Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 3 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 5303 — AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PREDATORY TELEMARKETING PRACTICES.

Last action — FILE NO. 330

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

43 added · 18 removed

43 line(s) added, 18 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Committee Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5303 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
330 January Session, 2021 House Bill No.
4958 Referred to Committee on GENERAL LAW Introduced by:
5303 House of Representatives, April 8, 2021 The Committee on General Law reported through REP.
(GL) AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PREDATORY TELEMARKETING PRACTICES.
D'AGOSTINO of the 91st Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PREDATORY TELEMARKETING PRACTICES.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
HB5303 / File No.
LCO 4958 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05303-R021 of 2 HB.docx Committee Bill No.
330 1 HB5303 File No.
5303 Section 1 from passage New section GL Joint Favorable LCO 4958 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-05303- 2 of 2 R02-HB.docx }
330 This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 from passage New section GL Joint Favorable HB5303 / File No.
330 2 HB5303 File No.
330 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill requires the Commissioner of Consumer Protection to conduct a study concerning predatory telemarketing practices resulting in no fiscal impact to the state because the department already regulates telemarketing and the Commissioner has the expertise to conduct the study.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None HB5303 / File No.
330 3 HB5303 File No.
330 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5303 AN ACT CONCERNING A STUDY OF PREDATORY TELEMARKETING PRACTICES.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION General Law Committee Joint Favorable Yea 18 Nay 0 (03/23/2021) HB5303 / File No.
330 4
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. FILE NO. 330

  2. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 246

  3. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  4. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  5. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/07/21

  6. FILED WITH LCO

  7. Joint Favorable

  8. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON General Law

  9. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  10. Vote to Draft

  11. PUBLIC HEARING 0218

  12. Reserved for Subject Matter Public Hearing

  13. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON General Law

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

6 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 181 not signed on

Sponsors (6)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (181)

181 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 181 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

public-safety technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5303?
HB 5303 is sponsored by Craig C. Fishbein (Republican), David Rutigliano (Republican), Devin R. Carney (Republican), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Fusco, John, and Witkos, Kevin D..
What is the current status of HB 5303?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5303?
Track HB 5303 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5303

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 5303

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →