HB3712 — PRIVACY PROTECTION-LOCATION
Last action — Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
1Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
Next likely step: a committee referral and hearing.
Odds of enactment
Low chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a low chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Introduced
Current position in the legislative process.
-
3 sponsors
1 primary, 2 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (3 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 1 recorded vote so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Creates the Privacy Protections for Location Information Derived from Electronic Devices Act. Makes it unlawful for a covered entity to collect or process an individual's location information except for a permissible purpose. Provides that before collecting or processing an individual's location information for one of those permissible purposes, a covered entity shall provide the individual with a copy of the location privacy policy and obtain consent from that individual Authorizes a civil action in which if the plaintiff prevails, the court may award (1) actual damages including damages for emotional distress, or $5,000 per violation, whichever is greater; (2) punitive damages; and (3) any other relief. Provides that in addition to any relief awarded, the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to any prevailing plaintiff. Defines terms. Makes other changes.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read HB3712 on the official Illinois source →Action History
-
Rule 19(a) / Re-referred to Rules Committee
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Barbara Hernandez
-
Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Second Reading - Short Debate
-
Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy
-
Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
-
Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary - Civil Committee; 013-007-000
-
Assigned to Judiciary - Civil Committee
-
Referred to Rules Committee
-
First Reading
-
Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Ann M. Williams
Sponsors
- Ann M. Williams · Primary
- Kelly M. Cassidy · Cosponsor
- Barbara Hernandez · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 180 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Ann M. Williams Democrat
Co-sponsors (2)
- Kelly M. Cassidy Democrat
- Barbara Hernandez Democrat
Not signed on (180)
180 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 180 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 35% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ann M. Williams | Democrat | Yea |
| Curtis J. Tarver, II | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniel Didech | Democrat | Yea |
| Dave Vella | Democrat | Yea |
| Eva-Dina Delgado | Democrat | Yea |
| Jennifer Gong-Gershowitz | Democrat | Yea |
| Kam Buckner | Democrat | Yea |
| Kelly M. Cassidy | Democrat | Yea |
| Kevin John Olickal | Democrat | Yea |
| Lilian Jiménez | Democrat | Yea |
| Margaret Croke | Democrat | Yea |
| Mary Beth Canty | Democrat | Yea |
| Tracy Katz Muhl | Democrat | Yea |
| Bradley Fritts | Republican | Nay |
| Daniel J. Ugaste | Republican | Nay |
| David Friess | Republican | Nay |
| Jed Davis | Republican | Nay |
| Martin McLaughlin | Republican | Nay |
| Steven Reick | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Weber | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB3712 do?
- Creates the Privacy Protections for Location Information Derived from Electronic Devices Act. Makes it unlawful for a covered entity to collect or process an individual's location information except for a permissible purpose. Provides that before collecting or processing an individual's location information for one of those permissible purposes, a covered entity shall provide the individual with a copy of the location privacy policy and obtain consent from that individual Authorizes a civil action in which if the plaintiff prevails, the court may award (1) actual damages including damages for emotional distress, or $5,000 per violation, whichever is greater; (2) punitive damages; and (3) any other relief. Provides that in addition to any relief awarded, the court shall award reasonable attorney's fees and costs to any prevailing plaintiff. Defines terms. Makes other changes.
- Who sponsors HB3712 ?
- HB3712 is sponsored by Ann M. Williams (Democrat), Kelly M. Cassidy (Democrat), and Barbara Hernandez (Democrat).
- What is the current status of HB3712 ?
- This bill has been introduced in the House. Introduced February 07, 2025. It must pass committee before a floor vote.
- Where can I track HB3712 ?
- Track HB3712 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB3712
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB3712
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →