HB 212 — County Formation Amendments
Last action — House/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 09, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
366 added · 336 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill HB 212 adds specific requirements for municipalities seeking to create a new county, such as conducting a feasibility study and establishing a clear process for initiating the proposal. It also clarifies how assets and liabilities will be divided between the existing county and the new one. These changes are significant because they lay out a structured approach for county creation, potentially reducing confusion and disputes during the process. Additionally, the bill ensures continued tax obligations, which helps maintain financial stability for both counties involved.
02-20HB0212S01 14:54compared 1stwith Sub.HB0212 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0212 but was omitted in HB0212S01 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0212 but was inserted into HB0212S01 DISCLAIMER:
(Buff)This H.B.document is provided to assist you in your comparison of the two bills.
212Sometimes Jordanthis D.automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
TeuscherTherefore, proposesyou theneed followingto substituteread bill:the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Daniel McCay 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
H ▸ requires a new county to levy local option sales and use taxes for transportation at the same B rate and in the same manner as the seceding county for transactions within the new scounty;2 ▸ 1 HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 clarifies provisions regarding the division assets and liabilities between a seceding county and a new county;
tand ▸ clarifiesmakes provisionstechnical regarding the division assets and liabilitiesconforming betweenchanges. a seceding county and a new county;
andMoney uAppropriated bin ▸this makesBill: technical and conforming changes.
HNone MoneyOther AppropriatedSpecial inClauses: this Bill:
B None .Utah Code Sections Affected:
Other Special Clauses:
2 None Utah Code Sections Affected:
17-61-101,17-61-101 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 1st17-61-401 Sub., as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-402 , as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-405 , as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-407 , as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 ENACTS:
(Buff)17-61-408 H.B., Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
212 02-20 14:54 17-61-401, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-402, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-405, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 17-61-407, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 13 ENACTS:
17-61-408, Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
17-61-10117-61-101. .
- 2 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 [(5)] (6) "New county" means the county that is created through the process described in Part 4, Creating New Counties.
(10) "Triggering resolution" means a legislative instrument indicating a desire to create a -new 2county -through 02-20the 14:54process 1stdescribed Sub.in Part 4, Creating New Counties.
(Buff) H.B.
212 new county through the process described in Part 4, Creating New Counties.
17-61-40117-61-401. .
(1)(a)(1) (a) Whenever a voter desires to have the territory within which the voter resides created into a new county, the voter may file a petition for the creation of a new county with the county legislative body of the seceding county in which the voter resides as described in this section.
and (ii)(A)(ii) (A) the petitioning municipality has a population of at least {333,000} one-third of the county population as of the last census;
or (B) one or more petitioning municipalities adopt substantially similar triggering resolutions in the same calendar year and, collectively, the petitioning municipalities have a population of at least {333,000} one-third of the county population as of the last census.
(2)(a)(2) (a) The petition described in Subsection [(1)] (1)(a) shall:
- 3 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (A) by at least one-fourth of the voters residing in the portion of the seceding county proposed to be created into a new county;
-(i) 3may -not 1stpropose Sub.that an existing municipality be divided by a new county boundary;
(Buff) H.B.
212 02-20 14:54 (i) may not propose that an existing municipality be divided by a new county boundary;
(3)(a)(3) (a) A voter shall file a petition for the creation of a new county on or before the first Monday in May of any year with the county legislative body of the seceding county.
(b)(i)(b) (i) A petitioning municipality shall, before the first Monday in May of any year, file a copy of the triggering resolution with the county legislative body of the seceding county.
and - 4 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (B) the petitioning municipality fulfilling the requirements of Subsection (3)(b)(i) shall include a list of the other petitioning municipalities that adopted substantially similar triggering resolutions.
(4)(a)(4) (a) Within three business days after the day on which a county legislative body receives a petition under Subsection (3)(a) or a triggering resolution under Subsection (3)(b), the county legislative body shall provide the petition or triggering resolution to the county clerk.
-[(ii)] 4(B) -certify 02-20on 14:54the 1stpetition Sub.whether each name is that of a registered voter in the seceding county;
(Buff) H.B.
Show all 86 changed lines (46 more)
212 [(ii)] (B) certify on the petition whether each name is that of a registered voter in the seceding county;
(A) determine whether the triggering resolution appears to satisfy the requirements of Subsections (2)(c)(2) (c) and (d);
(5)(a)(5) (a) An individual who signs a petition under this section may have the individual's signature removed from the petition by, no later than three business days after the day on which the county legislative body provides the petition to the county clerk, submitting to the county clerk a statement requesting that the individual's signature be removed.
[(6) {[} The seceding{] After receiving a certified petition or a triggering resolution from the county clerk under Subsection (4), the }seceding county legislative body shallshall{[} cause {] :} - 5 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 {(a) obtain a feasibility study from a feasibility consultant that:} {(i) considers:} {(A) population and population density within the propositionnew toand beseceding submittedcounties;} to{(B) current and five-year projections of demographics and economic base in the votersproposed residingnew and seceding counties, including household size and income, commercial and industrial development, and public facilities;} {(C) projected population growth in the proposed new and seceding counties during the next five years;} {(D) the present and five-year projections of the cost, including overhead, of providing the same or a similar service in the proposed new and seceding counties as the existing seceding county atprovides;} {(E) a specialprojection electionof toany new taxes per household that may be heldlevied accordingwithin tothe proposed new and seceding counties for five years after the datescreation establishedof the new county;} {(F) the physical and other assets that the new and seceding counties will require in Sectionorder 20A-1-204,to firstprovide, causingwithout 30interruption days'or noticediminution of theservice, electioncounty services to beresidents givenof inboth the mannernew providedand byseceding lawcounties;} for{(G) givingthe noticephysical and other assets that the new and seceding counties will no longer require in order to provide county services to residents of generalboth elections.the new and seceding counties;
and} {(H) any other factor that the feasibility consultant considers relevant to the cost of the creation of the new county to both the new and seceding counties;} {(ii) includes a written report of the results of the feasibility study that contains:} {(A) a recommendation as to whether the proposed creation of the new and seceding counties is functionally and financially feasible;} {(B) any conditions the feasibility consultant determines necessary to make the creation of the new county functionally and financially feasible;
and} {(C) a comparison of the costs of the new and seceding counties;} {(b) provide all municipalities within the county an opportunity to:} {(i) request modifications from the feasibility consultant regarding a draft of the feasibility study;
and} {(ii) submit written objections to the county regarding the final feasibility study;} - 6 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 {(c) if the feasibility study recommends that creation of the proposed new county is not functionally and financially feasible, for either the new county or seceding county, provide an opportunity to the voter who filed the petition under Subsection (3)(a) or the petitioning municipality to:} {(i) modify and refile the triggering resolution, requesting a revised or new feasibility study;} {(ii) withdraw the triggering resolution;
or} {(iii) opt to proceed to an election on the creation of a new county, despite the adverse recommendation;
and} {(d) if the feasibility study recommends that the creation of the new county and seceding county is functionally and financially feasible, or if the voter or petitioning municipality opt to proceed under Subsection (6)(c)(iii):} {(i) {provide notice of the special election described in Subsection (6)(d)(ii) in accordance with Section 20A-5-101 at least 30 days before the special election;
and} {(ii)} in accordance with Utah Constitution, Article XI, Section 3, submit }the proposition {[} to be submitted {]} to the voters residing in the seceding county at a special election to be held according to the dates established in Section 20A-1-204{[} , first causing 30 days' notice of the election to be given in the manner provided by law for giving notice of general elections{]} .
(D) the present and five-year projections of the cost, including overhead, of -providing 5the -same 1stor Sub.a similar service in the proposed new and seceding counties as the existing seceding county provides;
(Buff) H.B.
212 02-20 14:54 providing the same or a similar service in the proposed new and seceding counties as the existing seceding county provides;
- 7 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (F) the physical and other assets that the new and seceding counties will require in order to provide, without interruption or diminution of service, county services to residents of both the new and seceding counties;
and (d) if the feasibility study recommends that the creation of the new county and seceding -county 6is -functionally 02-20and 14:54financially 1stfeasible, Sub.or if the voter or petitioning municipality opt to proceed under Subsection (6)(c)(iii), submit the question of creating the new county to the voters:
(Buff) H.B.
212 county is functionally and financially feasible, or if the voter or petitioning municipality opt to proceed under Subsection (6)(c)(iii), submit the question of creating the new county to the voters:
and - 8 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (b) the development and production of the feasibility study.
Against the creation of (supplying the name proposed) [county.] county." [(9)] (10)(a)(10) (a) Subject to Subsection (9)(b), the expenses of any [special ]election described in this section shall be paid out of the general fund of the seceding county.
17-61-40217-61-402. .
(1)(a)(1) (a) If a petition for the creation of a new county impacts only one seceding county, the proposition submitted to voters under Section 17-61-401 shall be approved by a majority vote of those voters who reside:
and -(ii) 7in -each 1stremaining Sub.portion of each seceding county.
(Buff) H.B.
212 02-20 14:54 (ii) in each remaining portion of each seceding county.
and - 9 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (b) upon receiving the results from the lieutenant governor under Subsection (1)(a), the governor shall issue a proclamation, stating:
(a) within 30 days after the issuance of the governor's proclamation under SubsectionSubsection{[ [(1)]}[(1)] (2), send to the lieutenant governor:
(4)(a)(4) (a) The new county that is the subject of the lieutenant governor's certificate of creation under Section 67-1a-6.5 is a county of the state from and after January 1 following the issuance of the lieutenant governor's certificate of creation.
(b)(i)(b) (i) The effective date of the creation of a new county for purposes of assessing property within the county is governed by Section 59-2-305.5.
- 810 - 02-20HB0212 14:54compared 1stwith Sub.HB0212S01 (ii) Until the documents listed in Subsection{[ }[(2)(b)] (3)(b) are recorded in the office of the recorder of the new county, the new county may not:
(Buff) H.B.
212 (ii) Until the documents listed in Subsection [(2)(b)] (3)(b) are recorded in the office of the recorder of the new county, the new county may not:
(a) the rural real property remains in the {original } seceding county if the rural real property:
17-61-40517-61-405. .
- 11 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (2) The respective officers of the precincts, school districts, road districts, and election districts described in Subsection (1) shall hold office until the expiration of the terms for -which 9the -officers 1stwere Sub.elected or appointed.
(Buff) H.B.
212 02-20 14:54 which the officers were elected or appointed.
(5) Notwithstanding the creation of a new county, the seceding county Ĥ→may [may] shall ←Ĥ 314a continue to levy a tax on the property within the new county for the purpose of paying the seceding county's proportion of a general obligation or revenue bond until the satisfaction of the bonded indebtedness.
17-61-40717-61-407. .
- 12 - HB0212 compared with HB0212S01 (2) Before furnishing the revenue described in Subsection (1)(b) to the new county, the seceding county may retain:
-(a) 10the -pro 02-20rata 14:54cost 1stof Sub.assessing and collecting the county, school district, or other special tax revenue collected by the seceding county;
(Buff) H.B.
212 (a) the pro rata cost of assessing and collecting the county, school district, or other special tax revenue collected by the seceding county;
Section 17-61-4086 is enacted to read:
17-61-40817-61-408. .
Effective date.
2-4-26 7:19 AM - 1113 -
Show all 86 changed rows (46 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text Current pdf
- Amended Amended 2/20/2026 14:02:838 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/20/2026 14:02:838 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
House/ filed
-
House/ strike enacting clause
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ failed
-
Senate/ motion to reconsider
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ failed
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 2nd & 3rd readings/ suspension
-
Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ floor amendment
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0212S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0212S01
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0212S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0212S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0212
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0212
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0212
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0212
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Daniel McCay · Cosponsor
- Jordan D. Teuscher · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jordan D. Teuscher Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Daniel McCay Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 212?
- HB 212 is sponsored by Daniel McCay (Republican) and Jordan D. Teuscher (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 212?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 09, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track HB 212?
- Track HB 212 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 212
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 212
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →