AN ACT ESTABLISHING AN ENTERPRISE ZONE IN THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 626 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 626.
You're tracking SB 626
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 626 — AN ACT ESTABLISHING AN ENTERPRISE ZONE IN THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH.
Last action — FILE NO. 232
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
125 added · 37 removed125 line(s) added, 37 removed.
Senate General Assembly SubstituteFile Bill No.
626232 January Session, 2021 ANSubstitute ACTSenate ESTABLISHINGBill ANNo. ENTERPRISE ZONE IN THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH.
626 Senate, March 31, 2021 The Committee on Commerce reported through SEN.
HARTLEY of the 15th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT ESTABLISHING AN ENTERPRISE ZONE IN THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH.
Such municipalities shallsSB626 be/ inFile differentNo. counties.
If232 the1 commissionersSB626 approvesFile the designation of an area of a municipality as an enterprise zone because of a plant closure in the municipality and there is a closure of another plant in any other municipality in the state by the same business, the commissioner shall also designate an area in such other municipality as LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00626-R01 of 4 SB.docx Substitute Bill No.
626232 anshall enterprisebe zone.in different counties.
If the commissioner approves the designation of an area of a municipality as an enterprise zone because of a plant closure in the municipality and there is a closure of another plant in any other municipality in the state by the same business, the commissioner shall also designate an area in such other municipality as an enterprise zone.
In making his determination, the commissioner may also consider the vacancy rates for commercial and industrial facilities in a municipality and a municipality's program for thesSB626 implementation/ ofFile anNo. effective enterprise zone program.
232 2 sSB626 File No.
232 the implementation of an effective enterprise zone program.
(C) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, municipalities that were not distressed municipalities LCOunder {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00622the provisions of 4subsection R02-SB.docx(b) }of Substitutesection Bill32-9p No.on February 1, 1986, shall be eligible to designate areas as enterprise zones under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this subdivision.
626 under the provisions of subsection (b) of section 32-9p on February 1, 1986, shall be eligible to designate areas as enterprise zones under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this subdivision.
(4) On or after July 1, 2021, the commissioner shall approve the designation of one area as an enterprise zone, which shall be in a municipalitysSB626 with/ aFile population of not less than twelve thousand two hundred and not more than twelve thousand three hundred, having a total area of not more than 22.34 square miles and having an average population density of not more than 559.3 persons per square mile of LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00623 of 4 R02-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
626232 land,3 assSB626 enumeratedFile inNo. the 2010 federal decennial census.
232 municipality with a population of not less than twelve thousand two hundred and not more than twelve thousand three hundred, having a total area of not more than 22.34 square miles and having an average population density of not more than 559.3 persons per square mile of land, as enumerated in the 2010 federal decennial census.
Section 1 July 1, 2021 32-70(c) StatementsSB626 of/ LegislativeFile Commissioners:No.
232 4 sSB626 File No.
232 Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
LCOCE {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00626-4Joint ofFavorable 5Subst. R02-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
626-LCO CEsSB626 Joint/ FavorableFile Subst.No.
-LCO232 LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00626- 5 ofsSB626 5File R02-SB.docxNo. }
232 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Policy & Mgmt., Off.
GF - Cost None See Below Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Plymouth Grand List None See Below Reduction Plymouth Revenue None See Below Gain Explanation The bill designates the Town of Plymouth as an Enterprise Zone, which entitles certain businesses within the zone to certain corporate and property tax breaks.
There is a potential grand list reduction to Plymouth due to multiple five-year property tax breaks of between 40% and 80%, depending on the type of business, and type of investment undertaken.
This potential grand list reduction results in a revenue loss, given a constant mill rate.
Dueto thetiming ofgrandlist assessments,any revenue losswould first occur in FY 23.
Any revenue loss to Plymouth resulting from these exemptions is partially offset by the Distressed Municipalities grant program, which reimburses municipalities for 50% of the tax loss resulting from these exemptions, for a five-year period.
The bill results in an increased cost to OPM to fully fund the grant program, which will vary based on the revenue loss claimed by the Town of Plymouth.
While the grant is sSB626 / File No.
232 6 sSB626 File No.
232 proportionately reduced when the appropriation or bond authorization is insufficient for full funding, the grant is currently fully funded.
1 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to any grand list reductions experienced by the Town of Plymouth as a result of any Enterprise Zone property tax exemptions.
Show all 62 changed lines (22 more)
1FY 21 funding sources for the Distressed Municipalities grant program include 1) a prior year bond authorization of $2.9 million, 2) a FY 21 bond authorization of $7 million, and 3) a $1.5 million General Fund appropriation.
The cost to fully fund this grant in FY 21 is $6.3 million.
sSB626 / File No.
232 7 sSB626 File No.
232 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 626 AN ACT ESTABLISHING AN ENTERPRISE ZONE IN THE TOWN OF PLYMOUTH.
SUMMARY This bill creates a new enterprise zone by requiring the Department of Economic and Community Development commissioner to approve the designation of a zone in Plymouth on or after July 1, 2021.
The bill identifies Plymouth by it having the following features based on the federal census:
(1) population between 12,200 and 12,300, (2) maximum total area of 22.34 square miles, and (3) maximum average population density of 559.3 people per square mile of land.
Generally, to designate an area as an enterprise zone, municipalities must have qualified as “distressed municipalities” as of February 1, 1986.
The area must also meet certain poverty or unemployment criteria.
The bill allows Plymouth to designate an enterprise zone without meeting these criteria.
Under the bill, the designated enterprise zone in Plymouth must be two contiguous census tracts, contiguous portions of these tracts, or all or part of an individual census tract, according to the most recent census.
If a designated area is covered by zoning, part of the area must be zoned for commercial or industrial activity.
Businesses located in these zones may receive the same property tax benefits as those in existing enterprise zones, which include two benefits.
First, businesses may receive a five-year, 80% property tax exemption for improving or acquiring “manufacturing facilities” and acquiring machinery andequipment.
Thestate generallyreimbursesthe municipality for half the forgone property tax revenue, depending on available funding (CGS § 12-81(59) & (60)).
Second, they may receive a sSB626 / File No.
232 8 sSB626 File No.
232 seven-year property tax exemption (100% in first two years, 50% in the third, and a decrease of 10 percentage points in each of the remaining four years),withno statereimbursement,for commercialand residential real property improvements that do not qualify for the 5- year, 80% exemption (other than manufacturing facility improvements) (CGS § 32-71).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2021 COMMITTEE ACTION Commerce Committee Joint Favorable Yea 23 Nay 0 (03/18/2021) sSB626 / File No.
232 9
Show all 62 changed rows (22 more)
Action History
-
FILE NO. 232
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 171
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/30/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0309
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
-
DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE
-
Vote to Draft
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Commerce
Sponsors
- Henri Martin · Primary
- Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato · Primary
- Whit Betts · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Henri Martin Republican
- Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato Republican
- Betts, Whit
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (184)
184 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 184 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 626?
- SB 626 is sponsored by Henri Martin (Republican), Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato (Republican), and Betts, Whit.
- What is the current status of SB 626?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 626?
- Track SB 626 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 626
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 626
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →