S 940 — Product Liability
Last action — Referred to Committee on Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee vote, then a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
LowHow often bills like it became law.
-
In Committee
Current position in the legislative process.
-
11 sponsors
11 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-10, RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO DEFINE NECESSARY TERMS; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-30, RELATING TO THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 73 CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF A DISTRIBUTOR, WHOLESALER, DEALER, RETAILER, OR SELLER OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
118 added · 4 removedPlain-language change summary
The revised version of Bill S 940 changes the definitions and criteria related to product liability in South Carolina. It now better clarifies what constitutes a "defective product" and introduces limitations on the liability of distributors, wholesalers, dealers, and retailers. This matters because it may affect how easily consumers can seek compensation for damages caused by defective products, potentially reducing the legal responsibility of sellers in certain situations.
PK2025-2026 tS\iú²½Bill customXml/item4.xmlÍYín£Hý¿Oücò'´¡Ï۳خ$LìܳѨ
940 («1DÓÓµ´¯°¯¸O²06þêvO:Úâësï¹Uu«Text <øåeÂ=³¼XdéÛñpÁ±4Ì¢Eúðöbî]óÚW4h¥ìíE]ü2üÛof ù`E¸c%hI9po{eùtÕïá#[ÒâMöÄR°ÄY¾¤%|ÍúO4üHXPrevious Ò_®éýÆß~ïVersion éx~GlÏ÷îgd8Z$É ¿Û6¸6-bwdøSRþ\}âEÂRºd?=ÀwøúÈÀCR]$^©ÊKx]0$(Feb. KqD)} L×Í'7ÄóÛÃk¬ Mþ9¾5ìâϦe,ÒÁÚ?2-Ëù·ëzùÕR·Ó5ÆÞ¸iÝCýjߨµmùLª¼éxj»éÍ=sjã@v½§ww¦çâÙÔ9¦b±Ë¶¯¡Ý¾Ùáϧ/_í±Ö.xB,Ï8¡ißA:ÆõéníZ»,Óöéd>&C=[rg8ïÈd>;ecÚÁç\A7.væª0¡7¦.Þ!µH®a.ß#w0>s¸µµç¿'[9ARx(SQ÷áªþãþo\tÀ¾ßt©á-£cÞR\X&<ò â>¨¥ÛKâØµÖbÏïFÄî)ÄÖKÜ:)VÛºÅpÊó=1:¶nk!ùǸ^{¢)(C>R©ÎK2Õx ©1²
@¢LÙúÚ'oúSǼ1!ãº(¡(2 e^#ÆKTù@Q">¤êªcoî[§î©Ó^!5,k"/Ó8æ¥
19, 2026) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 940Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-10, RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO DEFINE NECESSARY TERMS;
AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-30, RELATING TO THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 73 CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF A DISTRIBUTOR, WHOLESALER, DEALER, RETAILER, OR SELLER OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT.
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:
SECTION 1. Sections 15-73-10 and 15-73-30 of the S.C.
Code are amended to read:
Section 15-73-10. (1) One who sells any product in a defective condition unreasonably dangerous to the user or consumer or to his property is subject to liability for physical harm caused to the ultimate user or consumer, or to his property, ifFor the purposes of this chapter:
(1)(a) "Product liability action" means any action brought by a claimant for personal injury, death, or property damage caused by the manufacture, construction, design, formula, preparation, assembly, installation, testing, warnings, instructions, marketing, packaging, or labeling of a manufactured product when the action is based upon:
(a)(i) The seller is engaged in the business of selling such a product, andnegligence (b)(ii) It is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold.innocent or negligent misrepresentation;
(iii) strict product liability doctrine;
(iv) the breach of any implied warranty;
or (v) the breach of any oral express warranty.
(b) A product liability action does not include an action for contribution or indemnity.
(2) The rule stated in subsection (1) shall apply although"Distributor" means any distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services.
(a) The seller has exercised all possible care in the preparation and sale of his product, and (b) The user or consumer has not bought the product from or entered into any contractual relation with the seller.
Section 15-73-30. (A) Comments to § 402A of the Restatement of Torts, Second, are incorporated herein by reference thereto as the legislative intent of this chapter.No product liability action may be asserted or may be provided a claim for relief against any distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services unless:
(1) the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services is also the manufacturer or assembler of the final product and the act of manufacturing or assembling the final product is causally related to the product's defective condition;
or (2) the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services altered or modified the product, and the alteration or modification of the product was a substantial factor in causing the harm for which recovery of damages is sought.
(B) Notwithstanding the provisions contained in subsection (A), if a claimant is unable to identify the manufacturer of an allegedly defective and unreasonably dangerous product following a good faith exercise of due diligence, then a product liability action may be brought against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services.
The claimant shall provide an affidavit certifying that the claimant, or his legal counsel, has in good faith exercised due diligence but has been unable to identify the manufacturer of the allegedly defective and unreasonably dangerous product.
(C) In a product liability action brought pursuant to subsection (B) against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services, the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services, upon answering the complaint or otherwise pleading, may file an affidavit certifying the correct identity of the manufacturer of the product that allegedly caused the claimant's injury.
Once the claimant has received an affidavit, the claimant shall exercise due diligence to file an action and obtain jurisdiction over the manufacturer.
Once the claimant has commenced an action against the manufacturer, and the manufacturer has or is required to have answered or otherwise pleaded, the claimant shall voluntarily dismiss all claims against the distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services unless the claimant can identify prima facie evidence that the requirements of subsection (A) for maintaining an action against a distributor, wholesaler, dealer, retailer, or seller of a product, or an individual or business entity using a product in the production or delivery of its products or services are satisfied.
SECTION 2. The repeal or amendment by this act of any law, whether temporary or permanent or civil or criminal, does not affect pending actions, rights, duties, or liabilities founded thereon, or alter, discharge, release or extinguish any penalty, forfeiture, or liability incurred under the repealed or amended law, unless the repealed or amended provision shall so expressly provide. After the effective date of this act, all laws repealed or amended by this act must be taken and treated as remaining in full force and effect for the purpose of sustaining any pending or vested right, civil action, special proceeding, criminal prosecution, or appeal existing as of the effective date of this act, and for the enforcement of rights, duties, penalties, forfeitures, and liabilities as they stood under the repealed or amended laws.
SECTION 3. If any section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this act is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such holding shall not affect the constitutionality or validity of the remaining portions of this act, the General Assembly hereby declaring that it would have passed this act, and each and every section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, sentence, clause, phrase, and word thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, paragraphs, subparagraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words hereof may be declared to be unconstitutional, invalid, or otherwise ineffective.
SECTION 4. This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.
----XX---- This web page was last updated on February 19, 2026 at 11:42 AM
Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
Sponsors
- Senator Daniel B. "Danny" Verdin III · Primary
- Senator Ronnie W. Cromer · Primary
- Senator Allen Blackmon · Primary
- Senator Ross Turner · Primary
- Senator Wes Climer · Primary
- Senator Lawrence K. "Larry" Grooms · Primary
- Senator A. Shane Massey · Primary
- Senator Sean M. Bennett · Primary
- Senator Jason Elliott · Primary
- Senator Greg Hembree · Primary
- Senator Rex F. Rice · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →11 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (159)
159 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 159 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does S 940 do?
- A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-10, RELATING TO THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO DEFINE NECESSARY TERMS; AND BY AMENDING SECTION 15-73-30, RELATING TO THE INTENT OF CHAPTER 73 CONCERNING THE LIABILITY OF A SELLER FOR SELLING A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT, SO AS TO PROVIDE LIMITATIONS ON THE LIABILITY OF A DISTRIBUTOR, WHOLESALER, DEALER, RETAILER, OR SELLER OF A DEFECTIVE PRODUCT.
- Who sponsors S 940?
- S 940 is sponsored by Senator Daniel B. "Danny" Verdin III, Senator Ronnie W. Cromer, Senator Allen Blackmon, Senator Ross Turner, Senator Wes Climer, Senator Lawrence K. "Larry" Grooms, Senator A. Shane Massey, Senator Sean M. Bennett, Senator Jason Elliott, Senator Greg Hembree, and Senator Rex F. Rice.
- What is the current status of S 940?
- This bill is in committee in the Senate. Introduced February 19, 2026. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track S 940?
- Track S 940 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on S 940
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of S 940
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →