SJR 10 — Joint Resolution Amending Court Rules Regarding Jury Selection
Last action — Senate/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 26, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
31 added · 33 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to SJR 10 make changes to the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure regarding how juries are selected in felony cases. Specifically, it adds updates to Rule 17.5 and Rule 18 to clarify the jury selection process. These changes are important because they aim to improve the efficiency of jury selection and ensure that the process complies with modern practices, potentially making it fairer and more straightforward for everyone involved.
SJR010S02 compared with SJR010S01SJR010 {Omitted text} shows text that was in SJR010S01SJR010 but was omitted in SJR010S02 inserted text shows text that was not in SJR010S01SJR010 but was inserted into SJR010S02 DISCLAIMER:
None J Other Special Clauses:
R This resolution provides a special effective date.
1J R Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure Affected:
0 S AMENDS:
1 SJR010S01SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 Rule 17.5 , Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 18 , Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah, two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses voting in favor thereof:
Rule 17.517.5. .
(a) Definitions.(1) "Participant" means a party, a participating victim, or an attorney for a party or participating victim.
(1) "Participant" means a party, a participating victim, or an attorney for a party or participating victim.
(b) Setting[The]Except as provided in Rule 18(b), the court has discretion to set a hearing format;as an in-person hearing, a remote hearing, or a hybrid hearing.
factors to consider.
[The] Except as provided in Rule 18(b), the court has discretion to set a hearing as an in-person hearing, a remote hearing, or a hybrid hearing.
(6) whether and to what extent documentary or testimonial evidence is likely to be - 2 - SJR010S01SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 presented;
(c) Request(1) A participant may request that the court allow the participant or a witness to appear at a hearing by a different format.format than that set by the court.
(1) Manner of request.
A participant may request that the court allow the participant or a witness to appear at a hearing by a different format than that set by the court.
(A) Email(i) andAn email or letter requests.request must be copied on all parties;
(i) An email or letter request must be copied on all parties;
(B) RequestIf making a request by written motion.motion, the motion must succinctly state the grounds for the request and be accompanied by a request to submit for decision and a proposed order.
If making a request by written motion, the motion must succinctly state the grounds for the request and be accompanied by a request to submit for decision and a proposed order.
(2) Timing.All requests, except those made verbally during a hearing, must be sent to the court at least seven days before the hearing unless there are exigent circumstances or the hearing was set less than seven days before the hearing date, in which cases the request must be made as soon as reasonably possible.
All- requests,3 except- thoseSJR010 madecompared verballywith duringSJR010S02 a(d) hearing,(1) mustThe be sent to the court atmay leastrule sevenon daysa before the hearing unless there are exigent circumstances or the hearing was set less than seven days before the hearing date, in which cases the request mustunder beparagraph made(c) aswithout soonawaiting asa reasonablyresponse. possible.
- 3 - SJR010S01 compared with SJR010S02 (d) Resolution of the request.
(1) Timing and manner of resolution.
The court may rule on a request under paragraph (c) without awaiting a response.
(2) Court'sThe accommodationcourt will accommodate a timely request unless the court makes, on the record, a finding of participant'sgood preference;cause to order the participant to appear in the format originally noticed.
factors to consider.
The court will accommodate a timely request unless the court makes, on the record, a finding of good cause to order the participant to appear in the format originally noticed.
(F) the possibility that the court [m ay]ay]may may order a party, who is not already in custody, into custody;
(3) EffectThe onpreference otherof participants.one participant, and the court's accommodation of that preference, does not:
The- preference4 of- oneSJR010 participant,compared andwith theSJR010S02 court's(A) accommodationchange the format of thatthe preference,hearing doesfor not:any other participant unless otherwise ordered by the court;
- 4 - SJR010S01 compared with SJR010S02 (A) change the format of the hearing for any other participant unless otherwise ordered by the court;
When the challenges for cause are completed, the clerk shall provide a list of the jurors remaining, and - 5 - SJR010S01SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 each side, beginning with the prosecution, shall indicate thereon its peremptory challenge to one juror at a time in regular turn until all peremptory challenges are exhausted or waived.
(b) (1) (i) In a felony case, the court {shall } must conduct jury selection in person at the place of trial unless both parties agree, on the record, that jury selection be conducted virtually.
(ii) When jury selection is conducted {as described } in person under paragraph (b)(1)(i), all prospective jurors must appear in person for examination.
[(c)(1)](ii) The challenge to the panel shall be taken before the jury is sworn and shall be in - 6 - SJR010S01 compared with SJR010S02 writing or made upon the record.
It shall specifically set forth the facts constituting the grounds - 6 - SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 of the challenge.
- 7 - SJR010S01 compared with SJR010S02 [(e)](4) The existence of any social, legal, business, fiduciary or other relationship between - 7 - SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 the prospective juror and any party, witness or person alleged to have been victimized or injured by the defendant, which relationship when viewed objectively, would suggest to reasonable minds that the prospective juror would be unable or unwilling to return a verdict which would be free of favoritism.
Alternate jurors must - 8 - SJR010S01 compared with SJR010S02 have the same qualifications and be selected and sworn in the same manner as any other juror.
- 8 - SJR010 compared with SJR010S02 If one or two alternate jurors are called, the prosecution and defense shall each have one additional peremptory challenge.
View plain text versions (5)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Senate/ filed
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ strike enacting clause
-
House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ circled
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SJR010S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SJR010S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SJR010S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SJR010S01
-
House/ return to Rules due to fiscal impact [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SJR010S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SJR010S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SJR010S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SJR010S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SJR010
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SJR010
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SJR010
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SJR010
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Casey Snider · Cosponsor
- Michael K. McKell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michael K. McKell Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Casey Snider Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SJR 10?
- SJR 10 is sponsored by Casey Snider (Republican) and Michael K. McKell (Republican).
- What is the current status of SJR 10?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 26, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SJR 10?
- Track SJR 10 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SJR 10
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SJR 10
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →