094S03Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0094 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0094 but was omitted in HB0094S03 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0094 but was inserted into HB0094S03 DISCLAIMER:
This94 documentCriminal isAccounts providedReceivable toAmendments assistGENERAL youSESSION inSTATE yourOF comparisonUTAH ofChief theSponsor: two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Criminal Accounts Receivable Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Todd Weiler 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
and ▸● {requires } reduce a {court, under certain circumstances, to allow a defendant to reduce the amount } portion of the defendant's criminal accounts receivable by completing {compensatory service or } a court-ordered treatment or course;
{and} ▸ changes the rate of credit for compensatory service;
H Money Appropriated in this Bill:
B None Other Special Clauses:
9 HB0094 compared with HB0094S03 None Utah Code Sections Affected:
77-32b-10577-32b-105, , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025, Chapter 259 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
77-32b-105.77-32b-105 .
(a)H.B. correct an error in a criminal accounts receivable;
94 Enrolled Copy (a) correct an error in a criminal accounts receivable;
(2)(2)(a) (2){(a)} {If } Subject to Subsection (2)(c), if a defendant files a petition under Subsection (1), and the sentencing court is satisfied that payment of an unpaid amount of a criminal accounts receivable will impose manifest hardship on the defendant or the defendant's family, the court {shall } may allow the defendant{,defendant: regardless of whether the criminal accounts receivable is delinquent or in default} :
(a){(i)}(i) to satisfy {an unpaid amount } the portion of the criminal accounts receivable{,receivable } that {is not the principal or interest amount owed for restitution} consists of unpaid fines, fees, surcharges, and interest with proof of compensatory service completed by the defendant at a rate of credit not less than {$10 } $12 for each hour of compensatory service;
and (b){(ii)}(ii) to reduce the {unpaid amount } portion of the criminal accounts receivable{,receivable that is not the principal or interest amount owed for restitution} that consists of unpaid fines, fees, surcharges, and interest in the amount of the cost of any treatment or course if:
(i){(A)}(A) the treatment or course was ordered by the court as part of the case;
(ii){(B)}(B) the defendant has completed the court's requirements related to the treatment or course;
and -(C) 2 - HB0094 compared with HB0094S03 (iii){(C)} the defendant provides proof that the defendant completed the court's requirements and paid the cost of the treatment or course.
{[(2)](b) (3)} Subsection (2)(a) applies regardless of whether:
[(2)]- (3)2 If- aEnrolled defendantCopy filesH.B. a petition under Subsection (1), and[ it appears to the satisfaction of] the sentencing court is satisfied that payment of an unpaid amount of a criminal accounts receivable will impose manifest hardship on the defendant[,] or the defendant's family, the court may:
94 [(2)] (3) If a defendant files a petition under Subsection (1), and[ it appears to the satisfaction of] the sentencing court is satisfied that payment of an unpaid amount of a criminal accounts receivable will impose manifest hardship on the defendant[,] or the defendant's family, the court may:
[(iii)[(iii)(A) (A) allow the defendant to satisfy an unpaid amount of the criminal accounts receivable, that is not the principal or interest amount owed for restitution, with proof of compensatory service completed by the defendant at a rate of credit not less than $10 for each hour of compensatory service;
and] [(B) allow the defendant to reduce the unpaid amount of the criminal accounts receivable, that is not the principal or interest amount owed for restitution, in the amount of the cost of any treatment or course if:] - 3 - HB0094 compared with HB0094S03 [(I) the treatment or course was ordered by the court as part of the case;] [(II) the defendant has completed the court's requirements related to the treatment or course;
and] [(III) the defendant provides proof that the defendant completed the court's requirements and paid the cost of the treatment or course.] [(3)] (4)(4)(a) (a) If a defendant is under the jurisdiction of the board, the defendant may petition the board, at any time before the defendant's sentence terminates, to modify the payment schedule for the defendant's criminal accounts receivable.
(b) If a defendant files a petition under Subsection [(3)(a)] (4)(a), the board may modify the payment schedule for the criminal accounts receivable in accordance with the factors described in Subsection 77-32b-103(3)(b) if the defendant has demonstrated that the criminal accounts receivable will impose a manifest hardship to the defendant,- or3 the- defendant'sH.B. family, due to changed circumstances or new evidence that justifies modifying the payment schedule.
94 Enrolled Copy defendant, or the defendant's family, due to changed circumstances or new evidence that justifies modifying the payment schedule.
Effective date.
2-3-26 1:07 PM - 4 -
View plain text versions (8)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #2 View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #3 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0094S03
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0094S03
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0094S03
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0094S03
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0094S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0094S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0094S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0094S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0094S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0094S01
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0094S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0094S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0094
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0094
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0094
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0094
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Todd Weiler · Cosponsor
- Grant Amjad Miller · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Grant Amjad Miller Democrat
Co-sponsors (1)
- Todd Weiler Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 94?
- HB 94 is sponsored by Todd Weiler (Republican) and Grant Amjad Miller (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB 94?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced December 29, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 94?
- Track HB 94 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 94
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 94
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →