SB 1008 — Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation
Last action — Chapter 1, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House of Delegates
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2026. Enacted.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 3 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
In plain language
This bill addresses the statute of limitations for asbestos and silica lawsuits.
The bill modifies the time limits for filing lawsuits related to asbestos and silica exposure. It specifically affects how long individuals have to bring these legal claims.
Summary
Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
64 added · 2 removedPlain-language change summary
The amendments to Senate Bill 1008 clarify when individuals can file lawsuits related to asbestos and silica exposure. The key changes specify that the statute of limitations for these lawsuits will not begin until a person receives a medical diagnosis, discovers pertinent facts, or dies from their condition. This matters because it gives those affected more time to take legal action, which can be crucial for seeking justice in cases of long-term health issues related to exposure. Additionally, it establishes distinct legal actions for nonmalignant conditions versus cancers, and outlines limitations regarding lawsuits against certain equipment manufacturers.
SB1008WEST HVIRGINIA JUDLEGISLATURE AMREGULAR #1BakerSESSION 3228 TheEnrolled CommitteeSenate onBill the1008 JudiciaryBYS movedENATORSH toELTON, amendOSE,AND theTARR bill[Passed onMarch page14, 1,2026; after the enacting clause, by striking the remainder of the bill and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
in effect from passage] Enr SB 1008 AN ACT to amend and reenact §55-7G-9 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to the statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation;
and clarifying when a cause of action may be brought.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
(a) With respect to an asbestos or silica action not barred by limitations as of this article's effective date, an exposed person's cause of action shall not accrue, nor shall the running of limitations commence, prior to the earlier of the date:(1)date: The exposed person received a medical diagnosis of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;(2) The exposed person discovered facts that would have led a reasonable person to obtain a medical diagnosis with respect to the existence of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;
or(3)(1) The date of death of the exposed person havingreceived an asbestos-related or silica-related impairment.(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to revive or extend limitations with respect to any claim for asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment that was otherwise time-barred on the effective date of this article.(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to adversely affect, impair, limit, modify, or nullify any settlement or other agreements with respect to an asbestos or silica action entered into prior to the effective date of this article.(d) An asbestos or silica action arising out of a nonmalignantmedical conditiondiagnosis shall be a distinct cause of action from an action for an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related cancer.impairment;
Where(2) otherwiseThe permittedexposed underperson statediscovered law,facts nothat damageswould shallhave beled awarded for fear or increased risk of future disease in an asbestos or silica action.(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a plaintiffreasonable inperson anto asbestosobtain or silica action may not bring an action against the manufacturers of mining equipment used underground when the exclusive use of asbestos in the equipment was as a resultmedical ofdiagnosis specificwith requirementsrespect under 30 CFR Part 18 or, as to the useexistence of silica,an theasbestos-related designimpairment was as specified in 30 CFR Part 33 when the equipment was originally manufactured, based on any theory or doctrine,silica-related exceptimpairment; within the applicable limitations period and, in any event, within 12 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession by the manufacturers or 10 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession to its initial user, consumer, or other non-seller, whichever period expires earlier, unless the manufacturers of equipment used in coal mining have expressly warranted or promised the product for a longer period and the action is brought within that period.
Thisor subsection(3) doesThe notdate applyof todeath of the useexposed ofperson brakeshaving andan anyasbestos-related brakeor material. AdoptedRejectedsilica-related impairment.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to revive or extend limitations with respect to any claim for asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment that was otherwise time- barred on the effective date of this article.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to adversely affect, impair, limit, modify, or nullify any settlement or other agreements with respect to an asbestos or silica action entered into prior to the effective date of this article.
(d) An asbestos or silica action arising out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of action from an action for an asbestos-related or silica-related cancer.
Where otherwise permitted under state law, no damages shall be awarded for fear or increased risk of future disease in an asbestos or silica action.
Enr SB 1008 (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a plaintiff in an asbestos or silica action may not bring an action against the manufacturers of mining equipment used underground when the exclusive use of asbestos in the equipment was as a result of specific requirements under 30 CFR Part 18 or, as to the use of silica, the design was as specified in 30 CFR Part 33 when the equipment was originally manufactured, based on any theory or doctrine, except within the applicable limitations period and, in any event, within 12 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession by the manufacturers or 10 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession to its initial user, consumer, or other non-seller, whichever period expires earlier, unless the manufacturers of equipment used in coal mining have expressly warranted or promised the product for a longer period and the action is brought within that period.
This subsection does not apply to the use of brakes and any brake material.
Enr SB 1008 The Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Delegates hereby certify that the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.
...............................................................
Clerk of the Senate ...............................................................
Clerk of the House of Delegates Originated in the Senate.
In effect from passage.
...............................................................
President of the Senate ...............................................................
Speaker of the House of Delegates __________ The within is ................................................
this the...........................................
Day of ..........................................................................................................., 2026.
.............................................................
Governor 3
View plain text versions (3)
- Enrolled Enrolled Version Current pdf
- sb1008 h jud am _1 adopted.htm View text html
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Reported do pass
-
Immediate consideration
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 301)
-
Ordered to House
-
House received Senate message
-
Introduced in House
-
To Judiciary
-
To House Judiciary
-
Markup Discussion
-
With amendment, do pass
-
On 1st reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
Amendment reported by the Clerk
-
Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed House (Roll No. 618)
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 619)
-
Communicated to Senate
-
House Message received
-
Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 645)
-
Effective from passage (Roll No. 646)
-
Communicated to House
-
Completed legislative action
-
To Governor 3/19/2026
-
To Governor 3/19/2026 - Senate Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/2026
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/2026 - Senate Journal
-
Approved by Governor 3/25/2026 - House Journal
-
Chapter 1, Acts, Regular Session, 2026
Sponsors
- Rose · Cosponsor
- Tarr · Cosponsor
- Brian Helton · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brian Helton Republican
Co-sponsors (2)
- Rose
- Tarr
Not signed on (149)
149 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 149 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ROSE | — | Yea |
| BARNHART | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD, M | — | Yea |
| TAYLOR | — | Yea |
| MORRIS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| OLIVERIO | — | Yea |
| WILLIS | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| GARCIA | — | Yea |
| QUEEN | — | Yea |
| WOODRUM | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Anne B. Charnock | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Helton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Craig A. Hart | Republican | Yea |
| Darren Thorne | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fuller | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
| Zack Maynard | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ROSE | — | Yea |
| BARNHART | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Yea |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Yea |
| MAYNARD, M | — | Yea |
| TAYLOR | — | Yea |
| MORRIS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Yea |
| OLIVERIO | — | Yea |
| WILLIS | — | Yea |
| PHILLIPS | — | Yea |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| GARCIA | — | Yea |
| QUEEN | — | Yea |
| WOODRUM | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Yea |
| Anne B. Charnock | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Helton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Yea |
| Craig A. Hart | Republican | Yea |
| Darren Thorne | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fuller | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
| Zack Maynard | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1008 do?
- Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation
- Who sponsors SB 1008?
- SB 1008 is sponsored by Rose, Tarr, and Brian Helton (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1008?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2026. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1008?
- Track SB 1008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1008
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1008
Last checked for changes 7 days ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →