Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: In Committee

HJ 78 — RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.

Last action — ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

76 added · 77 removed

76 line(s) added, 77 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
House of Representatives File No.
601 January Session, 2021 Substitute House Joint Resolution No.
733 General Assembly January Session, 2021(Reprint of File No.
78 House of Representatives, April 26, 2021 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
601) Substitute House Joint Resolution No.
STAFSTROM of the 129th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute joint resolution ought to be adopted.
78 As Amended by House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 26, 2021 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24154 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of American Rock Salt Company, LLC, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 21911 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of B.J.
Alan Company CT, Inc., is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25021 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Carline Aristhene, Estate Examiner for limited purposes of the estate of Kaydriene Aristhene, is confirmed.
That the decisions of the Claims Commissioner, file numbers 25000 and 25027 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissals of the claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Mark Ciriello, are confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 21911 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of B.J.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24649 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of C-Tech, is confirmed.
Alan Company CT, sHJ78 / File No.
601 1 sHJ78 File No.
601 Inc., is confirmed.
That the decisions of the Claims Commissioner, file numbers 25000 and 25027 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissals of the claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Mark Ciriello, are confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number sHJ78 / File No.
733 sHJ78 File No.
733 24976 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Gregory Curran, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24649 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of C-Tech, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24928 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Joseph Ellis, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24976 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Gregory Curran, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24790 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Michael James, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24928 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Joseph Ellis, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25274 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ivy Johnson, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24790 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Michael James, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25244 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Garland Knight, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25274 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Ivy Johnson, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24147 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of George M.
Leniart, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25244 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Garland Knight, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25463 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Nicholas Martin, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24147 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against sHJ78 / File No.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24575 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Leona McCulley, is sHJ78 / File No.
601 2 sHJ78 File No.
733 sHJ78 File No.
601 the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of George M.
733 confirmed.
Leniart, is confirmed.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 25463 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Nicholas Martin, is confirmed.
Sec.
13.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24575 of said commissioner, ordering the dismissal of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Leona McCulley, is confirmed.
Sec.
14.
JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
601 3 sHJ78 File No.
733 3 sHJ78 File No.
601 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
733 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
None Explanation The resolution, which confirms the decision of the Claims Commissioner to dismiss several claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars, will not result in a fiscal impact.
None The resolution allows the Claims Commissioner to dismiss several claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars.
The resolution will not result in a fiscal impact.
House "A" strikes the original bill and its associated fiscal impact, thus becoming the bill with the above referenced fiscal impact.
None sHJ78 / File No.
None The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
601 4 sHJ78 File No.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety ofneral informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Show all 45 changed rows (5 more)
Previous
Latest
601 OLR Bill Analysis sHJ 78 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
sHJ78 / File No.
733 4 sHJ78 File No.
733 OLR Bill Analysis sHJ 78 (as amended by House "A") RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
601 5
733 5
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

  2. ADOPTED SEN. AS AMENDED BY HO. A

  3. SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A

  4. FILE NO. 733

  5. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 483

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  8. ADOPTED HOUSE AS AMENDED BY HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  9. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  10. FILE NO. 601

  11. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 424

  12. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  13. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  14. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/26/21

  15. FILED WITH LCO

  16. Joint Favorable Substitute

  17. PUBLIC HEARING 0326

  18. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

  • Judiciary Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Judiciary Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety civil-rights
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HJ 78?
HJ 78 is sponsored by Judiciary Committee.
What is the current status of HJ 78?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HJ 78?
Track HJ 78 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HJ 78

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HJ 78

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →