HB4312 — DOM VIOLENCE-ORD PROT
Last action — Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Hernandez
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 07, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
16 sponsors
1 primary, 15 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (15 D · 1 R) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Changes the definitions of "harassment" to include, among other actions, doxing, electronic tracking, and nonconsensual creation, dissemination, or threatening the dissemination of electronically generated or digitally altered content pertaining to the petitioner. Requires a county (not just counties with more than 250,000 in population) to provide remote access to a hearing on a protective order to include relevant witnesses besides the petitioner and respondent. Creates additional remedies for the court to grant in a domestic violence order of protection. Requires that any motion to extend a plenary order must be filed on or before the expiration date, and the plenary order remains in effect after filing until its original expiration date or until the motion is presented or heard, whichever is later. Requires a plenary order to be extended if the court finds that since entry of the plenary order there has been no material change in the relevant circumstances as required by law, and an extension of a plenary order may be granted for any fixed period of time or indefinitely until the plenary order is vacated or modified. Provides that if the motion to extend the plenary order is uncontested, petitioner's motion or affidavit stating that there has been no material change in relevant circumstances since entry of the order and stating the reason for the requested extension is sufficient for the court to extend the plenary order for any length of time, including indefinitely. Provides that the court may grant a contested request for an extension of the plenary order for more than 2 years for good cause. Provides that a violation of the original order or a subsequent incident of abuse is not required to grant the extension or determine the length of the extension, and compliance with the original order does not negate the basis or length of the extension. Amends the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986. Makes conforming changes.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB4312 on the official Illinois source →Action History
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Hernandez
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Nabeela Syed
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Abdelnasser Rashid
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Tony M. McCombie
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Justin Slaughter
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Maura Hirschauer
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Daniel Didech
-
Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee; 019-000-000
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary - Civil Committee; by Voice Vote
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Laura Faver Dias
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Rules Refers to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Rules Committee
-
House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Rep. Maurice A. West, II
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michelle Mussman
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Joyce Mason
-
Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Michael J. Kelly
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Martha Deuter
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Rick Ryan
-
Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Yolonda Morris
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Maurice A. West, II
Sponsors
- II Maurice A. West · Primary
- Yolonda Morris · Cosponsor
- Kelly M. Cassidy · Cosponsor
- Joyce Mason · Cosponsor
- Laura Faver Dias · Cosponsor
- Rick Ryan · Cosponsor
- Martha Deuter · Cosponsor
- Michael J. Kelly · Cosponsor
- Michelle Mussman · Cosponsor
- Daniel Didech · Cosponsor
- Maura Hirschauer · Cosponsor
- Justin Slaughter · Cosponsor
- Tony M. McCombie · Cosponsor
- Abdelnasser Rashid · Cosponsor
- Nabeela Syed · Cosponsor
- Barbara Hernandez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 15 co-sponsors · 167 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Maurice A. West, II Democrat
Co-sponsors (15)
- Yolonda Morris Democrat
- Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat
- Joyce Mason Democrat
- Laura Faver Dias Democrat
- Rick Ryan Democrat
- Martha Deuter Democrat
- Michael J. Kelly Democrat
- Michelle Mussman Democrat
- Daniel Didech Democrat
- Maura Hirschauer Democrat
- Justin Slaughter Democrat
- Tony M. McCombie Republican
- Abdelnasser Rashid Democrat
- Nabeela Syed Democrat
- Barbara Hernandez Democrat
Not signed on (167)
167 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 167 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bob Morgan | Democrat | Yea |
| Dagmara Avelar | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniel Didech | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Vella | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jay Hoffman | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz | Democrat | Yea |
| Kam Buckner | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin John Olickal | Democrat | Yea |
| Lilian Jiménez | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Beth Canty | Democrat | Yea |
| Thaddeus Jones | Democrat | Yea |
| Tracy Katz Muhl | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley Fritts | Republican | Yea |
| Daniel J. Ugaste | Republican | Yea |
| David Friess | Republican | Yea |
| Jed Davis | Republican | Yea |
| Martin McLaughlin | Republican | Yea |
| Steven Reick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tom Weber | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB4312 do?
- Amends the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963. Changes the definitions of "harassment" to include, among other actions, doxing, electronic tracking, and nonconsensual creation, dissemination, or threatening the dissemination of electronically generated or digitally altered content pertaining to the petitioner. Requires a county (not just counties with more than 250,000 in population) to provide remote access to a hearing on a protective order to include relevant witnesses besides the petitioner and respondent. Creates additional remedies for the court to grant in a domestic violence order of protection. Requires that any motion to extend a plenary order must be filed on or before the expiration date, and the plenary order remains in effect after filing until its original expiration date or until the motion is presented or heard, whichever is later. Requires a plenary order to be extended if the court finds that since entry of the plenary order there has been no material change in the relevant circumstances as required by law, and an extension of a plenary order may be granted for any fixed period of time or indefinitely until the plenary order is vacated or modified. Provides that if the motion to extend the plenary order is uncontested, petitioner's motion or affidavit stating that there has been no material change in relevant circumstances since entry of the order and stating the reason for the requested extension is sufficient for the court to extend the plenary order for any length of time, including indefinitely. Provides that the court may grant a contested request for an extension of the plenary order for more than 2 years for good cause. Provides that a violation of the original order or a subsequent incident of abuse is not required to grant the extension or determine the length of the extension, and compliance with the original order does not negate the basis or length of the extension. Amends the Illinois Domestic Violence Act of 1986. Makes conforming changes.
- Who sponsors HB4312 ?
- HB4312 is sponsored by Maurice A. West, II (Democrat), Yolonda Morris (Democrat), Kelly M. Cassidy (Democrat), Joyce Mason (Democrat), Laura Faver Dias (Democrat), Rick Ryan (Democrat), Martha Deuter (Democrat), Michael J. Kelly (Democrat), Michelle Mussman (Democrat), Daniel Didech (Democrat), Maura Hirschauer (Democrat), Justin Slaughter (Democrat), Tony M. McCombie (Republican), Abdelnasser Rashid (Democrat), Nabeela Syed (Democrat), and Barbara Hernandez (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB4312 ?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced January 07, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB4312 ?
- Track HB4312 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB4312
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB4312
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →