H 4760 — Abortion-Inducing Drugs
Last action — Committee report: Favorable Medical Affairs
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 16, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
39 sponsors
39 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Mixed recorded votes
15 passed, 1 failed in recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 8 TO CHAPTER 41, TITLE 44 SO AS TO CREATE CRIMES AND ASSOCIATED PENALTIES REGARDING THE USE OF ABORTION-INDUCING DRUGS, WITH EXCEPTIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 44-53-250, RELATING TO SCHEDULE IV CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, SO AS TO ADD MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 44-53-370, RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSES AND PENALTIES, SO AS TO CREATE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR POSSESSION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL, WITH EXCEPTIONS.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
2 added · 133 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendments to Bill H 4760 removed a significant number of lines from the original draft, specifically 133 lines, while adding only a couple of lines. This reduction likely simplifies the bill's provisions regarding abortion-inducing substances and criminal penalties associated with their use. These changes matter because they could change how the bill is interpreted and enforced, impacting access to abortion-related healthcare in South Carolina. By streamlining the language, lawmakers may aim for clearer guidance and potentially reduce any legal ambiguities surrounding the legislation.
2025-2026 Bill 4760 Text of Previous Version (Jan.(Dec.
28,17, 2026)2025) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 4760Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter Committee ReportA Januarybill 28, 2026TO AMEND H.THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 8 TO CHAPTER 41, TITLE 44 SO AS TO CREATE CRIMES AND ASSOCIATED PENALTIES REGARDING THE USE OF ABORTION-INDUCING DRUGS, WITH EXCEPTIONS;
4760 Introduced by Reps.
W.
Newton, Oremus, G.
M.
Smith, Jordan, Crawford, Duncan, Erickson, Forrest, Gatch, Gilliam, Guest, Haddon, Hiott, Hixon, J.
E.
Johnson, Lawson, Ligon, Long, Lowe, McCravy, Martin, C.
Mitchell, T.
Moore, B.
Newton, Pedalino, Pope, Rankin, Robbins, Sessions, Vaughan, Whitmire, Willis, Yow, Chumley, Edgerton, Taylor, Bowers, White and Burns S.
Printed 1/28/26--H.
Read the first time January 13, 2026 ________ The committee on House Judiciary To whom was referred a Bill (H.
4760) to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by adding Article 8 to Chapter 41, Title 44 so as to create crimes and associated penalties regarding the use of abortion-inducing, etc., respectfully Report:
That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass with amendment:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, SECTION 8, by striking SECTION 8 and inserting:
SECTION 8. This act takes effect uponninety days after approval by the Governor.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.
W.
NEWTON for Committee.
statement of estimated fiscal impact Explanation of Fiscal Impact State Expenditure This bill prohibits any person from knowingly causing an abortion by means of delivering, dispensing, distributing, or providing a pregnant woman with an abortion-inducing drug.
This bill defines abortion-inducing drug as any drug or chemical, or any combination of drugs or chemicals, or any other substance when used with the intent to cause an abortion.
Under this bill, abortion-inducing drug does not mean a contraceptive, an emergency contraceptive, or the use of methotrexate to treat an ectopic pregnancy.
Any person who knowingly performs an abortion by means of an abortion-inducing drug is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than five years, or fined not more than $50,000, or both.
Additionally, any person who knowingly performs an abortion by means of an abortion-inducing drug that results in the death or the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions, of the pregnant woman is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than ten years, or fined not more than $75,000, or both.
Further, any person who knowingly performs an abortion by means of an abortion-inducing drug that results in the death or the substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function, not including psychological or emotional conditions, of a pregnant woman under the age of eighteen is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than fifty years, or fined not more than $100,000, or both.
This bill states that any person or entity that manufactures, mails, distributes, transports, delivers, or provides an abortion-inducing drug is subject to strict liability for damages from the harm caused to the mother or unborn child.
Additionally, this bill adds Mifepristone and Misoprostol to the list of Schedule IV controlled substances.
Further, this bill makes it unlawful for any person to knowingly or intentionally possess mifepristone or misoprostol, unless such substance was obtained pursuant to a valid prescription or order from a practitioner.
A person who violates this is guilty of a felony and, upon conviction, must be imprisoned for not more than five years, or fined not more than $5,000, or both.
This bill creates several new felony and misdemeanor offenses as well as civil actions.
As these are new offenses, there is no data to determine the number of new cases that may be heard in circuit court.
This bill may result in an increase in the number of civil or criminal cases and potentially the number of incarcerations, due to the newly created offenses, which may increase the workload of the court system and CID, PPP, CPC, and Corrections.
The potential increase in expenses for each agency will depend upon the increase in the number of cases and number of incarcerations.
These agencies anticipate that the potential increase in caseload can be managed within existing appropriations.
Judicial anticipates that the potential impact of the caseload in circuit court can be managed within existing appropriations.
However, if the bill has an unanticipated impact on caseloads or downstream expenses, these agencies will request an increase in General Fund appropriations.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
For information, according to Corrections, in FY 2024- 25, the annual total cost per inmate was $37,503, of which $35,696 was state funded.
Under this bill, BOP, within LLR, is required to notify all pharmacists in South Carolina about the provisions of this law and that lawful prescriptions for mifepristone and misoprostol may be filled.
Additionally, this bill requires DPH to notify all healthcare practitioners and providers in South Carolina about the provisions of this law and that mifepristone and misoprostol may be prescribed and administered in accordance with this act.
This bill will have no expenditure impact for PEBA as the agency anticipates this bill will have no impact on SHP.
Additionally, this bill will have no expenditure impact for SLED, the Office of the Attorney General, DHHS, or LLR as each agency anticipates any additional responsibilities due to this bill can be managed with existing staff and appropriations.
This bill will have no expenditure impact for the USC School of Medicine since the university does not render medical care through the School of Medicine.
SFAA indicates that IRF's Medical Professional policy excludes damages arising from the criminal act of an insured.
Under this bill, anyone performing an abortion by means of an abortion-inducing drug is guilty of a felony.
Therefore, these violations would have minimal impact to the IRF.
However, SFAA notes this bill may create an increased exposure for DPH in the event the agency fails to notify all required parties and concerns for an increase in exposure to pharmacies.
The agency is unable to quantify a fiscal impact related to these exposures at this time.
Therefore, the fiscal impact on SFAA and the IRF is undetermined depending upon the number of insurance claims that may arise due to this bill.
The expenditure impact of this bill on MUSC and DPH is pending, contingent upon a response from the agencies.
State Revenue This bill may result in a change in the fines and fees collected in court due to an increase in the caseload in court.
Court fines and fees are distributed to the General Fund, Other Funds, and local funds.
Therefore, RFA anticipates this bill may result in a change to General Fund and Other Funds revenue due to the change in fines and fees collections in court.
Local Expenditure RFA contacted all forty-six counties and MASC regarding this legislation and received responses from the counties of Charleston, Dorchester, Florence, Horry, Lancaster, and MASC.
The counties of Dorchester, Florence, Horry, and Lancaster indicate that the bill will have no expenditure impact.
Charleston County expresses concern that new civil causes of action and potential litigation risks for county-employed medical personnel, such as emergency medical services and detention center medical staff, could result in external legal defense costs.
MASC indicates that the fiscal impact to municipalities is likely minimal, as municipal courts do not have jurisdiction over the crimes or civil causes of action established by this bill because the punishments exceed the jurisdictional scope.
Additionally, because the Attorney General's Office and solicitors have prosecutorial responsibilities, MASC anticipates that municipal law enforcement officers will likely refer any suspected offenses to their attention for investigation.
Frank A.
Rainwater, Executive Director Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office _______ A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 8 TO CHAPTER 41, TITLE 44 SO AS TO CREATE CRIMES AND ASSOCIATED PENALTIES REGARDING THE USE OF ABORTION-INDUCING DRUGS, WITH EXCEPTIONS;
----XX---- This web page was last updated on JanuaryDecember 28,17, 20262025 at 08:3901:44 PM
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill creates new criminal offenses and associated penalties related to the use of abortion-inducing drugs while amending existing laws regarding controlled substances to include specific abortion medications.
-
Section 44-53-250
MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL
This change adds the drugs Mifepristone and Misoprostol to the list of Schedule IV controlled substances.
-
Section 44-53-370
CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR POSSESSION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL, WITH EXCEPTIONS
This change establishes criminal penalties for the possession of the abortion-inducing drugs Mifepristone and Misoprostol.
-
Chapter 41, Title 44
Article 8: Abortion-Inducing Drug Prohibitions
This addition creates a new article establishing prohibitions and regulations concerning abortion-inducing drugs.
-
Section 44-41-810
definitions related to abortion and abortion-inducing drugs
This section provides definitions for key terms related to the regulation of abortion-inducing drugs.
-
Section 44-41-820
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly cause an abortion to occur by means of delivering, dispensing, distributing, or providing a pregnant woman with an abortion-inducing drug.
This creates a felony offense for causing an abortion using abortion-inducing drugs, with specific penalties defined.
-
Section 44-41-830
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly and intentionally engage in the use of an abortion-inducing drug on a pregnant woman, without her knowledge or consent.
This establishes a felony for using abortion-inducing drugs on individuals without consent, with increased penalties based on gestational age.
-
Section 44-41-840
Any person or entity is subject to strict liability for damages from the harm caused to the mother or unborn child who manufactures, mails, distributes, transports, delivers, or provides an abortion-inducing drug.
This section imposes strict liability for entities involved with abortion-inducing drugs, allowing for civil action against them.
Action History
-
Committee report: Favorable Medical Affairs
-
Polled out of committee Medical Affairs
-
Scrivener's error corrected
-
Referred to Committee on Medical Affairs
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Roll call Yeas-76 Nays-28
-
Read third time and sent to Senate
-
Roll call Yeas-81 Nays-31
-
Read second time
-
Amended
-
Scrivener's error corrected
-
Requests for debate-Rep(s). Hiott, Kirby, Edgerton, Magnuson, Calhoon, Ford, Cromer, Harris, Cobb-Hunter, Bamberg, Rivers, Gilliard, Waters, Whitmire, Henderson-Myers, Grant, Rose, Weeks
-
Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary
-
Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Burns
-
Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Bowers, White
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton · Primary
- Representative Melissa Lackey Oremus · Primary
- Jr. Representative Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan · Primary
- Representative Heather Ammons Crawford · Primary
- Representative Adam L. Duncan · Primary
- Representative Shannon S. Erickson · Primary
- Jr. Representative Cally R. "Cal" Forrest · Primary
- Representative Gil Gatch · Primary
- Representative Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam · Primary
- Jr. Representative Thomas Duval "Val" Guest · Primary
- Representative Patrick B. Haddon · Primary
- Representative David R. Hiott · Primary
- Representative William M. "Bill" Hixon · Primary
- J.E. Johnson · Primary
- Representative M. Brian Lawson · Primary
- Representative Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon · Primary
- Representative Steven Wayne Long · Primary
- Representative Phillip D. Lowe · Primary
- Representative John R. McCravy III · Primary
- Representative David Martin · Primary
- Representative Cody T. Mitchell · Primary
- Representative Travis A. Moore · Primary
- Representative Brandon Newton · Primary
- Representative Fawn M. Pedalino · Primary
- Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Primary
- Representative Luke S. Rankin · Primary
- Representative Robby Robbins · Primary
- Representative Heath Sessions · Primary
- Representative David Vaughan · Primary
- Representative William R. "Bill" Whitmire · Primary
- Representative Mark N. Willis · Primary
- Representative Richard L. "Richie" Yow · Primary
- Representative William M. "Bill" Chumley · Primary
- Representative Sarita L. Edgerton · Primary
- Representative Bill Taylor · Primary
- Representative Phillip Bowers · Primary
- Representative Joseph S. "Joe" White · Primary
- Representative James Mikell "Mike" Burns · Primary
- Jr. Representative G. Murrell Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →39 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 131 not signed on · 74 voted No
Sponsors (39)
- Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton Voted No
- Representative Melissa Lackey Oremus Voted No
- Representative Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr. Voted No
- Representative Heather Ammons Crawford Voted No
- Representative Adam L. Duncan Voted No
- Representative Shannon S. Erickson Voted No
- Representative Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr. Voted No
- Representative Gil Gatch Voted No
- Representative Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam Voted No
- Representative Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr. Voted No
- Representative Patrick B. Haddon Voted No
- Representative David R. Hiott Voted No
- Representative William M. "Bill" Hixon Voted No
- J.E. Johnson
- Representative M. Brian Lawson Voted No
- Representative Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon Voted No
- Representative Steven Wayne Long Voted No
- Representative Phillip D. Lowe Voted No
- Representative John R. McCravy III Voted No
- Representative David Martin Voted No
- Representative Cody T. Mitchell Voted No
- Representative Travis A. Moore Voted No
- Representative Brandon Newton Voted No
- Representative Fawn M. Pedalino Voted No
- Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope Voted No
- Representative Luke S. Rankin
- Representative Robby Robbins Voted No
- Representative Heath Sessions Voted No
- Representative David Vaughan Voted No
- Representative William R. "Bill" Whitmire Voted No
- Representative Mark N. Willis Voted No
- Representative Richard L. "Richie" Yow Voted No
- Representative William M. "Bill" Chumley Voted No
- Representative Sarita L. Edgerton Voted No
- Representative Bill Taylor Voted No
- Representative Phillip Bowers Voted No
- Representative Joseph S. "Joe" White Voted No
- Representative James Mikell "Mike" Burns Voted No
- Representative G. Murrell Smith, Jr.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (131)
131 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 131 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 75 | 26 | 0 | 18 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 76 | 27 | 0 | 20 |
| % of votes cast | 62% | 22% | 0% | 16% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 29 | 76 | 0 | 15 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 30 | 78 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 24% | 63% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (124)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 79 | 26 | 0 | 14 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 81 | 27 | 0 | 15 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 22% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 27 | 0 | 11 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 83 | 28 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 23% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 30 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 81 | 31 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 25% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (124)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 26 | 0 | 12 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 83 | 27 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 79 | 28 | 0 | 12 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 81 | 29 | 0 | 13 |
| % of votes cast | 66% | 24% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 82 | 20 | 0 | 17 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 84 | 21 | 0 | 18 |
| % of votes cast | 68% | 17% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 61 | 42 | 0 | 16 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 62 | 44 | 0 | 17 |
| % of votes cast | 50% | 36% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 84 | 18 | 0 | 17 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 19 | 0 | 18 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 15% | 0% | 15% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 30 | 0 | 13 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 78 | 31 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 25% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 85 | 20 | 0 | 14 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 87 | 21 | 0 | 15 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 17% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 78 | 29 | 0 | 13 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 30 | 0 | 14 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 24% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (124)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 81 | 16 | 0 | 22 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 83 | 16 | 0 | 24 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 13% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 80 | 24 | 0 | 15 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 82 | 25 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 20% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (123)
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 76 | 29 | 0 | 15 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 78 | 30 | 0 | 16 |
| % of votes cast | 63% | 24% | 0% | 13% |
How each member voted (124)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H 4760 do?
- A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY ADDING ARTICLE 8 TO CHAPTER 41, TITLE 44 SO AS TO CREATE CRIMES AND ASSOCIATED PENALTIES REGARDING THE USE OF ABORTION-INDUCING DRUGS, WITH EXCEPTIONS; BY AMENDING SECTION 44-53-250, RELATING TO SCHEDULE IV CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, SO AS TO ADD MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 44-53-370, RELATING TO CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENSES AND PENALTIES, SO AS TO CREATE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR POSSESSION OF MIFEPRISTONE AND MISOPROSTOL, WITH EXCEPTIONS.
- Who sponsors H 4760?
- H 4760 is sponsored by Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton, Representative Melissa Lackey Oremus, Representative Wallace H. "Jay" Jordan, Jr., Representative Heather Ammons Crawford, Representative Adam L. Duncan, Representative Shannon S. Erickson, Representative Cally R. "Cal" Forrest, Jr., Representative Gil Gatch, Representative Leon D. "Doug" Gilliam, Representative Thomas Duval "Val" Guest, Jr., Representative Patrick B. Haddon, Representative David R. Hiott, Representative William M. "Bill" Hixon, J.E. Johnson, Representative M. Brian Lawson, Representative Thomas R. "Randy" Ligon, Representative Steven Wayne Long, Representative Phillip D. Lowe, Representative John R. McCravy III, Representative David Martin, Representative Cody T. Mitchell, Representative Travis A. Moore, Representative Brandon Newton, Representative Fawn M. Pedalino, Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope, Representative Luke S. Rankin, Representative Robby Robbins, Representative Heath Sessions, Representative David Vaughan, Representative William R. "Bill" Whitmire, Representative Mark N. Willis, Representative Richard L. "Richie" Yow, Representative William M. "Bill" Chumley, Representative Sarita L. Edgerton, Representative Bill Taylor, Representative Phillip Bowers, Representative Joseph S. "Joe" White, Representative James Mikell "Mike" Burns, and Representative G. Murrell Smith, Jr..
- What is the current status of H 4760?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 16, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track H 4760?
- Track H 4760 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H 4760
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H 4760
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →