Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate Bipartisan · 3 D · 1 R cosponsors

SB 818 — AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 605

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

64 added · 26 removed

64 line(s) added, 26 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
New Copy Senate General Assembly File No.
818 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
660 January Session, 2021 Substitute Senate Bill No.
1702 Referred to Committee on AGING Introduced by:
818 Senate, May 10, 2021 The Committee on Appropriations reported through SEN.
(AGE) AN ACT PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
OSTEN of the 19th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a) For purposes of this section:
(Effective from passage) Not later than January 1, 2022, the Commissioner of Social Services shall submit a report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to aging and appropriations and the budgets of state agencies.
(1) "Institutionalized spouse" has the same meaning as provided in 42 USC 1396r-5(h)(1).
Suchreport shallexamine thecost andfeasibility ofpermitting a community spouse of an institutionalized spouse to retain the maximum resource amount allowable for such community spouse pursuant to 42 USC 1396r-5(f)(2).
(2) "Community spouse" has the same meaning as provided in 42 USC 1396r-5(h)(2).
For purposes of this section, "institutionalized spouse" and "community spouse" each have the same meaning as provided in 42 USC 1396r-5(h).
(b) The Commissioner of Social Services shall amend the Medicaid state plan to permit a community spouse of an institutionalized spouse to retain the maximum resource amount allowable for such community spouse pursuant to 42 USC 1396r-5(f)(2).
sSB818 / File No.
(c) The commissioner shall adopt regulations, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 of the general statutes, to implement the LCO 1702 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00818-R01 of 2 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
660 1 sSB818 File No.
818 provisions of this section.
660 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 from passage New section AGE Joint Favorable C/R APP APP Joint Favorable Subst.
Section 1 from passage New section AGE Joint Favorable C/R APP LCO 1702 R01-SB.docx }OUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00818- 2 of 2
sSB818 / File No.
660 2 sSB818 File No.
660 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to examine the cost and feasibility of allowing the community spouse of an institutionalized individual to retain the maximum amount of assets allowed under federal law, and report to the General Assembly by January 1, 2022.
This has no fiscal impact as DSS has the expertise necessary to complete the report.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB818 / File No.
660 3 sSB818 File No.
660 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 818 AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION Aging Committee Joint Favorable Change of Reference - APP Yea 15 Nay 0 (02/16/2021) Appropriations Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 50 Nay 0 (04/21/2021) sSB818 / File No.
660 4
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 605

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULES.

  4. SENATE PASSED

  5. FILE NO. 660

  6. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 391

  7. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  8. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  9. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 05/10/21

  10. FILED WITH LCO

  11. Joint Favorable Substitute

  12. FAV. CHG. OF REF. HOUSE TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  13. FAV. CHG. OF REF., SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  14. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  15. FILED WITH LCO

  16. Joint Favorable Change of Reference APP

  17. PUBLIC HEARING 0209

  18. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Aging

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 818?
SB 818 is sponsored by Saud Anwar (Democratic), Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), Joan V. Hartley (Democratic), Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), and Kevin C. Kelly.
What is the current status of SB 818?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 818?
Track SB 818 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 818

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 818

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →