HB 425 — Local Government Fees Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 24, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
22 added · 23 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill HB 425 includes minor technical changes for clarity and alignment with previous statutes. Importantly, it specifies that a city can meet a particular requirement by submitting necessary documentation, which could help streamline processes for local governments. This update ensures that the language in the bill is clear and consistent, making it easier for officials to understand and implement the regulations.
02-18Enrolled 10:56Copy H.B.
H Money Appropriated in this Bill:
B None .Other Special Clauses:
OtherNone SpecialH.B. Clauses:
2425 NoneEnrolled 5Copy Utah Code Sections Affected:
10-1-406, as enacted by Laws of Utah 2003, Chapter 253 H.B.ENACTS:
425 02-18 10:56 ENACTS:
and (ii)- is2 not- relatedEnrolled to:Copy H.B.
425 (ii) is not related to:
or -(B) 2increased -deterioration 02-18of 10:56a H.B.highway as a result of the activities of the telecommunications provider in a right-of-way;
425 (B) increased deterioration of a highway as a result of the activities of the telecommunications provider in a right-of-way;
(2) Except as provided in Subsection (3), a town may not impose a general fee for a public safety- service.3 - H.B.
425 Enrolled Copy safety service.
-(ii) 3the -fee H.B.is to generate revenue to pay for the town's obligation under an agreement with one or more other political subdivisions for a public safety service provided to the town;
425 02-18 10:56 (ii) the fee is to generate revenue to pay for the town's obligation under an agreement with one or more other political subdivisions for a public safety service provided to the town;
(2)- Except4 as- providedEnrolled inCopy SubsectionH.B. (3), a city may not impose a general fee for a public safety service.
(3)425 A(2) cityExcept ofas theprovided third,in fourth,Subsection or(3), fiftha classcity may not impose a general fee for a public safety -service. 4 - 02-18 10:56 H.B.
425(3) A city of the third, fourth, or fifth class may impose a general fee for a public safety service if:
and (B)- the5 services- providedH.B. to, the benefits received by, or the need created by those who pay the transportation utility fee;
425 Enrolled Copy (B) the services provided to, the benefits received by, or the need created by those who pay the transportation utility fee;
-(b) 5A -city H.B.may impose a transportation utility fee to provide funding for any number of transportation facilities but may not have more than a single transportation utility fee in effect at a time.
425 02-18 10:56 (b) A city may impose a transportation utility fee to provide funding for any number of transportation facilities but may not have more than a single transportation utility fee in effect at a time.
(ii) exclude traffic counts from whichever day of the week generates the lowest amount of traffic, on average and as best approximated with the methodologies used under Subsection (4)(a)(i), for the transportation facility or transportation - 6 - 02-18Enrolled 10:56Copy H.B.
425 (ii) exclude traffic counts from whichever day of the week generates the lowest amount of traffic, on average and as best approximated with the methodologies used under Subsection (4)(a)(i), for the transportation facility or transportation facility system;
(ii)- a7 consideration- ofH.B. the age of development within areas with the same zoning designation;
or425 (iii)Enrolled theCopy lack(ii) ofa financialconsideration contributions,of or the reducedage financialof contributions,development thatwithin aareas -with 7the -same H.B.zoning designation;
425or 02-18(iii) 10:56the lack of financial contributions, or the reduced financial contributions, that a tax-exempt organization user makes to the cost of constructing, maintaining, or operating a transportation facility.
(ii) The limitation under Subsection (7)(d)(i) does not apply to a designated transportation- facilities8 capital- orEnrolled reserveCopy accountH.B. established before the effective date of a transportation utility fee under this section.
(8)(a)425 Simultaneouslytransportation withfacilities adoptingcapital anor ordinancereserve describedaccount inestablished Subsectionbefore (7),the aeffective citydate -of 8a -transportation 02-18utility 10:56fee H.B.under this section.
425(8)(a) Simultaneously with adopting an ordinance described in Subsection (7), a city shall establish an appeals process for an individual or entity that wishes to challenge the user classification, as described in Subsection (5), the city assigns to the individual or entity.
(d) Notwithstanding Sections 10-6-124, 10-6-125, and 10-6-135.5, a city may not transfer- money9 in- aH.B. transportation fund to any other fund or to a separate account.
(10)(a)425 AEnrolled cityCopy thattransfer imposesmoney in a transportation utilityfund feeto shallany conductother anfund annualor reviewto of the transportation utility fee as provided in this Subsection (10) and prepare a writtenseparate -account. 9 - H.B.
425(10)(a) 02-18A 10:56city that imposes a transportation utility fee shall conduct an annual review of the transportation utility fee as provided in this Subsection (10) and prepare a written report of the annual review.
(ii) A city may fulfill the requirement of Subsection (10)(c)(i) by submittedsubmitting the written report as part of the city's annual financial reports submitted to the state auditor.
(14)(a) Nothing in this section precludes or abrogates the property tax exemptions provided- for10 in- UtahEnrolled Constitution,Copy ArticleH.B. XIII, Section 3.
(b)425 Toprovided the extent that a court determines a transportation utility fee is a property tax for purposesin of Utah Constitution, Article XIII, Section 3,3. a city may not require a - 10 - 02-18 10:56 H.B.
425(b) To the extent that a court determines a transportation utility fee is a property tax for purposes of Utah Constitution, Article XIII, Section 3, a city may not require a person to pay that transportation utility fee with respect to property or the use of property that is exempt from property tax under Utah Constitution, Article XIII, Sec tion 3.
(ii) identify and provide a reasonable estimate of existing funding sources that could be used to pay for a new transportation facility or for maintaining, operating, repairing, upgrading, or replacing an existing transportation facility;
425 02-18Enrolled 10:56Copy (iii)(ii) explainidentify and provide a reasonable calculationestimate showingof how existing county funding sources arethat inadequatecould tobe coverused theto costpay offor constructing a new transportation facility or for maintaining, operating, repairing, upgrading, or replacing an existing transportation facility;
(iii) explain and provide a reasonable calculation showing how existing county funding sources are inadequate to cover the cost of constructing a new transportation facility or maintaining, operating, repairing, upgrading, or replacing an existing transportation facility;
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
(5)(a) A county shall establish different rates within a transportation utility fee for different- classifications12 of- usersEnrolled ofCopy aH.B. transportation facility if the rates and classifications have a reasonable basis.
(b)425 The different types of classifications of users of a transportation facility underif -the 12rates -and 02-18classifications 10:56have H.B.a reasonable basis.
425(b) The different types of classifications of users of a transportation facility under Subsection (5)(a) shall include, at a minimum:
(b)(i) The governing body of a county that proposes to impose or increase a transportation- utility13 fee- shall,H.B. in addition to the notice required under Subsection (6)(a), provide notice of the proposed fee and the public hearing:
(A)425 inEnrolled aCopy noticetransportation withutility fee shall, in addition to the county'snotice monthlyrequired utilityunder bill,Subsection if(6)(a), theprovide countynotice mailsof orthe emailsproposed -fee 13and -the H.B.public hearing:
425(A) 02-18in 10:56a notice with the county's monthly utility bill, if the county mails or emails residents a monthly utility bill;
(i) demonstrate why the county's assignment of a user classification to the individual or- entity14 is- notEnrolled reasonableCopy asH.B. applied to the individual or entity;
425 or entity is not reasonable as applied to the individual or entity;
-(c) 14The -appeal 02-18process 10:56described H.B.in Subsection (8)(a) shall establish the individual or body at the county that shall hear and make a final decision on the appeal, which shall be:
425 (c) The appeal process described in Subsection (8)(a) shall establish the individual or body at the county that shall hear and make a final decision on the appeal, which shall be:
(iii) demonstrate that there is still a reasonable relationship between the amount of the transportation- utility15 fee- andH.B. the transportation services provided to, benefits received by, or need created by those who pay the fee;
(iv)425 considerEnrolled otherCopy possibletransportation revenueutility sourcesfee thatand the countytransportation couldservices useprovided forto, -benefits 15received -by, H.B.or need created by those who pay the fee;
425(iv) 02-18consider 10:56other possible revenue sources that the county could use for transportation facilities instead of a transportation utility fee;
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ committee report favorable [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House/ to standing committee [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0425
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0425
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0425
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0425
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Brady Brammer · Cosponsor
- Karen M. Peterson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Karen M. Peterson Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Brady Brammer Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 425?
- HB 425 is sponsored by Brady Brammer (Republican) and Karen M. Peterson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 425?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 29, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 425?
- Track HB 425 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 425
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 425
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →