HB 113 — Emergency Reporting Abuse Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 23, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 26, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
113 added · 126 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill HB 113 introduces specific penalties for anyone who calls 911 without a real emergency, aiming to address the issue of emergency reporting abuse. This change is significant because it seeks to protect emergency services from being overwhelmed by false alarms, allowing them to respond more effectively to real emergencies. Additionally, some technical adjustments were made to ensure the bill aligns with existing laws. Overall, these amendments will help improve public safety and resource management within the emergency response system.
HB0113S02Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0113 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0113 but was omitted in HB0113S02 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0113 but was inserted into HB0113S02 DISCLAIMER:
This113 documentEmergency isReporting providedAbuse toAmendments assistGENERAL youSESSION inSTATE yourOF comparisonUTAH ofChief theSponsor: two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Emergency Reporting Abuse Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Monson Senate Sponsor:LincolnSponsor: Fillmore 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
Lincoln Fillmore 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
{and} ▸ moves a definition to the statute in which the definition is referenced;
None H Other Special Clauses:
B None 1 Utah Code Sections Affected:
HB0113 compared with HB0113S02 AMENDS:
76-9-105.576-9-105.5, , as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, Chapter 173 76-9-105.676-9-105.6, , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2025, Chapter 173 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
76-9-105.5.76-9-105.5 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) As used in this section:
(i)H.B. "Emergency" means a situation in which property or human life is in jeopardy and the prompt summoning of aid is essential to the preservation of human life or property.
113 Enrolled Copy (i) "Emergency" means a situation in which property or human life is in jeopardy and the prompt summoning of aid is essential to the preservation of human life or property.
(b) makes a false report, or intentionally aids, abets, or causes another person to make a false report, through any means to an emergency response service, including a law enforcement dispatcher or a 911 emergency response service, if the false report claims that:
and (iii) the emergency described in Subsection (2)(b)(i) is occurring, or will occur, at a specified location;[ or] (c) makes a false report after having previously made a false report, or intentionally [aides][ aides] aids, abets, or causes a third party to make a false report, to an emergency response service, including a - 2 - HB0113 compared with HB0113S02 law enforcement dispatcher or a 911 emergency response service, alleging a violation of Section 63G-31-302 regarding a sex-designated changing room[.] ;
or (d)(d)(i) (i) under circumstances not amounting to an offense described in Subsection (2)(a) or (b), contacts, through any means, a 911 emergency response service, when the actor knows, or reasonably should know, that no actual or perceived emergency, crime, or other circumstance jeopardizing public safety exists;
and (ii) has previously been informed by a 911 response service dispatcher, a law enforcement officer, or a prosecuting attorney that the circumstance the actor is reporting to a 911 emergency response service, or a substantially similar circumstance,- is2 not- aEnrolled circumstanceCopy thatH.B. is appropriate for being reported to a 911 emergency response service.
(3)113 (a)circumstance, (i)is Exceptnot asa providedcircumstance inthat Subsectionis {[(3)(b){]}appropriate (3)(a)(ii),for (d),being orreported (e)},to (f), or (g), a violation911 ofemergency Subsectionresponse (2)(a)service. is a class B misdemeanor.
{[(b){]}(3)(a) {(ii)}Except }as Aprovided violationin of Subsection (2)(a)(3)(b), is(f), aor second(g), degreea felonyviolation ifof theSubsection report(2)(a) is regarding a weaponclass ofB massmisdemeanor. destruction.
{[(c){]}(b) {(b)} } A violation of Subsection (2)(b)(2)(a) is a second degree felony.felony if the report is regarding a weapon of mass destruction.
{[(d){]}(c) {{(c)} } {[} A {]}violation Except as provided in Subsection (3)(d) or (e), a }violation of Subsection (2)(c)(2)(b) is a classsecond Bdegree misdemeanor.felony.
(d){(e)}(d) ExceptA as provided in Subsection {(3)(a)(ii) } (3)(f) or {(e)} (g), a violation of Subsection {(2)(2)(c) (a) or (c) } (2)(d) is a {third degree felony if the violation:} class B misdemeanor.
(i){(f)}(e) {is the actor's third } Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b)(3)(f) or {subsequent(g), convictiona orviolation adjudicationof underSubsection this(2)(d) section;is a class B misdemeanor.
}(f) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b) or (g), a violation of Subsection (2)(a) or(d)or (d) is a class A misdemeanor if:
(ii){(i)}(i) {causes an emergency response, } the violation is the actor's third or {a delay of an emergency response to another request for emergency services} subsequent conviction or adjudication under Subsection (2)(a), {that results in:} (b), or (d);
or (A){(ii)}(ii)(A) (A) {bodily injury or substantial bodily injury } the actor was reckless as to {an } whether the actor's violation could jeopardize the safety of any individual;
{or} and - 3 - HB0113 compared with HB0113S02 (B) the actor's violation causes an emergency response, or a delay of an emergency response to another request for emergency services, that results in serious bodily injury to an individual or pecuniary loss equal to, or in excess,excess ofof, $5,000 in value.
(e){(g)}(g) Except as provided in Subsection {(3)(a)(ii)} (3)(b), a violation of Subsection (2)(a) or {(c) } (d) is a {second } third degree felony ifif: {the violation causes an emergency response, or a delay of an emergency response to another request for emergency services, that results in} :
(i) {serious bodily injury } the actor was reckless as to {an } whether the actor's violation could jeopardize the safety of any individual;
{or} and (ii) {death to } the actor's violation causes an emergency response, or a delay of an emergency response to another request for emergency services, that results in the death of any individual.
(4)(4)(a) (a) In addition to another penalty authorized by law, a court shall order an actor convicted of a violation of this section to:
and (ii)(ii)(A) (A) serve a minimum of four days {in jail} of incarceration;
(b)- The3 court- mayH.B. order that the actor pay less than the full amount of the costs described in Subsection [(4)(a)] (4)(a)(i) only if the court states on the record the reasons why the reimbursement would be inappropriate.
Show all 47 changed lines (7 more)
113 Enrolled Copy (b) The court may order that the actor pay less than the full amount of the costs described in Subsection [(4)(a)] (4)(a)(i) only if the court states on the record the reasons why the reimbursement would be inappropriate.
76-9-105.6.76-9-105.6 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) As used in this section:
- 4 - HB0113 compared with HB0113S02 (2) An actor commits prohibited use of a party line or public pay telephone in an emergency if the actor:
(5)(5)(a) (a) In addition to another penalty authorized by law, a court shall order an actor convicted of a violation of this section to reimburse a federal, state, or local unit of government, or a private business, organization, individual, or entity for all expenses and losses incurred in responding to the violation.
Effective date.
2-9-26 4:27 PM - 54 -
Show all 47 changed rows (7 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Compared against the Utah Code as published AI-generated reading aid — verify against the official bill.
The bill expands the definition of emergency reporting abuse and introduces new penalties while making technical adjustments.
-
76-9-105.5
[(ii) "Party line" means a subscriber's line or telephone circuit:] [(A) that consists of two or more connected main telephone stations; and] [(B) where each telephone station has a distinctive ring or telephone number.]The definition of 'party line' was removed from this section.
-
76-9-105.5
[(3)(a)]→ (3)(f)The subsections related to violations and penalties are renumbered for clarity.
-
76-9-105.5
[ ... ] the emergency described in Subsection (2)(b)(i) is occurring, or will occur, at a specified location; [or]The reference to the specified location requirement was removed from the parameters defining a false report.
-
76-9-105.5
[a]lleging a violation of Section 63G-31-302 regarding a sex-designated changing room[.] ;The reference to the specific violation regarding sex-designated changing rooms was retained but restructured.
-
76-9-105.5
(d)(i) under circumstances not amounting to an offense described in Subsection (2)(a) or (b), contacts, through any means, a 911 emergency response service, when the actor knows, or reasonably should know, that no actual or perceived emergency, crime, or other circumstance jeopardizing public safety exists; and (ii) has previously been informed by a 911 response service dispatcher, a law enforcement officer, or a prosecuting attorney that the circumstance the actor is reporting to a 911 emergency response service, or a substantially similar circumstance, is not a circumstance that is appropriate for being reported to a 911 emergency response service.
A new subsection was added that defines additional conditions under which a violation of emergency reporting abuse occurs, specifically relating to contacting 911 services.
-
76-9-105.5
[to] reimburse a federal, state, or local unit of government, or a private business, organization, individual, or entity for all expenses and losses incurred in responding to the violation[.] ;→ [i) to reimburse a federal, state, or local unit of government, or a private business, organization, individual, or entity for all expenses and losses incurred in responding to the violation; and]The structure of the court order penalties for reimbursement was modified to clarify that there can be additional penalties.
-
76-9-105.6
[the same as that term is defined in Section 76-9-105.5.]→ a subscriber's line or telephone circuit: (A) that consists of two or more connected main telephone stations; and (B) where each telephone station has a distinctive ring or telephone number.The definition of 'party line' was moved into the current section to avoid referencing another section.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ concurs with Senate amendment
-
House/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ to House with amendments
-
Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Bill Substituted by Sponsor in Senate Rules Comm [Senate Rules Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0113S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0113S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0113S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0113S02
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0113S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0113S01
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0113S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0113S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0113
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0113
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0113
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0113
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0113
Sponsors
- Lincoln Fillmore · Cosponsor
- Logan Monson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Logan Monson Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Lincoln Fillmore Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 113?
- HB 113 is sponsored by Lincoln Fillmore (Republican) and Logan Monson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 113?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced October 23, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 113?
- Track HB 113 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 113
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 113
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →