Connecticut 2021 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 7 D · 6 R cosponsors

HB 6414 — AN ACT REQUIRING THE STUDY OF THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE STATE.

Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 561

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

43 added · 11 removed

43 line(s) added, 11 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
6414 January Session, 2021 LCO No.
56 January Session, 2021 House Bill No.
3155 Referred to Committee on ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY Introduced by:
6414 House of Representatives, March 16, 2021 The Committee on Energy and Technology reported through REP.
(ET) AN ACT REQUIRING THE STUDY OF THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE STATE.
ARCONTI of the 109th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT REQUIRING THE STUDY OF THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE STATE.
Section 1 July 1, 2021 New section ET Joint Favorable LCO 3155 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-06414-R01-1 of 2 HB.docx Raised Bill No.
Section 1 July 1, 2021 New section HB6414 / File No.
6414 LCO 3155 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2021HB-06414- 2 of 2 R01-HB.docx }
56 1 HB6414 File No.
56 ET Joint Favorable HB6414 / File No.
56 2 HB6414 File No.
56 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation There is no fiscal impact resulting from the bill, which requires the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection to study its own policies and procedures to determine whether improvement may lead to better use of technology in the state.
It is anticipated that the Department is able to fulfill the requirements of the bill within existing resources.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None HB6414 / File No.
56 3 HB6414 File No.
56 OLR Bill Analysis HB 6414 AN ACT REQUIRING THE STUDY OF THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY IN THE STATE.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Special Acts.
COMMITTEE ACTION Energy and Technology Committee Joint Favorable Yea 20 Nay 6 (03/02/2021) HB6414 / File No.
56 4
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 561

  2. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  3. TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17

  4. HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  5. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FILE NO. 56

  7. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 79

  8. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  9. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  10. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/15/21

  11. FILED WITH LCO

  12. Joint Favorable

  13. PUBLIC HEARING 0218

  14. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Energy and Technology

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

16 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 171 not signed on

Sponsors (16)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (171)

171 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 171 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

environment technology
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 6414?
HB 6414 is sponsored by Tom Delnicki (Republican), Irene M. Haines (Republican), John-Michael Parker (Democratic), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), Liz Linehan (Democratic), Tammy Nuccio (Republican), Hilda E. Santiago (Democratic), Ferraro, Charles J., Jaime S. Foster (Democratic), Nicole Klarides-Ditria (Republican), Winkler, Michael A., Travis Simms (Democratic), Petit, William A., Dave W. Yaccarino (Republican), Greg S. Howard (Republican), and Kenneth Gucker (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 6414?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 6414?
Track HB 6414 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 6414

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HB 6414

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →