Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 13 D · 11 R cosponsors

SB 989 — AN ACT CONCERNING ONLINE HARASSMENT.

Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2021. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 78% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 38 sponsors

    38 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (13 D · 11 R) — cross-party backing.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

136 added · 398 removed

136 line(s) added, 398 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
Substitute Senate Bill No.
612 January Session, 2021 Substitute Senate Bill No.
989 Public Act No.
989 Senate, April 26, 2021 The Committee on Judiciary reportedthrough SEN.
21-56 AN ACT CONCERNING ONLINE HARASSMENT.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING ONLINE HARASSMENT.
sSB989 / File No.
Sec.
612 1 sSB989 File No.
612 Sec.
[, "course of conduct"] (1) "Course of conduct" means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which a person directly, indirectly or through a third party, by any action, method, device or means, including, but not limited to, electronic or social media, [(1)] (A) follows, lies in wait for, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, communicates about or with or sends unwanted gifts to, a person, or [(2)] (B) interferes with a person's property;
[, "course of conduct"] Substitute Senate Bill No.
989 (1) "Course of conduct" means two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which a person directly, indirectly or through a third party, by any action, method, device or means, including, but not limited to, electronic or social media, [(1)] (A) follows, lies in wait for, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, harasses, communicates about or with or sends unwanted gifts to, a person, or [(2)] (B) interferes with a person's property;
[.] (3) "Personally identifying information" means:
[.] and (3) "Personally identifying information" means:
(A) Any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, such as name, prior legal name, alias, mother's maiden name, Social Security number, date or place of birth, address, phone number or biometric data;
(A) Any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual's identity, such as name, prior legal name, alias, mother's maiden name, Social Security number, date or place of birth, address, telephone number or biometric data;
or (C) Any other sensitive private information that is linked or linkable to a specific identifiable individual, such as gender identity, sexual orientation or any sexually intimate visual depiction;
or (C) Any other sensitive private information that is linked or linkable to a specific identifiable individual, such as gender identity, sexual orientation or any sexually intimate visual depiction.
and (4) "Serious inconvenience" means that a person significantly modifies the person's actions or routines in an attempt to avoid the actor or because of the actor's conduct.
"Serious inconvenience" includes, but is not limited to, changing a telephone number, changing an electronic mail address, deleting or meaningfully changing or significantly decreasing use of the Internet, moving from an established residence, sSB989 / File No.
612 2 sSB989 File No.
612 changing daily routines, changing routes to and from place of employment, changing employment or employment schedule or losing time from employment.
[or] (C) fear damage or destruction to or tampering with such specific person's property;
or (C) fear injury to or the death of an animal owned by or in possession and control of such specific person;
or (D) fear or injury to or the death of an animal owned by or in possession and control of such specific person;
Public Act No.
(2) Such person intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at or concerning a specific person that wouldcause a reasonable personto fearthat suchperson'semployment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact [at] to such other person's place of employment or business, including electronically, through video-teleconferencing or by digital media, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity;
21-56 2 of 5 Substitute Senate Bill No.
989 (2) Such person [intentionally] with intent to harass, terrorize or alarm, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in a course of conduct directed at or concerning a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear that such person's employment, business or career is threatened, where (A) such conduct consists of the actor telephoning to, appearing at or initiating communication or contact [at] to such other person's place of employment or business, including electronically, through video-teleconferencing or by digital media, provided the actor was previously and clearly informed to cease such conduct, and (B) such conduct does not consist of constitutionally protected activity;
(B) Fear damage or destruction to or tampering with the property owned by or in possession or control of the person;
or (B) Suffer emotional distress.
sSB989 / File No.
612 3 sSB989 File No.
612 (C) Suffer emotional distress;
or (D) Suffer serious inconvenience.
(a) A person is guilty of trafficking in personal identifying information when such person sells, gives or otherwise transfers personal identifying information, as defined in section 53a-129a or 53a- 181d, as amended by this act, of another person to a third person knowing that such information has been obtained without the authorization of such other person and that such third person intends to use such information for an unlawful purpose, including, but not limited to, a violation of section 53a-181d, as amended by this act.
(a) A person is guilty of trafficking in personal identifying information when such person sells, gives or otherwise transfers Public Act No.
21-56 3 of 5 Substitute Senate Bill No.
989 personal identifying information, as defined in section 53a-129a or 53a- 181d, as amended by this act, of another person to a third person knowing that such information has been obtained without the authorization of such other person and that such third person intends to use such information for an unlawful purpose, including, but not limited to, a violation of section 53a-181d, as amended by this act.
sSB989 / File No.
(b) An individual who is found liable under this section shall be jointly and severally liable with each other person, if any, who is found liable under this section for damages arising from the same violation.
612 4 sSB989 File No.
612 (b) An individual who is found liable under this section shall be jointly and severally liable with each other person, if any, who is found liable under this section for damages arising from the same violation.
(a) A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when:
(a) A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when [:
(1) By telephone [he, addresses another] or any electronic form of communication, the person, with intent to harass, terrorize or alarm another person, addresses such other person in or uses indecent or obscene language;
(1) Public Act No.
[or] (2) with intent to harass, [annoy] terrorize or alarm another person, [he] such person communicates with a person by telegraph or mail, [by] electronically transmitting a facsimile through connection with a telephone network, [by] electronic mail or text message or any other electronically sent message, whether by digital media account, messaging program or application, or otherwise by computer, computer service or computer network, as defined in section 53a-250, or [by] any other form of [written] communication, in a manner likely to cause [annoyance] terror, intimidation or alarm;
21-56 4 of 5 Substitute Senate Bill No.
[or] (3) with intent to harass, [annoy] terrorize or alarm another person, [he] such person makes a telephone call or engages in any other form of communication, whether or not a conversation ensues, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm;
989 By telephone he, addresses another in or uses indecent or obscene language;
or (4) with intent to harass, terrorize or alarm another person, and for no legitimate purpose, such person communicatesorsharesaphotograph,videoorwordsorengagesinany other form of communication to a digital, electronic, online or other meeting space, in a manner likely to cause terror, intimidation or alarm.
or (2)] with intent to harass, [annoy] terrorize or alarm another person, [he communicates] and for no legitimate purpose, such person:
(1) Communicates with a person by telegraph or mail, [by] electronically transmitting a facsimile through connection with a telephone network, [by] electronic mail or text message or any other electronically sent message, whether by digital media account, messagingprogramorapplication,orotherwiseby computer,computer service or computer network, as defined in section 53a-250, or [by] any other form of [written] communication, in a manner likely to cause [annoyance] terror, intimidation or alarm;
[or (3) with intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person, he] (2) makes a telephone call or engages in any other form of communication, whether or not a conversation ensues, in a manner likely to cause [annoyance] terror, intimidation or alarm;
or (3) communicates or shares a photograph, video or words or engages in any other form of communication to a digital, electronic, online or other meeting space, in a manner likely to cause terror, intimidation or alarm.
Show all 157 changed rows (117 more)
Previous
Latest
(c) The court may order any person convicted under this section to be sSB989 / File No.
(c) The court may order any person convicted under this section to be examined by one or more psychiatrists.
612 5 sSB989 File No.
612 examined by one or more psychiatrists.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Approved June 16, 2021 Public Act No.
Section 1 October 1, 2021 53a-181c Sec.
21-56 5 of 5
2 October 1, 2021 53a-181d Sec.
3 October 1, 2021 53a-129e Sec.
4 October 1, 2021 New section Sec.
5 October 1, 2021 53a-183 Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
In Section 3, the new language at the end of subsection (b) was moved to the end of subsection (a) for clarity.
JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
sSB989 / File No.
612 6 sSB989 File No.
612 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Correction, Dept.;
Judicial Dept.
GF - Potential See Below See Below (Probation) Cost Resources of the General Fund GF - Potential See Below See Below Revenue Gain Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill expands various crimes related to harassment to include conduct initiated through electronic methods and results in a potential cost for incarceration or probation and potential revenue from new fines.
On average, the marginal cost to the state for incarcerating an offender for the year is $2,200 while the average marginal cost for supervision in the community is less than $700 each year.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of violations.
1Inmate marginal cost is based on increased consumables (e.g.
food, clothing, water, sewage, living supplies, etc.) This does not include a change in staffing costs or utility expenses because these would only be realized if a unit or facility opened.
2Probation marginal cost is based on services provided by private providers and only includes costs that increase with each additional participant.
This does not include a cost for additional supervision by a probation officer unless a new offense is anticipated to result in enough additional offenders to require additional probation officers.
sSB989 / File No.
612 7 sSB989 File No.
612 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 989 AN ACT CONCERNING ONLINE HARASSMENT.
SUMMARY This bill expands various crimes related to harassment to include conduct initiated through electronic methods.
The bill does so by expanding what constitutes 2nd degree stalking to include certain conduct:
1.
concerning, but not directed at, a specific person;
2.
that causes fear of property damage or harm to an animal;
and 3.
involving the disclosure of personally identifiable information through electronic communications, in a manner that causes fear or serious distress or inconvenience.
The bill allows those harmed by a disclosure to bring a civil action to recover damages and other relief.
It also:
1.
expands 2nd degree harassment to include electronic methods of communication;
2.
limits 1st degree stalking of someone under age 16 to situations in which the actor is age 22 or older;
and 3.
expands 1st degree stalking to include situations in which the actor intentionally directs the conduct at the other person based on bias (e.g., race, sex, or disability).
The bill specifies that the crime of trafficking in personal identifying sSB989 / File No.
612 8 sSB989 File No.
612 information includes selling, giving, or otherwise transferring personal identifying information, as defined by the bill for purposes of 2nd degree stalking (see below).
Existing law already defines “personal identifying information” broadly to include information that may be used, alone or in conjunction with other information, to identify a specific individual (§ 3).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2021 §§ 2 & 4 — 2ND DEGREE STALKING The bill expands what constitutes 2nd degree stalking, by including (1) certain instances when an actor uses electronic communications to disclose a person’s personally identifiable information, causing distress, fear, or inconvenience, and (2) specified additional instances where the stalking would cause a reasonable person to fear for their property or an animal’s safety.
The bill specifies that 2nd degree stalking may be deemed to have been committed either in the place the communication began or was received.
By law, 2nd degree stalking is a class A misdemeanor (punishable by up to one year imprisonment, up to a $2,000 fine, or both).
Conduct Concerning but not Directed at a Specific Person Under current law, an actor commits 2nd degree stalking when he or she:
1.
knowingly engages in conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to (a) fear for his, her, or a third person’s physical safety or (b) suffer emotional distress or 2.
intentionally, and for no legitimate purpose, engages in conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to fear that his or her employment, business, or career is threatened, and has been previously asked to cease.
The bill broadens these categories of conduct to include instances sSB989 / File No.
612 9 sSB989 File No.
612 where the actor engages in conduct concerning a specific person.
Fear of Property Damage or Harm to Animal The bill also expands the conduct that constitutes 2nd degree stalking to include instances when the actor knowingly engages in a course of conduct that is directed at or concerning a specific person and would cause a reasonable person to fear (1) damage or destruction to or tampering with the specific person’s property or (2) injury to or the death of an animal the specific person owns, possesses, or controls.
Electronic Communications to Workplace Under current law for 2nd degree stalking, when a person’s employment, business, or career is threatened, the actor’s threatening conduct may consist of the actor telephoning, appearing at, or initiating communication or contact at the other person’s place of employment or business.
The bill specifies that these communication methods include electronic video-teleconferencing or digital media.
As under existing law, in order for it to be 2nd degree stalking, the actor must not have been previously and clearly informed to stop this conduct.
Electronic Disclosures Made for No Legitimate Purpose The bill also makes it 2nd degree stalking when the actor, for no legitimate purpose and with intent to harass, terrorize, or alarm, by means of electronic communication, including electronic or social media, discloses a specific person’s personally identifiable information without the person’s consent, knowing, that under the circumstances, the disclosure would cause a reasonable person to:
1.
fear for his or her or a third person’s physical safety;
2.
fear damage or destruction to or tampering with the property the person owns, possesses, or controls;
or 3.
suffer emotional distress or serious inconvenience.
Definitions.
Under the bill, “serious inconvenience” means that a person significantly modifies his or her actions or routines in an attempt sSB989 / File No.
612 10 sSB989 File No.
612 to avoid the actor or because of the actor’s conduct.
It includes changing a telephone number or e-mail address, deleting or meaningfully changing or significantly decreasing Internet use, moving from an established residence, changing daily routines or routes to and from work, changing employment or employment schedule, or losing time from employment.
“Personally identifying information” means:
1.
any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity, such as a name, prior legal name, alias, mother’s maiden name, Social Security number, date or place of birth, address, phone number, or biometric data;
2.
any information that is linked or linkable to an individual, such as medical, financial, education, consumer, or employment information, data, or records;
or 3.
any other sensitive private information that is linked or linkable to a specific identifiable individual, such as gender identity, sexual orientation, or any sexually intimate visual depiction.
Private Right of Action.
Under the bill, a person harmed by 2nd degree harassment through the intentional electronic disclosure of personally identifiable information (see above) may bring a civil action in Superior Court for the judicial district where the person resides or the Hartford judicial district.
The action may be brought against (1) the person or persons who committed the violation or (2) any person who knowingly benefitted, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participating in the activity that the person knew or should have known involved 2nd degree harassment through an electronic disclosure.
The plaintiff may recover damages and other appropriate relief, including reasonable attorney’s fees.
The court, on a party’s motion, may issue a temporary or permanent injunction to prevent the disclosure or continued disclosure of a party’s personally identifying information.
sSB989 / File No.
612 11 sSB989 File No.
612 The bill requires an individual who is found liable to be jointly and severally liable with other individuals, if any, who are found liable for damages from the same violation.
The bill sets the statute of limitations for this action at three years from the date of the violative act.
§ 5 — 2ND DEGREE HARASSMENT The bill expands 2nd degree harassment to involve electronic methods of communication, and in certain instances it eliminates the intent to annoy someone as a prohibited action.
As under existing law, the offense may be deemed to have been committedeitherintheplacethecommunicationbeganorwasreceived, and the court may order anyone convicted to be examined by one or more psychiatrists.
By law, 2nd degree harassment is a class C misdemeanor (punishable by up to three months imprisonment, up to a $500 fine, or both).
Communications Involving Indecent or Obscene Language Under current law, an actor may commit 2nd degree harassment when by telephone, he or she addresses another person in, or uses, indecent or obscene language.
The bill expands this crime to include instances when the person addresses another person using an electronic communication.
It also requires, for a charge of 2nd degree harassment, that the indecent or obscene communication be made with the intent to harass, terrorize, or alarm the other person.
Harassment on Electronic Meeting Spaces The bill expands 2nd degree harassment to include instances when a person, with intent to harass, terrorize, or alarm another person for no legitimate purpose, communicates or shares a photograph, video, or words or engages in any other communications to a digital, electronic, online, or other meeting space, in a manner likely to cause terror, intimidation, or alarm.
sSB989 / File No.
612 12 sSB989 File No.
612 Other Harassing Communications Under current law, it is 2nd degree harassment when an individual withtheintenttoharass,annoy,oralarmanotherperson,communicates by telegraphor mail,by transmitting afaxthrough atelephonenetwork, computer network, or by other written communication, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.
The bill eliminates the intent to annoy someone as a basis for a 2nd degree harassment charge and adds the intent to terrorize someone as a basis for it.
It also specifies that covered communications include e-mail or text messages or other electronically sent messages, whether by digital media account, messaging program or application, or computer or computer service or network.
Under current law, it is 2nd degree harassment to make, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm, a telephone call with intent to harass, annoy, or alarm another person, whether or not there is a conversation.
The bill eliminates current law’s requirement that the communication be by telephone and makes this conduct through any form of communication (including electronic) 2nd degree harassment.
The bill also removes the intent to annoy another person as a basis for a charge and adds intent to terrorize as a basis.
§ 1 — 1ST DEGREE STALKING Under current law, a person is guilty of 1st degree stalking when he or she commits 2nd degree stalking (see above) and (1) previously was convicted of 2nd degree stalking, (2) violates a court order at the time of the offense, or (3) the victim is under age 16.
The bill (1) limits the latter provision to situations in which the stalker is age 22 or older.
It also expands the crime to include 2nd degree stalking combined with intentionally directing conduct at the other person because of his or her actual or perceived race, religion, ethnicity, disability, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression.
By law, 1st degree stalking is a class D felony (punishable by up to five years imprisonment, up to a $5,000 fine, or both).
sSB989 / File No.
612 13 sSB989 File No.
612 COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 38 Nay 0 (04/08/2021) sSB989 / File No.
612 14
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  2. TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR

  3. TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  4. PUBLIC ACT 21-56

  5. IN CONCURRENCE

  6. HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  7. HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  8. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 537

  9. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  10. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  11. SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  12. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  13. FILE NO. 612

  14. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 351

  15. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  16. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  17. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/26/21

  18. FILED WITH LCO

  19. Joint Favorable Substitute

  20. PUBLIC HEARING 0310

  21. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

38 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (38)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 989?
SB 989 is sponsored by Perone, Chris, Eric C. Berthel (Republican), Donna Veach (Republican), Heather S. Somers (Republican), Cheeseman, Holly H., Tammy R. Exum (Democratic), Bobby G. Gibson (Democratic), Ben McGorty (Republican), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Jonathan Steinberg (Democratic), Dave W. Yaccarino (Republican), Fiorello, Kimberly, Gucker, Kenneth M, Irene M. Haines (Republican), Maria P. Horn (Democratic), Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Arora, Harry, Petit, William A., Gregory Haddad (Democratic), John-Michael Parker (Democratic), Phipps, Quentin W., Wood, Terrie E., Tony Hwang (Republican), Eleni Kavros DeGraw (Democratic), Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Thomas, Stephanie, Tom Delnicki (Republican), Morrin Bello, Amy, Craig C. Fishbein (Republican), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Formica, Paul M., Liz Linehan (Democratic), Larry B. Butler (Democratic), Devlin, Laura M., Betts, Whit, John A. Kissel (Republican), Rob Sampson (Republican), and Kevin C. Kelly.
What is the current status of SB 989?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2021. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 989?
Track SB 989 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 989

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 989

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →