West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Enacted 1 R cosponsors

SB 1008 — Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation

Last action — Chapter 1, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2026. Enacted.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 76% · moderate confidence
  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 3 sponsors

    1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 3 recorded votes so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill addresses the statute of limitations for asbestos and silica lawsuits.

The bill modifies the time limits for filing lawsuits related to asbestos and silica exposure. It specifically affects how long individuals have to bring these legal claims.

Summary

Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

64 added · 2 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendments to Senate Bill 1008 clarify when individuals can file lawsuits related to asbestos and silica exposure. The key changes specify that the statute of limitations for these lawsuits will not begin until a person receives a medical diagnosis, discovers pertinent facts, or dies from their condition. This matters because it gives those affected more time to take legal action, which can be crucial for seeking justice in cases of long-term health issues related to exposure. Additionally, it establishes distinct legal actions for nonmalignant conditions versus cancers, and outlines limitations regarding lawsuits against certain equipment manufacturers.

→
Previous
Latest
SB1008 H JUD AM #1Baker 3228 The Committee on the Judiciary moved to amend the bill on page 1, after the enacting clause, by striking the remainder of the bill and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Enrolled Senate Bill 1008 BYS ENATORSH ELTON, OSE,AND TARR [Passed March 14, 2026;
in effect from passage] Enr SB 1008 AN ACT to amend and reenact §55-7G-9 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to the statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation;
and clarifying when a cause of action may be brought.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
(a) With respect to an asbestos or silica action not barred by limitations as of this article's effective date, an exposed person's cause of action shall not accrue, nor shall the running of limitations commence, prior to the earlier of the date:(1) The exposed person received a medical diagnosis of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;(2) The exposed person discovered facts that would have led a reasonable person to obtain a medical diagnosis with respect to the existence of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;
(a) With respect to an asbestos or silica action not barred by limitations as of this article's effective date, an exposed person's cause of action shall not accrue, nor shall the running of limitations commence, prior to the earlier of the date:
or(3) The date of death of the exposed person having an asbestos-related or silica-related impairment.(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to revive or extend limitations with respect to any claim for asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment that was otherwise time-barred on the effective date of this article.(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to adversely affect, impair, limit, modify, or nullify any settlement or other agreements with respect to an asbestos or silica action entered into prior to the effective date of this article.(d) An asbestos or silica action arising out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of action from an action for an asbestos-related or silica-related cancer.
(1) The exposed person received a medical diagnosis of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;
Where otherwise permitted under state law, no damages shall be awarded for fear or increased risk of future disease in an asbestos or silica action.(e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a plaintiff in an asbestos or silica action may not bring an action against the manufacturers of mining equipment used underground when the exclusive use of asbestos in the equipment was as a result of specific requirements under 30 CFR Part 18 or, as to the use of silica, the design was as specified in 30 CFR Part 33 when the equipment was originally manufactured, based on any theory or doctrine, except within the applicable limitations period and, in any event, within 12 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession by the manufacturers or 10 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession to its initial user, consumer, or other non-seller, whichever period expires earlier, unless the manufacturers of equipment used in coal mining have expressly warranted or promised the product for a longer period and the action is brought within that period.
(2) The exposed person discovered facts that would have led a reasonable person to obtain a medical diagnosis with respect to the existence of an asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment;
This subsection does not apply to the use of brakes and any brake material.  AdoptedRejected
or (3) The date of death of the exposed person having an asbestos-related or silica-related impairment.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to revive or extend limitations with respect to any claim for asbestos-related impairment or silica-related impairment that was otherwise time- barred on the effective date of this article.
(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to adversely affect, impair, limit, modify, or nullify any settlement or other agreements with respect to an asbestos or silica action entered into prior to the effective date of this article.
(d) An asbestos or silica action arising out of a nonmalignant condition shall be a distinct cause of action from an action for an asbestos-related or silica-related cancer.
Where otherwise permitted under state law, no damages shall be awarded for fear or increased risk of future disease in an asbestos or silica action.
Enr SB 1008 (e) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, a plaintiff in an asbestos or silica action may not bring an action against the manufacturers of mining equipment used underground when the exclusive use of asbestos in the equipment was as a result of specific requirements under 30 CFR Part 18 or, as to the use of silica, the design was as specified in 30 CFR Part 33 when the equipment was originally manufactured, based on any theory or doctrine, except within the applicable limitations period and, in any event, within 12 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession by the manufacturers or 10 years from the date of first sale, lease, or delivery of possession to its initial user, consumer, or other non-seller, whichever period expires earlier, unless the manufacturers of equipment used in coal mining have expressly warranted or promised the product for a longer period and the action is brought within that period.
This subsection does not apply to the use of brakes and any brake material.
Enr SB 1008 The Clerk of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Delegates hereby certify that the foregoing bill is correctly enrolled.
...............................................................
Clerk of the Senate ...............................................................
Clerk of the House of Delegates Originated in the Senate.
In effect from passage.
...............................................................
President of the Senate ...............................................................
Speaker of the House of Delegates __________ The within is ................................................
this the...........................................
Day of ..........................................................................................................., 2026.
.............................................................
Governor 3
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Judiciary

  3. Introduced in Senate

  4. To Judiciary

  5. Reported do pass

  6. Immediate consideration

  7. Read 1st time

  8. On 2nd reading

  9. Read 2nd time

  10. On 3rd reading

  11. Read 3rd time

  12. Passed Senate (Roll No. 301)

  13. Ordered to House

  14. House received Senate message

  15. Introduced in House

  16. To Judiciary

  17. To House Judiciary

  18. Markup Discussion

  19. With amendment, do pass

  20. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  21. Read 1st time

  22. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  23. Read 2nd time

  24. Amendment reported by the Clerk

  25. Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  26. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  27. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  28. Read 3rd time

  29. Passed House (Roll No. 618)

  30. Effective from passage (Roll No. 619)

  31. Communicated to Senate

  32. House Message received

  33. Senate concurred in House amendments and passed bill (Roll No. 645)

  34. Effective from passage (Roll No. 646)

  35. Communicated to House

  36. Completed legislative action

  37. To Governor 3/19/2026

  38. To Governor 3/19/2026 - Senate Journal

  39. Approved by Governor 3/25/2026

  40. Approved by Governor 3/25/2026 - Senate Journal

  41. Approved by Governor 3/25/2026 - House Journal

  42. Chapter 1, Acts, Regular Session, 2026

Sponsors

  • Rose · Cosponsor
  • Tarr · Cosponsor
  • Brian Helton · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 149 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

  • Rose
  • Tarr

Not signed on (149)

149 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 149 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Roll Call

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 13000
Unaffiliated 21000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
ROSE — Yea
BARNHART — Yea
RUCKER — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
TAKUBO — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
TARR — Yea
MAYNARD, M — Yea
TAYLOR — Yea
MORRIS — Yea
WELD — Yea
OLIVERIO — Yea
WILLIS — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
WOELFEL — Yea
GARCIA — Yea
QUEEN — Yea
WOODRUM — Yea
ROBERTS — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Anne B. Charnock Republican Yea
Brian Helton Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Craig A. Hart Republican Yea
Darren Thorne Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Scott Fuller Republican Yea
T. Kevan Bartlett Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea
Zack Maynard Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Roll Call

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 13000
Unaffiliated 21000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
ROSE — Yea
BARNHART — Yea
RUCKER — Yea
JEFFRIES — Yea
TAKUBO — Yea
MARTIN — Yea
TARR — Yea
MAYNARD, M — Yea
TAYLOR — Yea
MORRIS — Yea
WELD — Yea
OLIVERIO — Yea
WILLIS — Yea
PHILLIPS — Yea
WOELFEL — Yea
GARCIA — Yea
QUEEN — Yea
WOODRUM — Yea
ROBERTS — Yea
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
HAMILTON — Yea
Amy Grady Republican Yea
Anne B. Charnock Republican Yea
Brian Helton Republican Yea
Charles H. Clements Republican Yea
Craig A. Hart Republican Yea
Darren Thorne Republican Yea
Jason Barrett Republican Yea
Laura Wakim Chapman Republican Yea
Mike Azinger Republican Yea
Scott Fuller Republican Yea
T. Kevan Bartlett Republican Yea
Vince Deeds Republican Yea
Zack Maynard Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 1008 do?
Relating to statute of limitations for asbestos and silica litigation
Who sponsors SB 1008?
SB 1008 is sponsored by Rose, Tarr, and Brian Helton (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 1008?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 19, 2026. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 1008?
Track SB 1008 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 1008

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 1008

Last checked for changes 7 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →