Relating to the authority of the legislature or a state court to declare certain federal actions to be unco...
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 78 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 78.
You're tracking HB 78
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 78 — Relating to the authority of the legislature or a state court to declare certain federal actions to be unconstitutional federal actions, including the effect and enforcement of such a declaration.
Last action — Filed
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced August 15, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
Not enough signal yet to read this bill's trajectory — we surface a likelihood only once there's real movement (stage, sponsorship, committee, or votes) to point to.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
- Introduced View text Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
This bill amends 1 section(s) of the Texas statutes: Section 37.0056, Civil Practice and Remedies Code.
-
CHAPTER 394. ENFORCEMENT OF UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION Sec. 394.001. DEFINITIONS. In this chapter: (1) "Committee" means the Joint Legislative Committee on Constitutional Enforcement. (2) "Federal action" includes: (A) a federal law; (B) a federal agency rule, policy, or standard; (C) an executive order of the president of the United States; (D) an order or decision of a federal court; and (E) the making or enforcing of a treaty. (3) "Unconstitutional federal action" means a federal action enacted, adopted, or implemented without authority specifically delegated to the federal government by the people and the states through the United States Constitution. Sec. 394.002. JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTIONAL ENFORCEMENT. (a) The Joint Legislative Committee on Constitutional Enforcement is established as a permanent joint committee of the legislature. The committee is established to review federal actions that challenge the sovereignty of the state and of the people for the purpose of determining if the federal action is unconstitutional. (b) The committee consists of the following 12 members: (1) six members of the house of representatives appointed by the speaker of the house; and (2) six members of the senate appointed by the lieutenant governor. (c) Not more than four house members of the committee may be members of the political party whose members constitute a majority of the membership of the house. Not more than four senate members of the committee may be members of the political party whose members constitute a majority of the membership of the senate. (d) Members of the committee serve two-year terms beginning with the convening of each regular legislative session. (e) If a vacancy occurs on the committee, the appropriate appointing officer shall appoint a member of the house or senate, as appropriate, to serve for the remainder of the unexpired term. (f) The speaker of the house and the lieutenant governor shall each designate one member of the committee as a joint chair of the committee. (g) The committee shall meet at the call of either joint chair. (h) A majority of the members of the committee constitutes a quorum. Sec. 394.003. COMMITTEE REVIEW OF FEDERAL ACTION. (a) The committee may review any federal action to determine whether the action is an unconstitutional federal action. (b) When reviewing a federal action, the committee shall consider the plain reading and reasoning of the text of the United States Constitution and the understood definitions at the time of the framing and construction of the Constitution by our forefathers before making a final declaration of constitutionality, as demonstrated by: (1) the ratifying debates in the several states; (2) the understanding of the leading participants at the constitutional convention; (3) the understanding of the doctrine in question by the constitutions of the several states in existence at the time the United States Constitution was adopted; (4) the understanding of the United States Constitution by the first United States Congress; (5) the opinions of the first chief justice of the United States Supreme Court; (6) the background understanding of the doctrine in question under the English Constitution of the time; and (7) the statements of support for natural law and natural rights by the framers and the philosophers admired by the framers. (c) Not later than the 180th day after the date the committee holds its first public hearing to review a specific federal action, the committee shall vote to determine whether the action is an unconstitutional federal action. (d) The committee may determine that a federal action is an unconstitutional federal action by majority vote. Sec. 394.004. LEGISLATIVE DETERMINATION. (a) If the committee determines that a federal action is an unconstitutional federal action, the committee shall report the determination to the house of representatives and to the senate during: (1) the current session of the legislature if the
amended
-
Section 37.0056, Civil Practice and Remedies Code
Sec. 37.0056. DECLARATIONS RELATING TO UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. (a) In this section, "federal action" and "unconstitutional federal action" have the meanings assigned by Section 394.001, Government Code. (b) Any court in this state has original jurisdiction of a proceeding seeking a declaratory judgment that a federal action effective in this state is an unconstitutional federal action. (c) A person is entitled to declaratory relief if the court determines that a federal action is an unconstitutional federal action. (d) In determining whether to grant declaratory relief to a person under this section, a court: (1) may not rely solely on the decisions of other courts interpreting the United States Constitution; and (2) must rely on the plain meaning of the text of the United States Constitution and any applicable constitutional doctrine as understood by the framers of the constitution. (e) Section 37.008 does not apply to relief sought under this section.
added
Action History
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Cecil Bell · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 78?
- HB 78 is sponsored by Cecil Bell.
- What is the current status of HB 78?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced August 15, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB 78?
- Track HB 78 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 78
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 78
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →