SB 1011 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF OPIOID ANTAGONISTS BY POLICE OFFICERS AND STUDYING THE USE OF EPINEPHRINE CARTRIDGE INJECTORS BY POLICE OFFICERS.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
20 sponsors
20 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (7 D · 5 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
50 added · 66 removed50 line(s) added, 66 removed.
GeneralSenate Assembly Raised Bill No.
1011 JanuaryPublic Session,Act 2021 LCO No.
440221-108 ReferredAN toACT CommitteeCONCERNING onTHE PUBLICUSE SAFETYOF OPIOID ANTAGONISTS BY POLICE OFFICERS AND SECURITYSTUDYING IntroducedTHE by:USE OF EPINEPHRINE CARTRIDGE INJECTORS BY POLICE OFFICERS.
(PS) AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF OPIOID ANTAGONISTS AND EPINEPHRINE CARTRIDGE INJECTORS BY POLICE OFFICERS.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) As used in this section, (1) "epinephrine"law cartridgeenforcement injector"unit" and "police officer" have the same meanings as provided in section 7-294a of the general statutes, and (2) "opioid antagonist" has the same meaning as provided in section 19a-90917a-714a of the general statutes;statutes.
(2)(b) "lawEach law enforcement unit"unit andshall "police(1) officer"require haveits thepolice sameofficers meaningsto asreceive providedtraining in sectionthe 7-294ause of thean generalopioid statutes;antagonist, and (2) acquire and maintain a supply of opioid antagonists for use by its police officers when responding to a medical emergency.
Any police officer who completes such training shall be permitted to carry and (3)administer "opioidan antagonist"opioid hasantagonist theto samean meaningindividual aswhom providedthe officer believes in sectiongood 17a-714afaith ofis theexperiencing generalan statutes.opioid-related drug overdose.
(b) Each law enforcement unit shall (1) require its police officers to receive training in the use of an opioid antagonist and an epinephrine cartridge injector, and (2) acquire and maintain a supply of opioid antagonists and epinephrine cartridge injectors for use by its police officers when responding to a medical emergency.
(c) Any police officer who completes such training shall be permitted to carry and administer (1) an opioid antagonist to an individual whom the officer believes in good faith is experiencing an opioid-related drug LCO 4402 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-01011-R021 of 3 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
1011 overdose, and (2) an epinephrine cartridge injector to an individual whom the officer believes in good faith is experiencing anaphylaxis.
Section(Effective 52-557vfrom passage) (a) As used in this section, (1) "epinephrine cartridge injector" has the same meaning as provided in section 19a-909 of the general statutesstatutes, isand repealed(2) "law enforcement unit" and "police officer" have the followingsame ismeanings substitutedas provided in lieusection thereof7- (EffectiveSenate fromBill passage):No.
(a)1011 A294a person (1) employed to work for the state or any political subdivision thereof that has acquired and maintains a supply of epinephrine cartridge injectors, (2) who is trained in the usegeneral ofstatutes. an epinephrine cartridge injector in accordance with subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 19a-909 or section 1 of this act, and (3) provides or administers an epinephrine cartridge injector to an individual whom the person believes in good faith is experiencing anaphylaxis during the course of such person's employment, shall not be liable to such individual for civil damages or subject to criminal prosecution for any personal injuries that result from acts or omissions by such person in using an epinephrine cartridge injector, which may constitute ordinary negligence.
(b) The immunityPolice providedOfficer Standards and Training Council, in thisconsultation subsectionwith shallthe notDepartments applyof Emergency Services and Public ProtectionandPublicHealth,shallconveneaworkinggrouptoexamine and make recommendations regarding the feasibility of requiring police officers to wilfulcarry orand wantonadminister misconductan orepinephrine actscartridge orinjector omissionsto constitutingan grossindividual negligence.whom the officer believes in good faith is experiencing anaphylaxis.
(b)At Thea stateminimum, orthe anyworking politicalgroup subdivisionshall thereof that (1) hasdetermine acquiredif andthe maintainsneed afor supplysuch ofrequirement epinephrineexists cartridgeby injectors,examining anddata (2)on employsthe ause personof whoepinephrine (A)cartridge isinjectors trainedby inpolice theofficers useand ofother anfirst epinephrineresponders cartridgeand injectorbalancing inthe accordancepotential withbenefit subdivisionto (2)the ofpublic subsectionwith (a)the ofpotential sectionimpact 19a-909to orthe sectionpolice 1officer ofand thislaw act,enforcement andunit, (B)(2) providesaddress orissues administersassociated anwith epinephrinesuch cartridgerequirement, injectorincluding tothe ancost individualof whomimplementation theand persontraining believespolice officers in goodthe faithadministration isof experiencingepinephrine anaphylaxiscartridge duringinjectors, the(3) courseconsult ofa suchmedical person'semployment,shallnotexpert beliableregarding tothe suchindividualshelf forlife civiland damagessafe forstorage anypractices personalof injuriesepinephrine thatcartridge resultinjectors, fromand acts(4) orif omissionsthe byworking suchgroup persondetermines inthe usingneed anfor epinephrinesuch cartridgerequirement injector,exists, whichmake mayrecommendations constitutefor ordinarylegislation negligence.regarding implementation.
The(c) immunityNot providedlater inthan thisJanuary subsection1, 2023, the council shall notsubmit applya report on the findings and recommendations of the working group to wilfulthe orjoint wantonstanding misconductcommittee orof actsthe orGeneral omissionsAssembly constitutinghaving grosscognizance negligence.of matters relating to public safety and security, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes.
LCOThe 4402working {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-01012group ofshall 3terminate R02-SB.docxon }the Raiseddate Billthat No.the commissioner and council submit such final report or January 1, 2023, whichever is later.
1011Approved ThisJune act30, shall2021 takePublic effectAct asNo. follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section21-108 12 fromof passage2 New section Sec.
2 from passage 52-557v PS Joint Favorable APP Joint Favorable LCO 4402 R02-SB.docx }OUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-01011- 3 of 3
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 21-108 Current pdf
- APP Joint Favorable View text pdf
- File No. 295 View text pdf
- PS Joint Favorable View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 21-108
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 567
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations
-
FILE NO. 295
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 201
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/06/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Public Safety and Security
Sponsors
- David Michel · Primary
- Carol Hall · Primary
- Robin E. Comey · Primary
- John-Michael Parker · Primary
- Jason Doucette · Primary
- Michael DiGiovancarlo · Primary
- Hilda E. Santiago · Primary
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria · Primary
- David K. Labriola · Primary
- Kenneth M Gucker · Primary
- Charles J. Ferraro · Primary
- Greg S. Howard · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
- Quentin W. Phipps · Primary
- Juan R. Candelaria · Primary
- Amy Morrin Bello · Primary
- Ben McGorty · Primary
- Holly H. Cheeseman · Primary
- Bill Buckbee · Primary
- Terrie E. Wood · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →20 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 167 not signed on
Sponsors (20)
- Michel, David
- Carol Hall Republican
- Robin E. Comey Democratic
- John-Michael Parker Democratic
- Jason Doucette Democratic
- Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic
- Hilda E. Santiago Democratic
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican
- Labriola, David K.
- Gucker, Kenneth M
- Ferraro, Charles J.
- Greg S. Howard Republican
- Travis Simms Democratic
- Phipps, Quentin W.
- Juan R. Candelaria Democratic
- Morrin Bello, Amy
- Ben McGorty Republican
- Cheeseman, Holly H.
- Bill Buckbee Republican
- Wood, Terrie E.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (167)
167 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 167 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 1011?
- SB 1011 is sponsored by Michel, David, Carol Hall (Republican), Robin E. Comey (Democratic), John-Michael Parker (Democratic), Jason Doucette (Democratic), Michael DiGiovancarlo (Democratic), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Nicole Klarides-Ditria (Republican), Labriola, David K., Gucker, Kenneth M, Ferraro, Charles J., Greg S. Howard (Republican), Travis Simms (Democratic), Phipps, Quentin W., Juan R. Candelaria (Democratic), Morrin Bello, Amy, Ben McGorty (Republican), Cheeseman, Holly H., Bill Buckbee (Republican), and Wood, Terrie E..
- What is the current status of SB 1011?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 04, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1011?
- Track SB 1011 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1011
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1011
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →