Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 11 R · 9 D cosponsors

SB 923 — AN ACT CONCERNING REVIEW OF ANIMAL CRUELTY LAWS BY THE CONNECTICUT SENTENCING COMMISSION.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 447

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

39 added · 11 removed

39 line(s) added, 11 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
923 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
424 January Session, 2021 Senate Bill No.
3645 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
923 Senate, April 13, 2021 The Committee on Judiciary reportedthrough SEN.
(JUD) AN ACT CONCERNING REVIEW OF ANIMAL CRUELTY LAWS BY THE CONNECTICUT SENTENCING COMMISSION.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING REVIEW OF ANIMAL CRUELTY LAWS BY THE CONNECTICUT SENTENCING COMMISSION.
LCO 3645 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00923-R01 of 2 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
SB923 / File No.
923 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
424 1 SB923 File No.
Section 1 from passage New section JUD Joint Favorable {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00923- LCO 3645 R01-SB.docx } 2 of 2
424 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 from passage New section JUD Joint Favorable SB923 / File No.
424 2 SB923 File No.
424 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires the Connecticut Sentencing Commission to review and report on the animal cruelty law of the state and does not result in afiscalimpactastheSentencingCommissioncanconducttheworkwith current resources.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB923 / File No.
424 3 SB923 File No.
424 OLR Bill Analysis SB 923 AN ACT CONCERNING REVIEW OF ANIMAL CRUELTY LAWS BY THE CONNECTICUT SENTENCING COMMISSION.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Yea 36 Nay 0 (03/29/2021) SB923 / File No.
424 4
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 447

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  4. SENATE PASSED

  5. FILE NO. 424

  6. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 255

  7. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  8. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  9. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/12/21

  10. FILED WITH LCO

  11. Joint Favorable

  12. PUBLIC HEARING 0312

  13. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

28 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on

Sponsors (28)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (159)

159 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 159 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 923?
SB 923 is sponsored by Lucy Dathan (Democratic), Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), Mary Welander (Democratic), Nicole Klarides-Ditria (Republican), Borer, Dorinda, Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Donna Veach (Republican), Heather S. Somers (Republican), Jason Doucette (Democratic), Scott, Tony J, Gucker, Kenneth M, Saud Anwar (Democratic), Joseph H. Zullo (Republican), Kurt Vail (Republican), Labriola, David K., Michel, David, Haskell, Will, Petit, William A., Patrick E. Callahan (Republican), Greg S. Howard (Republican), Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Kathy Kennedy (Republican), Craig C. Fishbein (Republican), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Devlin, Laura M., Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), Rob Sampson (Republican), and James J. Maroney (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 923?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 923?
Track SB 923 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 923

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 923

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →