HB 543 — Uniform Commercial Code Amendments
Last action — House/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 11, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
189 added · 39 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill HB 543 includes several significant changes to the Uniform Commercial Code. Notably, it clarifies which jurisdiction's laws apply to financial assets held by securities intermediaries, ensuring that necessary disclosures are made regarding those assets. Additionally, it removes previous exceptions that prioritized creditors over entitlement holders in security interests, which helps simplify and enhance clarity in handling such financial matters. These changes are important as they aim to create a more predictable legal framework that can benefit both businesses and consumers in financial transactions.
03-02HB0543S01 12:00compared 1stwith Sub.HB0543 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HB0543 but was omitted in HB0543S01 inserted text shows text that was not in HB0543 but was inserted into HB0543S01 DISCLAIMER:
(Buff)This H.B.document is provided to assist you in your comparison of the two bills.
543Sometimes Jasonthis B.automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
KyleTherefore, proposesyou theneed followingto substituteread bill:the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
John3 D.LONG TITLE General Description:
JohnsonThis 3bill LONGamends TITLE{and Generalrepeals Description:provisions of } the Uniform Commercial Code.
This bill amends the Uniform Commercial Code.
▸ {amends the statutory provisions } provides that {guide which jurisdiction's law applies to actions involving } a securities intermediary shall provide a disclosure when a financial asset held by the securities intermediaryintermediary{;} is subject to certain conditions.
Money▸ Appropriated{removes exceptions related to priority of creditors over entitlement holders in thissecurity Bill:interests;} ▸ {amends rules relating to the perfection and priority of a security interest;
Noneand} Other▸ Special{makes Clauses:technical and conforming changes.} Money Appropriated in this Bill:
H None UtahB CodeOther SectionsSpecial Affected:Clauses:
5 None 4 HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 Utah Code Sections Affected:
70A-8-511,{70A-8-109 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2000, Chapter 252} {70A-8-503 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 1996, Chapter 204} 70A-8-511 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 1996, Chapter 204 {70A-9a-305 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2000, Chapter 252} Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
s{Section t Section 1.
Section 70A-8-109 is amended to read:
} 70A-8-109.
Applicability -- Choice of law.
(1) The local law of the issuer's jurisdiction, as specified in Subsection (4), governs:
(a) the validity of a security;
(b) the rights and duties of the issuer with respect to registration of transfer;
(c) the effectiveness of registration of transfer by the issuer;
(d) whether the issuer owes any duties to an adverse claimant to a security;
and (e) whether an adverse claim can be asserted against a person to whom transfer of a certificated or uncertificated security is registered or a person who obtains control of an uncertificated security.
(2) The local law of the [securities intermediary's] entitlement holder's jurisdiction[, as specified in Subsection (5), ] governs:
(a) acquisition of a security entitlement from the securities intermediary;
(b) the rights and duties of the securities intermediary and entitlement holder arising out of a security entitlement;
(c) whether the securities intermediary owes any duties to an adverse claimant to a security entitlement;
and (d) whether an adverse claim can be asserted against a person who acquires a security entitlement from the securities intermediary or a person who purchases a security entitlement or interest therein from an entitlement holder.
(3) The local law of the jurisdiction in which a security certificate is located at the time of delivery governs whether an adverse claim can be asserted against a person to whom the security certificate is delivered.
- 2 - HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 (4) "Issuer's jurisdiction" means the jurisdiction under which the issuer of the security is organized or, if permitted by the law of that jurisdiction, the law of another jurisdiction specified by the issuer.
An issuer organized under the law of this state may specify the law of another jurisdiction as the law governing the matters specified in Subsections (1)(b) through (e).
[(5) The following rules determine a "securities intermediary's jurisdiction" for purposes of this section:] [(a) If an agreement between the securities intermediary and its entitlement holder governing the securities account expressly provides that a particular jurisdiction is the securities intermediary's jurisdiction for purposes of this part, this chapter, or this title, that jurisdiction is the securities intermediary's jurisdiction.] [(b) If Subsection (5)(a) does not apply and an agreement between the securities intermediary and its entitlement holder governing the securities account expressly provides that the agreement is governed by the law of a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the securities intermediary's jurisdiction.] [(c) If neither Subsection (5)(a) nor Subsection (5)(b) applies and an agreement between the securities intermediary and its entitlement holder governing the securities account expressly provides that the securities account is maintained at an office in a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the securities intermediary's jurisdiction.] [(d) If Subsections (5)(a) through (c) do not apply, the securities intermediary's jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the office identified in an account statement as the office serving the entitlement holder's account is located.] [(e) If Subsections (5)(a) through (d) do not apply, the securities intermediary's jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the chief executive office of the securities intermediary is located.] [(6) A securities intermediary's jurisdiction is not determined by the physical location of certificates representing financial assets, or by the jurisdiction in which is organized the issuer of the financial asset with respect to which an entitlement holder has a security entitlement, or by the location of facilities for data processing or other record keeping concerning the account.] {Section 2.
Section 70A-8-503 is amended to read:
} 70A-8-503.
Property interest of entitlement holder in financial asset held by securities intermediary.
- 3 - HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 (1) To the extent necessary for a securities intermediary to satisfy all security entitlements with respect to a particular financial asset, all interests in that financial asset held by the securities intermediary are held by the securities intermediary for the entitlement holders, are not property of the securities intermediary, and are not subject to claims of creditors of the securities intermediary[, except as otherwise provided in Section 70A-8-511].
Show all 79 changed lines (39 more)
(2) An entitlement holder's property interest with respect to a particular financial asset under Subsection (1) is a pro rata property interest in all interests in that financial asset held by the securities intermediary, without regard to the time the entitlement holder acquired the security entitlement or the time the securities intermediary acquired the interest in that financial asset.
(3) An entitlement holder's property interest with respect to a particular financial asset under Subsection (1) may be enforced against the securities intermediary only by exercise of that entitlement holder's rights under Sections 70A-8-505 through 70A-8-508.
(4) (a) An entitlement holder's property interest with respect to a particular financial asset under Subsection (1) may be enforced against a purchaser of the financial asset or interest therein only if:
(i) insolvency proceedings have been initiated by or against the securities intermediary;
(ii) the securities intermediary does not have sufficient interests in the financial asset to satisfy the security entitlements of all of its entitlement holders to that financial asset;
(iii) the securities intermediary violated its obligations under Section 70A-8-504 by transferring the financial asset or interest therein to the purchaser;
and (iv) the purchaser is not protected under Subsection (5).
(b) (i) The trustee or other liquidator, acting on behalf of all entitlement holders having security entitlements with respect to a particular financial asset, may recover the financial asset, or interest therein, from the purchaser.[ ] (ii) If the trustee or other liquidator elects not to pursue that right, an entitlement holder whose security entitlement remains unsatisfied has the right to recover its interest in the financial asset from the purchaser.
(5) An action based on the entitlement holder's property interest with respect to a particular financial asset under Subsection (1), whether framed in conversion, replevin, constructive trust, equitable lien, or other theory, may not be asserted against any purchaser of a financial asset or interest therein - 4 - HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 who gives value, obtains control, and does not act in collusion with the securities intermediary in violating the securities intermediary's obligations under Section 70A-8-504.
Section 1.
S70A-8-511. 70A-8-511 .
u{[(1) b (1) Except as otherwise provided in Subsections (2) and (3), if a{]} If }a securities intermediaryHintermediary does not have sufficient interests in a particular financial asset to satisfy both its{[its{]} the securities intermediary's} obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements to that financial asset .and {[its{]} the securities intermediary's} obligation to a creditor of the securities intermediary who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claims of entitlement holders, other than the creditor, have priority over the claim of the creditor.
{[(2) A claim of a creditor of a securities intermediary who has a security interest in a financial asset held by a securities intermediary has priority over claims of the securities intermediary's entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to that financial asset if the creditor has control over the financial asset.]} {[(3) If a clearing corporation does not have sufficient financial assets to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to a financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the securitiesclearing intermediarycorporation who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claim of the creditor has priority over the claims of entitlement holders,holders.]} other(4) thanIf theSubsection creditor,(2) 3aveor priority(3) overapplies to a financial asset held by a securities intermediary, the claimsecurities intermediary shall provide a written, conspicuous disclosure to each of the creditor.securities intermediary's entitlement holders stating:
(2) A claim of a creditor of a securities intermediary who has a security interest in a financial asset held by a securities intermediary has priority over claims of the securities intermediary's entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to that 1st Sub.
(Buff) H.B.
543 03-02 12:00 financial asset if the creditor has control over the financial asset.
(3) If a clearing corporation does not have sufficient financial assets to satisfy both its obligations to entitlement holders who have security entitlements with respect to a financial asset and its obligation to a creditor of the clearing corporation who has a security interest in that financial asset, the claim of the creditor has priority over the claims of entitlement holders.
(4) If Subsection (2) or (3) applies to a financial asset held by a securities intermediary, the securities intermediary shall provide a written, conspicuous disclosure to each of the securities intermediary's entitlement holders stating:
{Section 4.
Section 70A-9a-305 is amended to read:
} 70A-9a-305.
Law governing perfection and priority of security interests in investment property.
(1) Except as otherwise provided in Subsection (3), the following rules apply:
(a) While a security certificate is located in a jurisdiction, the local law of that jurisdiction governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in the certificated security represented thereby.
- 5 - HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 (b) The local law of the issuer's jurisdiction as specified in Subsection 70A-8-109(4) governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in an uncertificated security.
(c) The local law of the [securities intermediary's] entitlement holder's jurisdiction [as specified in Subsection 70A-8-109(5) ]governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in a security entitlement or securities account.
(d) The local law of the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction governs perfection, the effect of perfection or nonperfection, and the priority of a security interest in a commodity contract or commodity account.
(2) The following rules determine a commodity intermediary's jurisdiction for purposes of this part:
(a) If an agreement between the commodity intermediary and commodity customer governing the commodity account expressly provides that a particular jurisdiction is the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction for purposes of this part, this chapter, or this title, that jurisdiction is the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction.
(b) If Subsection (2)(a) does not apply and an agreement between the commodity intermediary and commodity customer governing the commodity account expressly provides that the agreement is governed by the law of a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction.
(c) If neither Subsection (2)(a) nor Subsection (2)(b) applies and an agreement between the commodity intermediary and commodity customer governing the commodity account expressly provides that the commodity account is maintained at an office in a particular jurisdiction, that jurisdiction is the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction.
(d) If none of the Subsections (2)(a) through (c) applies, the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the office identified in an account statement as the office serving the commodity customer's account is located.
(e) If none of the Subsections (2)(a) through (d) applies, the commodity intermediary's jurisdiction is the jurisdiction in which the chief executive office of the commodity intermediary is located.
(3) The local law of the jurisdiction in which the debtor is located governs:
(a) perfection of a security interest in investment property by filing;
(b) automatic perfection of a security interest in investment property created by a broker or securities intermediary;
and - 6 - HB0543 compared with HB0543S01 (c) automatic perfection of a security interest in a commodity contract or commodity account created by a commodity intermediary.
Effective date.
2-24-26 9:02 AM - 27 -
Show all 79 changed rows (39 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
House/ filed
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ strike enacting clause
-
Senate/ comm rpt/ sent to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Recommends Returned to Rules [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0543S01
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0543S01
-
House/ to standing committee [House Business, Labor, and Commerce Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0543S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0543S01
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HB0543
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HB0543
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HB0543
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HB0543
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- John D. Johnson · Cosponsor
- Jason B. Kyle · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jason B. Kyle Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- John D. Johnson Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 543?
- HB 543 is sponsored by John D. Johnson (Republican) and Jason B. Kyle (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 543?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 11, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track HB 543?
- Track HB 543 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 543
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 543
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →