HB 5307 — AN ACT CONCERNING PRICE GOUGING.
Last action — FILE NO. 697
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
147 added · 11 removed147 line(s) added, 11 removed.
GeneralHouse Assemblyof SubstituteRepresentatives BillFile No.
5307697 General Assembly January Session, 20212021(Reprint ANof ACTFile CONCERNINGNos. PRICE GOUGING.
3 and 628) Substitute House Bill No.
5307 As Amended by House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 20, 2021 AN ACT CONCERNING PRICE GOUGING.
and (3) "Unconscionably excessive price" means (A) the amount charged by the seller represents a gross disparity between (i) the price for which anitemwassold,rentedsHB5307 or/ leasedimmediatelyFile prior totheprecipitating event and when the precipitating event was reasonably anticipated, and (ii) the price for which such item is being sold, rented or leased during the period in which such precipitating event is in effect, and (B) the amount charged by the seller is not attributable to additional costs LCO \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05307-R031 of 2 HB.docx Substitute Bill No.
5307697 incurredsHB5307 byFile theNo. seller in connection with the sale, rental or lease of an item.
697 anitemwassold,rented or leasedimmediately prior totheprecipitating event or when the precipitating event was reasonably anticipated, and (ii) the price for which such item is being sold, rented or leased during the period in which such precipitating event is in effect, and (B) the amount charged by the seller is not attributable to additional costs incurred by the seller in connection with the sale, rental or lease of an item.
The Attorney General shall have exclusive authority to enforce any violation of the provisions of this section.
Section 1 October 1, 2021 42-230 JUDsHB5307 Joint/ FavorableFile Subst.No.
APP697 JointsHB5307 FavorableFile LCONo. {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05307- 2 of 2 R03-HB.docx }
697 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential See Below See Below Revenue Gain Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill defines price gouging during declared emergencies and expands the price gouging law resulting in a potential revenue gain to the state described below.
The bill may result in a revenue gain to the resources of the General Fund, to the extent the Office of Attorney General brings actions in Court for violations of the bill’s provisions.
The extent of any revenue gain would depend on the number of cases brought by the Attorney General subject to the $99 fine.
House "A" specifies that the Attorney General shall have the exclusive authority to enforce any violation in the bill which eliminates the potential cost to the Department of Consumer Protection and the State Comptroller.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of violations.
sHB5307 / File No.
697 3 sHB5307 File No.
697 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5307 (as amended by House "A")* AN ACT CONCERNING PRICE GOUGING.
SUMMARY Thisbilldefinesprice gouging during specifieddeclared emergencies ascharginganunconscionablyexcessiveprice (i.e.,apricethatisgrossly different from the price before the emergency and that is not the result of additional acquisition costs).
It also expands the price gouging law’s application beyond the retail sale of consumer goods to other supply chain transactions (e.g., wholesale) and to rental and lease transactions.
The bill correspondingly extends existing law’s price gouging enforcement provisions to the expanded definition.
By law, price gouging law violators are subject to a fine of up to $99 and deemed to have committed an unfair trade or deceptive practice (see BACKGROUND).
The bill specifies that the attorney general has exclusive authority to enforce the bill’s provisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2021 *House Amendment “A” adds the provision making the attorney general responsible for enforcement and clarifies the definition of “unconscionably excessive price.” APPLICABILITY TO ADDITIONAL TRANSACTIONS Under current law, the price gouging law only applies to retail sales;
it does not cover wholesale or supply chain transactions.
The bill extends the prohibition on price gouging to manufacturers, suppliers, wholesalers, and distributors (referred to as “sellers”).
The bill also extends the prohibition on price gouging to rental or sHB5307 / File No.
697 4 sHB5307 File No.
697 lease transactions;
currently, it applies only to sales.
PRICE GOUGING DEFINITION Current law prohibits sellers from increasing the price of any item sold at retail in a location subject to certain emergency declarations while the declaration is in effect, except if the seller can justify doing so as a price fluctuation that occurs during the normal course of business.
The bill replaces this general provision with more specific provisions defining what constitutes prohibited price gouging behavior.
The bill’s prohibition applies during the same emergency declarations as current law (which the bill calls “precipitating events,” see BACKGROUND).
Show all 66 changed lines (26 more)
Under the bill, price gouging is selling, renting, or leasing an item, or offering to do so, at an amount that represents an “unconscionably excessive price.” An “unconscionably excessive price” means that the amount charged:
1.
represents a gross disparity between (A) the price for which an item was sold, rented, or leased immediately prior to the precipitating event and when the precipitating event was reasonably anticipated or (B) the price for which such item is being sold, rented, or leased during the period in which such precipitating event is in effect and 2.
is not attributable to additional costs the seller incurred in connection with the item’s sale, rental, or lease.
BACKGROUND Legislative History The House referred the bill (File 3) to the Judiciary Committee, which reported a substitute that eliminates the provision specifying that the venue for the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) actions brought on the state’s behalf is the Hartford judicial district.
Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA) The law prohibits businesses from engaging in unfair and deceptive sHB5307 / File No.
697 5 sHB5307 File No.
697 acts or practices.
CUTPA allows the consumer protection commissioner to issue regulations defining what constitutes an unfair trade practice, investigate complaints, issue cease and desist orders, order restitution in cases involving less than $10,000, enter into consent agreements, ask the attorney general to seek injunctive relief, and accept voluntary statements of compliance.
It also allows individuals to sue.
Courts may issue restraining orders;
award actual and punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees;
and impose civil penalties of up to $5,000 for willful violations and $25,000 for a restraining order violation.
Precipitating Events Precipitating events are:
1.
emergencies declared by the governor immediately before or during a serious disaster or enemy attack, sabotage, or other hostile action within Connecticut or a neighboring state (CGS § 28-1(7));
2.
statewide or regional transportation emergencies declared by the governor during a substantial disruption in the operation of a major transportation facility or service which endangers public health, safety, or welfare (CGS § 3-6b(a));
and 3.
major disaster or emergency declarations issued by the U.S.
President.
Other laws regulate price gouging during (1) a declared severe weather event emergency (CGS § 42-235) or supply emergency (CGS §§ 42-231 & 42-232) or (2) an announced abnormal energy resource market disruption (CGS § 42-234).
COMMITTEE ACTION General Law Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 19 Nay 0 (02/02/2021) sHB5307 / File No.
697 6 sHB5307 File No.
697 Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 26 Nay 13 (04/20/2021) Appropriations Committee Joint Favorable Yea 34 Nay 15 (05/10/2021) sHB5307 / File No.
697 7
Show all 66 changed rows (26 more)
View plain text versions (7)
- File No. 697 View text pdf
- APP Joint Favorable View text pdf
- File No. 628 View text pdf
- File No. 3 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute JUD Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
- Substitute GL Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
FILE NO. 697
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 447
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Appropriations
-
FILE NO. 628
-
TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Judiciary
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/28/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Judiciary
-
FILE NO. 3
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 39
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 02/24/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0128
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON General Law
Sponsors
- Larry B. Butler · Primary
- Chris Perone · Primary
- Liz Linehan · Primary
- Gary A. Turco · Primary
- Stephanie Thomas · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
- Hilda E. Santiago · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →7 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on
Sponsors (7)
- Larry B. Butler Democratic
- Perone, Chris
- Liz Linehan Democratic
- Gary A. Turco Democratic
- Thomas, Stephanie
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
- Hilda E. Santiago Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5307?
- HB 5307 is sponsored by Larry B. Butler (Democratic), Perone, Chris, Liz Linehan (Democratic), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Thomas, Stephanie, Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), and Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5307?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 5307?
- Track HB 5307 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5307
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5307
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →