HB 6519 — AN ACT CONCERNING DATA COLLECTION TO PREVENT MALNUTRITION AMONG SENIOR CITIZENS.
Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 410
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
148 added · 45 removed148 line(s) added, 45 removed.
House of Representatives General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
6519502 January Session, 2021 LCOSubstitute House Bill No.
36546519 ReferredHouse toof Representatives, April 19, 2021 The Committee on HUMANHuman SERVICESServices Introducedreported by:through REP.
(HS)ABERCROMBIE ANof ACTthe CONCERNING83rd DATADist., COLLECTIONChairperson TOof PREVENTthe MALNUTRITIONCommittee AMONGon SENIORthe CITIZENS.part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING DATA COLLECTION TO PREVENT MALNUTRITION AMONG SENIOR CITIZENS.
Section 17a-304 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2021):
As used in this section and section 17a-305, as amended by this act, "NAPIS nutritional risk assessment" means a survey developed by the National Aging Program Information System, or NAPIS, that provides a person who takes the survey with a score correlating with risk of malnutrition.
The state shall be divided into five elderly planning and service areas, in accordance with federal law and regulations, each having an area agency on aging to carry out the mandates of the federal Older Americans Act of 1965, as amended.
The area agencies shall (1) represent older persons within their geographic areas, (2) develop an area plan for approval by the Department of Aging and Disability Services and upon such approval administer the plan, (3) coordinate sHB6519 / File No.
502 1 sHB6519 File No.
502 and assist local public and nonprofit, private agencies in the development of programs, (4) receive and distribute federal and state funds for such purposes, in accordance with applicable law, (5) distribute the NAPIS nutritional risk assessment to older persons, collect the assessments and report individual and average scores for each elderly planning and service area to the Department of Aging and Disability Services, and [(5)] (6) carry out any additional duties and functions required by federal law and regulations.
Sec.
2.
(c) The Department of Aging and Disability Services, in consultation with the five area agencies on agingaging, and representatives of elderly nutrition programs, shall review the method of allocation set forth in [subsection (a) of this section and shall report any findingsfindingsor orrecommendations,aswellasdataonservice recommendations,levelsandcosts, as well as data on service levels and costs, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizancecognizanceofmattersrelatingtoappropriationsandthebudgetsofstate of matters relating to appropriations and the budgets of state agencies and human services] subsections (a) and (b) of this section and evaluate the method used to allocate funding for elderly nutrition programs based on factors including, but not limited to:
(1) ElderlyFor populationeach dataof from the 2020five censuselderly planning and theservice Americanareas Communityas Surveydescribed conductedin bysection the17a- United304, Statesas Censusamended Bureauby forthis theact, five(A) elderly planningpopulation anddata servicefrom areasthe asmost describedrecent inUnited sectionStates 17a-304,census, and (2)(B) anyaverage increasedand costsindividual forscores LCOon No.the NAPIS nutritional risk assessment;
3654and 1(2) ofany 2increased Raisedcosts Billfor No.providers that deliver meals on wheels for the department's elderly nutrition program in sparsely populated rural regions.
6519The providersdepartment thatshall deliversolicit mealsinformation onand wheelsrecommendations from elderly nutrition providers for consideration in sparselyits populatedevaluation ruralof regions.the allocation method of the funding of such programs.
Not later than July 1, 2022, the department shallshallreport,inaccordance report,withthe inprovisionsofsection accordance11- with4a, the provisions of section 11-4a, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to aging, appropriations and the budgets of state agencies and human services on (A) theelderly ratespopulationdataand ofaverage reimbursementand forindividual eachscores meals on wheels provider in the stateNAPIS comparednutritional torisk theassessment costssHB6519 to/ provideFile mealsNo. on wheels for each such provider, (B) the administrative expenses of each such meals on wheels provider, (C) the number of meals on wheels providers that have reduced or eliminated deliveries based on inadequate state reimbursement, and (D) any recommended changes in the method of allocation of funds.
Providers502 of2 mealssHB6519 underFile theNo. department's elderly nutrition program shall annually provide the department with data on service levels and costs.
502 for each of the five elderly planning and service areas as described in section 17a-304, as amended by this act, (B) the rates of reimbursement for each meals on wheels provider in the department's elderly nutrition programcomparedtothecoststoprovidemealsonwheelsforeachsuch provider, (C) the administrative expenses of each such meals on wheels provider, (D) the number of such meals on wheels providers that have reduced or eliminated deliveries based on inadequate state reimbursement, and (E) any recommended changes in the method of allocation of funds.
Providers of meals [under] for the department's elderly nutrition program shall annually provide the department with data on service levels and costs.
Section 1 July 1, 2021 17a-305(c)17a-304 StatementSec. of Purpose:
To2 collectJuly data1, on2021 malnutrition17a-305(c) risksHS forJoint seniorFavorable citizensSubst. and ensure that they have adequate nutritional assistance.
[ProposedsHB6519 deletions/ areFile enclosedNo. in brackets.
Proposed502 additions3 aresHB6519 indicatedFile by underline, except that when the entire text of a bill or resolution or a section of a bill or resolution is new, it is not underlined.] LCO No.
3654502 2The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of 2the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill adds reporting requirements to the state's Area Agencies on Aging (AAAs) and the Department of Aging and Disability Services and results in no fiscal impact to the state or municipalities.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None 1Connecticut's five AAAs are part of the federal framework and design of service delivery under Older Americans Act programs.
sHB6519 / File No.
502 4 sHB6519 File No.
502 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 6519 AN ACT CONCERNING DATA COLLECTION TO PREVENT MALNUTRITION AMONG SENIOR CITIZENS.
SUMMARY This bill requires the state’s five area agencies on aging (AAAs) to (1) distribute the National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS) nutritional risk assessment to older persons, (2) collect completed assessments, and (3) report individual and average scores for each elderly planning and service area to the Department of Aging and Disability Services (ADS).
The NAPIS nutritional risk assessment is a survey that provides each respondent with a score correlating with malnutrition risk.
Current law requires ADS to review, in consultation with the AAAs, its method for allocating federal Older Americans Act funds to the AAAs for supportive services and elderly nutrition.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
The bill also requires ADS to review its allocation methods for state funds appropriated to the AAAs, and evaluate both state and federal funding allocations based on factors, including the following:
1.
for each of the five planning and service areas, the (a) elderly population data from the most recent U.S.
census and (b) average and individual scores on the NAPIS nutritional risk assessment;
and 2.
any increased costs for providers that deliver meals-on-wheels for ADS’ elderly nutrition programs in sparsely populated rural areas.
The bill requires ADS to (1) solicit information and recommendations from elderly nutrition providers for consideration in its evaluation and sHB6519 / File No.
502 5 sHB6519 File No.
502 (2) report, by July 1, 2022, to the Aging, Appropriations, and Human Services committees on certain related information.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2021 REPORT TO LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES Current law requires ADS to report to the Appropriations and Human Services committees (1) any findings or recommendations from itsreviewofallocation methods for federalfundsand (2)dataon service levels and costs.
The bill instead requires ADS to report, by July 1, 2022, to the Aging, Appropriations, and Human Services committees on the following information:
1.
elderly population data and average and individual scores onthe NAPIS nutritional risk assessment for each of the five elderly planning and service areas;
2.
reimbursement rates for each meals-on-wheels provider in ADS’ elderly nutrition program, compared to each provider’s costs to provide the meals;
3.
each meals-on-wheels provider’s administrative expenses;
4.
how many meal deliveries providers reduced or eliminated due to inadequate state reimbursement;
and 5.
any recommended changes for how to allocate funds.
COMMITTEE ACTION Human Services Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 19 Nay 0 (03/31/2021) sHB6519 / File No.
502 6
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- File No. 502 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute HS Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 410
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 502
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 369
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/19/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0304
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Human Services
Sponsors
- Eleni Kavros DeGraw · Primary
- Hilda E. Santiago · Primary
- Michael DiGiovancarlo · Primary
- Aimee Berger-Girvalo · Primary
- Patricia A. Dillon · Primary
- John-Michael Parker · Primary
- Christine Conley · Primary
- Dorinda Borer · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
- Kara Rochelle · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Jaime S. Foster · Primary
- Kathy Kennedy · Primary
- Jane M. Garibay · Primary
- Michelle L. Cook · Primary
- Kenneth Gucker · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →17 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 170 not signed on
Sponsors (17)
- Eleni Kavros DeGraw Democratic
- Hilda E. Santiago Democratic
- Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic
- Aimee Berger-Girvalo Democratic
- Patricia A. Dillon Democratic
- John-Michael Parker Democratic
- Conley, Christine
- Borer, Dorinda
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
- Kara Rochelle Democratic
- Travis Simms Democratic
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Jaime S. Foster Democratic
- Kathy Kennedy Republican
- Jane M. Garibay Democratic
- Cook, Michelle L.
- Kenneth Gucker Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (170)
170 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 170 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 6519?
- HB 6519 is sponsored by Eleni Kavros DeGraw (Democratic), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Michael DiGiovancarlo (Democratic), Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic), Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), John-Michael Parker (Democratic), Conley, Christine, Borer, Dorinda, Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic), Kara Rochelle (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Kathy Kennedy (Republican), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Cook, Michelle L., and Kenneth Gucker (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 6519?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 6519?
- Track HB 6519 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 6519
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 6519
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →