Law Enforcement Usage of Unmarked Vehicles
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 262 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 262.
You're tracking SB 262
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 262 — Law Enforcement Usage of Unmarked Vehicles
Last action — Senate/ filed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 06, 2026. It awaits signature.
Next likely step: the executive signs it into law or issues a veto.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
To Executive
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
18 added · 30 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of Bill SB 262 now specifically prohibits law enforcement officers from using unmarked vehicles to stop drivers for certain minor traffic infractions. This change is important because it aims to increase transparency and safety during traffic stops, ensuring that drivers can easily recognize law enforcement vehicles. Additionally, the revised bill clarifies the definitions and restrictions related to these unmarked vehicles, which may help reduce confusion about their use in traffic enforcement.
SB0262S03 compared with SB0262S01SB0262 {Omitted text} shows text that was in SB0262S01SB0262 but was omitted in SB0262S03 inserted text shows text that was not in SB0262S01SB0262 but was inserted into SB0262S03 DISCLAIMER:
None S Other Special Clauses:
B None 6S B Utah Code Sections Affected:
2 S ENACTS:
16 SB0262S01SB0262 compared with SB0262S03 77-7-28 , Utah Code Annotated 1953 Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
{7.Arrests and Citations, By Whom, and How Made (1) As used in this section:
} Arrests and Citations, By Whom, and How Made (1) As used in this section:
or}or } } {(B) {other lights commonly used by a law enforcement agency;
or} } {(c) {issuing a warning for a traffic infraction.} } (3) {An employee of a } A law enforcement agency may use an unmarked law enforcement {vehiclevehicle to{to initiate a stop of a } vehicle for {athe trafficpurpose infractionof ifinvestigating thea employeepotential ofcrime theother lawthan enforcementa agency}traffic :infraction.} for:
{(a)(a) {believes,an inassignment additionfor toan theemployee trafficof infraction,a law enforcement agency that exigentis circumstancesmeant orto anaddress imminenta riskdocumented tospecific publictraffic safetyissue exists;within a community;
or} } - 2 - SB0262S01SB0262 compared with SB0262S03 {(b)(b) {subject to Subsection (4), observes a trafficpublic violationsafety andoperation has reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity apart from the traffic violation is occurringmeant orto hasaddress occurred.} } {(4) {Under the circumstances described in Subsection (3)(b):} } {(a) {the traffic violationviolations maybased serveon: as the lawful basis for the stop;} } {(b) {the failure of the employee of the law enforcement agency to obtain evidence to support probable cause for the suspected additional criminal conduct does not render the stop unlawful under this section;
and} } (c){(a)} {the } an assignment for an employee of {the } a law enforcement agency {may not } that is meant to address a documented specific traffic issue {a citation for the traffic infraction.} within a community;
(b) a public safety operation that is meant to address traffic violations based on:
Effective Date.
View plain text versions (7)
- Comparison to Original Bill View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #1 View text pdf
- Comparison to Sub #2 View text Current pdf
- Substitute Substitute #1 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #2 pdf
- Substitute Substitute #3 pdf
- Introduced View text pdf
Action History
-
Senate/ filed
-
Senate/ strike enacting clause
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0262S03
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262S03
-
Senate/ filed
-
Senate/ failed
-
Senate/ substituted
-
Senate/ uncircled
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0262S03
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0262S03
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0262S02
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262S02
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0262S02
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0262S02
-
Senate/ circled
-
Senate/ 2nd reading
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0262S01
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0262
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262S01
-
Senate/ placed on 2nd Reading Calendar
-
Senate/ committee report favorable [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate Comm - Favorable Recommendation [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262S01
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0262S01
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0262S01
-
Senate/ received fiscal note from Fiscal Analyst
-
LFA/ fiscal note publicly available for SB0262
-
Senate Comm - Not Considered [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
LFA/ fiscal note sent to sponsor for SB0262
-
Senate/ to standing committee [Senate Judiciary, Law Enforcement, and Criminal Justice Committee]
-
Senate/ 1st reading (Introduced)
-
Senate/ received bill from Legislative Research
-
LFA/ bill sent to agencies for fiscal input for SB0262
-
LFA/ bill assigned to staff for fiscal analysis for SB0262
-
Numbered Bill Publicly Distributed
-
Bill Numbered but not Distributed
Sponsors
- Daniel McCay · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 103 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Daniel McCay Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (103)
103 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 103 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 262?
- SB 262 is sponsored by Daniel McCay (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 262?
- This bill has been sent to the executive. Introduced February 06, 2026. It awaits signature.
- Where can I track SB 262?
- Track SB 262 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 262
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 262
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →