HB 489 — Water Infrastructure Amendments
Last action — House/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 04, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
101 added · 20 removedPlain-language change summary
The changes in Bill HB 489 include updates to the definitions of "detention basin" and "retention basin," clarifying them as structures designed for specific water management purposes. Additionally, the requirements for designing these basins have shifted from emphasizing a quick water release to allowing for gradual drainage. These adjustments are important because they aim to improve stormwater management practices in the Great Salt Lake area, which can help protect the environment and reduce flooding risks.
02-26 14:44 H.B.
489 AmendedWater ExcerptsInfrastructure House Amendments FebruaryGENERAL 26,SESSION 2026STATE 02:44OF PMUTAH 1.Chief Sponsor:
LineThomas 24W. through 29:
(a)Peterson "Applicant"Senate meansSponsor: a person who[ is conducting or proposing ]:
(i)Calvin conductsR. or proposes to conduct a use of land;
and[Musselman who]3 (ii)LONG aTITLE permitteeGeneral requiresDescription: or allows to use low impact development.
(b)This "Detentionbill basin"addresses meansuse aof Ĥ→retention [ { best management practice} ]structure ←Ĥ 27a designed to temporarily capture and storedetention stormbasins. water runoff, releasing the storm water runoff slowly over time to:
Highlighted Provisions:
This bill:
▸ defines terms;
▸ limits use of retention basins within the Great Salt Lake basin;
▸ imposes design standards on certain detention basins within the Great Salt Lake basin;
and ▸ makes technical and conforming changes.
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
None Other Special Clauses:
None Utah Code Sections Affected:
AMENDS:
19-5-108.5, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 438 20 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 1.
Section 19-5-108.5 is amended to read:
19-5-108.5 .
Storm water permits.
(1) As used in this section:
H (a) "Applicant" means a person who[ is conducting or proposing ] :
B (i) conducts or proposes to conduct a use of land;
and[ who] .
26 (ii) a permittee requires or allows to use low impact development.
8 (b) "Detention basin" means a Ĥ→ [ best management practice] structure ←Ĥ 9 27a designed to temporarily capture and store storm water runoff, releasing the storm water runoff slowly over time to:
2.H.B.
Line489 5002-26 through14:44 55:(ii) reduce erosion;
water.and (iii) improve water quality by allowing sediment to settle out.
[(d)](f)(c) "Permittee""Great meansSalt aLake municipalitybasin" ormeans county with a storm water permit under the Utaharea Pollutantwithin: Discharge Elimination System.
(g)(i) "Retentionthe basin"surveyed meansmeander aline Ĥ→of [ {best management practice} ]structure ←Ĥ 53a designed to hold water to manage storm water runoff by capturing the stormGreat waterSalt runoffLake; to:
(ii) the drainage areas of the Bear River or the Bear River's tributaries;
(iii) the drainage areas of Bear Lake or Bear Lake's tributaries;
(iv) the drainage areas of the Weber River or the Weber River's tributaries;
(v) the drainage areas of the Jordan River or the Jordan River's tributaries;
(vi) the drainage areas of Utah Lake or Utah Lake's tributaries;
(vii) other water drainages lying between the Bear River and the Jordan River that are tributary to the Great Salt Lake and not included in the drainage areas described in Subsections (1)(c)(ii) through (vi);
and (viii) the drainage area of Tooele Valley.
Show all 70 changed lines (30 more)
[(b)] (d) "Independent review" is a review conducted:
(i) in accordance with this section;
and (ii) by an engineer[,] or engineering firm, designated by the division as having technical expertise in the area of storm water calculations.
[(c)] (e) "Low impact development" means a structural or natural engineered [systems] system located close to the source of storm water that [use or mimic] uses or mimics natural processes to encourage infiltration, evapotranspiration, or reuse of the storm water.
[(d)] (f) "Permittee" means a municipality or county with a storm water permit under the Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System.
(g) "Retention basin" means a Ĥ→ [best management practice] structure ←Ĥ 53a designed to hold water to manage storm water runoff by capturing the storm water runoff to:
and 3.(ii) improve water quality through sedimentation.
Line[(e)] 90(h) through"Storm 93a:water" means storm water runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage.
[(f)] (i) "Storm water permit" means a permit issued to a permittee by the division for the permittee's municipal separate storm sewer system.
[(g)] (j) "Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System" means the state-wide program for issuing, modifying, revoking and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing [ - 2 - 02-26 14:44 H.B.
489 permits] a permit under this chapter.
(2) A permittee shall reduce any requirement for an applicant to manage or control storm water runoff rates or storm water runoff volumes for flood control purposes to account for the reduction in storm water associated with approved low impact development practices.
(3) The director shall create and maintain a list of engineers, including engineering firms, capable of providing independent review of low impact development designs and storm water calculations for use by an applicant and a permittee pursuant to an appeal described in Subsection (4).
(4)(a) An applicant who appeals a permittee's determination regarding post-construction retention requirements under the permittee's storm water permit may request the permittee to refer the appeal to independent review for purposes of determining the technical aspects of the appeal, including:
(i) the required size of any low impact development system;
(ii) the calculations of reductions in storm water runoff rates or storm water runoff volumes for flood control due to the use of low impact development;
and (iii) the feasibility of constructing low impact development practices required by the permittee.
(b)(i) If an applicant makes a request under Subsection (4)(a)[:] , [(i)] the permittee shall:
(A) select an engineer or engineering firm from the list described in Subsection (3);
and (B) pay one-half of the cost of the independent review.
(ii) [An ] A permittee may not select an engineer or engineering firm[ selected by the permittee] under Subsection (4)(b)(i)[ may not be]:
(A) associated with the application that is the subject of the appeal;
or (B) employed by the permittee.
(5)(5)(a) (a) Ĥ→ [[For] {For}On ]On and after January 1, 2027, for ←Ĥ long-term storm water 93a management control, a permittee in the Great Salt Lake 4.basin shall prioritize a low impact development practice other than use of a retention basin, unless the applicant establishes to the satisfaction of the permittee that no - 3 - H.B.
Line489 9402-26 through14:44 100:feasible alternative to use of a retention basin is available.
basin(b) shallĤ→ prioritize[If] aOn lowand impactafter developmentJanuary practice1, other2027, thanif use←Ĥ of a detention basin is required for 97a post-construction retention basin,requirements unlessin the Great Salt Lake basin, the applicant establishesshall design the detention basin to Ĥ→ [release] 98a drain ←Ĥ all water Ĥ→ [ as soon as possible] ←Ĥ , except that the satisfactiondesign of the permitteedetention thatbasin nomay feasible99a alternativenot tointerfere usewith offlood acontrol retentionmanagement basinor isdrainage available.system capacity.
(b)Section Ĥ→2. [ {If} ]On and after January 1, 2027, if ←Ĥ a detention basin is required for 97a post-construction retention requirements in the Great Salt Lake basin, the applicant shall design the detention basin to Ĥ→ [ {release} ] - 1 - House Floor Amendments 98a drain ←Ĥ all water Ĥ→ [ { as soon as possible} ] ←Ĥ , except that the design of the detention basin may 99a not interfere with flood control management or drainage system capacity.
-Effective 2Date. - House Floor Amendments
This bill takes effect on May 6, 2026.
- 4 -
Show all 70 changed rows (30 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Amended Amended 2/26/2026 14:02:376 pdf
- Amended Amended Excerpts 2/26/2026 14:02:376 Current pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Amendments
2 amendmentsClick Show changes on an amendment above to see how it modifies the bill.
Action History
-
House/ filed
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ strike enacting clause
-
Senate/ Rules to 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Revenue and Taxation Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ held
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ floor amendment
-
House/ uncircled
-
House/ circled
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ committee report favorable [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House/ to standing committee [House Public Utilities and Energy Committee]
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0489
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0489
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0489
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0489
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Calvin R. Musselman · Cosponsor
- Karen M. Peterson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Karen M. Peterson Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Calvin R. Musselman Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 489?
- HB 489 is sponsored by Calvin R. Musselman (Republican) and Karen M. Peterson (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 489?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 04, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track HB 489?
- Track HB 489 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 489
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 489
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →