AN ACT CONCERNING INVESTMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL FUNDS.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 867 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 867.
You're tracking SB 867
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 867 — AN ACT CONCERNING INVESTMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL FUNDS.
Last action — MATTER PASS RETAINED
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
85 added · 15 removed85 line(s) added, 15 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
86781 January Session, 2021 LCOSenate Bill No.
3263867 ReferredSenate, toMarch 17, 2021 The Committee on PLANNINGPlanning ANDand DEVELOPMENTDevelopment Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(PD)CASSANO ANof ACTthe CONCERNING4th INVESTMENTDist., OFChairperson CERTAINof MUNICIPALthe FUNDS.Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING INVESTMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL FUNDS.
(2) provide for the management and investment of such system and any such trust, including the establishment of a board or commission or the LCOSB867 3263/ \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00867-R01File of 3 SB.docx Raised Bill No.
86781 designation1 ofSB867 anFile existingNo. boardor commission for such purposes;
81 designation of an existing boardor commission for such purposes;
2 from passage 3-13c LCOSB867 3263/ {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-008672File of 3 R01-SB.docx } Raised Bill No.
86781 PD2 JointSB867 FavorableFile LCONo. 3263 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2021SB-00867- 3 of 3 R01-SB.docx }
81 PD Joint Favorable SB867 / File No.
81 3 SB867 File No.
81 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 22 $ FY 23 $ Various Municipalities Potential See Below See Below Savings Explanation The bill allows municipalities that do not currently participate in the Connecticut Municipal Employees Retirement System to invest their pension fund assets with those invested by the State Treasurer.
To the extent that the bill provides municipalities access to investment classes with lower administrative fees, there are potential savings to municipalities that opt to pool their funds with the Treasurer.
While it is anticipated that the bill will also provide such municipalities with access to more investment classes, resulting in more diversification and less risk, it is unknown how choosing this option would impact investment returns.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.
SB867 / File No.
81 4 SB867 File No.
81 OLR Bill Analysis SB 867 AN ACT CONCERNING INVESTMENT OF CERTAIN MUNICIPAL FUNDS.
SUMMARY This bill allows a municipality that does not participate in the Connecticut Municipal Employees Retirement System (CMERS) to invest its retirement system’s assets with the state’s combined retirement plansand trust fundsthat are administered,held,or invested by the state treasurer (i.e., the Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds).
The bill authorizes the treasurer to adopt regulations to allow for the funds’ investment.
The investment andmanagement ofthetrust’sassets must comply with the prudent investor standard, as existing law requires for municipalities managing their own pension, retirement, or other postemployment health and life benefit systems.
The bill places these retirement systems’ trust funds under the same oversight and requirements established in the trust statutes for funds that include the Teachers' Pension Fund, the State Employee Retirement Fund, and the Connecticut Municipal Employees' Retirement Fund.
As this change applies to all such retirement systems’ trust funds, and not only those that are invested by the treasurer pursuant to the bill, it is unclear what effect, if any, it will have.
The bill also makes technical and conforming changes.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage BACKGROUND Connecticut Municipal Employees Retirement System (CMERS) SB867 / File No.
81 5 SB867 File No.
81 CMERS is the optional municipal retirement system administered by the State Retirement Commission and the state treasurer is responsible for its investment (CGS chapter 113).
Membership includes over 200 employee groups from more than 80 municipalities (e.g., a single town may have separate groups for police officers, firefighters, general town employees, and housing authority employees).
Prudent Investor Standard Under Connecticut law, trustees must follow certain standards when investing and managing trust assets when the trust provisions are not explicit.
For example, trustees must invest and manage assets as “prudent investors” would and use any special skills or expertise they have (CGS § 45a-541 et seq.).
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Yea 26 Nay 0 (03/02/2021) SB867 / File No.
81 6
Action History
-
MATTER PASS RETAINED
-
DESIGNATED ONLY SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 81
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 82
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/16/21
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0219
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development
Sponsors
- David Michel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Michel, David
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 867?
- SB 867 is sponsored by Michel, David.
- What is the current status of SB 867?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 867?
- Track SB 867 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 867
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 867
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →