HB 320 — Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 18, 2026.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 24 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill HB 320 makes adjustments to the responsibilities of the Office of Artificial Intelligence Policy and updates a few sections of the law. Notably, it renumbers certain sections for clarity, removes a specific section related to participation in an artificial intelligence learning laboratory, and clarifies language regarding who is recognized as relevant in the industry. These changes are important as they streamline the regulatory framework and reflect a more focused approach to managing artificial intelligence policies in the state.
02-05Enrolled 14:30Copy H.B.
H 13-72-401, (Renumbered from 13-72-302, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter B186) 13-72-402, (Renumbered from 13-72-303, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 186) .H.B.
13-72-402,320 (RenumberedEnrolled fromCopy 13-72-303, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 2 186) 0 13-72-403, (Renumbered from 13-72-305, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 186) REPEALS:
H.B.13-72-304, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 186 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
320 02-05 14:30 13-72-304, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 186 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
(12) "Joint interpretation agreement" means an agreement between a participant, the office, and a relevant agency or governmental entity that clarifies the application of a provision of- state2 law- orEnrolled ruleCopy toH.B. artificial intelligence technology.
320 of state law or rule to artificial intelligence technology.
-[(8)] 2(14) -"Learning 02-05laboratory" 14:30means H.B.the artificial intelligence analysis and research program created in Section 13-72-301.
320 [(8)] (14) "Learning laboratory" means the artificial intelligence analysis and research program created in Section 13-72-301.
(2) The executive director of the department shall appoint a director to oversee the management- and3 operations- ofH.B. the office.
320 Enrolled Copy management and operations of the office.
-(b) 3consult -with H.B.businesses and other stakeholders in the state about potential regulatory proposals;
320 02-05 14:30 (b) consult with businesses and other stakeholders in the state about potential regulatory proposals;
(c) evaluate the effectiveness and viability of current, potential, or proposed regulation on- artificial4 intelligence- technologiesEnrolled withCopy artificialH.B. intelligence companies;
320 on artificial intelligence technologies with artificial intelligence companies;
-(3)(a) 4The -office 02-05shall 14:30periodically H.B.set a learning agenda for the learning laboratory that establishes the specific areas of artificial intelligence policy the office intends to study.
320 (3)(a) The office shall periodically set a learning agenda for the learning laboratory that establishes the specific areas of artificial intelligence policy the office intends to study.
[(ii)] (iii) relevant[industry industries[industryleaders] leaders];relevant industries;
Part- 4.5 - H.B.
320 Enrolled Copy Part 4.
-(1) 5A -participant H.B.who uses or wants to utilize an artificial intelligence technology in the state may apply for a regulatory mitigation agreement or a joint interpretation agreement according to criteria and procedures outlined by the office by rule made under Section 13-72-201.
320 02-05 14:30 (1) A participant who uses or wants to utilize an artificial intelligence technology in the state may apply for a regulatory mitigation agreement or a joint interpretation agreement according to criteria and procedures outlined by the office by rule made under Section 13-72-201.
[(7)] (8)(a) The office may [remove a participant] terminate a regulatory mitigation agreement or a joint interpretation agreement at any time and for any reason, and the participant- does6 not- haveEnrolled anCopy expectationH.B. of a property right or license to participate in the learning laboratory.
(b)320 A participant [demonstrating]does usingnot orhave deploying an artificialexpectation intelligenceof technologya -property 6right -or 02-05license 14:30to H.B.participate in the learning laboratory.
320(b) A participant [demonstrating] using or deploying an artificial intelligence technology that violates legal or regulatory requirements or the terms of [the participation agreement ] a regulatory mitigation agreement or a joint interpretation agreement may be immediately removed from further participation and subject to all applicable civil and criminal penalties.
(2) To evaluate whether [an applicant] a participant meets eligibility criteria to [receive] obtain a regulatory mitigation agreement or a joint interpretation agreement, the office may consult with relevant agencies, governmental entities, and outside experts regarding the- application.7 - H.B.
320 Enrolled Copy the application.
-[13-72-305] 713-72-403 -. H.B.
320 02-05 14:30 [13-72-305] 13-72-403 .
243a Ĥ→ (4) The office may grant up to two extensions for any regulatory mitigation or 243b joint interpretation agreement.
←Ĥ Section 7.
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Amended Amended 2/5/2026 10:02:948 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/5/2026 10:02:948 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Government Operations and Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ amended [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House Comm - Amendment Recommendation [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House/ to standing committee [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0320
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0320
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0320
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0320
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Kirk A. Cullimore · Cosponsor
- Paul A. Cutler · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Paul A. Cutler Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Kirk A. Cullimore Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 320?
- HB 320 is sponsored by Kirk A. Cullimore (Republican) and Paul A. Cutler (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 320?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 320?
- Track HB 320 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 320
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 320
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →