South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

S 167 — South Carolina Waterways Protection Act

Last action — Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 14, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the House.

Odds of enactment

High chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 46% · moderate confidence
  • Passed Senate

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 1 recorded vote so far.

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

Summary

A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION ACT"; BY ADDING SECTION 50-9-975 SO AS TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION FUND AND THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH REVENUES IN THE FUND MAY BE EXPENDED; AND BY ADDING SECTION 12-37-3215 SO AS TO REQUIRE THAT A TAX NOTICE FOR WATERCRAFT MUST INCLUDE A WATERWAYS PROTECTION FEE OF THREE DOLLARS.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

6 added · 160 removed

Plain-language change summary

The revised version of Bill S 167 now includes a provision to establish the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund, which will be funded by a new watercraft fee of three dollars added to tax notices. This change is important because it will help finance efforts to ensure safer navigation in South Carolina's waterways by allowing the Department of Natural Resources to identify, remove, and mark hazards. By having a dedicated fund for this purpose, the state aims to enhance the safety and accessibility of its waterways for residents and visitors alike.

→
Previous
Latest
29, 2025) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 167Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
14, 2025) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 167Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) Committee Report January 29, 2025   S.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.)                 A bill   TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION ACT";
167   Introduced by Senator Campsen   S.
Printed 1/29/25--S.
Read the first time January 14, 2025   ________   The committee on Senate Fish, Game and Forestry To whom was referred a Bill (S.
167) to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws so as to enact the "South Carolina Waterways Protection Act";
by adding Section 50-9-975 so as to establish the South Carolina, etc., respectfully Report:
That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass:
  GEORGE CAMPSEN for Committee.
    statement of estimated fiscal impact Explanation of Fiscal Impact State Expenditure This bill establishes the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund to be used by DNR to remove various hazards to navigation from the waters of the state, to identify and mark hazards to navigation, and to establish and maintain a grant program to remove water navigation hazards.  The fund will be supported by a $3 fee attached to watercraft tax notices in the state.    South Carolina Office of Resilience.  This bill specifies that SCOR may, upon a request from DNR, assist in the development and administration of a grant program established by the fund.  If DNR requests SCOR to coordinate and assist in developing the grant program, SCOR indicates that this could be managed with existing staff and resources and would have no impact on the agency.
 If DNR requests SCOR to facilitate and manage the grant program in its entirety, SCOR anticipates the need to hire 4.0 additional FTEs, including a Grant Administrator, two Program Coordinators, and a Senior Fiscal Analyst, with total salary and fringe as well as one time setup costs of $310,948 in FY 2025-26 and $258,948 in each year thereafter.  However, as the responsibilities in this bill for SCOR are dependent upon a request for assistance from DNR, the General Fund expenditure impact for SCOR will depend on decisions by DNR.
  Department of Natural Resources.  This bill requires DNR to administer the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund and to use the funds to improve the navigation of waters in the state by removing or marking various hazards.  The department must allocate the funds in the four game zones within the state based upon the number of registered and documented watercraft in each game zone.
Based on a previous response on similar legislation, this bill will result in an Other Funds expenditure impact of approximately $696,000 on DNR beginning in FY 2025-26 as the department anticipates the expenses associated with this bill are dependent upon the amount of revenue generated within the fund.  DNR is unsure which aspects of the program will be implemented first as anticipated revenues are not expected to fully fund the total cost to implement all responsibilities outlined in this bill.    For reference, the following tables display the potential recurring and non-recurring expenses DNR anticipates will be needed to fulfill the responsibilities outlined in this bill.    Non-Recurring Expenses   Average Cost per Unit Number of Units Total* Vessel Removal $8,750 $306,000 Buoys Lighting $545 1,723 $939,000 Officer Equipment $220,000 $880,000 *Totals rounded to nearest thousand.    Recurring Expenses   Average Cost per Unit Number of Units Total* FTEs $66,492 4.0 $388,000 Vessel Removal $8,750 9.23 $81,000 Buoy Maintenance $122 1,723 $210,000 *Totals rounded to nearest thousand.    State Treasurer's Office.
Under this bill, revenues for the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund must be remitted to STO and credited to an account separate and distinct from the General Fund and used for the purposes specified in the bill.  STO indicates this requirement will be managed within existing appropriations and will have no fiscal impact.
  State Revenue This bill establishes the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund, which will be supported by a $3 fee attached to all watercraft tax notices in the state.  Based on data provided by DNR in FY 2024-25, there are 361,023 watercrafts registered in the state.  Of these, 134,000 are exempt from property taxes pursuant to Section 12-37-220(B)(38)(a), which exempts watercraft and motors that have an assessment of no more than $50.
A $3 fee applied to the remaining 227,023 watercraft will result in an increase in Other Funds revenue totaling approximately $681,000.  Additionally, there are 4,986 vessels documented by the USCG.  USCG documentation is mandatory for all commercial vessels five net tons and over and is voluntary for recreational vessels five net tons and over.
These watercrafts are also subject to property taxes in the state.  Assuming none of the USCG vessels are exempt from property tax, the $3 fee will increase Other Funds revenue by approximately $15,000.  Therefore, the total increase in Other Funds revenue will be approximately $696,000 annually.    Local Expenditure This bill establishes the South Carolina Waterways Protection Fund, which will be supported by a $3 fee attached to all watercraft tax notices in the state.  RFA contacted the county auditors to determine the potential impact to implement this fee and to ask how many tax notices are sent out annually.  The Counties of Abbeville, Allendale, Barnwell, Beaufort, Charleston, Cherokee, Chester, Chesterfield, Darlington, Lancaster, Laurens, Newberry, Oconee, Pickens, Spartanburg, Williamsburg, and York provided a response.    The estimated number of tax notices provided included some combination of boats, boat motors, DNR registered watercraft, and USCG documented vessels.  Due to the varying types of watercraft included in the various responses, RFA has relied on the estimated number of taxable watercraft from DNR to determine the potential revenue impact of this bill.
  Allendale, Chesterfield, Laurens, Newberry, and York did not address the potential expenditure impact of this bill.  Abbeville, Beaufort, Charleson, and Cherokee anticipate being able to add this $3 fee to tax notices with no increase in local expenditures.
Barnwell, Chester, Darlington, Lancaster, Oconee, Pickens, and Spartanburg anticipate this bill will result in an undermined increase in expenses to update their systems to implement this $3 fee.  Williamsburg was unable to determine a potential impact without further information on the implementation of this fee.
Based on these responses, this bill will have a one-time undetermined local expenditure impact that will vary among counties.         Frank A.
Rainwater, Executive Director Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office   _______                 A bill   TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION ACT";
----XX---- This web page was last updated on January 29, 2025 at 08:58 PM
----XX---- This web page was last updated on January 14, 2025 at 12:30 PM
View plain text versions (4)
  • 01/14/2025 View text html
  • 01/29/2025 View text html
  • 01/30/2025 View text Current html
  • Introduced Filed vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document

Action History

  1. Referred to Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

  2. Introduced and read first time

  3. Read third time and sent to House

  4. Roll call Ayes-39 Nays-4

  5. Read second time

  6. Scrivener's error corrected

  7. Committee report: Favorable Fish, Game and Forestry

  8. Referred to Committee on Fish, Game and Forestry

  9. Introduced and read first time

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 169 not signed on · 4 voted No

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (169)

169 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 169 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

2nd Reading

Passed 39 Yea · 4 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 39403
Total 39403
% of votes cast 85%9%0%7%
How each member voted (46)
Member Party Vote
Senator Luke A. Rankin — Yea
Devine, Tameika Isaac — Yea
Matthews, Margie Bright — Not Voting
Nutt, Roger A. — Yea
Senator A. Shane Massey — Yea
Senator Allen Blackmon — Not Voting
Senator Billy Garrett — Nay
Senator Brad Hutto — Not Voting
Senator Brian Adams — Yea
Senator Carlisle Kennedy — Yea
Senator Daniel B. "Danny" Verdin III — Yea
Senator Darrell Jackson — Yea
Senator Deon T. Tedder — Yea
Senator Ed Sutton — Yea
Senator Everett Stubbs — Yea
Senator George E. "Chip" Campsen III — Yea
Senator Greg Hembree — Yea
Senator Harvey S. Peeler, Jr. — Nay
Senator JD Chaplin — Yea
Senator Jason Elliott — Yea
Senator Jeff Zell — Yea
Senator Jeffrey R. Graham — Yea
Senator Josh Kimbrell — Yea
Senator Karl B. Allen — Yea
Senator Kent M. Williams — Yea
Senator Lawrence K. "Larry" Grooms — Yea
Senator Matthew W. "Matt" Leber — Yea
Senator Michael Johnson — Yea
Senator Michael W. Gambrell — Yea
Senator Mike Reichenbach — Nay
Senator Overture Walker — Yea
Senator Rex F. Rice — Nay
Senator Richard J. Cash — Yea
Senator Ronnie A. Sabb — Yea
Senator Ronnie W. Cromer — Yea
Senator Ross Turner — Yea
Senator Russell L. Ott — Yea
Senator Sean M. Bennett — Yea
Senator Shane R. Martin — Yea
Senator Stephen L. Goldfinch — Yea
Senator Thomas C. Alexander — Yea
Senator Thomas D. "Tom" Corbin — Yea
Senator Tom Davis — Yea
Senator Tom Fernandez — Yea
Senator Tom Young, Jr. — Yea
Senator Wes Climer — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does S 167 do?
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS SO AS TO ENACT THE "SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION ACT"; BY ADDING SECTION 50-9-975 SO AS TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTH CAROLINA WATERWAYS PROTECTION FUND AND THE PURPOSES FOR WHICH REVENUES IN THE FUND MAY BE EXPENDED; AND BY ADDING SECTION 12-37-3215 SO AS TO REQUIRE THAT A TAX NOTICE FOR WATERCRAFT MUST INCLUDE A WATERWAYS PROTECTION FEE OF THREE DOLLARS.
Who sponsors S 167?
S 167 is sponsored by Senator George E. "Chip" Campsen III.
What is the current status of S 167?
This bill has passed the Senate. Introduced January 14, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track S 167?
Track S 167 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on S 167

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of S 167

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →