West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Introduced 1 R cosponsors

SB 901 — Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program

Last action — To Finance

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

177 added · 180 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amended version of Senate Bill 901 introduces several changes related to truancy laws. One key change is that magistrates are now explicitly given the authority to handle truancy cases at the same level as circuit courts. Additionally, the amendments clarify the penalties for older students (18 and over) who miss school without a valid reason, allowing judges to delay fines if the student attends school consistently for 60 days. These changes aim to provide a clearer framework for addressing truancy and encourage better school attendance among students.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Introduced FISCAL Senate Bill 901 NOTE By Senators Smith (Mr.
CS for SB 901 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 901 By Senators Smith (Mr.
President) and Woelfel (By Request The Executive) [Introduced February 10, 2026;
President) and Woelfel (By Request The Executive) [Reported February 25 2026, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 901 A BILL to amend and reenact §18-8-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
referred to the Committee on the Judiciary;
and to amend the code by adding two new sections, designated §49-2-202a and §61-11-22b, relating to affording parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children with additional resources and assistance prior to conviction;
and then to the Committee on Finance] Intr.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H A BILL to amend and reenact §18-8-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, and to amend the code by adding two new sections, designated §49-2-202a and §61-11-22b, relating to affording parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children with additional resources and assistance prior to conviction;
and allowing magistrate and circuit court judges to require the Department of Human Services to offer home-based family preservation services for families of truant children, when the courts are involved.
and allowing magistrate and circuit court judges to require the Department of Human Services to offer home-based family preservation services for families of truant children when the courts are involved.
Upon conviction of a second offense, a fine may be imposed of not less than $50 nor more than $100 together with the costs of prosecution or confined in jail not less than five nor more than 20 days.
Upon conviction A parent, guardian, or custodian convicted of a second offense, a fine may be imposed of may be fined not less than $50 nor more than $100 together with the costs of prosecution or confined in jail not less than five nor more than 20 days.
Every day a child is out of school contrary to this article constitutes a separate offense.
1 CS for SB 901 Every day a child is out of school contrary to this article constitutes a separate offense.
Magistrates shall have concurrent jurisdiction with circuit courts for Intr.
Magistrates shall have concurrent jurisdiction with circuit courts for the trial of offenses arising under this section.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H the trial of offenses arising under this section.
(d) (b) Jurisdiction to enforce compulsory school attendance laws lies in the county in which a student resides and in the county where the school at which the student is enrolled is Intr.
2 CS for SB 901 (d) (b) Jurisdiction to enforce compulsory school attendance laws lies in the county in which a student resides and in the county where the school at which the student is enrolled is located.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H located.
PART II.
HOME-BASED FAMILY PRESERVATION ACT.
(a) Oftentimes, truancy or chronic absenteeism can be a symptom of deeper problems, including the mental health and substance abuse of the child or their parents, undiagnosed learning disorders of the child, deficient parenting skills of the parents, or complex family dynamics.
(a) Truancy or chronic absenteeism from school can be a symptom of deeper problems, including the mental health and substance abuse of the child or his or her parents, undiagnosed learning disorders of the child, deficient parenting skills of the parents, or complex family dynamics.
Except as otherwise allowed, the home-based family preservation services required by this section shall be provided consistent with the home-based family preservation services required by §49-2-202 of this code.
Except as otherwise allowed, the home-based family preservation services required by this section shall be provided consistent 3 CS for SB 901 with the home-based family preservation services required by §49-2-202 of this code.
(d) Nothing contained herein should be interpreted as precluding or limiting other actions the department, or the courts, may take to provide children and their families with better tools to Intr.
(d) Nothing contained in this section should be interpreted as precluding or limiting other actions the department, or the courts, may take to provide children and their families with better tools to address the root causes of truancy, and to improve school attendance.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H address the root causes of truancy, and to improve school attendance.
(e) When the department initiates short-term home-based family preservation intervention pursuant to this section, then a contractor employee of the department may provide services to more than three families during any period of time, as long as the department can determine that the caseload will not impact the efficacy of the services.
(e) When short-term home-based family preservation intervention is initiated pursuant to this section, then a contractor employee of the department may engage in more than three families during any period of time, so long as the department can determine that such will not impact the efficacy of the services.
– Any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code, who has no other pending criminal charges, shall be entitled to an offer to enter into pretrial diversion agreement, pursuant to the terms and procedure set forth in this subsection.
– Any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code, who has no other pending criminal charges, may enter into pretrial diversion agreement, pursuant to the terms and procedure set forth in this subsection.
(1) The prosecuting attorney and the person charged may enter into a pretrial diversion.
(1) The prosecuting attorney and the person charged may enter into a written pretrial diversion agreement.
A pretrial diversion will not be valid unless it is reduced to writing.
The written agreement shall be executed in the presence of the person’s attorney, or, if the person does not have counsel, in the presence of the presiding magistrate or circuit court judge.
The written agreement must be executed in the presence of the person’s attorney, or, if the person does not have counsel, in the presence of the presiding magistrate or circuit court judge.
(A) The pretrial diversion agreement shall set forth the duration of the agreement, which must be at least six months, but may not exceed 18 months.
(A) The pretrial diversion agreement must set forth the duration of the agreement, which must be at least six months, but may not exceed 18 months.
(B) The pretrial diversion agreement shall include the condition that the person must improve the school attendance of any child named in the criminal complaint.
(B) The pretrial diversion agreement must include the condition that the person must improve the school attendance of any child named in the criminal complaint.
The pretrial diversion 4 CS for SB 901 agreement may include other children under the care, custody, and control of the person charged, even if the other children are not alleged in the criminal complaint.
The pretrial diversion agreement may include other children under the care, custody, and control of the person charged, even if the other child is not alleged in the criminal complaint.
(C) The pretrial diversion agreement may include terms and conditions similar to those set forth in §62-12-9 of this code relating to conditions of probation, including supervision by a Intr.
(C) The pretrial diversion agreement may include terms and conditions similar to those set forth in §62-12-9 of this code relating to conditions of probation, including supervision by a probation officer.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H probation officer.
(E) The pretrial diversion agreement must include a waiver of confidentiality, which allows the county truancy officer to provide the magistrate or circuit court judge, the prosecuting attorney, and the probation officer, if any, with the school attendance records of the subject child or children.
(E) The pretrial diversion agreement shall include a waiver of confidentiality, which allows the county truancy officer to provide the magistrate or circuit court judge, the prosecuting attorney, and the probation officer, if any, with the school attendance records of the child or children of the person charged.
The county truancy officer must submit school attendance records to the parties prior to the final hearing on the pretrial diversion, but the county truancy officer may be required to submit records more frequently, upon the direction of the magistrate or circuit court judge.
The county truancy officer shall submit school attendance records to the parties prior to the final hearing on the pretrial diversion, but the magistrate or circuit court judge may require the county truancy officer to submit records more frequently.
A person entering a pretrial diversion agreement should be advised that these terms and conditions may be ordered as a part of the pretrial diversion.
The magistrate or circuit court judge shall advise a person entering a pretrial diversion agreement that these terms and conditions may be ordered as a part of the pretrial diversion.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge may require status hearings, at which time the court shall be provided with an update as to the progress of the person charged.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge may require status hearings, at which time the county truancy officer shall provide the court with an update as to the progress of the person charged.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may order the county truancy officer, or his or her designee, to appear in court to provide the school attendance for the person charged or the children of the person charged.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may order the county truancy officer, or his or her designee, to appear in court to provide the school attendance of the child or the children of the 5 CS for SB 901 person charged.
It is presumed that if a parent, guardian, or custodian is charged pursuant to §18-8-2 of this code, then it is significantly Intr.
It is presumed that if a parent, guardian, or custodian is charged pursuant to §18-8-2 of this code, then it is significantly more likely that a child in the home will be removed from the custody of the parent, guardian, or custodian, and, as such, home-based family preservation services may be appropriate.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H more likely that a child in the home will be removed from the custody of said parent, guardian, or custodian, and, as such, home-based family preservation services may be appropriate.
No charged person is obligated to enter into a pretrial diversion agreement.
A charged person is not obligated to enter into a pretrial diversion agreement.A magistrate or circuit court judge may deny a pretrial diversion, in accordance with Rule 11 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure.
A magistrate or circuit court judge may deny a pretrial diversion, in accordance with Rule 11 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(4) A person who has entered into a pretrial diversion agreement with a prosecuting attorney and who has successfully complied with the terms of the pretrial diversion is not subject to prosecution for the offense or offenses described in the agreement, or for the underlying conduct or transaction constituting the offense or offenses described in the agreement, unless the agreement includes a provision that upon compliance the person agrees to plead guilty or nolo contendere to a specific related offense, with or without a specific sentencing recommendation by the prosecuting attorney.
(4) A person who has entered into an agreement for a pretrial diversion with a prosecuting attorney and who has successfully complied with the terms of the pretrial diversion is not subject to prosecution for the offense or offenses described in the agreement, or for the underlying conduct or transaction constituting the offense or offenses described in the agreement, unless the agreement includes a provision that upon compliance the person agrees to plead guilty or nolo contendere to a specific related offense, with or without a specific sentencing recommendation by the prosecuting attorney.
(5) Upon the determination of the magistrate or circuit court judge that the person who has entered into an agreement for a pretrial diversion has not successfully complied with the terms of the pretrial diversion, the prosecuting attorney may proceed to prosecute the person for the charged offenses, as if the pretrial diversion agreement was never entered.
(5) Upon the determination of the magistrate or circuit court judge that the person who has entered into an agreement for a pretrial diversion has not successfully complied with the terms of the pretrial diversion, the prosecuting attorney may proceed to prosecute the person for the charged offenses, as if the pretrial diversion was never entered.
6 CS for SB 901 (6) A person who enters into a pretrial diversion agreement pursuant to this section may also be entitled to a pretrial diversion for other charges pursuant to §61-11-22 of this code.
(6) A person who enters into a pretrial diversion agreement pursuant to this section may also be entitled to a pretrial diversion for other charges, insomuch as permissible pursuant to §61- 11-22 of this code.
Nothing contained in this section shall prevent the prosecuting attorney from filing new charges which arise after the entry of the pretrial diversion agreement.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
Previous
Latest
Nothing contained herein shall prevent the prosecuting attorney from filing new charges which arise after the entry of the pretrial diversion agreement.
– The prosecuting attorney may offer a pretrial diversion to any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 even if the Intr.
– The prosecuting attorney may offer a pretrial diversion to any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 even if the person has other pending criminal charges, or if the person it charged with a second offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H person has other pending criminal charges, or if the person it charged with a second offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code.
The agreement shall have the same requirements and shall have the same procedure as set forth in subsection (a) of this section, except that the duration of the agreement must be for a minimum of 12 months but may not exceed 24 months.
The agreement will have the same requirements and will have the same procedure as set forth in subsection (a) of this section, except that the duration of the agreement must be for a minimum of 12 months, but may not exceed 24 months.
(c) Delayed Sentencing for Truancy Guilty Plea or Conviction.
(c) Delayed Sentencing for Truancy Conviction.
If the conviction is obtained in June, July, or the beginning of August, the sentencing hearing shall be extended such that there is a continuous 90-day period which begins with the start of the next school year.
If the conviction is obtained in June, July, or in August prior to the beginning of the school year, the sentencing hearing shall be extended so that there is a continuous 90-day period which begins with the start of the next school year.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge shall require the defendant to ensure that any child or children within the care, custody, or control of the defendant shall maintain good school attendance for the 90 days, regardless of whether the child was named in the criminal complaint which resulted in the conviction.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge shall require the defendant to ensure that any child or children within the care, custody, or control of the defendant maintains good school attendance for the 90 days, regardless of whether the child was named in the criminal complaint which resulted in the conviction.
The magistrate or circuit court judge will identify what would be considered good or adequate attendance for the purposes of this subsection.
The magistrate or circuit court judge shall identify what would be considered good or adequate attendance for the purposes of this subsection.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may order the defendant to participate in an assessment through the day report center to determine whether substance use is a contributing factor.
The magistrate 7 CS for SB 901 or circuit court judge may order the defendant to participate in an assessment through the day report center to determine whether substance use is a contributing factor.
Intr.
(A) Upon a finding of substantial compliance, then the statutory fine for a first offense or second offense shall become not less than $5 nor more than $50 together with the costs of prosecution.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H (A) Upon a finding of substantial compliance, then the statutory fine for a first offense or second offense shall become not less than $5 nor more than $50 together with the costs of prosecution.
(C) If the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that all children under the care, custody, or control maintained school attendance during the 90-day period, and that the defendant substantially complied with any term or condition of the delay period, then the magistrate or circuit court judge shall order the defendant to pay court costs, but will not impose a fine, jail term, or probation.
(C) If the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that all children under the care, custody, or control of the defendant maintained school attendance during the 90-day period, and that the defendant substantially complied with any term or condition of the 90-day period, then the magistrate or circuit court judge shall order the defendant to pay court costs, but may not impose a fine, jail term, or probation.
Upon agreement by the parties, the magistrate or circuit court judge may allow the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, and will entertain a motion of the prosecuting attorney to dismiss the charge, with prejudice.
Upon agreement by the parties, the magistrate or circuit court judge may allow the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, and shall entertain a motion of the prosecuting attorney to dismiss the charge, with prejudice.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may consider the child or children to have maintained the required attendance if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the child or children only had excused absences.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may consider the child or children to have maintained the required attendance if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the child or children only had excused absenThe.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may also determine that the child or children did not have the required attendance if the child or children were habitually tardy.
magistrate or circuit court judge may also determine that the child or children did not have the required attendance if the child or children were habitually tardy.
(4) The magistrate or circuit court judge may allow for a 90-day delay in sentencing, pursuant to the requirements of this subsection, if the defendant is convicted at trial and if the parties agree to the delay.
8 CS for SB 901 (4) The magistrate or circuit court judge may allow for a 90-day delay in sentencing, pursuant to the requirements of this subsection, if the defendant is convicted at trial and if the parties agree to the delay.
A person convicted by trial who receives a 90-day delay in sentencing will not be eligible for the dismissal of charges.
A person convicted by trial who receives a 90-day delay in sentencing is not eligible for the dismissal of charges.
– For purposes of this section, (1) "County truancy officer" shall include any county truancy officer, specialist, probation officer, or other person designated by the school or the court as the most appropriate person Intr.
– For purposes of this section, (1) "County truancy officer" shall include any county truancy officer, specialist, probation officer, or other person designated by the school, board of education, or the court as the most appropriate person capable of providing the court with school attendance records.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H capable of providing the court with school attendance records.
(2) "Excused absences" has the same definition as set forth in §18-8-4 of this code.
(2) "Excused absences" shall have the same definition as set forth in §18-8-4 of this code.
However, a magistrate or circuit court judge may requests a doctor’s excuse, even if not required by §18-8-4 of this code, and, further, a magistrate or circuit court judge may find that an absence excused by the school is not excused for purposes of this section if the excuse provided cannot be confirmed as authentic, or if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the excused absences did not justify the child from missing school.
However, a magistrate or circuit court judge may requests a doctor’s excuse, even if not required by §18-8-4 of this code, and, further, a magistrate or circuit court judge find that an absence excused by the school is not excused for purposes of this section if the excuse provided cannot be confirmed as authenticate, or if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the excused absences did not justify the child from missing school.
NOTE:
This bill creates a Truancy Pretrial Diversion Program that allows parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children an opportunity to remedy the truancy prior to conviction, allows for additional delays in sentencing to address the underlying truancy, and requires the Department of Human Services to provide home-based family preservation services when ordered by a magistrate or circuit court judge.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Judiciary then Finance

  3. Introduced in Senate

  4. To Judiciary

  5. Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance

  6. To Finance

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Woelfel

Not signed on (150)

150 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 150 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 901 do?
Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program
Who sponsors SB 901?
SB 901 is sponsored by Woelfel and Randy E. Smith (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 901?
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 901?
Track SB 901 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 901

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 901

Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →