H 3144 — Inmate legal counsel access
Last action — Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the House.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS, BY ADDING SECTION 24-3-990 SO AS TO PROVIDE INMATES CONFINED TO STATE, COUNTY, OR MUNICIPAL DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED ACCESS TO LEGAL COUNSEL WHEN REQUESTED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND TO DEFINE THE TERM "IN-PERSON MEETING."
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
33 added · 6 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to Bill H 3144 allows inmates in South Carolina detention facilities to access legal counsel without being denied, as long as it does not compromise facility security or operations. Additionally, it provides a clear definition of what constitutes an "in-person meeting" between an inmate and their lawyer. This change is significant because it ensures that inmates have better access to legal representation, which is fundamental to their rights and can impact their cases while promoting the fair administration of justice.
PK2025-2026 ¡T/ZÃb³Bill M3144 customXml/item1.xml½WÝnH¾ß§ù¢¹Text 1þ!ëÐÅ0i1xahUÃXÅ´ZUê+ìýîËõIöof ÆÄiW{±1âïûæÌÃaòúó:Al¯²ôêL¸àÏKÃ,Z¥wWg>¹æÆg(/hÑ$KÙÕY½V$OKiÈÏYA#ZP"i~Õ»/Ë~?ïÙæÙKÁg5-àqs× á'zÇú"Ïûë=½¿Sãêç:1ÝcävÕé*I&ýcÛäÚ´°Í±ú*)~-¯x°®Ù«;xkÒoPrevious ÓPeeĨVersion ¹Ñ(Dec. p²ÌÜ8¢7¦4Vx)ʤÀ ¦¦eÓ`¦yqÍ·X³,õ&9ôO;ÓÓtò¼³vPo4ý-~»÷1`òF âèíøÄtìSüm5ÝÏMB0vñÂqOEÑE³ík°ÛúèÈßwÁET²ÙvX{Gl`h'FØÙ®výrZÛÞ6Ë´ë¾çñ´|mÊ\sßbÃ_¥qá±{'Ð;G»pqY¸'iéL¾MnÏ㢹oº¹Ð,d`]³Ô½ÖtÓ2 do[²¦¸TS¦ëP¥¤
o\*zØBïgØFûUoØEоfÚH7]Ø~!hèÒì*$ÑUÓwa¾ûË´¹-D2ÇÀ/¾û»Ò]öÕgZãûlÛj@ûÙìè¨;ló &VpràüR°§UÔ®«ÝR»º}£Îl8ð´]ÿ¹_ROýðGÏcaG)ß7ÞeODa¤D§Ð(÷.¸åhÄ8a8å¥Âñ¨w^l8¼ N_,Èw¦s»^²MïRh,äËà ¸{@Þ»Zi}ZÓͧý@iQÖ%J0PÄ,IJëÀ.VŶdíɽ˸ÜÀ±|_@:Ä»âØì©wYÀnG1Xì%Uì-r3¶§õÚNy+JOG!Il,×ãÈM˲5r½¯ç?gú¯ãVñÈÒR^øOñ|<ïU0%P§ÉJëÞæeZ^0ðïa=`ÓeÂ`íMäÍÐÇÄóÀhbl]®ÎǦ :]æAº]BÀG±BC~H«ÜWø8æ¥*°Ärr$KUB¶81?,£g¾û ØDã Nü?(w±[îÑÆ|aB¡[<¯øÿ+/bм¨ÿÚÞcÐêþô XUd¦ð1ÄPÂîhÂlæ,A4Y·öðZÀwjßfÒM²Wiå÷¿åaÕܪÆyq=6-BW|ºe+'êÝáýv³ÎÒèçjGÔIÿø+PýPK ¡T/ZÙî!å Y customXml/itemProps1.xml±NÃ0wÂÊâɵJÚTI*©+Õ8Ô"¶#Û$Ä»ã¨b ã'}ÿwW?õÞÁyeM
Ó Ã´½2c
:²ÇÈaz1Y6ë²÷^áup QÄ8óUra>Pêå´ð;ËÁ:-Bn¤vÖÊE 4c,§r,ý¢§E¶ÈS[%_|Çxuiº»ls^¾ç;Í}ËÚm²ï¤^}.
0ø¿qå-NýGlòMp1ÒÄz#>^osF~sBë^õÑëÔ?PK ¡T/Z>ÊåÕ½ ' customXml/_rels/item1.xml.relsϱjÃ0à½O!´hªeg(¡XöÙBp!«Ï¶¥ºKHÞ¾¢S2Þÿ÷sm«¸A&Ѩ¦ªèpôq6êgØn ¶q´+F0ê¤úî£=Áj¹dhñDA"¹0§oÉ-,U Ë9X.cu²îbgкþÒù¿!»'SF#óal¤ Þ±q¼ºkÈ/*´»c8õ±4ÁæØHÏþVMUL©»V?ý×ýPK ! 3hè [Content_Types].xmlÍMÛ0ï
þ£ë+¥gý8¶ÝB¯4NDõ
f²»ù÷íÄ-%³M¼ÎÅkæ}E43¿}²&{Ú»Mò1ËÀI¯´[ìûýçÑ;! §ñ ¶d·×¯æ÷Û ¥l[
÷£\û .>ZAég\ñ äO±>ßré£Ul1ÿ¥ØÊ>=¥× I,ûÐV^!-¥uþàÔ_.£C2ë\ë7)ñÕÊ¿ vy_Si¢VÝH_MQüÑGÅ2óã28}Yj m~¥¢jnMÞ®X¡Ý͹Aòö5\Ø»èNÎÆiE+=¤É0½Ù0¼yiú\º]BL'éò³î@ÚÀË4ºÝö@ú Ø)w"<Âò[owÞóÔÇ×h¥;!À©öÊk âäòðþÓÁü«ÕËþáý§ù7e \ÿÙõO~bi t'ÄÊxD·/Ñ=í½NøÖúÍ1üõÕ²\Í=Ö]ÅA¦4ç@ó<ÿ/µ9f"ë2ÍMñ?¶½ªìQ8©lôÙûjæR ëÝ´¿ê¢óz]üPK ! U~ù á _rels/.relsMK1ïÿ!̽;Û*"ÒÝ^DèMdýC2û©¶ÿÞX]¨k=fòÎg¬7{;ªwið®eQb§½\WÁk󴸡Ñ;®àÀ 6õõÕú
GÜú!$).UÐĤ{¶ ØåÖGK±Ã@ú:ÆUYÞaüÍzÂT[SAÜPÍ!ð9lß¶æG¯wxy/ìE¹?ʧQ Å¥ãõs.'¤ò¼ÏWbNhyÉM?6>ÌJÇòÍí%mô.·ÿ¬çùVÂÉǬ?PK ! ¶ää? Ï word/_rels/document.xml.relsÍÁr0_
áÐ[6ig:í!^ÒzÈLF Ð bígë¡ÔW¨°Mh§í;fv«oñóûõ¶*hU!ëØõ=ì:P§u»W+w}{s%ÓærÌ#µÝ\ëæ!æP1åÉj³"d[1mÌ6C KY`¢võc:»þ'¢¢Há£L» jýÀhÉÐÚð+×y`m:vGNÏDt;»í_¹DH©¡=Alßðsd¥Tµ»á˰øqɦµ.i§´¬¾öû 8wò¢BCµ°xf-úM-ÇbXÎÉãc©lb¿2¯XkýÀÆz=ºl奵a
¿
mqúá¥2)³6Þ0n½mí¿Q&µuW%ÐñpxuYÁùë0æ¬PóÚ4ÃHÇÀsBhóìhbíÍs"èÒ=J-:÷мWEtN>i³Ö!7Ú²¨GmbÂ*w³Ùx*UiÈe§ÀËäJ²TÀÚ4÷¼Y÷桳U¼ð)}Ǫ潵?)û$<Ø]UcTüaØã³äÿÓÖäZ³c¦÷4©H)VI@ßRÖ}F&'Ipe.!jZ0?¨Ï¹÷RàÀ3çÄí_sLÂ%ÁbI² 9w×ù·Ç> ìûô߸`åG,H#Ê9ã¸!3²J9(KÍÌ3¸Èú-»ýPK ! ÚògÀ Q word/document.xmlíÙnãÈñ=@þ¡¡Ýl÷!¬½à9£
-;fÐ"[×¼BR½Aù
<H|K>e¾$Õ
06, 2024) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 3144Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS, BY ADDING SECTION 24-3-990 SO AS TO PROVIDE INMATES CONFINED TO STATE, COUNTY, OR MUNICIPAL DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED ACCESS TO LEGAL COUNSEL WHEN REQUESTED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND TO DEFINE THE TERM "IN-PERSON MEETING." Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Article 9, Chapter 3, Title 24 of the S.C.
Code is amended by adding:
Section 24-3-990. (A) An inmate confined in a state, county, or municipal detention facility shall not be prohibited access to legal counsel when requested, provided such access does not jeopardize the security of the detention facility or prohibit the normal operations of the detention facility.
In the event an in-person meeting is requested between an inmate and legal counsel, the state, county, or municipal detention facility shall make a reasonable effort to accommodate the request, provided the meeting does not jeopardize the security of the detention facility or prohibit the normal operations of the detention facility.
(B) For the purposes of this section, an "in-person meeting" is a meeting that occurs when an inmate and legal counsel have been placed in the same room or general area with no continuous partition.
The state, county, or municipal detention facility may provide general visual observation of the area in which the in-person meeting occurs, but shall not provide audio or video supervision of the area so as to uphold the privileged nature of the inmate's communications with legal counsel.
SECTION 2. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
----XX---- This web page was last updated on December 06, 2024 at 10:30 AM
Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Representative J. Todd Rutherford · Primary
- Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 168 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (168)
168 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 168 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H 3144 do?
- A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS, BY ADDING SECTION 24-3-990 SO AS TO PROVIDE INMATES CONFINED TO STATE, COUNTY, OR MUNICIPAL DETENTION FACILITIES SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED ACCESS TO LEGAL COUNSEL WHEN REQUESTED UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES AND TO DEFINE THE TERM "IN-PERSON MEETING."
- Who sponsors H 3144?
- H 3144 is sponsored by Representative J. Todd Rutherford and Tiffany R. Spann-Wilder (Democrat).
- What is the current status of H 3144?
- This bill is in committee in the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track H 3144?
- Track H 3144 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H 3144
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H 3144
Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →