HJ 75 — RESOLUTION VACATING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DENY THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF JEAN BARJON AND REMANDING THE CLAIM TO THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER FOR A HEARING ON THE MERITS.
Last action — IN CONCURRENCE
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
44 added · 38 removed44 line(s) added, 38 removed.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
585732 General Assembly January Session, 20212021(Reprint Substituteof HouseFile Joint Resolution No.
75585) Substitute House ofJoint Representatives,Resolution AprilNo. 22, 2021 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
STAFSTROM75 ofAs theAmended 129thby Dist.,House ChairpersonAmendment ofSchedule the"A" CommitteeApproved onby the partLegislative ofCommissioner theMay House,26, that2021 theRESOLUTION substituteVACATING jointTHE resolutionDECISION oughtOF toTHE beCLAIMS adopted.COMMISSIONER TO DENY THE CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE OF JEAN BARJON AND REMANDING THE CLAIM TO THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER FOR A HEARING ON THE MERITS.
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DENY CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
SectionThat 1.the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23763 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Jean Barjon, is vacated and the claim is remanded to said commissioner for a hearing on the merits upon which said commissioner shall not deny such claim solely or in part because such claimant fails to present expert testimony concerning the prevailing standard of care for purposes of such claim.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 22239 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Edwin Andino, is confirmed.
Sec.
2.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 23763 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Jean Barjon, is confirmed.
Sec.
3.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number 24243 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars of Cedric Brown, is confirmed.
Sec.
4.
That the decision of the Claims Commissioner, file number sHJ75 / File No.
585 1 sHJ75 File No.
585 25041 of said commissioner, ordering the denial of the claim against the stateinexcessoftwentythousanddollarsofAbrahamChemmarappally and Shinymol Chemmarappally, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Jeffny Pally, is confirmed.
JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
585732 2 sHJ75 File No.
585732 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
NoneAgency MunicipalAffected Impact:Fund-Effect FY 22 $ Comptroller - Adjudicated Claims Account GF - Potential See Below Cost Note:
NoneGF=General ExplanationFund TheMunicipal resolutions,Impact: which confirm the decisions of the Claims Commissioner to dismiss several claims against the state in excess of twenty thousand dollars, will not result in a fiscal impact.
None Explanation The Outresolution Yearsauthorizes StateJean Impact:Barjon to present her claim against the state to the Claims Commissioner.
NoneThe Municipalassociated Impact:fiscal impact depends on the adjudication of the claim.
NoneHouse sHJ75"A" /strikes Filethe No.original bill and its associated fiscal impact, thus becoming the bill with the above referenced fiscal impact.
585The 3Out sHJ75Years FileBased No.on the timing of when the claim is potentially awarded, and since it would be one-time in nature, there would be no out year fiscal impact.
585for OLRthe Billpurposes Analysisof sHJinformation, 75summarization RESOLUTIONand CONFIRMINGexplanation THEand DECISIONdoes OFnot THErepresent CLAIMSthe COMMISSIONERintent TOof DENYthe CERTAINGeneraly CLAIMSAssembly AGAINSTor THEeither STATE.chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
sHJ75 / File No.
732 2 sHJ75 File No.
732 OLR Bill Analysis sHJ 75 (as amended by House "A") RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER TO DENY CERTAIN CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE.
585732 43
View plain text versions (4)
- File No. 732 View text pdf
- File No. 585 View text pdf
- House Joint Resolution View text Current pdf
- Substitute JUD Joint Favorable Substitute Resolution pdf
Action History
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
ADOPTED SEN. AS AMENDED BY HO. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 732
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 482
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
ADOPTED HOUSE AS AMENDED BY HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 585
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 412
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/21/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0326
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Judiciary Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Judiciary Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HJ 75?
- HJ 75 is sponsored by Judiciary Committee.
- What is the current status of HJ 75?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HJ 75?
- Track HJ 75 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HJ 75
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HJ 75
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →