SB 818 — AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 605
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
64 added · 26 removed64 line(s) added, 26 removed.
New Copy Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
818660 January Session, 2021 LCOSubstitute Senate Bill No.
1702818 ReferredSenate, toMay 10, 2021 The Committee on AGINGAppropriations Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(AGE)OSTEN ANof ACTthe PERMITTING19th THEDist., COMMUNITYChairperson SPOUSEof OFthe ANCommittee INSTITUTIONALIZEDon MEDICAIDthe RECIPIENTpart TOof RETAINthe THESenate, MAXIMUMthat AMOUNTthe OFsubstitute ALLOWABLEbill ASSETS.ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
(NEW) (Effective from passage) (a)Not Forlater purposesthan January 1, 2022, the Commissioner of thisSocial section:Services shall submit a report, in accordance with the provisions of section 11-4a of the general statutes, to the joint standing committees of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to aging and appropriations and the budgets of state agencies.
(1)Suchreport "Institutionalizedshallexamine spouse"thecost hasandfeasibility ofpermitting a community spouse of an institutionalized spouse to retain the samemaximum meaningresource asamount providedallowable infor such community spouse pursuant to 42 USC 1396r-5(h)(1).1396r-5(f)(2).
(2)For "Communitypurposes of this section, "institutionalized spouse" hasand "community spouse" each have the same meaning as provided in 42 USC 1396r-5(h)(2).1396r-5(h).
(b)sSB818 The/ CommissionerFile ofNo. Social Services shall amend the Medicaid state plan to permit a community spouse of an institutionalized spouse to retain the maximum resource amount allowable for such community spouse pursuant to 42 USC 1396r-5(f)(2).
(c)660 The1 commissionersSB818 shallFile adopt regulations, in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54 of the general statutes, to implement the LCO 1702 \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00818-R01 of 2 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
818660 provisionsThis ofact thisshall section.take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
ThisSection act1 shallfrom takepassage effectNew assection followsAGE andJoint shallFavorable amendC/R theAPP followingAPP sections:Joint Favorable Subst.
SectionsSB818 1/ fromFile passageNo. New section AGE Joint Favorable C/R APP LCO 1702 R01-SB.docx }OUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00818- 2 of 2
660 2 sSB818 File No.
660 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires the Department of Social Services (DSS) to examine the cost and feasibility of allowing the community spouse of an institutionalized individual to retain the maximum amount of assets allowed under federal law, and report to the General Assembly by January 1, 2022.
This has no fiscal impact as DSS has the expertise necessary to complete the report.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB818 / File No.
660 3 sSB818 File No.
660 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 818 AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PERMITTING THE COMMUNITY SPOUSE OF AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MEDICAID RECIPIENT TO RETAIN THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF ALLOWABLE ASSETS.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION Aging Committee Joint Favorable Change of Reference - APP Yea 15 Nay 0 (02/16/2021) Appropriations Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 50 Nay 0 (04/21/2021) sSB818 / File No.
660 4
View plain text versions (4)
- File No. 660 View text pdf
- AGE Joint Favorable Change of Reference View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute APP Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 605
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULES.
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 660
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 391
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 05/10/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
FAV. CHG. OF REF. HOUSE TO COMM. ON Appropriations
-
FAV. CHG. OF REF., SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Change of Reference APP
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0209
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Aging
Sponsors
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Mitch Bolinsky · Primary
- Joan V. Hartley · Primary
- Patricia Billie Miller · Primary
- Kevin C. Kelly · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on
Sponsors (5)
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Mitch Bolinsky Republican
- Joan V. Hartley Democratic
- Patricia Billie Miller Democratic
- Kevin C. Kelly
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (182)
182 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 182 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 818?
- SB 818 is sponsored by Saud Anwar (Democratic), Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), Joan V. Hartley (Democratic), Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), and Kevin C. Kelly.
- What is the current status of SB 818?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 818?
- Track SB 818 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 818
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 818
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →