HB 330 — Liability Limitations Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 18, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
60 added · 74 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of Bill HB 330, a new provision was added that allows individuals to have an affirmative defense in civil lawsuits for actions taken according to government guidelines. This means if someone follows the rules set by a government entity, they may have a legal protection against being held liable for certain mistakes. However, the bill also clarifies that this defense won't apply if someone exceeds the government's directions or causes harm due to a faulty product. This update is important because it establishes clear boundaries on when following government rules can help shield someone from legal consequences, promoting accountability while still recognizing the role of governmental authorization.
HB0330S02Enrolled comparedCopy withH.B. HB0330 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0330 but was omitted in HB0330S02 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0330 but was inserted into HB0330S02 DISCLAIMER:
This330 documentLiability isLimitations providedAmendments toGENERAL assistSESSION youSTATE inOF yourUTAH comparisonChief ofSponsor: the two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Liability Limitations Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Jack Senate Sponsor:RonaldSponsor: M.
Ronald M.
▸ {provides that } specifies the circumstances in which the affirmative defense described above does not applyapply, {if a person fails to comply with} , {or exceeds the scope of, a governmental entity's authorization or requirement, or causes harm through a defective product} including in an action for products liability;
H ▸ clarifies that lawful authorization to engage in an activity does not eliminate a duByduty to exercise reasonable care;
3 ▸ specifies that the affirmative defense applies regardless of the theory of liability;
and HB0330 compared with HB0330S02 ▸ abrogates the common law to the extent the common law is inconsistent with the affirmative defense.
78B-4-90178B-4-901, , Utah Code Annotated 1953 78B-4-90278B-4-902, , Utah Code Annotated 1953 BeH.B. it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
330 Enrolled Copy Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 178B-4-901 is enacted to read:
78B-4-901.Part 9.
Limitations on Liability Based on Governmental Authorization 78B-4-901 .
9.As used in this part, "governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 63G-7-102.
Limitations on Liability Based on {Governemtal } Governmental Authorization As used in this {part,"governmental } part, "governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in Section 63G-7-102.
Section 278B-4-902 is enacted to read:
78B-4-902.78B-4-902 .
- 2 - HB0330 compared with HB0330S02 (i) for conduct, when the conduct is undertaken;
(2) The affirmative defense described in Subsection (1) does not apply if the plaintiff proves thatthethat the governmental entity that issued the authorization or requirement described in Subsection (1) has determined that:
(a) the person materially failed to comply with the terms or conditions of the authorization or requirementrequirement; {described in Subsection (1);
or}(b) ;the person's conduct exceeded the scope of the authorization or requirement;
(b) the person's conduct exceeded the scope of the authorization or requirement {described in Subsection (1).} ;
{or}- (c)2 apply- toEnrolled {anyCopy }H.B. a products liability action {for damages for personal injury, death, or property damages allegedly caused by a defect or defective condition in a product.} ;
330 (c) apply to a products liability action;
(4) {The } Subject to Subsections (2) and (3), the affirmative defense described in this section applies {in } to a civil action regardless of {whether } the {civil action is based on negligence, strict liability, nuisance, or another } theory of liabilityonliability on which the action is based.
Effective date.
2-17-26 12:34 PM - 3 -
View plain text versions (6)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
House/ to Governor
-
House/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
House/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from House for Enrolling
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ sent for enrolling
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ signed by President/ returned to House
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ concurs with Senate amendment
-
House/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House with amendments
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0330S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0330S02
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ comm rpt/ substituted [Senate Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Substitute Recommendation [Senate Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0330S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0330S02
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0330S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0330S01
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ substituted
-
House/ uncircled
-
House/ circled
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0330S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0330S01
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ committee report favorable [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House/ to standing committee [House Judiciary Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0330
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0330
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0330
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0330
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Ronald M. Winterton · Cosponsor
- Colin W. Jack · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Colin W. Jack Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Ronald M. Winterton Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 330?
- HB 330 is sponsored by Ronald M. Winterton (Republican) and Colin W. Jack (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 330?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 330?
- Track HB 330 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 330
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 330
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →