SB 963 — Protecting due process in firearm confiscation
Last action — Motion to take from the table rejected (Roll No. 410)
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Protecting due process in firearm confiscation
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
33 added · 28 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 963 introduces new guidelines for how firearms and ammunition can be surrendered during protective order proceedings. Key changes include stipulating that a respondent must be properly notified of a hearing and allowing for the removal of firearms only under specific conditions, such as failure to attend the hearing or a court finding of domestic violence. This matters because it aims to ensure due process for individuals who might be affected by protective orders, balancing the safety of victims with the rights of respondents.
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION IntroducedCommittee Substitute for Senate Bill 963 ByBYSENATORSWILLIS SenatorTHORNE Willis[Reported [IntroducedMarch February2, 17,2026, 2026;from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 963 A BILL to amend and reenact §48-27-502 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to surrender of firearms and ammunition in protective order proceedings;
referredrequiring toproper theservice Committee on the Judiciary] Intr SB 963 2026R4136 A BILL to amend and reenact §48-27-502 of therespondent; Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to mandatory provisions in protective order;
requiringpermitting aprotective fullorder adversarialto hearingdirect bysurrender a court of recordfirearms beforein acertain respondentcircumstances; may be prohibited from possessing any firearm or ammunition, and only then by clear and convincing evidence;
andrequiring providingcertain forcourt automaticfindings; appeal by respondent.
and providing for appeal.
(f) Notwithstanding any provision of this code to the contrary, a protective order issued under this chapter or chapter 53 of this code may not prohibit a respondent from possessing any CS for SB 963 firearm or ammunition or confiscate any firearm or Intrammunition SBowned 963by 2026R4136the ammunitionsrespondent ownedunless byrespondent theis respondent:properly served with notice of a hearing in accordance with West Virginia law and:
(1) UnlessRespondent therefails isto aappear fullfor adversarial hearing before a court of record, with the respondentscheduled presenthearing; with legal representation;
and (2) ThereRespondent isconsents clear and convincing evidence that the respondent poses an immediate danger to the petitioner,surrender establishedof byhis documented threats, sworn testimony, or otherher substantial evidence, and that the confiscation of firearms and ammunitionammunition; is not used as a punitive or retaliatory measure in domestic violence proceedings.
(g)or If(3) After a protectivefull orderadversarial ishearing, grantedwhere containing the mandatory language of this section, the respondent hasmay anelect automaticto appealhave fromlegal thatcounsel orderpresent, whichand shall be heard by the court withinfinds, 10by daysa aspreponderance providedof inthe §48-27-510.evidence, that:
NOTE:(A) Domestic violence has occurred;
The(B) purposeAny of thisthe billcircumstances isspecified toin require§53-8-7(a)(2) a full adversarial hearing before a court of recordthis beforecode aare respondentpresent; may be prohibited from possessing any firearm or ammunition, under mandatory provisions in protective order and then only by clear and convincing evidence.
Theor bill(C) alsoRespondent provideshas forcommitted automaticacts appealof byabuse, respondent.threats, harassment, or engaged in other conduct that places petitioner, or the minor children of petitioner, in reasonable fear of bodily injury.
Strike-throughs(4) indicateAny languagefinding thatpursuant wouldto besubdivision stricken(3) fromof athis headingsubsection orthat theresults presentin lawa andprohibition underscoringon indicatesrespondent’s newpossession languageof thata wouldfirearm or ammunition shall be added.supported by:
(A) Substantial evidence of record including, but not limited to, witness testimony, police reports, documented threats or admissions, medical records, or other relevant documentation;
and (B) A finding that the petitioner is requesting the surrender of the firearms and ammunition of the respondent in good faith and not for a retaliatory or otherwise malicious purpose.
(g) If a protective order is granted containing the mandatory language of this section, the respondent may file a petition for appeal with the circuit court as provided in §48-27-510(b) and §53-8-9(a) of this code.
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version Current pdf
Action History
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Judiciary
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Committee substitute reported
-
Immediate consideration
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 3rd reading
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 346)
-
Ordered to House
-
House received Senate message
-
Introduced in House
-
To Judiciary
-
To House Judiciary
-
Motion to discharge from committee
-
Motion to table the motion to discharge from committee rejected
-
Motion to take from the table rejected (Roll No. 410)
Sponsors
- Willis · Primary
- Darren Thorne · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Willis
Co-sponsors (1)
- Darren Thorne Republican
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 20 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 11 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 32% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Anitra Hamilton | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Nay |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Rick Garcia | Democrat | Nay |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Nay |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Nay |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Nay |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Nay |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Nay |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 963 do?
- Protecting due process in firearm confiscation
- Who sponsors SB 963?
- SB 963 is sponsored by Willis and Darren Thorne (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 963?
- This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 963?
- Track SB 963 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 963
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 963
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →