Bench warrants for failure to appear
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H 3067 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H 3067.
You're tracking H 3067
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H 3067 — Bench warrants for failure to appear
Last action — Referred to Committee on Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 17-15-175 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A JUDGE MAY NOT ISSUE A BENCH WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR UNLESS THE SOLICITOR OR CLERK OF COURT HAS PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD BEFORE ISSUING THE BENCH WARRANT.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
36 added · 6 removedPlain-language change summary
The latest version of Bill H 3067 introduces new requirements before a judge can issue a bench warrant for someone who fails to appear in court. Specifically, it now mandates that the solicitor must post a list of potential bench warrants at the courthouse and on their website at least 48 hours prior to requesting a warrant. This change aims to ensure individuals have adequate notice of their court obligations and adds a layer of protection against unnecessary penalties.
PK2025-2026 GP/ZÊBill 3067 !Text customXml/item1.xmlÅWÝnH¾ß§ù¢¹)1¿6Î:t1c¼ÃÐ*ªVh!±íHÓjUi_a_qdØ`ì8íÝ®dqÎ÷}sÎññ»¯ë}áy±Ún®/¤KññM¼MVûëNý%Û$,ÛnøõÅf{ñÎøe=GÊ@\ð%¬dD6Åuï¡,¯úý"~àkV\nù<é6_³^óûþ#?³{ÞEqÐ_ïéýм÷±íYÁ»4¤wKlLVY6îÛÆSg]s7YùkõMWß°5sïð÷[ÈØ±of UÕFkB,¢ j²"xuEUT'Z<îpLÃ3pfú>%Î-6çscʲûçã}ÞYOPïMë¿Ýû¼]zçúÔ¡u<÷ÿdWÍòRPrevious ^zä\§c¶;»ký~9â\Ô ùÓVersion kïèm<§ævö#$1§¯µëí²Ï,l¿§ãëR&¹Åv°<3Jë:ÂcrgÐ;G»$¸Z¸gi=]8Áu0[KÓ=¿^@º|0=&¹;C<øMÃø,Ê(Dec. J¤RQ¼ª?¨Áo+Ñ·üpæþ.Û¤¸£r bäðÎQ¢íIª ÉfÔ44·ÂÄ5çûÜ`1ÁÄZÞký:uItXõ{}×ï°Iêt°µü{}Ú< ëC%GÐöÔÚ.G© K©¢k(´Õ:%·¢¡G2®ÿH¬¤£DEBÂõHP]K4AÖY¬Jj¬HÚa)Q Ê#ÍÓ`Æø@ è !TIÐQK82c÷®z×Da ©#Ae1X:i9Ê©õÞ6$)@S©ã|ZG<ï]I
~{<·àu(zWQÇ0Ùn?¯Yþy?Ц©4´$Í
µ&©Ì¨) âÐËUùTÑöìÞUZmàMø|ߪ¤ @¯I.î]°;AOQ'?ÞöèªÌ8áLEB·@íímþÖ,Í3þýHßå_Ë=`U°(ã]o³¢ éø¶Gø#gSòõ~øópó´¥Pr)a÷¾¿=DEç,Æ©èÚPP¥ªI&D<XÌÚPR_L¢Ï¾ÀQ¹x9òéüm h/¦í¿Ê\U¦ÇªëÒÌõTTb6|SÆ «ÀF±,è,Õ.µ(yùîV'!OÓí?XËÊi-¥%Ô-3àÿ«f¬(À¿w7ößÞi Áä=X \Ð3Ës¶)²UösTn{ò®ÒÖ$¬7Aèx¬xÈø·?ó,8~+âºÕ=òò~û¥êÐN OÁmÎkÐø!_ÁåY¹Ýü\î;îßìPK GP/ZÙî!å Y customXml/itemProps1.xml±NÃ0wÂÊâɵJÚTI*©+Õ8Ô"¶#Û$Ä»ã¨b ã'}ÿwW?õÞÁyeM
Ó Ã´½2c
:²ÇÈaz1Y6ë²÷^áup QÄ8óUra>Pêå´ð;ËÁ:-Bn¤vÖÊE 4c,§r,ý¢§E¶ÈS[%_|Çxuiº»ls^¾ç;Í}ËÚm²ï¤^}.
0ø¿qå-NýGlòMp1ÒÄz#>^osF~sBë^õÑëÔ?PK GP/Z>ÊåÕ½ ' customXml/_rels/item1.xml.relsϱjÃ0à½O!´hªeg(¡XöÙBp!«Ï¶¥ºKHÞ¾¢S2Þÿ÷sm«¸A&Ѩ¦ªèpôq6êgØn ¶q´+F0ê¤úî£=Áj¹dhñDA"¹0§oÉ-,U Ë9X.cu²îbgкþÒù¿!»'SF#óal¤ Þ±q¼ºkÈ/*´»c8õ±4ÁæØHÏþVMUL©»V?ý×ýPK ! 3hè [Content_Types].xmlÍMÛ0ï
þ£ë+¥gý8¶ÝB¯4NDõ
f²»ù÷íÄ-%³M¼ÎÅkæ}E43¿}²&{Ú»Mò1ËÀI¯´[ìûýçÑ;! §ñ ¶d·×¯æ÷Û ¥l[
÷£\û .>ZAég\ñ äO±>ßré£Ul1ÿ¥ØÊ>=¥× I,ûÐV^!-¥uþàÔ_.£C2ë\ë7)ñÕÊ¿ vy_Si¢VÝH_MQüÑGÅ2óã28}Yj m~¥¢jnMÞ®X¡Ý͹Aòö5\Ø»èNÎÆiE+=¤É0½Ù0¼yiú\º]BL'éò³î@ÚÀË4ºÝö@ú Ø)w"<Âò[owÞóÔÇ×h¥;!À©öÊk âäòðþÓÁü«ÕËþáý§ù7e \ÿÙõO~bi t'ÄÊxD·/Ñ=í½NøÖúÍ1üõÕ²\Í=Ö]ÅA¦4ç@ó<ÿ/µ9f"ë2ÍMñ?¶½ªìQ8©lôÙûjæR ëÝ´¿ê¢óz]üPK ! U~ù á _rels/.relsMK1ïÿ!̽;Û*"ÒÝ^DèMdýC2û©¶ÿÞX]¨k=fòÎg¬7{;ªwið®eQb§½\WÁk󴸡Ñ;®àÀ 6õõÕú
GÜú!$).UÐĤ{¶ ØåÖGK±Ã@ú:ÆUYÞaüÍzÂT[SAÜPÍ!ð9lß¶æG¯wxy/ìE¹?ʧQ Å¥ãõs.'¤ò¼ÏWbNhyÉM?6>ÌJÇòÍí%mô.·ÿ¬çùVÂÉǬ?PK ! ¯×Ðp> Ï word/_rels/document.xml.relsÍÁr0_
áÐ[MâN{È¡42b14 1HÄö³õÐGê+TØ&F´Óö";fö¬¾]vñóûÕ¶©èd%xêbÏwàLä_§n¯«¥»º½¹*},«V:ú.S·Tª½FH²*=Ñ×+
誴ÙQKÙ3] |?FÝÔkútv-üGQõ põÇhÙPJóK×y ÝTêNDO{t»
06, 2024) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 3067Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 17-15-175 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A JUDGE MAY NOT ISSUE A BENCH WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR UNLESS THE SOLICITOR OR CLERK OF COURT HAS PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD BEFORE ISSUING THE BENCH WARRANT.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Chapter 15, Title 17 of the S.C.
Code is amended by adding:
Section 17-15-175.
After an initial appearance, a circuit court judge may not issue a general sessions court bench warrant for failure to appear in court upon motion by a solicitor, unless the solicitor has conspicuously posted a list of potential bench warrants at the appropriate courthouse and on the solicitor's internet website at least forty-eight hours before the bench warrant is requested. This section does not apply if the presiding judge sua sponte issues the bench warrant for failure to appear or the person has been personally served with an appearance date.
SECTION 2. The repeal or amendment by this act of any law, whether temporary or permanent or civil or criminal, does not affect pending actions, rights, duties, or liabilities founded thereon, or alter, discharge, release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under the repealed or amended law, unless the repealed or amended provision shall so expressly provide.
After the effective date of this act, all laws repealed or amended by this act must be taken and treated as remaining in full force and effect for the purpose of sustaining any pending or vested right, civil action, special proceeding, criminal prosecution, or appeal existing as of the effective date of this act, and for the enforcement of rights, duties, penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities as they stood under the repealed or amended laws.
SECTION 3. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
----XX---- This web page was last updated on December 06, 2024 at 02:11 PM
Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Representative J. Todd Rutherford · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 169 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (169)
169 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 169 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H 3067 do?
- A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING SECTION 17-15-175 SO AS TO PROVIDE THAT A JUDGE MAY NOT ISSUE A BENCH WARRANT FOR FAILURE TO APPEAR UNLESS THE SOLICITOR OR CLERK OF COURT HAS PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE ATTORNEY OF RECORD BEFORE ISSUING THE BENCH WARRANT.
- Who sponsors H 3067?
- H 3067 is sponsored by Representative J. Todd Rutherford.
- What is the current status of H 3067?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track H 3067?
- Track H 3067 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H 3067
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H 3067
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →