HB 363 — Water Easement Amendments
Last action — House/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 26, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
70 added · 71 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised bill, HB 363S02, now gives municipalities the first priority to take control of a water conveyance easement when the holder intends to abandon it. It also simplifies the process for municipalities wanting to change the use of these easements by requiring them to notify affected landowners and file a description of the new use with the county recorder. This change is significant because it streamlines the process for municipalities to manage water resources, ensuring that local governments have more authority to address water conveyance needs effectively.
HB0363S02 compared with HB0363S01HB0363 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0363S01HB0363 but was omitted in HB0363S02 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0363S01HB0363 but was inserted into HB0363S02 DISCLAIMER:
▸ requires a {municipality } political subdivision that {holds } desires to establish control of a prescriptive easement for water conveyance to file a notice describing the use and location of the prescriptive easement in the office of the county recorder in which the easement is located;
▸ {allows a municipality to establish control of a prescriptive easement for water conveyance subject to a notice of intent to abandon the easement;} ▸ allows a {municipality } political subdivision to convert the use of a prescriptive easementHasement for H water conveyance if the {municipality} political subdivision:
03 ● 6 HB0363 compared with HB0363S02 files a notice describing the converted use of the easement in the office of the6countythe county recorder;
S ● 0 HB0363S01 compared with HB0363S02 waits 120 days from the day the {municipality } political subdivision sends notice to each affected landowner;
- 2 - HB0363 compared with HB0363S02 [(1)] (2) "Water conveyance" means a canal, ditch, pipeline, or other means of conveying water.
- 2 - HB0363S01 compared with HB0363S02 [(2)] (3) "Water user" means a water user or the water user's predecessor whose water being conveyed is represented by a water right recognized under state law or by shares in a mutual irrigation company.
(i) in each county where{[where{]} in which} the easement or part of the easement is located, file in the office of the county recorder a notice of intent to abandon the prescriptive easement that describes the easement or part of the easement to be abandoned[.] ;
- 3 - HB0363 compared with HB0363S02 (c) Upon the filing of a notice of intent to abandon a prescriptive easement under Subsection (2)(a) (i), a municipality in which the prescriptive easement is located shall have first priority to establish - 3 - HB0363S01 compared with HB0363S02 control of any portion of the easement located within the municipality's boundaries in accordance with the requirements of Subsection (4)(b).
(d) Nothing in this section limits the ability of a {municipality } political subdivision to receive a transfer of a prescriptive easement for a water conveyance directly from the holder of the prescriptive easement.
- 4 - HB0363 compared with HB0363S02 Section 4.
- 4 - HB0363S01 compared with HB0363S02 57-13a-105.
- 5 - HB0363S01HB0363 compared with HB0363S02 (b) If a landowner objects to a {municipality's } political subdivision's converted use within 120 days of the {municipality } political subdivision providing notice described in Subsection (2)(a)(i), the {municipality } political subdivision shall:
View plain text versions (7)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text Current pdf
- Amended Amended 2/27/2026 14:02:685 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/27/2026 14:02:685 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
1 amendmentClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
House/ filed
-
House/ strike enacting clause
-
House/ filed
-
House/ failed
-
House/ floor amendment
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0363S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0363S02
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0363S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0363S01
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0363S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0363S02
-
House Comm - Not Considered [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0363S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0363S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Political Subdivisions Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0363
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0363
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0363
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0363
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Nelson T. Abbott · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 103 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Nelson T. Abbott Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (103)
103 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 103 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 363?
- HB 363 is sponsored by Nelson T. Abbott (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 363?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 26, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track HB 363?
- Track HB 363 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 363
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 363
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →