SB 952 — AN ACT CONCERNING ENERGY STORAGE.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
4 sponsors
4 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
111 added · 301 removed111 line(s) added, 301 removed.
Substitute Senate GeneralBill Assembly File No.
291952 JanuaryPublic Session,Act 2021 Substitute Senate Bill No.
95221-53 Senate,AN AprilACT 6,CONCERNING 2021ENERGY TheSTORAGE. Committee on Energy and Technology reported through SEN.
NEEDLEMAN of the 33rd Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING ENERGY STORAGE.
(NEW) (Effective July 1, 2021) (a) On or before January 1, 2022, the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority shall initiate a proceeding to sSB952develop /and Fileimplement one or more programs, and associated funding mechanisms, for electric energy storage resources connected to the electricdistributionsystem.The authority shallestablish(1)oneor more programs for the residential class of electric customers, (2) one or more programs for commercial and industrial classes of electric customers, Substitute Senate Bill No.
291952 1and sSB952(3) Filea No.program for energy storage systems connected to the distribution system in front of the meter and not located at a customer premises.
291 develop and implement one or more programs, and associated funding mechanisms, for electric energy storage resources connected to the electricdistributionsystem.The authority shallestablish(1)oneor more programs for the residential class of electric customers, (2) one or more programs for commercial and industrial classes of electric customers, and (3) a program for energy storage systems connected to the distribution system in front of the meter and not located at a customer premises.
The authority shall also consider programs and rate designs sSB952to /incentivize Fileuses of electric energy storage technologies connected to the electric distribution system that avoid or defer investment in Public Act No.
29121-53 2 sSB952of File4 Substitute Senate Bill No.
291952 to incentivize uses of electric energy storage technologies connected to the electric distribution system that avoid or defer investment in traditional electric distribution system capacity upgrades.
(NEW) (Effective July 1, 2021) (a) The Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection, in consultation with the procurement manager identified in subsection (l) of section 16-2 of the general statutes and the Office of Consumer Counsel, may issue requests for proposals for energy storage projects connected at the transmission or distribution level, including stand-alone energy storage projects and energy storage projects paired with Class I renewable energy sources,sources thator wouldhydropower achievefacilities thethat goalshave ina sectionnameplate 1capacity rating of thisnot actmore inthan combinationone withhundred programsestablishedmegawatts, bythat thePublicUtilitiesRegulatorywould Authority.Iftheachieve Commissionerthe ofgoals Energyin andsection EnvironmentalProtection1 determinesof thatthis procuringact energyin storagecombination iswith costprograms effective,established theby commissioner shall proceed with the selectionPublic ofUtilities proposals.Regulatory Authority.
If the Commissioner of Energy and Environmental Protection determines that procuring energy storage is cost effective, the commissioner shall proceed with the selection of proposals.
(b) In making any selection of such proposals, the commissioner shall consider factors, including, but not limited to, (1) whether the proposal is in the best interest of ratepayers, including, but not limited to, the delivered price of such sources, (2) whether the proposal promotes electric distribution system reliability, including during winter peak demand, (3) any positive impacts on the state's economic development, (4) whether the proposal is consistent with the requirements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in accordance with section 22a-200a of the generalPublic statutes,Act and (5) whether the proposal is consistent with the sSB952 / File No.
29121-53 3 sSB952of File4 Substitute Senate Bill No.
291952 general statutes, and (5) whether the proposal is consistent with the policy goals outlined in the Comprehensive Energy Strategy adopted pursuant to section 16a-3d of the general statutes and the Integrated Resources Plan adopted pursuant to section 16a-3a of the general statutes.
Sec.Approved June 16, 2021 Public Act No.
4.21-53 4 of 4
(NEW) (Effective July 1, 2021) On or before January 15, 2022, and annually thereafter, each municipal utility, as defined in section 12- 265 of the general statutes, shall report, in accordance with section 11-4a of the general statutes, on the quantifiable progress of its carbon reduction to the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Such report shall be in a manner prescribed by the department to determine such municipal utility's contribution toward the state's emission reduction requirements pursuant to section 22a-200a of the general statutes.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
sSB952 / File No.
291 4 sSB952 File No.
291 Section 1 from passage New section Sec.
2 July 1, 2021 New section Sec.
3 July 1, 2021 New section Sec.
4 July 1, 2021 New section Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
In Section 1(c), technical clarifying changes were made.
ET Joint Favorable Subst.
sSB952 / File No.
291 5 sSB952 File No.
291 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation There is no fiscal impact resulting from the bill, which requires the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA) to design and implement programs related to electric energy storage.
The bill requires PURA to create a funding mechanismfor suchprograms.It isanticipatedthat any such funding mechanism will fall outside of state resources, such as through the ratemaking mechanism for electric utilities or financing programs through the Connecticut Green Bank.
While the bill requires that PURA consider the best interests of ratepayers for selecting related projects, the bill permits utilities to recover all prudent costs from ratepayers from costs associated with such storage projects.
To the extent that costs are recovered, there may be an adverse impact on ratepayers.
Show all 112 changed lines (72 more)
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB952 / File No.
291 6 sSB952 File No.
291 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 952 AN ACT CONCERNING ENERGY STORAGE.
SUMMARY This bill establishes (1) deployment goals, program requirements, and procurement authority for energy storage and (2) a municipal utility reporting requirement on carbon reduction progress.
The bill requires the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to report to the Energy and Technology Committee, annually, beginning January 1, 2023, on its quantifiable progress against the following energy storage deployment goals established in the bill:
1.
300 megawatts (MW) by December 31, 2024;
2.
650 MW by December 31, 2027;
and 3.
1,000 MW by December 31, 2030.
The bill requires the Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (PURA), by January 1, 2022,to (1)initiate aproceedingto developandimplement one or more programs and associated funding mechanisms for electric energy storage resources connected to the electric distribution system and (2) report to the Energy and Technology Committee on the proceeding’s status.
The bill establishes program objectives and allows PURA to select a third party to implement the program.
ThebillallowsDEEPtoissuerequestsforproposals(RFPs)forenergy storage projects connected at the transmission or distribution level to achieve the goals established in the bill when combined with PURA’s programs.
The bill requires the DEEP commissioner to select proposals if she determines that procuring energy storage is cost effective.
The bill establishes factors she must consider when making selections and sSB952 / File No.
291 7 sSB952 File No.
291 subjects any agreements to PURA’s review.
Under the bill, the electric distributioncompanies(EDCs,i.e.,EversourceandUnitedIlluminating) recover agreement costs from, and credit revenues to, electric ratepayers.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2021, except the DEEP reporting requirement on energy storage deployment goals is effective upon passage.
§ 2 — PURA PROCEEDING AND PROGRAMS The bill requires PURA to initiate a proceeding to develop and implement one or more programs and associated funding mechanisms for electric energy storage resources connected to the electric distribution system.
In its proceeding, PURA must establish:
1.
at least one program for residential electric customers, 2.
at least one program for commercial and industrial electric customers, and 3.
a program for energy storage systems connected to the distribution system in front of the meter and not located at a customer’s premises.
The bill requires PURA to solicit input on developing these programs from DEEP, the Connecticut Green Bank, the EDCs, and the Office of Consumer Counsel (OCC).
Under the bill, PURA must consider one or more programs and rate designs to encourage deployment of electric energy storage technologies connected to the distribution system that most effectively leverage the technology’s value to achieve objectives that:
1.
provide positive net present value to all ratepayers, or a subset of ratepayers paying for the benefits that accrue to that subset;
2.
provide multiple types of benefits to the electric grid (e.g., resilience, ancillary services, leveling out peaks in electricity use, sSB952 / File No.
291 8 sSB952 File No.
291 or supporting deployment of other distributed resources);
3.
foster sustained, orderly development of a state-based electric energy storage industry;
and 4.
maximize the value from the participation of energy storage systems in capacity markets.
PURA must also consider programs and rate designs to encourage uses of electric energy storage technologies connected to the electric distribution system that avoid or defer investment in traditional electric distribution system capacity upgrades.
The bill requires PURA to consider all energy storage configurations that are connected to the distribution system, including those connected in front of the meter and not located at a customer’s premises.
The bill allows PURA to select any combination of the Green Bank, DEEP, the EDCs, or another third party it deems appropriate to implement one or more electric energy storage programs.
§ 3 — DEEP SOLICITATION AND PROCUREMENT Project Selection The bill allows DEEP, in consultation with the state’s procurement manager and the OCC, to issue RFPs for energy storage projects connected at the transmission or distribution level that would, when combined with programs PURA establishes, achieve the bill’s energy storage goals.
Projects may include stand-alone energy storage projects or projects paired with Class I renewable energy sources (e.g., wind and solar).
The bill requires the DEEP commissioner, as part of her determination on whether procuring energy storage is cost effective, to publish and make available for public comment a cost effectiveness test that considers each applicable benefit provided by energy storage.
If the DEEP commissioner determines that procuring energy storage is cost effective, the bill requires her to begin selecting proposals.
sSB952 / File No.
291 9 sSB952 File No.
291 The bill requires the DEEP commissioner to consider at least the following when selecting proposals:
1.
whether the proposal is in ratepayers’ best interest, including the sources’ delivered price;
2.
whether the proposal promotes electric distribution system reliability, including during winter peak demand;
3.
any positive impacts on the state’s economic development, as determined in consultation with the Department of Economic and Community Development commissioner;
4.
whether the proposal is consistent with the state’s greenhouse gas reduction requirements under the Global Warming Solutions Act;
and 5.
whether the proposal is consistent with the state’s Comprehensive Energy Strategy and Integrated Resources Plan.
PURA Review and Cost Recovery Under the bill, any agreement entered into (presumably, by EDCs) as a result of DEEP’s selection is subject to PURA’s review and approval.
(The bill does not explicitly allow DEEP to direct EDCs to enter into agreements.) The bill requires PURA to (1) finish reviewing an agreement within 120 days after it was filed with PURA and (2) approve anagreementifitiscosteffectiveandinelectricratepayers’bestinterest.
Under thebill,EDCs must recover an approved agreement’snet costs through a fully reconciling rate component on electric ratepayer bills.
Costs include those incurred by the EDCs under the agreement and reasonable costs associated with the agreement.
The bill also requires EDCs to credit customers through the same fully reconciling rate component for any net revenues from selling products purchased under long-termcontractsenteredinto under thebill.(Thebilldoesnot specify lengths or quantities for contract terms.) § 4 — MUNICIPAL UTILITY REPORT sSB952 / File No.
291 10 sSB952 File No.
291 Starting by January 15, 2022, the bill annually requires municipal utilities to report to DEEP on the quantifiable progress of their carbon reduction.
Under the bill, the report must determine, in a manner DEEP prescribes, each municipal utility’s contribution toward the state’s emission reduction requirements under the state’s Global Warming Solutions Act.
By law, a “municipalutility”isamunicipality,municipaldepartment or agency, or district that manufactures, sells, or distributes gas or electricity for light, heat, or power (CGS § 12-265).
COMMITTEE ACTION Energy and Technology Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 24 Nay 2 (03/18/2021) sSB952 / File No.
291 11
Show all 112 changed rows (72 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 21-53 Current pdf
- File No. 291 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
- Substitute ET Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 21-53
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 534
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 291
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 182
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/06/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0304
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology
Sponsors
- David Michel · Primary
- Will Haskell · Primary
- Kenneth M Gucker · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 183 not signed on
Sponsors (4)
- Michel, David
- Haskell, Will
- Gucker, Kenneth M
- Travis Simms Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (183)
183 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 183 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 952?
- SB 952 is sponsored by Michel, David, Haskell, Will, Gucker, Kenneth M, and Travis Simms (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 952?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 25, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 952?
- Track SB 952 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 952
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 952
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →