HJR 15 — Joint Resolution Amending Court Rules to Address Sanctions and Dismissals
Last action — House/ filed
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 21, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Odds of enactment
Moderate chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 R).
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
155 added · 148 removedPlain-language change summary
In the updated version of HJR 15, new provisions were added that allow courts in Utah to impose sanctions in the form of charitable contributions. Additionally, it now permits defendants to request the dismissal of a case if they are named solely for representing another party. These changes aim to provide more flexibility in legal proceedings and could help reduce frivolous lawsuits, making the judicial process more efficient.
02-11HJR015S01 16:31compared 1stwith Sub.HJR015 {Omitted text} shows text that was in HJR015 but was omitted in HJR015S01 inserted text shows text that was not in HJR015 but was inserted into HJR015S01 DISCLAIMER:
(Buff)This H.J.R.document is provided to assist you in your comparison of the two bills.
15Sometimes Anthonythis E.automated comparison will NOT be completely accurate.
LoubetTherefore, proposesyou theneed followingto substituteread bill:the actual bills.
This automatically generated document could contain inaccuracies caused by:
limitations of the compare program;
bad input data;
or other causes.
Loubet Senate Sponsor:Sponsor:Brady Brammer 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
Brady Brammer 3 LONG TITLE General Description:
H None J R Other Special Clauses:
10 This resolution provides a special effective date.
s1 SHJR015 compared with HJR015S01 Utah Rules of Civil Procedure Affected:
u AMENDS:
bRule .11 , Utah Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 , Utah Rules of Civil Procedure Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah, two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses voting in favor thereof:
RuleAs 11,provided in Utah RulesConstitution Article VIII, Section 4, the Legislature may amend rules of Civilprocedure Procedureand Hevidence Ruleadopted 41,by the Utah RulesSupreme Court upon a two-thirds vote of Civilall Proceduremembers Jof .both houses of the Legislature:
R Be it resolved by the Legislature of the state of Utah, two-thirds of all members elected to each of the two houses voting in favor thereof:
5 As provided in Utah Constitution Article VIII, Section 4, the Legislature may amend rules of procedure and evidence adopted by the Utah Supreme Court upon a two-thirds vote of all members of both houses of the Legislature:
1stRule Sub.11.
(Buff) H.J.R.
15 02-11 16:31 Rule 11 .
(a) Signature.
(b)By Representationspresenting a pleading, written motion, or other paper to court.the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or advocating), an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances[,]:
By presenting a pleading, written motion, or other paper to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or advocating), an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances[,] :
[(b)](2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions are warranted by existing law - 2 - HJR015 compared with HJR015S01 or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law;
(c) Sanctions.
[(c)](1)A Howmotion initiated.for sanctions under this rule must be made separately from other motions or requests and must describe the specific conduct alleged to violate paragraph (b).
[(c)(1)](A) By motion.
A motion for sanctions under this rule must be made separately - 2 - 02-11 16:31 1st Sub.
(Buff) H.J.R.
15 from other motions or requests and must describe the specific conduct alleged to violate paragraph (b).
[(c)(1)](B) On court's initiative.
[(c)](2)(A) NatureA sanction imposed for violation of sanction;this rule must be limited to what is sufficient {[Subject } to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated.[Subject to the limitations in paragraphs (c)(2)(A) and (c)(2)(B), the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorney fees and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.] - 3 - HJR015 compared with HJR015S01 (B) Subject to the limitations described in paragraphs (c)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(D), the court may order a sanction that consists of, or includes:
limitations.
(A) A sanction imposed for violation of this rule must be limited to what is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated.[ Subject to the limitations in paragraphs (c)(2)(A) and (c)(2)(B), the sanction may consist of, or include, directives of a nonmonetary nature, an order to pay a penalty into court, or, if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence, an order directing payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorney fees and other expenses incurred as a direct result of the violation.] (B) Subject to the limitations described in paragraphs (c)(2)(C) and (c)(2)(D), the court may order a sanction that consists of, or includes:
(iii) an order to pay a charitable contribution to a nonprofit organization that offers free or low-cost legal assistance,assistance{; is approved by the court, and is not operating under the authority or direct control of the Judiciary;
or} , is approved by the court, and is not operating under the authority or direct control of the Judiciary;
[(c)(2)(A)][(c)(2)(A)](C)[Monetary (C) [Monetary sanctions may not be awarded]awarded]A A court may not award monetary sanctions against a represented party for a violation of paragraph (b)(2).
[(c)(2)(B)][(c)(2)(B)](D)[Monetary (D) [Monetary sanctions may not be awarded]awarded]A A court may not award monetary sanctions on the court's initiative unless the court issues its order to show cause before a voluntary dismissal or settlement of the claims made by or against the party which is, -or 3whose -attorneys 1stare, Sub.to be sanctioned.
(Buff) H.J.R.
Show all 61 changed lines (21 more)
15 02-11 16:31 or whose attorneys are, to be sanctioned.
[(c)](3) Order.
Rule 4141. .
(a) Voluntary dismissal;
effect.
(1) By the plaintiff.
(2) By court order.
If a defendant has pleaded a counterclaim before being served with the plaintiff's - 4 - HJR015 compared with HJR015S01 motion to dismiss, the action may be dismissed over the defendant's objection only if the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court.
(b) Involuntary dismissal;
effect.
(c) Dismissal of counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim.
A claimant's voluntary dismissal under paragraph (a)(1) must be made before a responsive pleading is served or, if -there 4is -no 02-11responsive 16:31pleading, 1stbefore Sub.evidence is introduced at a trial or hearing.
(Buff) H.J.R.
15 there is no responsive pleading, before evidence is introduced at a trial or hearing.
(d) Costs of previously-dismissed action.
and (B) the court determines, by {clear and convincing } a preponderance of the evidence:
(i) the action or claim against the defendant was frivolous or {of little weight or } has no reasonable {importance having no } basis in law or fact;
and (ii) the plaintiff, or the plaintiff's attorney, {lacked an honest belief that } brought the action or claim to harass, - 5 - HJR015 compared with HJR015S01 {or defense against the defendant was proper, intended to take unconscionable advantage of {another by bringing the action or claim, or intended to, or acted with, the knowledge that the } action or claim would hinder, delay, or defraud another.} cause unreasonable delay, needlessly increase the cost of litigation, or abuse the judicial process.
(e) Bond or undertaking to be delivered to opposing party.
Effective Date.date.
2-11-26 4:31 PM - 56 -
Show all 61 changed rows (21 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
House/ filed
-
House/ received from Senate
-
Senate/ to House
-
Senate/ strike enacting clause
-
Senate/ 2nd Reading Calendar to Rules [Senate Rules Committee]
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received from House
-
House/ to Senate
-
House/ passed 3rd reading
-
House/ 3rd reading
-
House/ 2nd reading
-
House/ comm rpt/ substituted [House Rules Committee]
-
House Comm - Favorable Recommendation [House Rules Committee]
-
House Comm - Substitute Recommendation [House Rules Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR015S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HJR015S01
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HJR015S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HJR015S01
-
House/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for HJR015
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for HJR015
-
House/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
House/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for HJR015
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for HJR015
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Brady Brammer · Cosponsor
- Anthony E. Loubet · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 102 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Anthony E. Loubet Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Brady Brammer Republican
Not signed on (102)
102 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 102 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HJR 15?
- HJR 15 is sponsored by Brady Brammer (Republican) and Anthony E. Loubet (Republican).
- What is the current status of HJR 15?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced January 21, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track HJR 15?
- Track HJR 15 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HJR 15
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HJR 15
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →