HB 5377 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE REMOVAL OF COVID-19 RELATED LAYOFFS FROM THE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE ACCOUNT.
Last action — TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2021. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
27 sponsors
27 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (12 D · 8 R) — cross-party backing.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
66 added · 174 removed66 line(s) added, 174 removed.
House ofBill Representatives General Assembly File No.
2545377 JanuaryPublic Session,Act 2021 House Bill No.
537721-5 HouseAN ofACT Representatives,CONCERNING AprilTHE 6,REMOVAL 2021OF TheCOVID-19 CommitteeRELATED onLAYOFFS LaborFROM andTHE PublicUNEMPLOYMENT EmployeesCOMPENSATION reportedEXPERIENCE throughACCOUNT. REP.
PORTER of the 94th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE REMOVAL OF COVID-19 RELATED LAYOFFS FROM THE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE ACCOUNT.
["contributing employer"] (2) "Contributing employer" means an employer who is assigned a HB5377percentage /rate Fileof No.contribution under the provisions of this section;
254["reimbursing 1employer"] HB5377(3) File"Reimbursing employer" means an employer liable for payments House Bill No.
2545377 percentagein ratelieu of contributioncontributions underas theprovided provisionsunder ofsection this31-225; section;
["reimbursing employer"] (3) "Reimbursing employer" means an employer liable for payments in lieu of contributions as provided under section 31-225;
Subsection (d) of section 31-225a of the general statutes is repealed andthefollowing issubstituted inlieuthereof(EffectiveOctober HB53771, /2021): File No.
254Public 2Act HB5377 File No.
25421-5 1,2 2021):of 3 House Bill No.
5377 (d) The standard rate of contributions shall be five and four-tenths per cent.
ThisApproved actMay shall3, take2021 effectPublic asAct followsNo. and shall amend the following sections:
Section21-5 13 Octoberof 1,3 2021 31-225a(a) Sec.
2 October 1, 2021 31-225a(d) LAB Joint Favorable HB5377 / File No.
254 3 HB5377 File No.
254 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which disregards certain unemployment insurance benefits charges for the purposes of calculating employers' unemployment tax rates, does not result in any fiscal impact as costs not directly charged to a specific employer will be handled as pooled costs spread among all employers.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None HB5377 / File No.
254 4 HB5377 File No.
254 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5377 AN ACT CONCERNING THE REMOVAL OF COVID-19 RELATED LAYOFFS FROM THE UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION EXPERIENCE ACCOUNT.
SUMMARY This bill disregards an employer’s benefit charges and taxable wages betweenJuly 1, 2019, andJune30,2021, whencalculating theemployer’s unemployment tax experience rate for taxable years starting on or after January 1, 2022.
In effect, this means that the unemployment benefits paid to an employer’s former employees during that period will not affect the employer’s experience rate.
The bill's provisions apply to the extent allowed by federal law and as necessary to respond to the spread of COVID-19.
The bill similarly disregardsthestatewidebenefitsandtaxable wages for calendar years 2020 and 2021 when calculating the unemployment tax rate that will apply to new employers for tax years starting on or after January 1, 2022 (see BACKGROUND).
Thus, the rate charged to employers who have not participated in thesystem long enough to have their own experience rates will not be affected by the benefits paid during those years.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2021 EXPERIENCE RATES By law, an employer’s experience rate generally depends on the amount of unemployment benefits its former employees received during its“experienceperiod,”whichisthethree-yearperiodpreceding each June 30, when an employer’s rate is calculated.
Under current law, an employer’s rate is determined by calculating the ratio between the amount charged to the employer’s experience account (generally, the HB5377 / File No.
254 5 HB5377 File No.
254 amount of benefits paid to its former employees) and the amount of the employer’s taxable wages during the experience period.
This ratio is converted to a percentage between 0.5% and 5.4%, which becomes the employer’s experience rate (CGS § 31-225a(e)).
For tax years starting on or after January 1, 2022, the bill requires that an employer’s experience period disregard the employer’s benefit charges and taxable wages from July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2021, when applicable.
Show all 55 changed lines (15 more)
Thus, an employer’s experience rate would not be affected by the chargeable benefits paid to its employees during that period.
NEW EMPLOYER RATES By law, employers that have not been chargeable with benefits for a long enough time to have their own experience rate calculated must pay 1% or the state's five-year benefit cost rate, whichever is higher.
Under current law, the state's five-year benefit cost rate is determined by dividing the total benefits paid to claimants over the previous five years by the five-year payroll over that period.
For tax years starting on or after January 1, 2022, the bill requires that thefive-yearbenefitcostratebecalculatedwithoutthebenefitpayments and taxable wages for calendar years 2020 and 2021, when applicable.
Thus, the statewide benefits paid during those years will not affect the rate charged to the new employers.
BACKGROUND Unemployment Tax Rate By law employers pay state unemployment insurance (UI) taxes to support the state’s Unemployment Trust Fund, which provides UI benefits to eligible claimants.
An employer’s state UI tax liability typically depends on three factors:
(1) its experience rate, (2) the fund balance rate (a tax rate tied to the financial solvency of the state’s unemployment trust fund), and (3) its taxable wage base (the amount of wages it paid that are subject to state UI taxes).
Generally, the sum of the first two rates, which can range from 0.5% to 6.8%, applies against HB5377 / File No.
254 6 HB5377 File No.
254 the first $15,000 of each employee’s wages (the taxable wage base) (CGS § 31-225a).
Related Bills sSB 1002 (§§ 26-27) and sHB 6595 (§§ 26-27), reported favorably by the Labor and Public Employees Committee, both contain identical provisions as this bill.
SB 711, reported favorably by the Commerce Committee, creates a “non-charge” against an employer’s experience rate for the unemployment benefits paid to former employees because of COVID- 19.
COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Yea 13 Nay 0 (03/18/2021) HB5377 / File No.
254 7
Show all 55 changed rows (15 more)
View plain text versions (5)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 21-5 Current pdf
- File No. 254 View text pdf
- LAB Joint Favorable View text pdf
- Committee Bill View text pdf
- Proposed Bill View text pdf
Action History
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 21-5
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR IN ORIGINAL
-
RULES SUSPENDED, TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNOR
-
ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE
-
SENATE PASSED
-
RULES SUSPENDED
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 354
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RULES SUSPENDED, TRANSMITTED TO SENATE
-
HOUSE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 254
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 208
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/06/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees
-
DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE
-
Vote to Draft
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0218
-
Reserved for Subject Matter Public Hearing
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees
Sponsors
- Catherine A. Osten · Primary
- Jason Rojas · Primary
- Robin E. Comey · Primary
- Holly H. Cheeseman · Primary
- Michael DiGiovancarlo · Primary
- David Rutigliano · Primary
- Julie Kushner · Primary
- Heather S. Somers · Primary
- Jeff Currey · Primary
- Christine Conley · Primary
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria · Primary
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Joshua M. Hall · Primary
- Rob Sampson · Primary
- Susan M. Johnson · Primary
- David Michel · Primary
- Craig C. Fishbein · Primary
- Mary M. Mushinsky · Primary
- Tammy Nuccio · Primary
- Tim Ackert · Primary
- Tami Zawistowski · Primary
- Tom Delnicki · Primary
- Bobby G. Gibson · Primary
- Kevin Ryan · Primary
- Cindy Harrison · Primary
- Trenee McGee · Primary
- Cristin McCarthy Vahey · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →27 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on
Sponsors (27)
- Catherine A. Osten Democratic
- Jason Rojas Democratic
- Robin E. Comey Democratic
- Cheeseman, Holly H.
- Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic
- David Rutigliano Republican
- Julie Kushner Democratic
- Heather S. Somers Republican
- Currey, Jeff
- Conley, Christine
- Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Joshua M. Hall Democratic
- Sampson, Rob
- Susan M. Johnson Democratic
- Michel, David
- Craig C. Fishbein Republican
- Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic
- Tammy Nuccio Republican
- Tim Ackert Republican
- Tami Zawistowski Republican
- Tom Delnicki Republican
- Bobby G. Gibson Democratic
- Ryan, Kevin
- Harrison, Cindy
- Trenee McGee Democratic
- Cristin McCarthy Vahey Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5377?
- HB 5377 is sponsored by Catherine A. Osten (Democratic), Jason Rojas (Democratic), Robin E. Comey (Democratic), Cheeseman, Holly H., Michael DiGiovancarlo (Democratic), David Rutigliano (Republican), Julie Kushner (Democratic), Heather S. Somers (Republican), Currey, Jeff, Conley, Christine, Nicole Klarides-Ditria (Republican), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Joshua M. Hall (Democratic), Sampson, Rob, Susan M. Johnson (Democratic), Michel, David, Craig C. Fishbein (Republican), Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Tammy Nuccio (Republican), Tim Ackert (Republican), Tami Zawistowski (Republican), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Bobby G. Gibson (Democratic), Ryan, Kevin, Harrison, Cindy, Trenee McGee (Democratic), and Cristin McCarthy Vahey (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5377?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced January 22, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 5377?
- Track HB 5377 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5377
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5377
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →