HB 249 — Federal Funds Modifications
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 17, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
270 added · 670 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill HB 249 made two key changes: first, it added a requirement for the Utah State University Jon M. Huntsman School of Business to create a public dashboard to show how much the state relies on federal funds and to model economic scenarios for future planning. Second, the bill removed a provision that included the Federalism Commission in the process of reviewing certain federal funds requests. These adjustments are significant because they enhance transparency about federal funding in the state's budget and focus the commission's role, potentially impacting how federal funds are managed moving forward.
HB0249S01Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0249 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0249 but was omitted in HB0249S01 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0249 but was inserted into HB0249S01 DISCLAIMER:
This249 documentFederal isFunds providedModifications toGENERAL assistSESSION youSTATE inOF yourUTAH comparisonChief ofSponsor: the two bills.
SometimesCalvin thisRoberts automatedSenate comparisonSponsor: will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore,John youD. need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Federal Funds Modifications GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Calvin Roberts Senate Sponsor:John D.
and ● model economic scenarios to inform federal funds contingency planning;andplanning; H ▸ {includes the commission in the federal funds acceptance process by:} B ● 2 9 HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 {ensuring the commission receive a copy of each new federal funds request that does not require legislative review and is approved by the governor, Judicial Council, or State Board of Education;
and} ● {directing the commission to review and make a recommendation regarding each medium impact federal funds request approved by the governor, Judicial Council, or State Board of Education;} ▸ {establishesmakes criteriatechnical forand theconforming commission'schanges. review of a medium impact federal funds request;} ▸ {directs the commission to categorize each medium impact federal funds request that the commission reviews;
and} ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
▸ This bill appropriates {$650,000} $300,000 in operating and capital budgets for fiscal year 2027, all of which is from the Income Tax Fund.
36-12-13 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 439 63C-4a-303 (Effective 05/06/26) (Repealed 07/01/28), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 9 {63J-5-102 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 286} {63J-5-201 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2021, Chapter 382} {63J-5-202 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2021, Chapter 382} {63J-5-203 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 272} {63J-5-203.5 (Effective 05/06/26), as enacted by Laws of Utah 2016, Chapter 272} {63J-5-204 (Effective 05/06/26), as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 286} ENACTS:
53H-4-317H.B. (Effective 05/06/26), Utah Code Annotated 1953 - 2 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
249 Enrolled Copy 53H-4-317 (Effective 05/06/26), Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
36-12-13.36-12-13 (Effective 05/06/26).
(a)(a)(i) (i) to estimate general revenue collections, including comparisons of:
- 32 - HB0249Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0249S01 (iv) anticipated direct expenditure by Utah residents and businesses, including the unit cost, number of units, and total cost to all impacted residents and businesses;
249 (iv) anticipated direct expenditure by Utah residents and businesses, including the unit cost, number of units, and total cost to all impacted residents and businesses;
- 4 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (h) to prepare, before each annual general session of the Legislature, a summary showing- the3 current- statusH.B. of the following as compared to the past nine fiscal years:
249 Enrolled Copy showing the current status of the following as compared to the past nine fiscal years:
(3)(3)(a) (a) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(b), the legislative fiscal analyst shall submit to the Executive Appropriations Committee the results of the budget stress test described in Subsection (2)(e)(iii).
- 5 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (b) The legislative fiscal analyst shall submit to the Federalism Commission the portions of the results of the budget stress test that relate to federal funds.
[(3)] (4) The legislative fiscal analyst shall have a master's degree in public administration, political- science,4 economics,- accounting,Enrolled orCopy theH.B. equivalent in academic or practical experience.
249 political science, economics, accounting, or the equivalent in academic or practical experience.
Section 253H-4-317 is enacted to read:
53H-4-317.53H-4-317 (Effective 05/06/26).
-63C-4a-303 6(Effective -05/06/26) HB0249(Repealed compared07/01/28). with HB0249S01 63C-4a-303.
Federalism Commission duties -- Evaluation of federal law -- Curriculum on federalism -- Environment discussions -- Oversight of Center for Constitutional Studies in relation to center's federalism- duties5 --- ReviewH.B. of federal funds portion of budget stress test.
(1)249 (a)Enrolled InCopy accordancefederalism withduties Section-- 63C-4a-304,Review theof commissionfederal mayfunds evaluateportion aof federalbudget law:stress test.
(1)(a) In accordance with Section 63C-4a-304, the commission may evaluate a federal law:
(b)(b)(i) (i) To assist the commission in the evaluation of federal law as required in this section and Section 63C-4a-304, the commission may contract with a third party that is a Utah institution of higher education to monitor federal law for possible implications on the principles of federalism.
(c)(c)(i) (i) As used in this Subsection (1)(c), "interim committee" means the same as that term is defined in Section 36-12-1.
or - 7 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (ii) assistance in communicating with a federal governmental entity regarding the federal law;
(b)(b)(i) (i) give written notice of an evaluation made under Subsection (1) to the federal governmental- entity6 responsible- forEnrolled adoptingCopy orH.B. administering the federal law;
249 governmental entity responsible for adopting or administering the federal law;
(7)(7)(a) (a) The commission shall develop curriculum for a seminar on the principles of federalism.
- 87 - HB0249H.B. compared with HB0249S01 (vii) how and when challenges should be made to a federal law or regulation on the basis of federalism;
Show all 245 changed lines (205 more)
249 Enrolled Copy (vii) how and when challenges should be made to a federal law or regulation on the basis of federalism;
(b) coordinate with and make recommendations to the institute regarding the institute's federalism-federalism-related related duties under Section 53H-4-704;
- 98 - HB0249Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0249S01 (a) determining the extent of federal jurisdiction in the agency's resource sphere;
249 (a) determining the extent of federal jurisdiction in the agency's resource sphere;
{Section 4.
Section 63J-5-102 is amended to read:
} 63J-5-102.
Definitions.
(1) As used in this chapter:
(a) (i) "Agency" means a department, division, committee, commission, council, court, or other administrative subunit of the state.
(ii) "Agency" includes:
(A) executive branch entities;
(B) judicial branch entities;
and (C) the State Board of Education.
(iii) "Agency" does not mean higher education institutions or political subdivisions.
(b) "Contingency disclosure and plan" means, with respect to a federal funds reauthorization or new federal funds request, the submitting or requesting agency's:
(i) disclosure of:
(A) the likelihood that the amount or value of the federal funds will be reduced, and how that likelihood changes over time;
and (B) the likelihood that the federal funds will become unavailable, and how that likelihood changes over time;
(ii) explanation of:
(A) whether accepting the federal funds may create an expectation of ongoing funding by any beneficiary of the funds;
and - 10 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (B) as applicable, how the agency will communicate to stakeholders that services funded by the federal funds may or will be temporary;
(iii) plan for how the agency will:
(A) proceed if the amount or value of the federal funds are unexpectedly reduced in any material degree or amount;
(B) proceed if the federal funds become unavailable unexpectedly;
(C) wind down the program or services funded by the federal funds when the federal funds are exhausted;
and (D) transition any beneficiaries of the funds to a different program or service provider if the agency is unable to continue providing the same program or services due to a decrease or loss of federal funds;
and (iv) designation of the federal funds and the program or purpose for which the funds will be used as either:
(A) mandatory under federal or state law;
(B) high priority;
or (C) low priority.
(c) (i) "Federal funds" means cash or other money received from the United States government or from other individuals or entities for or on behalf of the United States and deposited with the state treasurer or any agency of the state.
(ii) "Federal funds" includes federal assistance and federal assistance programs, however described.
(d) "Federal funds reauthorization" means:
(i) the formal submission from an agency to the federal government applying for or seeking reauthorization of federal funds which the state is currently receiving;
(ii) the formal submission from an agency to the federal government applying for or seeking reauthorization to participate in a federal program in which the state is currently participating that will result in federal funds being transferred to an agency;
or (iii) that period after the first year of a previously authorized and awarded grant or funding award, during which federal funds are disbursed or are scheduled to be disbursed after the first year because the term of the grant or financial award extends for more than one year.
(e) - 11 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (i) "Federal funds request summary" means a document detailing:
(A) the amount of money that is being requested or is available to be received by the state from the federal government for each federal funds reauthorization or new federal funds request;
(B) those federal funds reauthorizations and new federal funds requests that are included as part of the agency's proposed budget for the fiscal year, and the amount of those requests;
(C) the amount of new state money, if any, that will be required to receive the federal funds or participate in the federal program;
(D) the number of additional permanent full-time employees, additional permanent part-time employees, or combination of additional permanent full-time employees and additional permanent part-time employees, if any, that the state estimates are needed in order to receive the federal funds or participate in the federal program;
(E) any requirements that the state must meet as a condition for receiving the federal funds or participating in the federal program;
and (F) for each federal funds reauthorization for qualifying federal funds and each new federal funds request for qualifying federal funds, a contingency disclosure and plan, and a state jurisdiction evaluation.
(ii) "Federal funds request summary" includes, if available:
(A) the letter awarding an agency a grant of federal funds or other official documentation awarding an agency a grant of federal funds;
and (B) a document detailing federal maintenance of effort requirements.
(f) "Federal maintenance of effort requirements" means any matching, level of effort, or earmarking requirements, as defined in Office of Management and Budget requirements, that are imposed on an agency as a condition of receiving federal funds.
(g) "Federalism Commission" means the Federalism Commission created in Section 63C-4a-302.
[(g)] (h) (i) "Intergovernmental transfer program" means an existing reimbursement program or category that is authorized by the Medicaid state plan or waiver authority for intergovernmental transfers.
(ii) "Intergovernmental transfer program" does not include the addition of a provider to an existing intergovernmental transfer program.
[(h)] (i) "Local education agency" or "LEA" means:
(i) a school district;
- 12 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (ii) a charter school;
or (iii) the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.
[(i)] (j) "New federal funds" means:
(i) federal assistance or other federal funds that are available from the federal government that:
(A) the state is not currently receiving;
or (B) exceed the federal funds amount most recently approved by the Legislature by more than 25% for a federal grant or program in which the state is currently participating;
(ii) a federal assistance program or other federal program in which the state is not currently participating;
or (iii) a one-time TANF request.
[(j)] (k) "New federal funds request" means:
(i) the formal submission from an agency to the federal government:
(A) applying for or otherwise seeking to obtain new federal funds;
or (B) applying for or seeking to participate in a new federal program that will result in federal funds being transferred to an agency;
or (ii) a one-time TANF request.
[(k)] (l) (i) "New state money" means money, whether specifically appropriated by the Legislature or not, that the federal government requires Utah to expend as a condition for receiving the federal funds or participating in the federal program.
(ii) "New state money" includes money expended to meet federal maintenance of effort requirements.
[(l)] (m) "One-time TANF request" means a proposed expenditure by the Department of Workforce Services from its reserves of federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families funds:
(i) for a project or program that will last for a fixed amount of time and is not an ongoing project or program of the Department of Workforce Services;
and (ii) that is greater than $1,000,000 over the amount most recently approved by the Legislature.
[(m)] (n) "Qualifying federal funds" means federal funds that are:
(i) greater than 10% of the receiving entity's annual budget;
or (ii) greater than $2,000,000.
[(n)] (o) "State" means the state of Utah and all of its agencies, and any administrative subunits of those agencies.
- 13 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 [(o)] (p) "State jurisdiction evaluation" means:
(i) a disclosure of:
(A) whether accepting the federal funds or participating in the federal program will require the use of state funds or increase the administrative costs of the state or agency;
(B) the extent to which accepting the federal funds or participating in the federal program will impair or impact the exclusive police power jurisdiction of the state to protect or provide for the health, safety, welfare, and morals of the state;
and (C) the extent to which accepting the federal funds or participating in the federal program will impair or impact the jurisdiction of the state over federal areas within the state;
and (ii) to the extent that accepting the federal funds or participating in the federal program will impair or impact the state's jurisdiction as described in Subsection [(1)(o)(i)(B)] (1)(p)(i)(B) or (C), an identification of the constitutional authority supporting federal assertion of jurisdiction or authority for the funding, program, or an associated regulation or restriction.
(2) When this chapter describes an employee as a "permanent full-time employee" or a "permanent part- time employee," it is not intended to, and may not be construed to, affect the employee's status as an at-will employee.
{Section 5.
Section 63J-5-201 is amended to read:
} 63J-5-201.
Legislative appropriation subcommittees to review certain federal funds reauthorizations -- Executive appropriations review -- Legislative approval.
(1) The Governor's Office of Planning and Budget shall annually prepare and submit a federal funds request summary for each agency to the Legislative Fiscal Analyst at the same time the governor submits the confidential draft budget under Section 63J-1-201.
(2) (a) The Legislative Fiscal Analyst, as directed by the Executive Appropriations Committee, may include federal funds in the base budget appropriations act or acts, when those acts are prepared as provided in JR3-2-402.
(b) The Legislative Fiscal Analyst shall submit a federal funds request summary for each agency to:
(i) the legislative appropriations subcommittee responsible for that agency's budget for review during each annual general session[.] ;
and (ii) the Federalism Commission.
- 14 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (3) Each legislative appropriations subcommittee shall review [the] each federal funds request summary and may:
(a) recommend that the agency accept the federal funds or participate in the federal program for the fiscal year under consideration;
or (b) recommend that the agency not accept the federal funds or not participate in the federal program for the fiscal year under consideration.
(4) The [Legislative ]Executive Appropriations Committee shall:
(a) review each subcommittee's recommendation;
(b) determine whether or not the agency should be authorized to accept the federal funds or participate in the federal program;
and (c) direct the Legislative Fiscal Analyst to include or exclude those federal funds and federal programs in an annual appropriations act for approval by the Legislature.
(5) Legislative approval of an appropriations act containing federal funds constitutes legislative approval of the federal grants or awards associated with the federal funds for the purposes of compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
{Section 6.
Section 63J-5-202 is amended to read:
} 63J-5-202.
Governor to approve certain new federal funds requests.
(1) (a) Before obligating the state to accept or receive new federal funds or to participate in a new federal program, and no later than three months after submitting a new federal funds request, and, where possible, before formally submitting the new federal funds request, an executive branch agency shall submit a federal funds request summary to the governor or the governor's designee for approval or rejection when:
(i) the state will receive total payments of $1,000,000 or less per year if the new federal funds request is approved;
(ii) receipt of the new federal funds will require no additional permanent full-time employees, permanent part-time employees, or combination of additional permanent full-time employees and permanent part-time employees;
and (iii) no new state money will be required to match the new federal funds or to implement the new federal program for which the grant is issued.
- 15 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (b) The Governor's Office of Planning and Budget shall report each new federal funds request that is approved by the governor or the governor's designee and each new federal funds request granted by the federal government to:
(i) the [Legislature's Executive Appropriations Committee] Federalism Commission;
(ii) the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst;
and (iii) the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.
(2) The governor or the governor's designee shall approve or reject each new federal funds request submitted under the authority of this section.
(3) (a) If the governor or the governor's designee approves the new federal funds request, the executive branch agency may accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(b) If the governor or the governor's designee rejects the new federal funds request, the executive branch agency may not accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(4) If an executive branch agency fails to obtain the governor's or the governor's designee's approval under this section, the governor may require the agency to:
(a) withdraw the new federal funds request;
(b) return the federal funds;
(c) withdraw from the federal program;
or (d) any combination of Subsections (4)(a), (4)(b), and (4)(c).
(5) If a letter or other official documentation awarding an agency a grant of federal funds is not available to be included in a federal funds request summary submitted to the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget under this section, the agency shall submit to the Governor's Office of Planning and Budget the letter or other official documentation awarding the agency a grant of federal funds before expending the federal funds granted.
{Section 7.
Section 63J-5-203 is amended to read:
} 63J-5-203.
Judicial council to approve certain new federal funds requests.
(1) (a) Before obligating the state to accept or receive new federal funds or to participate in a new federal program, and no later than three months after submitting a new federal funds request, and, where possible, before formally submitting the new federal funds request, a judicial branch agency shall submit a federal funds request summary to the Judicial Council for its approval or rejection when:
- 16 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (i) the state will receive total payments of $1,000,000 or less per year if the new federal funds request is approved;
(ii) receipt of the new federal funds will require no additional permanent full-time employees, additional permanent part-time employees, or combination of additional permanent full-time employees and permanent part-time employees;
and (iii) no new state money will be required to match the new federal funds or to implement the new federal program for which the grant is issued.
(b) The Judicial Council shall report each new federal funds request that is approved by it and each new federal funds request granted by the federal government to:
(i) the [Legislature's Executive Appropriations Committee] Federalism Commission;
(ii) the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst;
and (iii) the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.
(2) The Judicial Council shall approve or reject each new federal funds request submitted to it under the authority of this section.
(3) (a) If the Judicial Council approves the new federal funds request, the judicial branch agency may accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(b) If the Judicial Council rejects the new federal funds request, the judicial branch agency may not accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(4) If a judicial branch agency fails to obtain the Judicial Council's approval under this section, the Judicial Council may require the agency to:
(a) withdraw the new federal funds request;
(b) return the federal funds;
(c) withdraw from the federal program;
or (d) any combination of Subsections (4)(a), (4)(b), and (4)(c).
(5) If a letter or other official documentation awarding a judicial branch agency a grant of federal funds is not available to be included in a federal funds request summary submitted to the Judicial Council under this section, the judicial branch agency shall submit to the Judicial Council the letter or other official documentation awarding the judicial branch agency a grant of federal funds before expending the federal funds granted.
{Section 8.
Section 63J-5-203.5 is amended to read:
} - 17 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 63J-5-203.5.
State Board of Education to approve certain new federal funds requests.
(1) (a) Before obligating the state to accept or receive new federal funds or to participate in a new federal program, and no later than three months after submitting a new federal funds request, and, where possible, before formally submitting the new federal funds request, the State Board of Education shall review a federal funds request summary of the State Board of Education when:
(i) the state will receive total payments of $1,000,000 or less per year if the new federal funds request is approved;
(ii) receipt of the new federal funds will require no additional permanent full-time employees, additional permanent part-time employees, or a combination of additional permanent full-time employees and permanent part-time employees;
and (iii) no new state money will be required to match the new federal funds or to implement the new federal program for which the grant is issued.
(b) The State Board of Education shall approve or reject each new federal funds request reviewed under this section.
(2) The State Board of Education shall report each new federal funds request that is approved by the board and each new federal funds request granted to the board by the federal government to:
(a) the [Legislature's Executive Appropriations Committee] Federalism Commission;
(b) the Office of the Legislative Fiscal Analyst;
and (c) the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel.
(3) If a letter or other official documentation awarding the State Board of Education a grant of federal funds is not available to be included in the federal funds request summary submitted under this section, the letter or other official documentation awarding the State Board of Education a grant of federal funds shall be submitted to the State Board of Education before expending the federal funds granted.
{Section 9.
Section 63J-5-204 is amended to read:
} 63J-5-204.
Legislative review and approval of certain federal funds requests.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "High impact federal funds request" means a new federal funds request that will or could:
(i) result in the state receiving total payments of $10,000,000 or more per year from the federal government;
- 18 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (ii) require the state to add 11 or more permanent full-time employees, 11 or more permanent part-time employees, or combination of permanent full-time and permanent part-time employees equal to 11 or more in order to receive the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program;
or (iii) require the state to expend more than $1,000,000 of new state money in a fiscal year in order to receive or administer the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(b) "Medium impact federal funds request" means a new federal funds request that will or could:
(i) result in the state receiving total payments of more than $1,000,000 but less than $10,000,000 per year from the federal government;
(ii) require the state to add more than zero but less than 11 permanent full-time employees, more than zero but less than 11 permanent part-time employees, or a combination of permanent full-time employees and permanent part-time employees equal to more than zero but less than 11 in order to receive or administer the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program;
or (iii) require the state to expend $1 to $1,000,000 of new state money in a fiscal year in order to receive or administer the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(2) (a) (i) Before obligating the state to accept or receive new federal funds or to participate in a new federal program under a medium impact federal funds request that was not authorized during a legislative session as provided in Section 63J-5-201, an agency shall:
(A) submit the federal funds request summary to the governor, the Judicial Council, or the State Board of Education, as appropriate, for approval or rejection;
and (B) if the governor, the Judicial Council, or the State Board of Education approves the new federal funds request, submit the federal funds request summary to the [Legislative Executive Appropriations Committee] Federalism Commission for its review [and recommendations] in accordance with Subsections (2)(b) and (c).
(ii) The procedures required under Subsection (2)(a)(i) shall be performed, if possible, before the date that the medium impact funds request is formally submitted, but not later than three months after the date of formal submission.
(b) Upon receipt of a federal funds request summary, the Federalism Commission shall:
(i) review the federal funds request summary in accordance with Subsection (2)(c);
and (ii) - 19 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (A) recommend that the agency accept the new federal funds;
or (B) refer the federal funds request summary to the Executive Appropriations Committee for further review as provided in Subsection (2)(c).
(c) When the Federalism Commission reviews a federal funds request summary, the Federalism Commission shall:
(i) consider:
(A) the duration and reliability of the federal funds;
(B) state budget dependence, including the risk of reliance on the federal funds for essential services;
(C) the impact if the amount or value of the federal funds were reduced, including the ability to fund, scale down, or terminate each funded program;
(D) the federal funds' effect on the state's autonomy, including conditions tied to the federal funds and constraints on state policy choices;
and (E) consistency with long-term state goals;
and (ii) based on the Federalism Commission's evaluation of the items described in Subsection (2)(c)(i), determine whether the agency's designation under Subsection 63J-5-102(1)(b)(iv) is the appropriate designation and, if not, which designation described in Subsection 63J-5-102(1)(b)(iv) is the appropriate designation.
[(b)] (d) [The Legislative] If the Federalism Commission refers a federal funds request summary to the Executive Appropriations Committee under Subsection (2)(b)(ii)(B), the Executive Appropriations Committee shall:
(i) review the federal funds request summary and [may:] the results of the Federalism Commission's review under Subsection (2)(c);
and [(i)] (ii) (A) recommend that the agency accept the new federal funds;
[(ii)] (B) recommend that the agency not accept the new federal funds;
or [(iii)] (C) recommend to the governor that the governor call a special session of the Legislature to review and approve or reject the acceptance of the new federal funds.
(3) (a) - 20 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 (i) Before obligating the state to accept or receive new federal funds or to participate in a new federal program under a high impact federal funds request that was not authorized during a legislative session as provided in Section 63J-5-201, an agency shall:
(A) submit the federal funds request summary to the governor, the Judicial Council, or the State Board of Education, [ ]as appropriate, for approval or rejection;
and (B) if the governor, the Judicial Council , or the State Board of Education approves the new federal funds request, submit the federal funds request summary to the Legislature for its approval or rejection in an annual general session or a special session.
(ii) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(a)(iii), the procedures required under Subsection (3)(a) (i) shall be performed, if possible, before the date that the high impact funds request is formally submitted, but not later than three months after the date of formal submission.
(iii) For a high impact federal funds request for the Medical Assistance Program, commonly known as Medicaid, or the Children's Health Insurance Program, the procedures required under Subsection (3)(a)(i) shall be performed, if possible, before the date that the high impact funds request is formally submitted, but not later than the end of the earlier of the next annual general session or special session of the Legislature after the date of formal submission.
(b) (i) If the Legislature approves the new federal funds request, the agency may accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(ii) If the Legislature fails to approve the new federal funds request, the agency may not accept the new federal funds or participate in the new federal program.
(4) If an agency fails to comply with the procedures of this section or fails to obtain the Legislature's approval:
(a) the governor, the Judicial Council, or the State Board of Education, as appropriate, may require the agency to withdraw the new federal funds request or refuse or return the new federal funds;
(b) the Legislature may, if federal law allows, opt out or decline to participate in the new federal program or decline to receive the new federal funds;
or (c) the Legislature may reduce the agency's General Fund appropriation in an amount less than, equal to, or greater than the amount of federal funds received by the agency.
(5) If a letter or other official documentation awarding an agency a grant of federal funds is not available to be included in the agency's federal funds request summary to the governor, the Judicial - 21 - HB0249 compared with HB0249S01 Council, or the State Board of Education, as appropriate, under this section, the agency shall submit to the governor, the Judicial Council, or the State Board of Education, as appropriate, the letter or other official documentation awarding the agency a grant of federal funds before expending the federal funds granted.
ITEMTEM 1 To Utah State University - Education and General From Income Tax Fund {500,000} 150,000 From Income Tax Fund, One-time 150,000 Schedule of Programs:
Public Service {650,000} 300,000 The Legislature intends that the Analytics Solutions Center at the Utah State University Jon M.
Effective date.
2-6-26 2:58 PM - 229 -
Show all 245 changed rows (205 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ committee report favorable [House Government Operations Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Government Operations Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0249S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0249S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Government Operations Committee]
-
Bill Substituted by Sponsor in House Rules Comm [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0249S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0249S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0249
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0249
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0249
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0249
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- John D. Johnson · Cosponsor
- Calvin Roberts · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Calvin Roberts Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- John D. Johnson Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 249?
- HB 249 is sponsored by John D. Johnson (Republican) and Calvin Roberts (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 249?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 14, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 249?
- Track HB 249 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 249
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 249
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →