Utah 2026 General Session Status: To Executive 2 R cosponsors

HB 544 — County Land Use Authority Amendments

Last action — House/ filed

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 11, 2026. It awaits signature.

Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 46% · moderate confidence
  • To Executive

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 2 sponsors

    1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

136 added · 15 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Bill HB 544 makes it clear that counties must accept and process applications for single-family homes on certain parcels that aren't part of a subdivision. Specifically, it adds the requirement that counties protect property rights in their land use authority, which is an important consideration for homeowners. Additionally, some conditional language has been removed, streamlining the application criteria for these homes. These changes aim to make it easier for individuals to build single-family dwellings on qualifying land, helping to address housing needs.

→
Previous
Latest
03-03 07:58 H.B.
544 County Land Use Authority Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Kristen Chevrier Senate Sponsor:
Keith Grover 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
This bill requires a county to accept and process a plan review application for a single-family dwelling on a qualifying parcel that is not part of a subdivision.
Highlighted Provisions:
This bill:
▸ defines terms;
▸ amends the purpose of a county's general land use authority to include protecting property rights;
▸ describes the circumstances under which a county is required to accept and process a plan review application for a single-family dwelling on a qualifying parcel;
and ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
None Other Special Clauses:
None Utah Code Sections Affected:
AMENDS:
17-79-101, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2025, First Special Session, Chapter 14 ENACTS:
H 17-79-621, Utah Code Annotated 1953 B .
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
4 Section 1.
Section 17-79-101 is amended to read:
17-79-101 .
Purposes -- General land use authority -- Limitations.
(1)(a) The purposes of this chapter are to:
(i) provide for the health, safety, and welfare;
544 Amended Excerpts House Amendments March 03, 2026 07:58 AM 1.
544 03-03 07:58 (ii) promote the prosperity;
Line 95 through 109:
(iii) improve the morals, peace, good order, comfort, convenience, and aesthetics of each county and each county's present and future inhabitants and businesses;
(iv) protect the tax base;
(v) secure economy in governmental expenditures;
(vi) foster the state's agricultural and other industries;
(vii) protect both urban and nonurban development;
(viii) protect and ensure access to sunlight for solar energy devices;
(ix) provide fundamental fairness in land use regulation;
(x) facilitate orderly growth, allow growth in a variety of housing types, and contribute toward housing affordability;[ and] (xi) protect property rights;
and (xii) protect property values.
(b) Subject to Subsection (4) and Section 11-41-103, to accomplish the purposes of this chapter, a county may enact all ordinances[,] and resolutions, [and rules] adopt all policies, and may enter into other forms of land use controls and development agreements that the county considers necessary or appropriate for the use and development of land within the unincorporated area of the county or a designated mountainous planning district, including ordinances, resolutions, [rules] policies, restrictive covenants, easements, and development agreements governing:
(i) uses;
(ii) density;
(iii) open spaces;
(iv) structures;
(v) buildings;
Show all 83 changed rows (43 more)
Previous
Latest
(vi) energy-efficiency;
(vii) light and air;
(viii) air quality;
(ix) transportation and public or alternative transportation;
(x) infrastructure;
(xi) street and building orientation and width requirements;
(xii) public facilities;
(xiii) fundamental fairness in land use regulation;
and (xiv) considerations of surrounding land uses to balance the foregoing purposes with - 2 - 03-03 07:58 H.B.
544 a landowner's private property interests and associated statutory and constitutional protections.
(2) Each county shall comply with the mandatory provisions of this part before any agreement or contract to provide goods, services, or municipal-type services to any storage facility or transfer facility for high-level nuclear waste, or greater than class C radioactive waste, may be executed or implemented.
(3)(a) Any ordinance[,] or resolution a county enacts, or [rule enacted by a county] a policy that a county adopts in accordance with the county's authority under this chapter shall comply with the state's exclusive jurisdiction to regulate oil and gas activity, as described in Section 40-6-2.5.
(b) A county may enact an ordinance[,] or resolution, or [rule] adopt a policy that regulates surface activity incident to an oil and gas activity if the county demonstrates that the regulation:
(i) is necessary for the purposes of this chapter;
(ii) does not effectively or unduly limit, ban, or prohibit an oil and gas activity;
and (iii) does not interfere with the state's exclusive jurisdiction to regulate oil and gas activity, as described in Section 40-6-2.5.
(4)(a) This Subsection (4) applies to development agreements entered into on or after May 5, 2021.
(b) A provision in a county development agreement is unenforceable if the provision requires an individual or an entity, as a condition for issuing building permits or otherwise regulating development activities within an unincorporated area of the county, to initiate a process for a municipality to annex the unincorporated area in accordance with Title 10, Chapter 2, Part 8, Annexation.
(c) Subsection (4)(b) does not affect or impair the enforceability of any other provision in the development agreement.
Section 2.
Section 17-79-621 is enacted to read:
17-79-621 .
Qualifying parcel application and approval for single-family dwelling building permit.
(1) As used in this section:
(i) was created by a written instrument, other than a subdivision plat, before the county adopted a land use ordinance Ĥ→ [ {regulating the parcel} ]that requires 98a county subdivision approval to create a lot for a single-family dwelling in the zone 98b where the parcel is located ←Ĥ ;
(i) was created by a written instrument, other than a subdivision plat, before the county adopted a land use ordinance Ĥ→ [regulating the parcel] that requires - 3 - H.B.
Ĥ→ [ {or} ]and 98c (ii) is located in a zone where a single-family dwelling is a permitted use.
544 03-03 07:58 98a county subdivision approval to create a lot for a single-family dwelling in the zone 98b where the parcel is located ←Ĥ ;
[ {(ii) is similar to a lot or parcel that:} ] [ {(A) has the same zoning designation;
Ĥ→ [or] and 98c (ii) is located in a zone where a single-family dwelling is a permitted use.
and} ] [ {(B) (I) conforms to applicable development standards for a single-family } ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [ {residential lot;} ] [ {(II) at some point in the past was approved, recognized, or treated as a lot or } ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [ {parcel for which a single-family dwelling was a conforming use;
[(ii) is similar to a lot or parcel that:] [(A) has the same zoning designation;
or} ] [ {(III) contains a single-family dwelling that the county recognizes as a } ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [ {conforming use.} ] ←Ĥ (2) Subject to Subsection (3) and Section 17-79-810, a county shall accept and process a plan review application for a single-family dwelling on a qualifying parcel that is made by the qualifying parcel's owner of record, if:
and] [(B)(I) conforms to applicable development standards for a single-family ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [residential lot;] [(II) at some point in the past was approved, recognized, or treated as a lot or ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [parcel for which a single-family dwelling was a conforming use;
- 1 - House Committee Amendments
or] [(III) contains a single-family dwelling that the county recognizes as a ] ←Ĥ Ĥ→ [conforming use.] ←Ĥ (2) Subject to Subsection (3) and Section 17-79-810, a county shall accept and process a plan review application for a single-family dwelling on a qualifying parcel that is made by the qualifying parcel's owner of record, if:
(a) the proposed building meets the minimum setback requirements of the zoning designation where the qualifying parcel is located;
(b) applicable utility providers review and approve the plan review application;
(c) to the extent required by county ordinance, the local health department reviews and approves the plan review application;
and (d) to the extent required by county ordinance, the owner of the qualifying parcel dedicates a portion of the qualifying parcel for street frontage.
(3) The owner of a parcel has the burden, under Subsection (2), of establishing by substantial evidence that the parcel is a qualifying parcel.
(4) A county accepting and processing a plan review or approval of a building permit under Subsection (2) does not:
(a) require the county to accept or maintain a street or other right-of-way;
(b) require the county, a special district, or a utility provider to extend or provide a utility to a qualifying parcel;
or (c) limit the county's authority to enforce the provisions of this chapter or other law against a person who divides a parcel without required county approval.
Section 3.
Effective Date.
This bill takes effect on May 6, 2026.
- 4 -
View plain text versions (3)

Amendments

2 amendments

Click Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.

Action History

  1. House/ filed

  2. House/ received from Senate

  3. Senate/ to House

  4. Senate/ strike enacting clause

  5. Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  6. Senate/ received from House

  7. House/ to Senate

  8. House/ passed 3rd reading

  9. House/ motion to reconsider

  10. House/ to Senate

  11. House/ passed 3rd reading

  12. House/ 3rd reading

  13. House/ 2nd reading

  14. House/ comm rpt/ amended [House Political Subdivisions Committee]

  15. House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]

  16. House Comm - Amendment Recommendation [House Political Subdivisions Committee]

  17. House/ to standing committee [House Political Subdivisions Committee]

  18. House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst

  19. LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0544

  20. LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0544

  21. House/ 1st reading (Introduced)

  22. House/ received bill from Legislative Research

  23. LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0544

  24. LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0544

  25. Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed

  26. Bill Numbered but not Distributed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (102)

102 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 102 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 544?
HB 544 is sponsored by Keith Grover (Republican) and Kristen Chevrier (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 544?
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 11, 2026. It awaits signature.
Where can I track HB 544?
Track HB 544 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 544

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 544

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →