SB 927 — Clarifying Commissioner of Agriculture's authority to regulate bees
Last action — Senate requests House to concur
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Clarifying Commissioner of Agriculture's authority to regulate bees
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
14 added · 1 removedPlain-language change summary
The recent amendment to SB 927, now designated the West Virginia Apiary Act, emphasizes the importance of protecting pollinators, particularly honey bees, which are essential for the state's agriculture. New provisions were added to establish clear regulations regarding bee keeping and the management of apiaries, including specific guidelines for local municipalities. This change is significant as it aims to create a uniform framework to support beekeeping, which is beneficial for both the economy and food security, while preventing local governments from enacting overly restrictive rules that could hinder beekeeping practices. Overall, these amendments help ensure the sustainability of pollinator populations and their critical role in agricultural productivity.
SB927 HFASFA HeckertMartin 3-11#2 #1Casto3-14Wolfe 3264 Delegate7816 Senator HeckertMartin moved to amend the committee strike and insert amendment onby pagestriking 5,out sectioneverything 3,after line 44, immediately following the wordarticle “boundaries”heading byand inserting the following:“that is not maintained in accordancelieu withthereof the requirementsfollowing: of §19-13-3(a)”. Adopted
§19-13-1.
Short title;
legislative findings.
(a) This article may be cited shall be known as the West Virginia Apiary Act.
(b) The Legislature finds and declares that:(1) Pollinators such as honey bees have been in drastic decline in this state and nationwide for several decades.(2) Protecting pollinators, including, but not limited to, honey bees, is of critical importance to building and maintaining the state's economy, specifically with respect to agricultural operations that rely on pollinators.(3) The practice of beekeeping has had a positive economic impact on this state and on the food security of the state's residents.(4) The private keeping and maintaining of honey bee colonies in apiaries by citizens of this state is critical to increasing pollinator populations, which will in turn strengthen the state’s agricultural operations.
Therefore, it is in the best interest of the state and its citizens to provide for a uniform and predictable statewide regulatory framework applicable to bees, bee equipment, and apiaries. §19-13-2.
Definitions.
For the purpose of this article, the term:
(1) "Abandoned apiary" means any apiary in which twenty-five percent or more of the colonies are dead or diseased, or the death or disarray of the colonies exposes them to robbing, or diseased or potentially diseased abandoned bee equipment which may jeopardize the welfare of neighboring colonies.(2) "Apiary" means any place where one or more colonies or nuclei of bees are kept or where bee equipment is stored.(3) "Appliances" means any apparatus, tool, machine, or other device used in the handling and manipulating of bees, honey, wax, and hives.
It also means, as well as any container of honey and wax that may be used in any apiary or in transporting bees and their products and apiary supplies.(4) "Bees" means any stage of the common hive or honey bee (Apis mellifera), or other species of the genus Apis.(5) "Bee equipment" means hives, supers, frames, veils, gloves, or any other appliances.(6) "Bee products" means honey, bees wax, pollen, propolis, and royal jelly.(7) "Colony" means the hive and includes bees, comb, honey, and bee equipment.(8) "Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture of the State of West Virginia or a duly authorized employee.(9) "Control agents or control mechanisms" means any method of chemical or mechanical control to suppress or eradicate an apiary disease, pest, or parasitic infestation in an apiary or the colonies contained therein.(10) "Department" means the Department of Agriculture of the State of West Virginia.(11) "Hive" means a frame hive, box hive, box, barrel, log, gum, skep, or any other receptacle or container, natural or artificial, or any part thereof, which may be used or employed as a domicile for bees.(12) "Honey bee pest" means American foulbrood (Bacillus larvae), European foulbrood (Melissococcus pluton), Varroa mite (Varroa destructor), honey bee tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi), Tropilaelaps mite (Tropilaelaps clareae or Tropilaelaps mercedsae), or any other virus or infectious or parasitic organism determined by the commissioner to be transmissible to other bee colonies and that represents a threat to beekeeping in West Virginia.(13) "Nuclei" means the removal of a split portion or division of any colony of honey bees for the express purpose of creating a numerical increase in colonies for honey production, pollination service, or monetary gain through sale of honey bees.(14) "Packaged bees" means bees shipped in combless packages accompanied by a valid certificate of health from an authorized state or federal agency verifying which verifies:(A) The absence or presence of any infectious or communicable diseases or parasitic infestations;
and further providing(B) That no honey has been used for food while in transit or that any honey used as food in transit was properly sterilized.(15) "Person" means corporations, partnerships, associations, societies, individuals or group of individuals or any employee, servant, or agent acting for or employed by any person.(16) "Premises" means any parcel of real estate and or structures in which bee equipment, bees, bee products, and or bee appliances are or may be utilized for storage purposes.(17) "Quarantine" means a declaration by the commissioner which specifies a period of enforced isolation to contain and prevent the spread of honey bee pests.(18) "Sterilized or sterilization" means to treat and neutralize honey bee pests by means of steam autoclave, pit incineration, or by any other acceptable method which the commissioner determines effective for control of honey bee pests.
§19-13-3.
Commissioner's powers and duties;
rule-making authority;
apiary education;
cooperation with governmental agencies;
seizure of infected bees and bee equipment;
commissioner’s exclusive authority.
(a) The commissioner may shall propose rules for legislative approval in accordance with the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code:
(1) To effectively eradicate, suppress, or control honey bee pests as far as may be practical;(2) To regulate the keeping and maintaining of bees, bee equipment, queen breeding equipment, apiaries, and appliances.
All apiaries in this state shall be subject to the provisions of this article, and those located within the boundaries of a municipality shall be maintained in accordance with the West Virginia Department of Agriculture’s Honey Bee Best Management Practices (HBBMP), which the commissioner shall promulgate by legislative rule:
Provided, That no more than two colonies shall be permitted on any tract of land of less than 1/4 acre, subject to all other requirements of the HBBMP;(3) To regulate treatments, retreatments, and fees for the services;
and(4) any other rules For any other purpose necessary to effectuate the enforcement of this article:
Provided, That in no case shall any rule promulgated by the commissioner be interpreted or enforced in any way that prevents, inhibits, or otherwise impedes any economic development activity.
For purposes of this subdivision, “economic development activity” means total private real and property investment in a project that is in excess of $50,000, through acquisition of real property, infrastructure, new construction, reconstruction, installation of fixtures, and equipping of the project.(b) The commissioner is authorized to conduct apiary education in a manner which advances and promotes bee culture in West Virginia.(c) The commissioner is authorized to cooperate with the federal government and its agencies, departments, and instrumentalities;
other West Virginia agencies, departments, divisions, or political subdivisions;
and any other state or commonwealth and its agencies, departments, or political subdivisions, in order to carry out the effective administration of this article.(d) The commissioner is authorized to stop the delivery of, to seize, to destroy, to treat, or to order returned to point of origin, at the owner's expense, all appliances, bees, bee equipment, bee products, or hives transported into or within this state which are found to be infected with honey bee pests, regardless of whether a valid certificate of inspection is attached.(e) The commissioner shall have exclusive authority to register, permit, inspect, sample, and otherwise regulate the keeping and maintaining of bees, bee equipment, and apiaries in this state, but solely upon the parcel or tract of property upon which an apiary is located, as provided in this article.
(f) No county, municipality, or other political subdivision may, whether by ordinance, charter, resolution, administrative act, or otherwise, enact, adopt, implement, or enforce any ordinance, regulation, or rule which relates to the registration, permitting, inspection, placement, location, or management of apiaries in any manner which conflicts with the powers and duties of the commissioner or with rules promulgated by the commissioner pursuant to this article:
Provided, That a municipality may adopt any ordinance, regulation, or rule that requires beekeepers and apiaries within its jurisdiction to comply with the HBBMP, and may reference the HBBMP in relation to zoning classifications or land use:
Provided, however, That no county, municipality, or other political subdivision may adopt or enforce any ordinance, regulation, or rule that imposes requirements more restrictive than, or inconsistent with, those established pursuant to §19-13-3(a) of this code:
Provided further, That a municipality may impose reasonable minimum lot size restrictions and/or setback restrictions in the interest of public safety for any apiary within its boundaries that is not maintained in accordance with the requirements of § 19-13-3(a) of this code.(g) Any ordinance, regulation, or rule in conflict with §19-13-3(f) of this code is preempted by the provisions of this article.
Article 19.
Preservation of Agricultural Production.
§19-19-4.
Agriculture not adverse;
limitation of actions.
The conduct of agriculture upon agricultural land shall not be deemed adverse to other use or uses of adjoining or neighboring land, whether such other land be used or occupied for residential, commercial, business or for governmental, or any uses other than agricultural.
No complaint or right of action shall be maintained in any court of this state against the owner or operator of agricultural lands adverse to the conduct of agriculture upon agricultural lands, unless:(1) The complainant's use and occupancy of land of the complainant has existed upon his or her adjoining or neighboring land before the agricultural operation complained of upon the agricultural land;
Show all 53 changed lines (13 more)
and(2) The conduct of such agricultural operation complained of has, by clear and convincing evidence, caused or will cause actual physical damage to the person or property of the owner or occupant of such adjoining or neighboring lands. §19-19-7.
Additional limitations on nuisance actions.
(a) The provisions of this section are in addition to the limitations on actions brought against an agricultural operation in §19-19-4 of this code and shall also apply to any nuisance action brought against an agricultural operation in any court of this state.
(b) A person may not file a nuisance action to recover damages in which an agricultural operation is alleged to be a public or private nuisance unless:(1) He or she is the majority legal land owner;(2) He or she owns property adversely affected by agricultural operations within one-half mile of the agricultural operation;
and(3) The agricultural operation has materially violated a federal, state, or local law applicable to agriculture.(c) No agricultural operation within this state which has been in operation for a period of more than one year shall be considered a nuisance, either public or private, as the result of a changed condition in or about the locality where such agricultural operation is located.
In any nuisance action, public or private, against an agricultural operation or its principals or employees proof that the agricultural operation has existed for one year or more is an absolute defense to the nuisance action, if the operation is in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and permits.(d) No state or local agency, county, municipality, or other political subdivision may bring a criminal or civil action against an agricultural operation for an activity that is in material compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and permits.(e) No agricultural operation shall be or become a private or public nuisance if the operators are conducting the agricultural operation in a manner consistent with commonly accepted agricultural practice.
If the operation is in material compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and permits, it shall be presumed to be conducted in a manner consistent with commonly accepted agricultural practice.(f) No agricultural operation shall be considered a nuisance, private or public, if the agricultural operation makes a reasonable expansion, so long as the operation is in material compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and permits.(1) For the purpose of this section, a reasonable expansion includes, but is not limited to:(A) Transfer of the agricultural operation;(B) Purchase of additional land for the agricultural operation;(C) Introducing technology to an existing agricultural operation including, but not limited to, new activities, practices, equipment, and procedures consistent with technological development within the agricultural industry;(D) Applying a Natural Resources Conservation Service program or other United States Department of Agriculture program to an existing or future agricultural operation;
or(E) Any other change that is related and applied to an existing agricultural operation, so long as the change does not affect the agricultural operation’s compliance with applicable state and federal laws, regulations, and permits.(2) The reasonable expansion exemption provided by this subsection cannot apply to an expansion that:(A) Creates a substantially adverse effect upon the environment;
or(B) Creates a hazard to public health and safety.(g) A requirement of a municipality does not apply to an agricultural operation situated outside of the municipality’s corporate boundaries on the effective date of this chapter.
If an agricultural operation is subsequently annexed or otherwise brought within the corporate boundaries of a municipality, the requirements of the municipality do not apply to the agricultural operation.(h) An agricultural operation is not, nor shall it become, a private or public nuisance after it has been in operation for more than one year, if such operation was not a nuisance at the time the operation began, and the conditions or circumstances complained of as constituting the basis for the nuisance action exist substantially unchanged since the established date of operation.
The established date of operation is the date on which an agricultural operation commenced.(i) The provisions of this section shall not apply in any of the following circumstances:(1) Whenever a nuisance results from the negligent operation of any such agricultural operation;
or(2) To affect or defeat the right of any person to recover for injuries or damages sustained because of an agricultural operation or portion of an agricultural operation that is conducted in violation of a federal, state, or local statute or governmental requirement that applies to the agricultural operation or portion of agricultural operation.(j) The protected status of an agricultural operation, once acquired, is assignable, alienable, and inheritable.
The protected status of an agricultural operation, once acquired, may not be waived by the temporary cessation of operations or by diminishing the size of the operation. AdoptedRejected
Show all 53 changed rows (13 more)
View plain text versions (6)
- sb927 sfa martin _2 3-14 adopted.htm View text html
- sb927 hfa heckert 3-11 _1 adopted.htm View text html
- sb927 h gov am _1 adopted.htm View text Current html
- Amended Committee amendment adopted (Roll No. 495) html
- Amended Amendment adopted (Roll No. 494) html
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Agriculture
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Agriculture
-
Reported do pass
-
On 1st reading
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
On 3rd reading with right to amend
-
Laid over on 3rd reading 2/23/2026 with right to amend
-
Read 3rd time
-
Floor amendment reported
-
Floor amendment withdrawn by unanimous consent
-
Motion bill be laid over on calendar rejected (Roll No. 216)
-
Passed Senate (Roll No. 217)
-
Ordered to House
-
House received Senate message
-
Introduced in House
-
To Government Organization
-
To House Government Organization
-
With amendment, do pass
-
Immediate consideration
-
Read 1st time
-
On 2nd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 2nd time
-
Amendment reported by the Clerk
-
Amendment adopted (Roll No. 494)
-
Committee amendment adopted (Roll No. 495)
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
On 3rd reading, Special Calendar
-
Read 3rd time
-
Passed House (Roll No. 608)
-
Communicated to Senate
-
House Message received
-
Senate amended House amendment and passed bill (Roll No. 692)
-
Senate requests House to concur
Sponsors
- Taylor · Cosponsor
- Craig A. Hart · Primary
- Laura Wakim Chapman · Cosponsor
- Darren Thorne · Cosponsor
- Bill Hamilton · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 147 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Craig A. Hart Republican
Co-sponsors (4)
- Taylor
- Laura Wakim Chapman Republican
- Darren Thorne Republican
- Bill Hamilton Republican
Not signed on (147)
147 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 147 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| Anitra Hamilton | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Mike Woelfel | Democrat | Yea |
| Rick Garcia | Democrat | Yea |
| Ben Queen | Republican | Yea |
| Carl Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Rose | Republican | Yea |
| Dean Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Eric Tarr | Republican | Yea |
| Glenn Jeffries | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jack Woodrum | Republican | Yea |
| Jay Taylor | Republican | Yea |
| Jimmy Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Mark R. Maynard | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Oliverio | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Patricia Rucker | Republican | Yea |
| Robbie Morris | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rollan A. Roberts | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Rupie Phillips | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Weld | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Takubo | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Willis | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
| Trenton Barnhart | Republican | Yea |
Roll call published as PDF — view source.
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 11 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 25 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 74% | 26% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (34)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| ROSE | — | Yea |
| BARNHART | — | Yea |
| RUCKER | — | Yea |
| JEFFRIES | — | Nay |
| TAKUBO | — | Yea |
| MARTIN | — | Yea |
| TARR | — | Nay |
| MAYNARD, M | — | Yea |
| TAYLOR | — | Yea |
| MORRIS | — | Yea |
| WELD | — | Nay |
| OLIVERIO | — | Nay |
| WILLIS | — | Nay |
| PHILLIPS | — | Nay |
| WOELFEL | — | Yea |
| GARCIA | — | Nay |
| QUEEN | — | Yea |
| WOODRUM | — | Yea |
| ROBERTS | — | Yea |
| MR PRESIDENT | — | Yea |
| HAMILTON | — | Yea |
| Amy Grady | Republican | Nay |
| Anne B. Charnock | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Helton | Republican | Yea |
| Charles H. Clements | Republican | Nay |
| Craig A. Hart | Republican | Yea |
| Darren Thorne | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Barrett | Republican | Yea |
| Laura Wakim Chapman | Republican | Yea |
| Mike Azinger | Republican | Yea |
| Scott Fuller | Republican | Yea |
| T. Kevan Bartlett | Republican | Yea |
| Vince Deeds | Republican | Yea |
| Zack Maynard | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 927 do?
- Clarifying Commissioner of Agriculture's authority to regulate bees
- Who sponsors SB 927?
- SB 927 is sponsored by Taylor, Craig A. Hart (Republican), Laura Wakim Chapman (Republican), Darren Thorne (Republican), and Bill Hamilton (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 927?
- This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 927?
- Track SB 927 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 927
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 927
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →