Guardians ad Litem
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when H 3013 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on H 3013.
You're tracking H 3013
We'll email you the moment it moves.
H 3013 — Guardians ad Litem
Last action — Referred to Committee on Judiciary
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It now moves to the second chamber.
Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Passed House
Current position in the legislative process.
-
10 sponsors
10 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 63-3-820, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN PRIVATE FAMILY COURT CASES, SO AS TO REQUIRE A CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
7 added · 91 removed7 line(s) added, 91 removed.
2025-2026 Bill 3013 Text of Previous Version (Mar.(Dec.
26,06, 2026)2024) - South Carolina Legislature Online South Carolina General Assembly126th Session, 2025-2026Bill 3013Indicates Matter StrickenIndicates New Matter(Text matches printed bills.
Document has been reformatted to meet World Wide Web specifications.) Indicates Matter Stricken Indicates New Matter Committee ReportA Marchbill 26, 2026TO AMEND H.THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 63-3-820, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN PRIVATE FAMILY COURT CASES, SO AS TO REQUIRE A CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM.
3013 Introduced by Reps.
Robbins, Pope, Pedalino, McCravy, W.
Newton, Cobb-Hunter and C.
Mitchell S.
Printed 3/26/26--H.
Read the first time January 14, 2025 ________ The committee on House Judiciary To whom was referred a Bill (H.
3013) to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws by amending Section 63-3-820, relating to qualifications to serve as a guardian ad litem in private family court cases, etc., respectfully Report:
That they have duly and carefully considered the same, and recommend that the same do pass with amendment:
Amend the bill, as and if amended, SECTION 1, by striking Section 63-3-820(B)(2) and inserting:
(2) A lay guardian ad litem appointed pursuant to Section 63-3-810, appointed in matters involving the Department of Social Services, or appointed under any other provision of state law related to guardian ad litem appointments must undergo aan annual criminal history background check conducted by the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division.
This background check must be submitted in compliance with subsection (D) prior to each and every appointment as a lay guardian ad litem under any provision of state law.
Costs of conducting each criminal history background check must be borne by the individual seeking to be appointed as the guardian ad litem.
Such costs may not be assessed to, reimbursed by, or otherwise paid by any party to the action.
(3) The criminal history background check shall be valid for three hundred sixty-five days from the date of issuance and shall satisfy the requirements of this section for any appointment occurring within that time period.
(4) All guardians ad litem subject to subsection (B)(2) have an affirmative duty to immediately notify the court and the parties if, during the pendency of any appointment, the guardian ad litem is arrested for or charged with any offense enumerated in subsection (B)(1).
Upon such notification, the court shall review the continued eligibility of the guardian ad litem to serve in the matter.
Failure to comply with the notification requirement constitutes grounds for removal and may subject the guardian ad litem to contempt of court.
Renumber sections to conform.
Amend title to conform.
W.
NEWTON for Committee.
statement of estimated fiscal impact Explanation of Fiscal Impact State Expenditure This bill requires that an individual must undergo a criminal background check conducted by SLED prior to each appointment as a guardian ad litem, pursuant to §63-3-810.
Further, the cost of the background check is to be covered by the individual seeking to be appointed as the guardian ad litem.
Additionally, this bill adds that upon appointment to a case, a guardian ad litem must provide a copy of the criminal background check from SLED in the affidavit provided to the court.
Judicial and DCA anticipate that this bill will have no expenditure impact.
Judicial states that this bill will not result in any additional actions or workload for family court.
DCA indicates that it administers the Cass Elias McCarter Guardian ad Litem Program which manages volunteer guardians ad litem, not private guardians ad litem, and therefore, are not subject to the requirements of this bill.
SLED anticipates that any increase in workload due to the increase in requests for background checks can be managed within existing staff and appropriations.
Therefore, this bill will have no expenditure impact on the agency.
For information, SLED notes this bill will require the agency to run a name-based check, a SLED CATCH, rather than a more extensive, finger-print based background check.
State Revenue The cost for a SLED CATCH check is $25, which is retained by SLED.
Pursuant to Section 23-3-115(A), revenue generated by criminal records checks performed by SLED up to an amount of $4,461,000 must be deposited in the General Fund.
Any revenue over that amount is retained by SLED.
The current three-year average in fees collected for background checks totals approximately $17,541,968, of which $4,461,000 is deposited to the General Fund, and the remainder is retained by SLED.
The potential increase in fee revenue for SLED will depend on the number of additional CATCH checks done as a result of this bill.
Therefore, the impact to Other Funds revenue for the increase in criminal record checks fee is undetermined.
Frank A.
Show all 42 changed lines (2 more)
Rainwater, Executive Director Revenue and Fiscal Affairs Office _______ A bill TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 63-3-820, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN PRIVATE FAMILY COURT CASES, SO AS TO REQUIRE A CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM.
----XX---- This web page was last updated on MarchDecember 26,06, 20262024 at 05:1310:02 PMAM
Show all 42 changed rows (2 more)
Action History
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Read third time and sent to Senate
-
Roll call Yeas-112 Nays-0
-
Read second time
-
Amended
-
Member(s) request name added as sponsor: Govan, Erickson, Bradley, Gibson
-
Scrivener's error corrected
-
Committee report: Favorable with amendment Judiciary
-
Member(s) request name added as sponsor: C.Mitchell
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Introduced and read first time
-
Referred to Committee on Judiciary
-
Prefiled
Sponsors
- Representative Robby Robbins · Primary
- Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope · Primary
- Representative Fawn M. Pedalino · Primary
- Representative John R. McCravy III · Primary
- Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton · Primary
- Representative Cody T. Mitchell · Primary
- Jr. Representative Jerry N. Govan · Primary
- Representative Shannon S. Erickson · Primary
- Representative Jeff Bradley · Primary
- Representative Daniel Gibson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →10 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on
Sponsors (10)
- Representative Robby Robbins
- Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope
- Representative Fawn M. Pedalino
- Representative John R. McCravy III
- Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton
- Representative Cody T. Mitchell
- Representative Jerry N. Govan, Jr.
- Representative Shannon S. Erickson
- Representative Jeff Bradley
- Representative Daniel Gibson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 109 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 111 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (123)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does H 3013 do?
- A BILL TO AMEND THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS BY AMENDING SECTION 63-3-820, RELATING TO QUALIFICATIONS TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM IN PRIVATE FAMILY COURT CASES, SO AS TO REQUIRE A CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK TO SERVE AS A GUARDIAN AD LITEM.
- Who sponsors H 3013?
- H 3013 is sponsored by Representative Robby Robbins, Representative Thomas E. "Tommy" Pope, Representative Fawn M. Pedalino, Representative John R. McCravy III, Representative Wm. Weston J. Newton, Representative Cody T. Mitchell, Representative Jerry N. Govan, Jr., Representative Shannon S. Erickson, Representative Jeff Bradley, and Representative Daniel Gibson.
- What is the current status of H 3013?
- This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 05, 2024. It now moves to the second chamber.
- Where can I track H 3013?
- Track H 3013 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on H 3013
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of H 3013
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →