SB 901 — Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program
Last action — To Finance
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House of Delegates
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
177 added · 180 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended version of Senate Bill 901 introduces several changes related to truancy laws. One key change is that magistrates are now explicitly given the authority to handle truancy cases at the same level as circuit courts. Additionally, the amendments clarify the penalties for older students (18 and over) who miss school without a valid reason, allowing judges to delay fines if the student attends school consistently for 60 days. These changes aim to provide a clearer framework for addressing truancy and encourage better school attendance among students.
CS for SB 901 WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION IntroducedCommittee FISCALSubstitute for Senate Bill 901 NOTE By Senators Smith (Mr.
President) and Woelfel (By Request The Executive) [Introduced[Reported February 10,25 2026;2026, from the Committee on the Judiciary] CS for SB 901 A BILL to amend and reenact §18-8-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended;
referredand to amend the Committeecode onby theadding Judiciary;two new sections, designated §49-2-202a and §61-11-22b, relating to affording parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children with additional resources and assistance prior to conviction;
and then to the Committee on Finance] Intr.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H A BILL to amend and reenact §18-8-2 of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, and to amend the code by adding two new sections, designated §49-2-202a and §61-11-22b, relating to affording parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children with additional resources and assistance prior to conviction;
and allowing magistrate and circuit court judges to require the Department of Human Services to offer home-based family preservation services for families of truant children,children when the courts are involved.
Upon conviction A parent, guardian, or custodian convicted of a second offense, a fine may be imposed of may be fined not less than $50 nor more than $100 together with the costs of prosecution or confined in jail not less than five nor more than 20 days.
1 CS for SB 901 Every day a child is out of school contrary to this article constitutes a separate offense.
Magistrates shall have concurrent jurisdiction with circuit courts for Intr.the trial of offenses arising under this section.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H the trial of offenses arising under this section.
2 CS for SB 901 (d) (b) Jurisdiction to enforce compulsory school attendance laws lies in the county in which a student resides and in the county where the school at which the student is enrolled is Intr.located.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H located.
PART II.
HOME-BASED FAMILY PRESERVATION ACT.
(a) Oftentimes,Truancy truancy or chronic absenteeism from school can be a symptom of deeper problems, including the mental health and substance abuse of the child or theirhis or her parents, undiagnosed learning disorders of the child, deficient parenting skills of the parents, or complex family dynamics.
Except as otherwise allowed, the home-based family preservation services required by this section shall be provided consistent 3 CS for SB 901 with the home-based family preservation services required by §49-2-202 of this code.
(d) Nothing contained hereinin this section should be interpreted as precluding or limiting other actions the department, or the courts, may take to provide children and their families with better tools to Intr.address the root causes of truancy, and to improve school attendance.
SB(e) 901When 2026R4024Sthe 2026R4025Hdepartment addressinitiates theshort-term roothome-based causesfamily preservation intervention pursuant to this section, then a contractor employee of truancy,the anddepartment may provide services to improvemore schoolthan attendance.three families during any period of time, as long as the department can determine that the caseload will not impact the efficacy of the services.
(e) When short-term home-based family preservation intervention is initiated pursuant to this section, then a contractor employee of the department may engage in more than three families during any period of time, so long as the department can determine that such will not impact the efficacy of the services.
– Any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code, who has no other pending criminal charges, shallmay be entitled to an offer to enter into pretrial diversion agreement, pursuant to the terms and procedure set forth in this subsection.
(1) The prosecuting attorney and the person charged may enter into a written pretrial diversion.diversion agreement.
AThe pretrialwritten diversionagreement willshall be executed in the presence of the person’s attorney, or, if the person does not behave validcounsel, unlessin itthe ispresence reducedof tothe writing.presiding magistrate or circuit court judge.
(A) The writtenpretrial diversion agreement mustshall beset executedforth in the presenceduration of the person’sagreement, attorney,which or,must ifbe theat personleast doessix notmonths, havebut counsel,may innot theexceed presence18 ofmonths. the presiding magistrate or circuit court judge.
(A)(B) The pretrial diversion agreement mustshall setinclude forth the durationcondition ofthat the agreement,person which must beimprove atthe leastschool sixattendance months,of butany maychild notnamed exceedin 18the months.criminal complaint.
(B) The pretrial diversion 4 CS for SB 901 agreement mustmay include other children under the conditioncare, thatcustody, and control of the person mustcharged, improveeven if the schoolother attendancechildren ofare anynot childalleged named in the criminal complaint.
The pretrial diversion agreement may include other children under the care, custody, and control of the person charged, even if the other child is not alleged in the criminal complaint.
(C) The pretrial diversion agreement may include terms and conditions similar to those set forth in §62-12-9 of this code relating to conditions of probation, including supervision by a Intr.probation officer.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H probation officer.
(E) The pretrial diversion agreement mustshall include a waiver of confidentiality, which allows the county truancy officer to provide the magistrate or circuit court judge, the prosecuting attorney, and the probation officer, if any, with the school attendance records of the subject child or children.children of the person charged.
The county truancy officer mustshall submit school attendance records to the parties prior to the final hearing on the pretrial diversion, but the countymagistrate truancyor officercircuit maycourt bejudge requiredmay torequire submit records more frequently, upon the directioncounty oftruancy theofficer magistrateto orsubmit circuitrecords courtmore judge.frequently.
AThe magistrate or circuit court judge shall advise a person entering a pretrial diversion agreement should be advised that these terms and conditions may be ordered as a part of the pretrial diversion.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge may require status hearings, at which time the courtcounty truancy officer shall beprovide providedthe court with an update as to the progress of the person charged.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may order the county truancy officer, or his or her designee, to appear in court to provide the school attendance forof the personchild charged or the children of the 5 CS for SB 901 person charged.
It is presumed that if a parent, guardian, or custodian is charged pursuant to §18-8-2 of this code, then it is significantly Intr.more likely that a child in the home will be removed from the custody of the parent, guardian, or custodian, and, as such, home-based family preservation services may be appropriate.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H more likely that a child in the home will be removed from the custody of said parent, guardian, or custodian, and, as such, home-based family preservation services may be appropriate.
NoA charged person is not obligated to enter into a pretrial diversion agreement.agreement.A magistrate or circuit court judge may deny a pretrial diversion, in accordance with Rule 11 of the West Virginia Rules of Criminal Procedure.
(4) A magistrateperson orwho circuithas courtentered judgeinto maya denypretrial diversion agreement with a pretrialprosecuting diversion,attorney inand accordancewho has successfully complied with Rulethe 11terms of the Westpretrial Virginiadiversion Rulesis ofnot Criminalsubject Procedure.to prosecution for the offense or offenses described in the agreement, or for the underlying conduct or transaction constituting the offense or offenses described in the agreement, unless the agreement includes a provision that upon compliance the person agrees to plead guilty or nolo contendere to a specific related offense, with or without a specific sentencing recommendation by the prosecuting attorney.
(4)(5) AUpon the determination of the magistrate or circuit court judge that the person who has entered into an agreement for a pretrial diversion with a prosecuting attorney and who has not successfully complied with the terms of the pretrial diversiondiversion, is not subject to prosecution for the offenseprosecuting orattorney offensesmay describedproceed into prosecute the agreement,person or for the underlyingcharged conductoffenses, oras transactionif constituting the offensepretrial ordiversion offenses described in the agreement, unless the agreement includeswas anever provisionentered. that upon compliance the person agrees to plead guilty or nolo contendere to a specific related offense, with or without a specific sentencing recommendation by the prosecuting attorney.
(5)6 UponCS thefor determinationSB of901 the(6) magistrateA or circuit court judge that the person who hasenters entered into an agreement for a pretrial diversion hasagreement notpursuant successfullyto compliedthis withsection themay termsalso ofbe theentitled pretrial diversion, the prosecuting attorney may proceed to prosecutea thepretrial persondiversion for theother chargedcharges offenses,pursuant asto if§61-11-22 theof pretrialthis diversioncode. was never entered.
(6)Nothing Acontained personin who enters into a pretrial diversion agreement pursuant to this section mayshall alsoprevent bethe entitledprosecuting toattorney afrom pretrialfiling diversionnew forcharges otherwhich charges,arise insomuchafter asthe permissibleentry pursuantof tothe §61-pretrial 11-22diversion ofagreement. this code.
Show all 64 changed lines (24 more)
Nothing contained herein shall prevent the prosecuting attorney from filing new charges which arise after the entry of the pretrial diversion agreement.
– The prosecuting attorney may offer a pretrial diversion to any person charged with committing a first offense in violation of §18-8-2 even if the Intr.person has other pending criminal charges, or if the person it charged with a second offense in violation of §18-8-2 of this code.
SBThe 901agreement 2026R4024Sshall 2026R4025Hhave personthe hassame otherrequirements pendingand criminalshall charges,have orthe ifsame theprocedure personas itset chargedforth within asubsection second(a) offenseof inthis violationsection, except that the duration of §18-8-2the agreement must be for a minimum of this12 code.months but may not exceed 24 months.
The(c) agreementDelayed willSentencing have the same requirements and will have the same procedure as set forth in subsection (a) of this section, except that the duration of the agreement must be for aTruancy minimumGuilty ofPlea 12or months,Conviction. but may not exceed 24 months.
(c) Delayed Sentencing for Truancy Conviction.
If the conviction is obtained in June, July, or in August prior to the beginning of August,the school year, the sentencing hearing shall be extended suchso that there is a continuous 90-day period which begins with the start of the next school year.
(A) The magistrate or circuit court judge shall require the defendant to ensure that any child or children within the care, custody, or control of the defendant shallmaintains maintain good school attendance for the 90 days, regardless of whether the child was named in the criminal complaint which resulted in the conviction.
The magistrate or circuit court judge willshall identify what would be considered good or adequate attendance for the purposes of this subsection.
The magistrate 7 CS for SB 901 or circuit court judge may order the defendant to participate in an assessment through the day report center to determine whether substance use is a contributing factor.
Intr.(A) Upon a finding of substantial compliance, then the statutory fine for a first offense or second offense shall become not less than $5 nor more than $50 together with the costs of prosecution.
SB 901 2026R4024S 2026R4025H (A) Upon a finding of substantial compliance, then the statutory fine for a first offense or second offense shall become not less than $5 nor more than $50 together with the costs of prosecution.
(C) If the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that all children under the care, custody, or control of the defendant maintained school attendance during the 90-day period, and that the defendant substantially complied with any term or condition of the delay90-day period, then the magistrate or circuit court judge shall order the defendant to pay court costs, but willmay not impose a fine, jail term, or probation.
Upon agreement by the parties, the magistrate or circuit court judge may allow the defendant to withdraw his or her guilty plea, and willshall entertain a motion of the prosecuting attorney to dismiss the charge, with prejudice.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may consider the child or children to have maintained the required attendance if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the child or children only had excused absences.absenThe.
The magistrate or circuit court judge may also determine that the child or children did not have the required attendance if the child or children were habitually tardy.
8 CS for SB 901 (4) The magistrate or circuit court judge may allow for a 90-day delay in sentencing, pursuant to the requirements of this subsection, if the defendant is convicted at trial and if the parties agree to the delay.
A person convicted by trial who receives a 90-day delay in sentencing willis not be eligible for the dismissal of charges.
– For purposes of this section, (1) "County truancy officer" shall include any county truancy officer, specialist, probation officer, or other person designated by the schoolschool, board of education, or the court as the most appropriate person Intr.capable of providing the court with school attendance records.
SB(2) 901"Excused 2026R4024Sabsences" 2026R4025Hhas capablethe ofsame providingdefinition theas courtset withforth schoolin attendance§18-8-4 records.of this code.
(2)However, "Excuseda absences"magistrate shallor havecircuit thecourt samejudge definitionmay asrequests seta forthdoctor’s inexcuse, even if not required by §18-8-4 of this code.code, and, further, a magistrate or circuit court judge may find that an absence excused by the school is not excused for purposes of this section if the excuse provided cannot be confirmed as authentic, or if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the excused absences did not justify the child from missing school.
However, a magistrate or circuit court judge may requests a doctor’s excuse, even if not required by §18-8-4 of this code, and, further, a magistrate or circuit court judge find that an absence excused by the school is not excused for purposes of this section if the excuse provided cannot be confirmed as authenticate, or if the magistrate or circuit court judge determines that the excused absences did not justify the child from missing school.
NOTE:
This bill creates a Truancy Pretrial Diversion Program that allows parents, guardians, and custodians of truant children an opportunity to remedy the truancy prior to conviction, allows for additional delays in sentencing to address the underlying truancy, and requires the Department of Human Services to provide home-based family preservation services when ordered by a magistrate or circuit court judge.
Strike-throughs indicate language that would be stricken from a heading or the present law and underscoring indicates new language that would be added.
Show all 64 changed rows (24 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- Committee Substitute View text Current pdf
- Introduced Introduced Version pdf
Action History
-
Filed for introduction
-
To Judiciary then Finance
-
Introduced in Senate
-
To Judiciary
-
Committee substitute reported, but first to Finance
-
To Finance
Sponsors
- Woelfel · Cosponsor
- Randy E. Smith · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 150 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Randy E. Smith Republican
Co-sponsors (1)
- Woelfel
Not signed on (150)
150 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 150 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 901 do?
- Creating truancy pre-trial diversion program
- Who sponsors SB 901?
- SB 901 is sponsored by Woelfel and Randy E. Smith (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 901?
- This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 901?
- Track SB 901 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 901
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 901
Last checked for changes about 1 month ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →