West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Introduced 1 R cosponsors

SB 963 — Protecting due process in firearm confiscation

Last action — Motion to take from the table rejected (Roll No. 410)

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Protecting due process in firearm confiscation

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

33 added · 28 removed

Plain-language change summary

The updated version of SB 963 introduces new guidelines for how firearms and ammunition can be surrendered during protective order proceedings. Key changes include stipulating that a respondent must be properly notified of a hearing and allowing for the removal of firearms only under specific conditions, such as failure to attend the hearing or a court finding of domestic violence. This matters because it aims to ensure due process for individuals who might be affected by protective orders, balancing the safety of victims with the rights of respondents.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Introduced Senate Bill 963 By Senator Willis [Introduced February 17, 2026;
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 963 BYSENATORSWILLIS THORNE [Reported March 2, 2026, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 963 A BILL to amend and reenact §48-27-502 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to surrender of firearms and ammunition in protective order proceedings;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary] Intr SB 963 2026R4136 A BILL to amend and reenact §48-27-502 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to mandatory provisions in protective order;
requiring proper service of respondent;
requiring a full adversarial hearing by a court of record before a respondent may be prohibited from possessing any firearm or ammunition, and only then by clear and convincing evidence;
permitting protective order to direct surrender of firearms in certain circumstances;
and providing for automatic appeal by respondent.
requiring certain court findings;
and providing for appeal.
(f) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, a protective order may not prohibit a respondent from possessing any firearm or ammunition or confiscate any firearm or Intr SB 963 2026R4136 ammunitions owned by the respondent:
(f) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, a protective order issued under this chapter or chapter 53 of this code may not prohibit a respondent from possessing any CS for SB 963 firearm or ammunition or confiscate any firearm or ammunition owned by the respondent unless respondent is properly served with notice of a hearing in accordance with West Virginia law and:
(1) Unless there is a full adversarial hearing before a court of record, with the respondent present with legal representation;
(1) Respondent fails to appear for the scheduled hearing;
and (2) There is clear and convincing evidence that the respondent poses an immediate danger to the petitioner, established by documented threats, sworn testimony, or other substantial evidence, and that the confiscation of firearms and ammunition is not used as a punitive or retaliatory measure in domestic violence proceedings.
(2) Respondent consents to the surrender of his or her firearms and ammunition;
(g) If a protective order is granted containing the mandatory language of this section, the respondent has an automatic appeal from that order which shall be heard by the court within 10 days as provided in §48-27-510.
or (3) After a full adversarial hearing, where respondent may elect to have legal counsel present, and the court finds, by a preponderance of the evidence, that:
NOTE:
(A) Domestic violence has occurred;
The purpose of this bill is to require a full adversarial hearing before a court of record before a respondent may be prohibited from possessing any firearm or ammunition, under mandatory provisions in protective order and then only by clear and convincing evidence.
(B) Any of the circumstances specified in §53-8-7(a)(2) of this code are present;
The bill also provides for automatic appeal by respondent.
or (C) Respondent has committed acts of abuse, threats, harassment, or engaged in other conduct that places petitioner, or the minor children of petitioner, in reasonable fear of bodily injury.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
(4) Any finding pursuant to subdivision (3) of this subsection that results in a prohibition on respondent’s possession of a firearm or ammunition shall be supported by:
(A) Substantial evidence of record including, but not limited to, witness testimony, police reports, documented threats or admissions, medical records, or other relevant documentation;
and (B) A finding that the petitioner is requesting the surrender of the firearms and ammunition of the respondent in good faith and not for a retaliatory or otherwise malicious purpose.
(g) If a protective order is granted containing the mandatory language of this section, the respondent may file a petition for appeal with the circuit court as provided in §48-27-510(b) and §53-8-9(a) of this code.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Judiciary

  3. Introduced in Senate

  4. To Judiciary

  5. Committee substitute reported

  6. Immediate consideration

  7. Read 1st time

  8. On 2nd reading

  9. Read 2nd time

  10. On 3rd reading

  11. Read 3rd time

  12. Passed Senate (Roll No. 346)

  13. Ordered to House

  14. House received Senate message

  15. Introduced in House

  16. To Judiciary

  17. To House Judiciary

  18. Motion to discharge from committee

  19. Motion to table the motion to discharge from committee rejected

  20. Motion to take from the table rejected (Roll No. 410)

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 10 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Willis

Co-sponsors (1)

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Roll Call

Passed 22 Yea · 11 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 20801
Unaffiliated 1000
Democrat 1300
Total 221101
% of votes cast 65%32%0%3%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
Anitra Hamilton Democrat Nay
Mike Woelfel Democrat Nay
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Rick Garcia Democrat Nay
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Chris Phillips Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Nay
Dean Jeffries Republican Nay
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Glenn Jeffries Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Nay
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Jimmy Willis Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Not Voting
Mike Oliverio Republican Nay
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Robbie Morris Republican Nay
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Nay
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Nay
Tom Takubo Republican Nay
Tom Willis Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 963 do?
Protecting due process in firearm confiscation
Who sponsors SB 963?
SB 963 is sponsored by Willis and Darren Thorne (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 963?
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 963?
Track SB 963 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 963

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 963

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →