SB 292 — Autonomous Systems Amendments
Last action — Governor Signed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2026. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Spencer Cox (Republican) on March 23, 2026.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
377 added · 510 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill SB 292 introduce several important changes related to liability for automated driving systems. Notably, the bill now sets a cap on noneconomic damages in lawsuits against manufacturers, which could limit compensation for emotional distress or pain and suffering. Additionally, it offers manufacturers an affirmative defense if they meet specific advanced technology standards, meaning they might not be held liable under certain circumstances. These changes aim to balance innovation in automated driving technology with the legal responsibilities of those who develop it.
SB0292S02Enrolled comparedCopy withS.B. SB0292 {Omitted text} shows text that was in SB0292 but was omitted in SB0292S02 inserted text shows text that was not in SB0292 but was inserted into SB0292S02 DISCLAIMER:
This292 documentAutonomous isSystems providedAmendments toGENERAL assistSESSION youSTATE inOF yourUTAH comparisonChief ofSponsor: the two bills.
Sometimes this automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
Therefore, you need to read the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Autonomous Systems Amendments GENERAL SESSION STATE OF UTAH Chief Sponsor:
Cullimore House Sponsor:JordanSponsor: D.
Jordan D.
▸ limits liability of certain automated driving system manufacturers and developers to certain types B of claims;
{and} 2 ▸ 9 SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 requires a sunset review of provisions related to liability of automated driving systems and vehicles;
{41-6a-111941-26-102.1, , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2020, Chapter 106} 41-26-102.1 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2022, Chapter 134 41-26-104S.B. , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2019, Chapter 459 63I-1-278 , as last amended by Laws of Utah 2025, Chapter 26 78B-6-702 , as enacted by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3 78B-6-703 , as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 3 ENACTS:
78B-4-901292 ,Enrolled UtahCopy Code41-26-104, Annotatedas 1953enacted 78B-4-902by ,Laws of Utah Code2019, AnnotatedChapter 1953459 78B-4-90363I-1-278, ,as Utahlast Codeamended Annotatedby 1953Laws 78B-4-904of , Utah Code2025, AnnotatedChapter 195326 {78B-4-90578B-6-702, ,as Utahenacted Codeby AnnotatedLaws 1953}of 78B-6-708Utah ,2008, UtahChapter Code3 Annotated78B-6-703, 1953as Berenumbered itand enactedamended by theLaws Legislature of theUtah state2008, ofChapter Utah:3 ENACTS:
{Section78B-4-901, 1.Utah Code Annotated 1953 78B-4-902, Utah Code Annotated 1953 78B-4-903, Utah Code Annotated 1953 78B-4-904, Utah Code Annotated 1953 78B-6-708, Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
Section 41-6a-1119 is amended to read:
} 41-6a-1119.
Personal delivery device.
(1) As used in this section:
(a) "Eligible entity" means a corporation, partnership, association, firm, sole proprietorship, or other entity engaged in a business that includes the operation of a personal delivery device.
(b) "Main-traveled way" means the same as that term is defined in Section 72-7-502.
- 2 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (c) "Pedestrian area" means a sidewalk, crosswalk, school crosswalk, school crossing zone, or safety zone.
(d) (i) "Personal delivery device" means an electrically powered device to which all of the following apply:
(A) the device is manufactured for transporting cargo and goods;
and (B) the device is equipped with automated driving technology, including hardware and software, that enables the operation of the device with or without active control or monitoring by a person.
(ii) A mobile carrier as defined in Section 41-6a-1120 is not a personal delivery device.
(iii) "Personal delivery device" does not include:
(A) a motor vehicle;
or (B) an [ADS-dedicated] ADS-equipped vehicle as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
(e) (i) "Personal delivery device operator" means an employee or agent of an eligible entity who exercises active physical control over, or monitoring of, the navigation and operation of a personal delivery device.
(ii) "Personal delivery device operator" does not include:
(A) with respect to a delivery or other service rendered by a personal delivery device, the person who requests the delivery or service;
or (B) a person who only arranges for and dispatches a personal delivery device for a delivery or other service.
(2) An eligible entity may operate a personal delivery device so long as all of the following requirements are met:
(a) the personal delivery device is operated at a maximum speed of:
(i) 10 miles per hour when in a pedestrian area;
or (ii) 20 miles per hour on a highway in an area that is not a pedestrian area;
(b) the eligible entity maintains an insurance policy that includes general liability coverage of not less than $100,000 for damages arising from the operation of the personal delivery device by the eligible entity and any agent of the eligible entity;
and (c) the personal delivery device is equipped with all of the following:
Show all 187 changed lines (147 more)
- 3 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (i) a marker that clearly identifies the name and contact information of the eligible entity operating the personal delivery device and a unique identification number;
(ii) a braking system that enables the personal delivery device to come to a controlled stop;
and (iii) if the personal delivery device is being operated between sunset and sunrise, a light on both the front and rear of the personal delivery device that is visible on all sides of the personal delivery device in clear weather from a distance of at least 500 feet to the front and rear of the personal delivery device when directly in front of low beams of headlights on a motor vehicle.
(3) A personal delivery device operator may not allow a personal delivery device to do any of the following:
(a) fail to comply with traffic or pedestrian control devices and signals;
(b) unreasonably interfere with pedestrians or traffic;
or (c) transport hazardous material that is:
(i) regulated under 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 51, Transportation of Hazardous Material;
and (ii) required to be placarded under 49 C.F.R., Part 172, Subpart F, Placarding.
(4) (a) When operating on a highway, the personal delivery device:
(i) shall operate as close as practicable to the edge of the highway in the direction of authorized traffic movement;
and (ii) except as provided in Subsection (4)(b), may not travel in the main-traveled way.
(b) Notwithstanding Subsection (4)(a), a personal delivery device:
(i) if practical and with due regard for safety and traffic conditions may temporarily operate in the main- traveled way to avoid a parked car or other obstacle on the edge of the highway;
and (ii) shall return to the edge of the highway as described in Subsection (4)(a) as soon as conditions allow.
(c) Notwithstanding Subsections (4)(a) and (b), a personal delivery device may not operate on a:
(i) highway with a speed limit of 45 miles per hour or higher;
or (ii) limited access highway.
(5) A personal delivery device has the rights and obligations applicable to a pedestrian under the same circumstances, except that a personal delivery device shall yield the right-of-way to a pedestrian.
(6) A person may not operate a personal delivery device unless the person complies with this section.
(7) An eligible entity is responsible for both of the following:
- 4 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (a) a violation of this section that is committed by a personal delivery device operator operated for the benefit of the eligible entity;
and (b) any other circumstance, including a technological malfunction, in which a personal delivery device operates in a manner prohibited by Subsection (3).
(8) (a) Following discussions with and input from eligible entities, a local authority or political subdivision may reasonably regulate the operation of personal delivery devices on a highway or pedestrian area.
(b) This section does not affect the authority of a peace officer of a local authority or political subdivision to enforce the laws of this state relating to the operation of a personal delivery device.
(9) A violation of this section is an infraction.
41-26-102.1.41-26-102.1 .
{(a)}(1) {[}"ADS-dedicated "ADS-dedicated{]} "ADS-equipped} vehicle" means a vehicle:
(i){(a)}(a) designed to be operated {[exclusivelyexclusively ]} by a level four ADS or level five ADS for all trips within the given operational design domain limitations of the ADS, if any[.] ;
and (ii){(b)}(b) that conforms to all applicable U.S.
{(2)}(2) {(a)} "ADS-equipped vehicle" means a vehicle with a level three, level four, or level five ADS that is designed for:
(a) complete trips in driverless operation under routine or normal operating conditions within the vehicle's operationoperational design domain;
[(2)] (3)(3)(a) (a) "Automated driving system" or "ADS" means the hardware and software that are:
and (ii) {that conforms } conforming to all applicable U.S.
- 5 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (b) "Automated driving system" or "ADS" is used specifically to describe a level three, four,- or2 five- drivingEnrolled automationCopy system.S.B.
292 four, or five driving automation system.
[(5)] (6)(6)(a) (a) "Dispatch" means to place an ADS-equipped vehicle into service in driverless operation by engaging the ADS.
[(11)] (12)(12)(a) (a) "Dynamic driving task" means all of the real-time operational and tactical functions required to operate a motor vehicle in on-road traffic, including:
- 6 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (ii) longitudinal motion control through acceleration and deceleration;
and (vi)- enhancing3 conspicuity- withS.B. lighting, signaling, and gesturing.
292 Enrolled Copy (vi) enhancing conspicuity with lighting, signaling, and gesturing.
[(15)] (16)(16)(a) (a) "Human driver" means a natural person who performs in real-time all or part of the dynamic driving task.
[(16) "Level five automated driving system" or "level five ADS" means an ADS feature that has the capability to perform on a sustained basis the entire dynamic driving task under all conditions that can reasonably be managed by a human driver, as well as any maneuvers necessary to respond to a system failure, without any expectation that a human user will respond to a request to intervene.] [(17) "Level four automated driving system" or "level four ADS" means an ADS feature that, without any expectation that a human user will respond to a request to intervene, has:] - 7 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 [(a) the capability to perform on a sustained basis the entire dynamic driving task within its operational design domain;
or] [(ii) a system failure.] [(18) "Level three automated driving system" or "level three ADS" means an ADS feature that:]- [(a)4 has- theEnrolled capabilityCopy toS.B. perform on a sustained basis the entire dynamic driving task within its operational design domain;
and]292 [(b)that:] requires[(a) ahas fallback-ready user to operate the vehiclecapability after receiving a request to interveneperform oron in response to a systemsustained failure.]basis (16){(17)}the "Levelentire fivedynamic ADS" means a level five automated driving systemtask aswithin definedits inoperational SAEdesign Internationaldomain; Standard J3016_202104, "Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles," April 2021 edition, as adopted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
(17){(18)}and] [(b) requires a fallback-ready user to operate the vehicle after receiving a request to intervene or in response to a system failure.] (17) "Level fourfive ADS" means a level fourfive automated driving system as defined in SAE International Standard J3016_202104, "Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles," April 2021 edition, as adopted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
(18){(19)}(18) "Level threefour ADS" means a level threefour automated driving system as defined in SAE International Standard J3016_202104, "Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles," April 2021 edition, as adopted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
(19){(20)}(19) "Level twothree DAS"ADS" means a level twothree drivingautomated automationdriving system as defined in SAE International Standard J3016_202104, "Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles," April 2021 edition, as adopted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
[(19)](20) (20){(21)}"Level "Minimaltwo riskDAS" condition" means a conditionlevel totwo whichdriving aautomation usersystem oras andefined ADSin maySAE bringInternational aStandard motorJ3016_202104, vehicle"Taxonomy inand orderDefinitions for Terms Related to reduceDriving theAutomation riskSystems offor aOn-Road crashMotor whenVehicles," aApril given2021 tripedition, cannotas oradopted shouldby notthe beNational completed.Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
-[(19)] 8(21) -"Minimal SB0292risk comparedcondition" withmeans SB0292S02a [(20)]condition (21){(22)}to "Objectwhich anda eventuser detectionor andan response"ADS meansmay bring a motor vehicle in order to reduce the subtasksrisk of thea dynamiccrash drivingwhen taska thatgiven include:trip cannot or should not be completed.
[(20)] (22) "Object and event detection and response" means the subtasks of the dynamic driving task that include:
[(21)] (22){(23)}(23) "On-demand autonomous vehicle network" means a transportation service network that uses a software application or other digital means to dispatch or otherwise enable the prearrangement of transportation with motor vehicles that have a level four or five ADS in driverless operation for purposes of transporting persons, including for-hire transportation and transportation for compensation.
[(22)] (23){(24)}(24) "Operate" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-1a-102.
[(23)]- (24){(25)}5 "Operational- designS.B. domain" means the operating conditions under which a given ADS or feature thereof is specifically designed to function, including:
292 Enrolled Copy [(23)] (25) "Operational design domain" means the operating conditions under which a given ADS or feature thereof is specifically designed to function, including:
[(24)] (25){(26)}(26) "Operator" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-6a-102.
[(25)] (26){(27)}(27) "Passenger" means a user on board a vehicle who has no role in the operation of that vehicle.
[(26)] (27){(28)}(28) "Person" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-6a-102.
[(27)] (28){(29)}(29) "Remote driver" means a human driver with a valid driver license who is not located in a position to manually exercise in-vehicle braking, accelerating, steering, or transmission gear selection input devices, but operates the vehicle.
[(28)] (29){(30)}(30) "Request to intervene" means the notification by an ADS to a fallback-ready user indicating that the fallback-ready user should promptly begin or resume operation of the vehicle.
[(29)] (31) {"Sustained"Sustained operation of a motor vehicle" means the performance of part or all of the dynamic driving task both between and across external events, including response to external events and continued performance of part or all of the dynamic driving task in the absence of external events.]}events. [(30)] (32) "System failure" means a malfunction in a driving automation system or other vehicle system that prevents the ADS from reliably performing the portion of the dynamic driving task on a sustained basis, including the complete dynamic driving task[, that the ADS would otherwise perform].
-[(30)] 9(32) -"System SB0292failure" comparedmeans witha SB0292S02malfunction [(31)]in (33)a "User"driving meansautomation a:system or other vehicle system that prevents the ADS from reliably performing the portion of the dynamic driving task on a sustained basis, including the complete dynamic driving task[, that the ADS would otherwise perform].
[(31)] (33) "User" means a:
41-26-104.41-26-104 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) When an ADS is operating a motor vehicle, the ADS is the operator, and shall satisfy electronically all physical acts required by a conventional driver in operation of the vehicle.
(b)- The6 ADS- isEnrolled responsibleCopy forS.B. the compliant operation of the vehicle and is not required to be licensed to operate the vehicle.
(2)292 (a)(b) IfThe a vehicle with an engaged level three ADS issues a request to intervene, the ADS is responsible for the compliant operation of the vehicle untiland disengagementis ofnot required to be licensed to operate the ADS.vehicle.
(2)(a) If a vehicle with an engaged level three ADS issues a request to intervene, the ADS is responsible for the compliant operation of the vehicle until disengagement of the ADS.
(3) The ADS is responsible for compliant operation of an [ADS-dedicated{][ADS-dedicated ADS-equipped} vehicle] ADS-equipped vehicle when the ADS is engaged.
63I-1-278.63I-1-278 .
- 10 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (6) In Section 78B-6-702, the following definitions are repealed on July 1, 2030:
(7) Subsections 78B-6-703(3) and (4), related to product defects for automated driving systems, isare repealed on July 1, 2030.
Section 478B-4-901 is enacted to read:
78B-4-901.Part 9.
Definitions.
9.
- 7 - S.B.
292 Enrolled Copy 78B-4-901 .
Definitions.
(1){(2)}(2) "ADS-equipped vehicle" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
(2){(3)}(3) "Automated driving system" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
(3){(4)}(4) "Developer" means a person that designs, creates, or produces the software or algorithms that constitute an automated driving system.
(4){(5)}(5) "Driverless operation" means the operation of a motor vehicle exclusively by a level four or level five automated driving system.
(5){(6)}(6) {"Fallback-ready user} "Dynamic driving task" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
{(6) {"Human driver" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.} } (7) "Level five ADS" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
{(9)(9) {"Level three ADS" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.} } {(10) {"Level two DAS" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.} } (11){(9)} "Manufacturer" means a person that manufactures, assembles, or produces an ADS-equipped vehicle or the hardware components of an automated driving system.
-(10) 11 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (12){(10)} "Noneconomic loss" means nonpecuniary harm that results from an injury or loss to a person or property, including:
(13){(11)}(11) {"Request to intervene} "Operational design domain" means the same as that term is defined in Section 41-26-102.1.
Section 578B-4-902 is enacted to read:
78B-4-902.78B-4-902 .
(1) Subject to Subsections (2), (3)(3), , and (4), in an action relating to an ADS-equipped vehicleorvehicle or an ADS-dedicated vehicle, the amount of the award for noneconomic losses, if any, may not exceed {$450,000} $1,000,000.
(3) In an action relating to {an ADS-equipped vehicle} a level four ADS or level five ADS under this chapter, punitive damages may not be awarded.
(4)- For8 a- claimEnrolled broughtCopy underS.B. Section 78B-4-903, the recoverable amount may not exceed the amount described in Subsection {78B-4-903(1)(e)} 78B-4-903(1)(c).
292 (4) For a claim brought under Section 78B-4-903, the recoverable amount may not exceed the amount described in Subsection 78B-4-903(1)(c).
Section 678B-4-903 is enacted to read:
78B-4-903.78B-4-903 .
(1)(1)(a) (a) This section applies only to an incident that occurred {while } related to an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle {operated in driverless operation} that is equipped with a level four ADS or level five ADS while the automated driving system is engaged and performing the entire dynamic driving task.
(b) This section does not apply to an incident that involves any driving assistance or task not performed by {an ADS-equipped vehicle while } the automated driving systemsystem. {is operating} .
-(c) 12 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 {(c) {An action brought under this section is the exclusive civil remedy for injury or property damage arising out of the driverless operation of an ADS-equipped vehicle.} } {(d) {A plaintiff who brings an action under this section may not bring, plead, or maintain any other civil action or theory of recovery, including negligence, strict liability, or product liability, against any defendant for the same injury or property damage.} } (e){(c)} Notwithstanding Section 78B-4-902 and any other provision of law, the total amount recoverable by a plaintiff under this section, including all damages, costs, and fees, may not exceed {$50,000} $100,000.
(f){(d)}(d) A prevailing plaintiff may recover compensatory damages available under this section, subject to the limitation described in Subsection {(1)(e)} (1)(c).
(2)(2)(a) (a) A person who suffers injury or property damage directly caused by an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle {operating in driverless operation } that is equipped with a level four ADS or level five ADS while the automated driving system is engaged and performing the entire dynamic driving task has a right of action under this section.
(b) {An } A person who suffers injury or property damage directly caused by an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle {operating in driverless operation } that is equipped with a level four ADS or level five ADS while the automated driving system is engaged and performing the entire dynamic driving task may bring an action against:
(a) the {vehicle } automated driving system was {in driverless operation } engaged at the time of the incident;
and (b) the {driverless operation } automated driving system was a proximate cause of the injury or property damage.- 9 - S.B.
-292 13Enrolled -Copy SB0292damage. compared with SB0292S02 (4) Any liability established under this section may be mitigated in proportion to the degree that the claimant's {own } or a third party's negligence, recklessness, or breach of duty of care contributed to the occurrence of the incident or the resulting harm.
(4) Any liability established under this section may be mitigated in proportion to the degree that the claimant's or a third party's negligence, recklessness, or breach of duty of care contributed to the occurrence of the incident or the resulting harm.
Section 778B-4-904 is enacted to read:
78B-4-904.78B-4-904 .
(1) A manufacturer or developer of a level four ADS or level five ADS is not subject to liability under a theory of negligence for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from the operation of an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle equipped with level four ADS or level five ADS while {operating in driverless operation} the automated driving system is engaged.
(2) A manufacturer or developer of a level four ADS or level five ADS may be held liable for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from the operation of an {ADS-dedicated } automated driving system of an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle only under:
Section 8 is enacted to read:
78B-4-905.
Liability related to operation of level two and level three driving automation systems -- Affirmative defense.
(1) This section applies to an incident involving a driving automation system operating with:
- 14 - SB0292 compared with SB0292S02 (a) a level two DAS;
or (b) a level three ADS.
(2) (a) In an action for personal injury or property damage arising from the operation of a vehicle equipped with a level three ADS, a defendant may assert an affirmative defense that:
(i) the driving automation system issued a request to intervene to the human driver;
and (ii) the human driver:
(A) was inattentive, negligent, or reckless;
(B) failed to maintain reasonable oversight of the operation of the vehicle;
or (C) failed to timely respond to the request to intervene.
(b) In an action for personal injury or property damage arising from the operation of a vehicle equipped with a level two DAS, a defendant may assert an affirmative defense that the human driver:
(i) was inattentive, negligent, or reckless;
or (ii) failed to maintain reasonable vigilance over the operation of the vehicle.
(3) An affirmative defense under Subsection (2) is established if the defendant proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the human driver's conduct described in Subsection (2)(b) was a proximate cause of the incident.
(4) Subject to Subsection (5), nothing in this section:
(a) limits the application of comparative fault under Section 78B-5-818;
or (b) alters the duties of a human driver imposed under Title 41, Chapter 6a, Traffic Code.
(5) In an action for personal injury or property damage arising from the operation of a vehicle equipped with a level two DAS or level three ADS, the limitations on noneconomic and punitive damages outlined in Section 78B-4-902 apply.
(6) This section does not create a new cause of action and may not be construed to expand or limit existing theories of liability except as expressly provided in this section.
Section 8.
78B-6-702.78B-6-702 .
[ As used in this part, "unreasonably dangerous" means that the product was dangerous to an extent beyond which would be contemplated by the ordinary and prudent buyer, consumer, or user of that product in that community considering the product's characteristics, propensities, risks, dangers, and uses together with any actual knowledge, - 1510 - SB0292Enrolled comparedCopy withS.B. SB0292S02 training, or experience possessed by that particular buyer, user, or consumer.] As used in this part:
292 dangerous to an extent beyond which would be contemplated by the ordinary and prudent buyer, consumer, or user of that product in that community considering the product's characteristics, propensities, risks, dangers, and uses together with any actual knowledge, training, or experience possessed by that particular buyer, user, or consumer.] As used in this part:
78B-6-703.78B-6-703 .
(1) In any action for damages for personal injury, death, or property damage allegedly caused by a defect in a product other than an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicledescribedvehicle described in Subsections (3) and (4), a product may not be considered to have a defect or to be in a defective condition, unless at the time the product was sold by the manufacturer or other initial seller, there was a defect or defective condition in the product which made the product unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer.
(3) In any action for damages for personal injury, death, or property damage allegedly caused by a defect in the automated driving system operation of a level four ADS or level five ADS of an ADS- equipped vehicleor an ADS-dedicated vehicle, the {ADS-equipped vehicle } automated driving - 1611 - SB0292S.B. compared with SB0292S02 system may not be considered to have a defect or to be in a defective condition, unless the plaintiff proves by {clear and convincing } a preponderance of the evidence that:
(a)292 aEnrolled reasonableCopy andlevel feasiblefive alternativeADS designof existedan atADS-equipped thevehicle timeor an ADS-dedicated vehicle, the {ADS-equippedautomated vehicledriving }system levelmay fournot ADSbe considered to have a defect or levelto fivebe ADSin wasa designeddefective andcondition, manufactured;unless the plaintiff proves by a preponderance of the evidence that:
(a) a reasonable and feasible alternative design existed at the time the level four ADS or level five ADS was designed and manufactured;
(4) There is a rebuttable presumption that {an ADS-equipped vehicle } a level four ADS or level five ADS is free from any defect or defective condition if the automated driving system:
Section 1078B-6-708 is enacted to read:
78B-6-708.78B-6-708 .
In an action based upon defective design, manufacture, or failure to warn related to {an } the automated driving system of an ADS-dedicated vehicle or an ADS-equipped vehicle that is {ADS-equipped vehicle } equipped with a level four ADS or level five ADS brought against the manufacturer or {developer of the automated driving } developer of the automated driving system, liability is precluded if:
Effective date.
3-4-26 12:18 PM - 1712 -
Show all 187 changed rows (147 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- Enrolled View text Current pdf
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Governor Signed
-
Senate/ to Governor
-
Senate/ received enrolled bill from Printing
-
Senate/ enrolled bill to Printing
-
Enrolled Bill Returned to House or Senate
-
Draft of Enrolled Bill Prepared
-
Bill Received from Senate for Enrolling
-
Senate/ signed by President/ sent for enrolling
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ signed by Speaker/ returned to Senate
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ concurs with House amendment
-
Senate/ placed on Concurrence Calendar
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ Rules to 3rd Reading Calendar
-
House/ 3rd Reading Calendar to Rules [House Rules Committee]
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292S02
-
House/ to standing committee [House Economic Development and Workforce Services Committee]
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ passed 3rd reading
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 3rd reading
-
Senate/ passed 2nd reading
-
Senate/ substituted
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292S01
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292S01
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0292
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0292
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0292
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0292
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Jordan D. Teuscher · Cosponsor
- Kirk A. Cullimore · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Kirk A. Cullimore Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Jordan D. Teuscher Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 292?
- SB 292 is sponsored by Jordan D. Teuscher (Republican) and Kirk A. Cullimore (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 292?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 12, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 292?
- Track SB 292 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 292
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 292
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →