HB 6504 — AN ACT CONCERNING ANIMAL WELFARE.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
11 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 3 D) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
611 added · 979 removed611 line(s) added, 979 removed.
Substitute House ofBill Representatives File No.
7516504 GeneralPublic AssemblyAct January Session, 2021(Reprint of File No.
434)21-90 SubstituteAN HouseACT BillCONCERNING No.ANIMAL WELFARE.
6504 As Amended by House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 27, 2021 AN ACT CONCERNING ANIMAL WELFARE.
sHB6504Sec. / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 Sec.
[The commissioner, the Chief Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer, any municipal] Any animal control officer or regional animalSubstitute controlHouse officerBill appointedNo. pursuant to section 22-328, 22-331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable, or any law enforcement officer may interfere to prevent any act of cruelty upon any dog or other animal, and any person who interferes with or obstructs or resists [the commissioner or] any such officer in the discharge of such duty shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor.
6504 animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22-331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable, or any law enforcement officer may interfere to prevent any act of cruelty upon any dog or other animal, and any person who interferes with or obstructs or resists [the commissioner or] any such officer in the discharge of such duty shall be guilty of a class D misdemeanor.
(b) [The Chief Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer or any municipal or regional animal control officer] Any animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22-331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this sHB6504act, /as Fileapplicable, may take physical custody of any animal upon issuance of a warrant finding probable cause that such animal is neglected or is cruelly treated in violation of section 22-366, 22-415, 53- Public Act No.
75121-90 sHB65042 Fileof 20 Substitute House Bill No.
7516504 act, as applicable, may take physical custody of any animal upon issuance of a warrant finding probable cause that such animal is neglected or is cruelly treated in violation of section 22-366, 22-415, 53- 247, 53-248, 53-249, 53-249a, 53-250, 53-251 or 53-252, and shall thereupon proceed as provided in subsection (c) of this section except that if, in the opinion of a licensed veterinarian or the State Veterinarian, at any time after physical custody of such animal is taken, such animal is so injured or diseased that it should be [destroyed] euthanized immediately, such officer may [humanely destroy or cause such animal to be humanely destroyed] have such animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian.
(c)Suchofficershallfilewiththesuperiorcourtwhichhasvenue(c)Suchofficershallfilewiththesuperiorcourtwhichhasvenueover over suchmatterorwiththesuperiorcourtforthejudicialdistrictofHartford at Hartford a verified petition plainly stating such facts of neglect or cruel treatment as to bring such animal within the jurisdiction of the court andpraying for appropriateactionbythe courtinaccordance with the provisions of this section.
A hearing on the order issued by the court pursuant to subdivision (1) or sHB6504Public /Act File No.
75121-90 sHB65043 Fileof 20 Substitute House Bill No.
7516504 (2) of this subsection shall be held not later than fourteen days after the issuance of such order.
Upon the filing of such petition, the court shall cause a summons for an order to show cause to be issued requiring the owner or owners or person having responsibility for the care of the animal, if known, to appear in court at thePublic timeAct andNo. place named.
If21-90 the4 owner or owners or person having responsibility for the care of the20 animalSubstitute isHouse notBill known, notice of the time sHB6504 / File No.
7516504 sHB6504the Filetime No.and place named.
751If the owner or owners or person having responsibility for the care of the animal is not known, notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be given by publication in a newspaper havingacirculationinthetownwheretheanimalislocatednotlessthan forty-eight hours prior to the date and time of the hearing.
The surety bond or cash bond shall be in the amount of five hundreddollarsforeachanimalplacedinthetemporarycareorcustody of such agency or person and shall secure payment for the reasonable expenses of the agency or person having temporary care and custody of theanimalincaringandprovidingforsuchtheanimalincaringandprovidingforsuchanimaluntilthecourtmakes animaluntilthecourtmakes a finding as to the animal's disposition under subsection (g) of this section.
The requirement that a bond be posted may be waived if such owner provides satisfactory evidence that such owner is indigent and unablePublic toAct payNo. for such bond.
(g)21-90 (1)5 If, after hearing, the court finds that the animal is neglected or cruelly treated, it shall vest ownership of the20 animalSubstitute inHouse anyBill state, municipal or other public or private agency which is permitted by law sHB6504 / File No.
7516504 sHB6504unable Fileto No.pay for such bond.
751(g) (1) If, after hearing, the court finds that the animal is neglected or cruelly treated, it shall vest ownership of the animal in any state, municipal or other public or private agency which is permitted by law to care for neglectedorcruelly treatedanimalsor withany personfound to be suitable or worthy of such responsibility by the court.
(5) If the court makes a finding under subdivision (3) of this subsectionPublic afterAct theNo. issuance of an order of temporary care and custody and the owner of the animal has posted a bond, the agency or person with whom the bond was posted shall return such bond to such owner.
(h)21-90 If6 the court finds that the animal is neglected or cruelly treated, the expenses incurred by the state or a municipality in providing proper food, shelter and care to an animal it has taken custody of under20 subsectionSubstitute (a)House orBill (b) of this section and the expenses incurred by any sHB6504 / File No.
7516504 sHB6504subsection Fileafter No.the issuance of an order of temporary care and custody and the owner of the animal has posted a bond, the agency or person with whom the bond was posted shall return such bond to such owner.
751(h) If the court finds that the animal is neglected or cruelly treated, the expenses incurred by the state or a municipality in providing proper food, shelter and care to an animal it has taken custody of under subsection (a) or (b) of this section and the expenses incurred by any state, municipalor other publicor privateagency or personinproviding temporary care and custody pursuant to an order vesting temporary care and custody, calculated at the rate of fifteen dollars per day per animal or twenty-five dollars per day per animal if the animal is a horse or other large livestock until the date ownership is vested pursuant to subdivision (1) of subsection (g) of this section shall be paid by the owner or owners or person having responsibility for the care of the animal.
(i) If the court vests ownership of the animal in the Commissioner of Agriculture or a municipality, the commissioner or the municipality may conduct or participate in a public auction of the animal under such conditionsthecommissioner or themunicipality deemsdeemsnecessary necessary or the commissioner or the municipality may consign the animal to an auction or sell the animal through an open advertised bid process whereby bid price and demonstration of sufficient knowledge and ability to care for such animal are factors for the commissioner's or municipality's consideration.
All moneys collected from the sale of animals sold by a municipality through such open advertised bid processPublic shallAct beNo. deposited by the town treasurer or other fiscal officer in thetown'sgeneralfund.The commissioner or themunicipality mayalso vestownershipofanysuchanimalinanindividualorapublicorprivate nonprofit animal rescue or adoption organization.
21-90 7 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 process shall be deposited by the town treasurer or other fiscal officer in thetown'sgeneralfund.The commissioner or themunicipality mayalso vestownershipofanysuchanimalinanindividualorapublicorprivate nonprofit animal rescue or adoption organization.
Deposits of moneys may be made into the account from public or private sources, including, but not limited to, the sHB6504federal /government Fileor No.municipal governments.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 federal government or municipal governments.
(a)Public InAct eachNo. municipality of the state having apopulation of more than twenty-five thousand which has adopted the provisions of chapter 113, or otherwise provided for a merit system for its employees, the chief of police, or such other appointing authority as the charter may designate, shall, appoint a full-time municipal animal control officer and such assistants as are deemed necessary, subject to the provisions of said chapter 113 or other merit system, to administer and enforce the laws relating to dogs or other domestic animals.
21-90 8 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 (a) In each municipality of the state having apopulation of more than twenty-five thousand which has adopted the provisions of chapter 113, or otherwise provided for a merit system for its employees, the chief of police, or such other appointing authority as the charter may designate, shall, appoint a full-time municipal animal control officer and such assistants as are deemed necessary, subject to the provisions of said chapter 113 or other merit system, to administer and enforce the laws relating to dogs or other domestic animals.
Any person so appointed as a member of the police department shall be fully eligible sHB6504to /participate Filein No.the retirement system of such department.
Show all 243 changed lines (203 more)
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 to participate in the retirement system of such department.
(d)Public TheAct municipalNo. animal control officer so appointed in any [city] municipality the limits of which are not coterminous with those of the [town] municipality in which it is located shall have authority as such municipal animal control officer throughout such town, and the town treasurer or other fiscal officer shall annually reimburse the [city] municipality, from the dog fund account, for the salaries and expenses of such officer or his or her assistants.
21-90 9 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 (d) The municipal animal control officer so appointed in any [city] municipality the limits of which are not coterminous with those of the [town] municipality in which it is located shall have authority as such municipal animal control officer throughout such town, and the town treasurer or other fiscal officer shall annually reimburse the [city] municipality, from the dog fund account, for the salaries and expenses of such officer or his or her assistants.
If, in any [city or town] municipality, the officer or officers charged with such duty fail to report such appointment, the commissioner shall notify such officer or officers to make and report such appointment within ten days of receipt of such notification, and, if such appointment is not made within such time, the commissioner shall appoint a municipal animal control officer for such [city or town] sHB6504municipality. / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 municipality.
Such written appointment shall include, at a minimum, information concerningPublic theAct compensationNo. to be paid to such officer, insurance provided to such officer and the use of equipment, if any, for such officer.
21-90 10 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 concerning the compensation to be paid to such officer, insurance provided to such officer and the use of equipment, if any, for such officer.
Upon certification of such agreement to the commissioner with assurances from the towns so certifying that they will provide and continue to provide adequate facilitiesandcompensationforsuchofficer,thecommissionermay,after giving due regard to the regional aspects of the proposed facilities and sHB6504whether /the Fileproposed No.region would be in the best interests of the towns so certifying, establish such region.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 whether the proposed region would be in the best interests of the towns so certifying, establish such region.
(a)Public [TheAct ChiefNo. Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer or any municipal animal control officer] Any animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22- 331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable, shall be responsible for the enforcement of this chapter and shall make diligent search and inquiry for any violation of any of its provisions.
21-90 11 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 (a) [The Chief Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer or any municipal animal control officer] Any animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22- 331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable, shall be responsible for the enforcement of this chapter and shall make diligent search and inquiry for any violation of any of its provisions.
The officer shall impound such dog or other domestic animal at the pound serving the town where the dog or other domestic animal is taken unless, in the opinion of a licensed veterinarian, the dog or other domestic animal is so injured or diseased that it should be [destroyed] euthanized immediately, in which case the municipal animal control officer of such sHB6504town /may File[cause No.the dog or other domestic animal to be mercifully killed] have such dog or other animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarianor disposedofastheState Veterinarianmay direct.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 town may [cause the dog or other domestic animal to be mercifully killed] have such dog or other animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarianor disposedofastheState Veterinarianmay direct.
[Such officer shall immediately notify the owner or keeper of any other domestic animal which is taken into custody, if such owner or keeper is known.] If the owner or keeper of any such dog or other domestic animal is unknown, the officer shall immediately tag or employ [such] other suitable means of official identification of the dog or other domestic animal [as may be approved by the Chief Animal Control Officer] and shall promptly cause (A) a description of such dog or other domestic animal to be published once inthelostandfoundcolumnofanewspaperhavingacirculationinsuch townPublic orAct thatNo. has a state-wide circulation, and (B) a photograph or description of such dog or other domestic animal and the date on which such dog or other domestic animal is no longer legally required to be impounded to be posted on a national pet adoption Internet web site or an Internet web site that is maintained or accessed by the animal control officer and that is accessible to the public through an Internet search, except such posting shall not be required if:
21-90 12 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 town or that has a state-wide circulation, and (B) a photograph or description of such dog or other domestic animal and the date on which such dog or other domestic animal is no longer legally required to be impounded to be posted on a national pet adoption Internet web site or an Internet web site that is maintained or accessed by the animal control officer and that is accessible to the public through an Internet search, except such posting shall not be required if:
If any animal control officer does not have the technologicalresources to post such information on an Internet web site as required by subparagraph (B) of this subdivision, such officer may contact a public or private animal rescue organization and request that such organization post such information, at such organization's expense, on an Internet web site that is accessible to the sHB6504public /through Filean No.Internet search.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 public through an Internet search.
(b) If such dog or other domestic animal is not claimed by and released to the owner within seven days after the date of publication, [the municipal animal control] such officer, upon finding such dog or other domestic animal to be in satisfactory health, may have a licensed veterinarian spay or neuter such dog and sell such dog or other domestic animal to any person who satisfies such officer that such personPublic isAct purchasingNo. such dog or other domestic animal as a pet and that such person can give it a good home and proper care.
21-90 13 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 person is purchasing such dog or other domestic animal as a pet and that such person can give it a good home and proper care.
Any person who purchases a dog as a pet shall pay a fee of five dollars and procure a license and tag for such dog from the town clerk, in accordance with the provisions of section sHB650422-338. / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 22-338.
(d) No regional or municipal dog pound facility, municipality, [regional or municipal animal control officer] animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22- 331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable,Public orAct publicNo. or private nonprofit animal rescue organization that arranges for the provision of treatment by a licensed veterinarian to an injured, sick or diseased animal pursuant to a contract described in section 22-332e shall be held civilly liable for such actions unless such actions are performed in a wanton, reckless or malicious manner.
21-90 14 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 applicable, or public or private nonprofit animal rescue organization that arranges for the provision of treatment by a licensed veterinarian to an injured, sick or diseased animal pursuant to a contract described in section 22-332e shall be held civilly liable for such actions unless such actions are performed in a wanton, reckless or malicious manner.
Thereafter, such animal importer or person who operates or maintains an animal shelter shall provide for the examination of such dog or cat by a veterinarian licensed under chapter 384 every ninety days until such dog or cat is sold, adopted or transferred, provided no such dog or cat shall be sold, adopted or transferred to another person by an animal importer or person who operates or maintains an animal shelter unless (1) such dog or cat was examined by a veterinarian licensed under chapter 384 not more than fifteen days prior to the sale, sHB6504adoption /or Filetransfer No.of such dog or cat, and (2) such veterinarian provides such animal importer or person who operates or maintains an animal shelter with a written certificate stating that such dog or cat is free of any symptoms of any illness, infectious, contagious or communicable disease.
751Such sHB6504certificate Fileshall list the name, address and contact information of such animal importer or person who operates or Public Act No.
75121-90 adoption15 or transfer of such20 dogSubstitute orHouse cat,Bill andNo. (2) such veterinarian provides such animal importer or person who operates or maintains an animal shelter with a written certificate stating that such dog or cat is free of any symptoms of any illness, infectious, contagious or communicable disease.
Such6504 certificate shall list the name, address and contact information of such animal importer or person who operates or maintains an animal shelter.
sHB6504Sec. / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 Sec.
(b)Public NotAct moreNo. than [ten] twenty per cent of the funds deposited in the animal population control account in accordance with subsection (f) of section 14-21h, subsection (a) of section 22-338, section 22-380f and section 22-380l shall be used for the sterilization and vaccination of feral cats program in accordance with subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of this section.
21-90 16 of 20 Substitute House Bill No.
6504 (b) Not more than [ten] twenty per cent of the funds deposited in the animal population control account in accordance with subsection (f) of section 14-21h, subsection (a) of section 22-338, section 22-380f and section 22-380l shall be used for the sterilization and vaccination of feral cats program in accordance with subdivision (4) of subsection (a) of this section.
For a sterilization procedure, [such voucher shall be in the amount of one hundred twenty dollars for a female dog, one hundred dollars for a male dog, seventy dollars for afemale cat andandfifty fifty dollars for a male cat] the Commissioner of Agriculture shall establish a rate of reimbursement that is not more than seventy-five per cent of the market rate or the fee charged by veterinarians in the state as of October 31, 2021.
(a) No person shall practice veterinary medicine, surgery or dentistry sHB6504until /[he] Filesuch person has obtained a license as provided in section 20- Public Act No.
75121-90 sHB650417 Fileof 20 Substitute House Bill No.
7516504 until [he] such person has obtained a license as provided in section 20- 199.
(b) No veterinarian licensed under this chapter may practice veterinary medicine on an animal without first establishing a veterinarian-client-patient relationship with the animal and the owner of the animal or person responsible for the care of the animal, except that a veterinarian licensed under this chapter may provide, in good faith, emergency or urgent care to an animal when no veterinarian- client-patientPublic relationshipAct has been established if the owner of the sHB6504 / File No.
75121-90 sHB650418 Fileof 20 Substitute House Bill No.
7516504 client-patient relationship has been established if the owner of the animal or person responsible for the care of such animal cannot be identified.
(c)Public AAct veterinarian-client-patientNo. relationship may not be established solely through veterinary telemedicine.
After21-90 a19 veterinarian-client-of sHB650420 /Substitute FileHouse Bill No.
7516504 sHB6504(c) FileA No.veterinarian-client-patient relationship may not be established solely through veterinary telemedicine.
751After a veterinarian-client- patient relationship has been established, such relationship may be maintained through veterinary telemedicine in between medically necessary examinations of the animal by the veterinarian or timely medical visits by the veterinarian to the location where the animal is kept.Ifthereisnoveterinarian-client-patientrelationship,aveterinarian may only provide general advice using electronic means and shall not provide any specific advice regarding the animal, including, but not limited to, any diagnosis or recommended medical care or treatment of the animal.
ThisApproved actJune shall28, take2021 effectPublic asAct followsNo. and shall amend the following sections:
Section21-90 120 fromof passage20 22-327(10) Sec.
2 from passage 22-327 Sec.
3 from passage 22-329 Sec.
4 from passage 22-329a Sec.
5 from passage 22-331 Sec.
6 from passage 22-331a Sec.
7 from passage 22-332 Sec.
8 from passage 22-344f Sec.
9 from passage New section Sec.
10 October 31, 2021 22-380g(b) Sec.
11 October 31, 2021 22-380i(a) Sec.
12 July 1, 2021 20-197 sHB6504 / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Department of Agriculture Animal See Below See Below Population Control - Acceleration of Costs Department of Agriculture GF - Potential Less than Less than Revenue Gain 20,000 20,000 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill makes various changes to animal-related laws.
It extends to animal shelter operators the same requirement that animal importers currently have (that dogs and cats be examined by a veterinarian within 48 hours of the animals entering the state).
Currently, violators are subject to a fine of up to $500 for each animal in violation.
The bill instead subjects an animal importer or animal shelter operator to a $250 fine per animal for a first violation and $500 fine per animal for subsequent violations.
Additionally,thebillrequiresanimalshelteroperatorsormaintainers tokeeprecordsofcertainveterinaryservicesforeachdogorcatforthree years, as current law does for animal importers.
The bill subjects an animal importer or animal shelter operator or maintainer who violates this provision to a $250 fine for a first violation and $500 fine for subsequent violations.
These provisions may result in a minimal revenue gain, expected to be less than $20,000 annually, to the extent sHB6504 / File No.
751 sHB6504 File No.
751 violations occur.
Also, the bill requires the Department of Agriculture (DoAg) to develop a waiver request process and form for an animal’s owner or veterinarian to request a reduction of a rabies quarantine period from six months to four months for animals exposed to rabies.
The bill requires DoAg to post the process and form on their website.
This is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact as the agency currently has expertise for this purpose.
It increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of funds that may be expended from the animal population control account, administered by DoAg, that may be used for sterilizing and vaccinating feral cats.
These sections update the reimbursement paid to veterinarians participating in the animal population control program up to 75% of the market rate for sterilization and vaccination services, plus $30, instead of $20 as under current law.
Currently, a veterinarian receives, $120 for a female dog, $100 for a male dog, $70 for a female cat, and $50 for a male cat, per sterilization, which is expected to be less than market rate in most municipalities.
The increase in reimbursement rate would result in the animal population control account expending funds at a rate faster than it otherwise would under the bill.
The current balance in the animal population control account is $644,517.
In 2020, there were 5,946 vouchers were issued under the animal population control program.
The bill requires a veterinarian to establish a veterinarian-client- patient relationship with the animal and the animal’s owner which has DoAg's Animal Population Control Program:
(1) provides low-income Connecticut residents discounted sterilization and vaccination options for dogs and cats, and (2) assistsregisterednonprofit rescuegroupswiththesterilizationandvaccinationofferal cats.
DoAg uses a separate, nonlapsing APC account for these costs.
Revenue is derived from a surcharge on municipal dog licenses, certain animal adoption fees for pounds’ unsterilized cats and dogs, and proceeds from commemorative APCP “Caring for Pets” license plates.
sHB6504 / File No.
751 21 sHB6504 File No.
751 no impact on the state or municipalities, as it applies to private, third- parties.
Lastly, the bill makes technical and conforming changes that have no fiscal impact.
House Amendment “A” removes certain provisions about service animals and adds the veterinarian-client-patient and veterinary telemedicine provisions.
This has no fiscal impact.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to the number of animals served under the program and the number of violations that occur.
sHB6504 / File No.
751 22 sHB6504 File No.
751 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 6504 (as amended by House “A”)* AN ACT CONCERNING ANIMAL WELFARE.
SUMMARY This bill makes a number of unrelated changes to animal-related statutes.
Principally, it:
1.
requires, when an animal control officer (ACO) seizes an animal that is neglected or cruelly treated and a veterinarian determines the animal is too injured or diseased to be treated, the ACO to have the animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian;
2.
allows municipalities and regional animal control facilities to appoint a temporary ACO from another municipality for up to days;
3.
requires regional animal control facilities to meet the same construction, maintenance, and sanitation standards as municipal pounds must under state law and regulations;
4.
requires animal shelters to have dogs and cats examined regularly by a licensed veterinarian and maintain records of veterinary services rendered, which existing law requires of animal importers, and revises fines for violations;
5.
requires the agriculture commissioner to develop a process to allow an animal’s owner to request a reduction, from six months to four months, in the rabies quarantine period under specified circumstances;
6.
increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of the animal sHB6504 / File No.
751 23 sHB6504 File No.
751 population control account funds that may be used for sterilizing and vaccinating feral cats under the agriculture department’s animal population control program (APCP);
and 7.
updates the reimbursement amount paid to veterinarians participating in the APCP.
Additionally, the bill generally requires a veterinarian, in order to practice veterinary medicine on an animal, to establish a veterinarian- client-patient relationship with the animal and the animal’s owner or caretaker.
It identifies the conditions that must be met to establish this relationship and allows the relationship to be maintained through veterinary telemedicine.
Lastly, the bill makes technical and conforming changes.
*House Amendment “A” removes certain provisions about service animals and adds the veterinarian-client-patient relationship and veterinary telemedicine provisions.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage, except the veterinarian-client- patient relationshipandveterinary telemedicine provisionsare effective July 1, 2021, and the APCP provisions are effective October 31, 2021.
§ 1 — POULTRY DEFINITION The bill makes a minor change to align the definition of poultry in the dog and companion animal statutes with the definition of poultry in the poultry dealer statute.
(Under the poultry dealer statute, poultry is any domestic fowl or game bird raised for food production, breeding, exhibition, or sale (CGS § 22-326s).) § 2 — SERVICE ANIMAL DEFINITION The bill adds a definition of “service animal” to the statutes concerning dogs and other companion animals.
It defines “service animal” as (1) a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for a person with a disability (which is the definition in the federal Americans with Disabilities Act regulations) and (2) an animal in sHB6504 / File No.
751 24 sHB6504 File No.
751 training to become a service animal.
§§ 3, 4 & 7 — ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICERS AND SEIZED ANIMALS Under current law, if an ACO takes physical custody of an animal that the ACO believes is in imminent harm and is neglected or cruelly treated and the animal is so injured or diseased in the opinion of a licensed veterinarian that it should be destroyed immediately, then the ACO may humanely destroy it or cause it to be humanely destroyed.
The bill instead allows the ACO to have the animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian under those circumstances.
Under current law, if a court is involved in a case of animal neglect or cruelty and determines that the animal is so injured or diseased that it shouldbedestroyed,thecourt mayorderthat theanimalbehumanely destroyed.
The bill instead allows the court to order that the animal be humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarian.
The bill also makes minor, technical, and conforming changes, including replacing references to “the chief ACO, any ACO, and any municipal ACO” with references to ACOs appointed under state law.
§ 5 — TEMPORARY ACO APPOINTMENT The bill allows a municipality’s chief elected official or a regional animal control facility (presumably the facility’s operator) to appoint an ACO from another municipality to act as the temporary ACO for the municipality or region for up to 90 days.
The bill grants the temporary ACO the same powers and authority he or she has in the municipality or region from which he or she came.
Temporaryappointmentsmustbeinwritingandincludeinformation on the ACO’s compensation, insurance, and use of equipment, if any.
The chief elected officials of the affected municipalities and the affected regional facilities must all approve of the temporary appointment.
The agriculture commissioner must be notified in writing of a temporary appointment within five days after the appointment is made.
(Presumably, the officials and facility operators provide this notice.) sHB6504 / File No.
751 25 sHB6504 File No.
751 § 6 — REGIONAL ANIMAL CONTROL FACILITIES By law, any two or more towns with populations of less than 50,000 may share a regional pound and be served by a regional ACO.
Under current law, the towns’ legislative bodies must approve the regional pound.
The bill instead specifies that if there is a board of selectmen or town council, then it approves the regional pound.
Otherwise, approval lies with a town’s governing body.
The bill also requires regional pounds to meet the same construction, maintenance, and sanitation standards as municipal pounds must under state law and regulations.
§ 8 — ANIMAL SHELTERS AND ANIMAL IMPORTERS Veterinary Services Required The bill extends to animal shelter operators or maintainers the requirement that animal importers have dogs and cats examined by a licensed veterinarian within 48 hours of the animals entering the state and every 90 days thereafter until the animals are sold, adopted, or otherwise transferred.
The shelter or importer cannot transfer an animal unless a veterinarian (1) examined it within 15 days before the transfer and (2) issued a written certificate of health that includes the shelter’s or importer’s name, address, and contact information.
Under current law, an animal importer who violates these requirements is subject to a fine of up to $500 for each animal in violation.
The bill instead subjects an animal importer or animal shelter operator or maintainer to a $250 fine per animal for a first violation and $500 fine per animal for subsequent violations.
Record Maintenance The bill also requires animal shelter operators or maintainers to keep records of veterinary services rendered to each dog or cat it imported into the state for three years.
Existing law requires the same of animal importers.
Under current law, an animal importer who does not maintain the sHB6504 / File No.
751 26 sHB6504 File No.
751 records as required is subject to a $500 fine.
The bill instead subjects an animal importer or animal shelter operator or maintainer who violates this provision to a $250 fine for a first violation and $500 fine for subsequent violations.
§ 9 — WAIVER FOR A RABIES QUARANTINE PERIOD REDUCTION The bill requires the agriculture commissioner to develop a waiver request process and form for an animal’s owner, keeper, or veterinarian to request a reduction of a rabies quarantine period from six months to four months.
Thisappliesto ananimalthat wasattackedandpotentially exposed to rabies and only if the owner, keeper, or veterinarian submits proof with the request that the animal was vaccinated against rabies within 96 hours after the attack.
The commissioner must post the waiver request process and form on the agriculture department’s website and make them publicly available and accessible as well as known to veterinarians in Connecticut.
§§ 10 & 11 — ANIMAL POPULATION CONTROL PROGRAM (APCP) The Department of Agriculture’s APCP (1) provides low-income Connecticut residents discounted sterilization and vaccination options for their dogs and cats and (2) assists registered nonprofit rescue groups with the sterilization and vaccination of feral cats.
The agriculture commissionerusesanestablishedanimalpopulationcontrolaccountfor the APCP costs.
The account funds come from a surcharge on dog licenses, certain animal adoption fees for pounds’ unsterilized cats and dogs, and proceeds from commemorative APCP “Caring for Pets” license plates.
The bill increases, from 10% to 20%, the maximum amount of the animalpopulationcontrolaccountfundsthat maybeusedforsterilizing and vaccinating feral cats under the APCP.
It also updates the reimbursement amount paid to veterinarians participating in the APCP.
Under current law, a veterinarian receives, per sterilization, $120 for a female dog, $100 for a male dog, $70 for a female cat, and $50 for a male cat.
The bill instead requires the sHB6504 / File No.
751 27 sHB6504 File No.
751 agriculture commissioner to establish a reimbursement rate that is up to 75% of the market rate or fee charged by veterinarians in Connecticut as of October 31, 2021.
When services to be performed include both sterilization and vaccination, the bill requires the reimbursement to be the amount designated for sterilization plus $30, instead of $20 as under current law.
§ 12 — VETERINARIAN PRACTICE Veterinarian-Client-Patient Relationship The bill requires a Connecticut-licensed veterinarian, in order to practice veterinary medicine on an animal, to establish a veterinarian- client-patient relationship with the animal and the animal’s owner or caretaker.
However, it allows a licensed veterinarian, in good faith, to provide emergency or urgent care to an animal without having this relationship if the animal’s owner or caretaker is unidentifiable.
Under the bill, a veterinarian establishes a veterinarian-client-patient relationship when the following conditions are met:
1.
the veterinarian has assumed the responsibility of making medical judgements about the animal’s health and the need for providing medical care or treatment to the animal, and has provided instruction to the animal’s owner or caretaker on the same;
2.
the veterinarian has sufficient knowledge of the animal to make a preliminary or general diagnosis of the animal;
3.
the animal’s owner or caretaker has agreed to follow the veterinarian’s recommendations about the animal’s medical care or treatment;
4.
the veterinarian is available for follow-up evaluation of the animal or has arranged for (a) emergency or urgent care or (b) continuing treatment by another licensed veterinarian who can access the animal’s medical records or provide reasonable and appropriate care;
sHB6504 / File No.
751 28 sHB6504 File No.
751 5.
the veterinarian oversees the animal’s medical care or treatment;
and 6.
the veterinarian has performed a physical examination of the animal or is personally acquainted with the keeping and care of the animal by providing care to another animal kept at the same location.
The bill specifies that a veterinarian-client-patient relationship may not be established solely through veterinary telemedicine.
Veterinary Telemedicine The bill defines “veterinary telemedicine” as the exchange of medical information about an animal’s health or delivery of a medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of an animal through electronic means, including by telephone, video, mobile apps, or an Internet website-based platform.
Once a veterinary-client-patient relationship is established, the bill allows the veterinarian to maintain that relationship through veterinary telemedicine in between medically necessary examinations of the animal or timely visits by the veterinarian to where the animal is kept.
If there is no veterinarian-client-patient relationship, the bill permits a veterinarian to provide only general advice using electronic means and prohibits him or her from providing specific advice, including a diagnosis or recommended care or treatment, for the animal.
BACKGROUND Related Bill sHB 6318 (File 119), favorably reported by the Human Services Committee and passed by the House, makes changes throughout the general statutes with respect to service animals, including aligning state law with the federal definition.
COMMITTEE ACTION Environment Committee sHB6504 / File No.
751 29 sHB6504 File No.
751 Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 32 Nay 0 (03/29/2021) sHB6504 / File No.
751 30
Show all 243 changed rows (203 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 21-90 Current pdf
- File No. 751 View text pdf
- File No. 434 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
- Substitute ENV Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill modifies definitions related to animal welfare and alters the authorities and procedures for animal control officers in handling cases of animal neglect and cruelty.
-
Section 22-327
means all domestic fowl and any pheasants or other game birdssecurely confinedandlawfully ownedandpossessedby any person under the provisions of section 26-40→ has the same meaning as provided in section 22-326sDefines 'Poultry' to align with the existing definition in another section, removing the previous specific wording.
-
Section 22-327
(13) "Service animal" has the same meaning as provided in 28 CFR 35.104 and includes any animal in training to become a service animal.
Adds a new definition for 'Service animal' to include animals in training.
-
Section 22-329
The commissioner, the Chief Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer, any municipal→ Any animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22-331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable,Streamlines the language to specify that any appointed animal control officer may intervene in cases of animal cruelty.
-
Section 22-329a
The Chief Animal Control Officer, any animal control officer or any municipal or regional animal control officer→ Any animal control officer or regional animal control officer appointed pursuant to section 22-328, 22-331, as amended by this act, or 22-331a, as amended by this act, as applicable,Updates the language to remove unnecessary titles and specify that any appointed animal control officer can take action in cases of animal harm.
-
Section 22-329a
destroyed→ euthanizedChanges the terminology from 'destroyed' to 'euthanized' to better reflect humane practices regarding animal care.
-
Section 22-329a
humanely destroy or cause such animal to be humanely destroyed→ have such animal humanely euthanized by a licensed veterinarianClarifies the process for euthanizing animals to ensure it is performed by a licensed veterinarian.
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 21-90
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
SEN. PASSED, HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 751
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 511
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 434
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 326
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/13/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0303
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Environment
Sponsors
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria · Primary
- Hilda E. Santiago · Primary
- David K. Labriola · Primary
- Anne M. Hughes · Primary
- Rob Sampson · Primary
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Charlie L. Stallworth · Primary
- Philip L. Young · Primary
- David Michel · Primary
- Kathy Kennedy · Primary
- Tony J. Scott · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 176 not signed on
Sponsors (11)
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican
- Hilda E. Santiago Democratic
- Labriola, David K.
- Anne M. Hughes Democratic
- Sampson, Rob
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Stallworth, Charlie L.
- Young, Philip L.
- Michel, David
- Kathy Kennedy Republican
- Tony J. Scott Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (176)
176 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 176 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 6504?
- HB 6504 is sponsored by Nicole Klarides-Ditria (Republican), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Labriola, David K., Anne M. Hughes (Democratic), Sampson, Rob, Saud Anwar (Democratic), Stallworth, Charlie L., Young, Philip L., Michel, David, Kathy Kennedy (Republican), and Tony J. Scott (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 6504?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 6504?
- Track HB 6504 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 6504
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 6504
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →