West Virginia 2026 Session Status: Introduced

SB 691 — Authorizing DOH to provide reimbursement for timely relocation of utilities

Last action — Communicated to House

  1. 1
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House of Delegates
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Authorizing DOH to provide reimbursement for timely relocation of utilities

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

2 added · 137 removed

Plain-language change summary

The recent amendment to Bill SB 691 clarifies the process for utilities to relocate their facilities when state highway projects require it. Key changes include setting a maximum notice period of 18 months for utilities to adjust their lines, outlining the required procedures for utilities to follow in these situations, and specifying the conditions under which utilities may receive reimbursement for relocation costs. This matters because it aims to create a more efficient collaboration between state highway projects and utility companies, potentially reducing construction delays and costs.

→
Previous
Latest
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 691 BYSENATORM.
SB691 HEPW AM.
AYNARD [Reported February 23, 2026, from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure] CS for SB 691 A BILL to amend and reenact §17-4-17b of the Code of West Virginia, 1931, as amended, relating to authorizing the Division of Highways to provide reimbursement for the timely relocation of utilities.
#1 3-9Casto 3264The Committee on Energy and Public Works moved to amend the bill by striking out everything after the enacting clause and inserting in lieu thereof the following:  ARTICLE 4.
Be it enacted by the Legislature of West Virginia:
ARTICLE 4.
§17-4-17b.
  §17-4-17b.
(a) Whenever the division reasonably determines that any public utility line or facility located upon, across, or under any portion of a state highway needs to be removed, relocated, or adjusted in order to accommodate a highway project, the division shall give to the utility reasonable notice in writing as mutually agreed, but not to exceed 18 months, directing it to begin the physical removal, relocation, or adjustment of such utility obstruction or interference at the cost of the utility, including construction inspection costs and in compliance with the rules of the division and the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
  (a) Whenever the division reasonably determines that any public utility line or facility located upon, across, or under any portion of a state highway needs to be removed, relocated, or adjusted in order to accommodate a highway project, the division shall give to the utility reasonable notice in writing as mutually agreed, but not to exceed 18 months, directing it to begin the physical removal, relocation, or adjustment of such utility obstruction or interference at the cost of the utility, including construction inspection costs and in compliance with the rules of the division and the provisions of §29A-3-1 et seq.
of this code.
of this code.(b) If the notice is in conjunction with a highway improvement project, it will be provided at the date of advertisement or award.
(b) If the notice is in conjunction with a highway improvement project, it will be provided at the date of advertisement or award.
Prior to the notice directing the physical removal, relocation, or adjustment of a utility line or facility, the utility shall adhere to the division’s utility relocation procedures for public road improvements which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:(1) The division will submit to the utility a letter and a set of plans for the proposed highway improvement project;(2) The utility must within a reasonable time submit to the division a written confirmation acknowledging receipt of the plans and a declaration of whether or not its facilities are within the proposed project limits and the extent to which the facilities are in conflict with the project;(3) If the utility is adjusting, locating, or relocating facilities or lines from or into the division’s right-of-way, the utility must submit to the division plans showing existing and proposed locations of utility facilities;(4) The utility’s submission shall include with the plans a work plan demonstrating that the utility adjustment, location, or relocation will be accomplished in a manner and time frame established by the division’s written procedures and instructions.
Prior to the notice directing the physical removal, relocation, or adjustment of a utility line or facility, the utility shall adhere to the division’s utility relocation procedures for public road improvements which shall include, but not be limited to, the following:
(1) The division will submit to the utility a letter and a set of plans for the proposed highway improvement project;
(2) The utility must within a reasonable time submit to the division a written confirmation acknowledging receipt of the plans and a declaration of whether or not its facilities are within the proposed project limits and the extent to which the facilities are in conflict with the project;
(3) If the utility is adjusting, locating, or relocating facilities or lines from or into the division’s right-of-way, the utility must submit to the division plans showing existing and proposed locations of utility facilities;
CS for SB 691 (4) The utility’s submission shall include with the plans a work plan demonstrating that the utility adjustment, location, or relocation will be accomplished in a manner and time frame established by the division’s written procedures and instructions.
The division will review the work plan to ensure compliance with the proposed improvement plans and schedule.
The division will review the work plan to ensure compliance with the proposed improvement plans and schedule.(c) If additional utility removal, relocation, or adjustment work is found necessary after the letting date of the highway improvement project, the utility shall provide a revised work plan within 30 calendar days after receipt of the division’s written notification of the additional work.
(c) If additional utility removal, relocation, or adjustment work is found necessary after the letting date of the highway improvement project, the utility shall provide a revised work plan within 30 calendar days after receipt of the division’s written notification of the additional work.
The division shall reimburse the utility for work performed by the utility that must be performed again as the result of a plan change on the part of the division.
The division shall reimburse the utility for work performed by the utility that must be performed again as the result of a plan change on the part of the division.(d) Should the utility fail to comply with the notice to remove, relocate, or adjust, the utility is liable to the division for direct contract damages, including costs, fees, penalties, or other contract charges, for which the division is proven to be liable to a contractor caused by the utility’s failure to timely remove, relocate, or adjust, unless a written extension is granted by the division.
(d) Should the utility fail to comply with the notice to remove, relocate, or adjust, the utility is liable to the division for direct contract damages, including costs, fees, penalties, or other contract charges, for which the division is proven to be liable to a contractor caused by the utility’s failure to timely remove, relocate, or adjust, unless a written extension is granted by the division.
The utility shall not be liable for any delay or other failure to comply with a notice to remove, relocate, or adjust that is not solely the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, the following:(1) The division has not performed its obligations in accordance with the division’s rules;(2) The division has not obtained all necessary rights-of-way that affect the utility;(3) The delay or other failure to comply by the utility is due to the division’s failure to manage schedules and communicate with the utility;(4) The division seeks to impose liability on the utility based solely upon oral communications or communications not directed to the utility’s designated contact person;(5) The division changes construction plans in any manner following the notice to remove or relocate and the change affects the utility’s facilities;
The utility shall not be liable for any delay or other failure to comply with a notice to remove, relocate, or adjust that is not solely the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, the following:
or(6) Other good cause, beyond the control of and not the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, labor disputes, unavailability of materials on a national level, act of God, or extreme weather conditions.(e) In order to avoid construction delays and to create an efficient and effective highway program, the division may schedule program meetings with the public utility on a quarterly basis to assure that schedules are maintained.(f) If a utility that is required by law to bear all or a portion of its own relocation costs elects to pursue a reimbursement agreement with the division pursuant to this subsection and provides the division with sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the utility is not adequately staffed, equipped, or capitalized to perform such relocation work with its own forces or contractors at a time convenient to and in coordination with the associated highway project, the division may pay for the associated relocation costs, including, but not limited to, design engineering, design review, construction, and inspection costs, out of the State Road Fund:
(1) The division has not performed its obligations in accordance with the division’s rules;
(2) The division has not obtained all necessary rights-of-way that affect the utility;
(3) The delay or other failure to comply by the utility is due to the division’s failure to manage schedules and communicate with the utility;
CS for SB 691 (4) The division seeks to impose liability on the utility based solely upon oral communications or communications not directed to the utility’s designated contact person;
(5) The division changes construction plans in any manner following the notice to remove or relocate and the change affects the utility’s facilities;
or (6) Other good cause, beyond the control of and not the fault of the utility, including, but not limited to, labor disputes, unavailability of materials on a national level, act of God, or extreme weather conditions.
(e) In order to avoid construction delays and to create an efficient and effective highway program, the division may schedule program meetings with the public utility on a quarterly basis to assure that schedules are maintained.
(f) If a utility that is required by law to bear all or a portion of its own relocation costs elects to pursue a reimbursement agreement with the division pursuant to this subsection and provides the division with sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the utility is not adequately staffed, equipped, or capitalized to perform such relocation work with its own forces or contractors at a time convenient to and in coordination with the associated highway project, the division may pay for the associated relocation costs, including, but not limited to, design engineering, design review, construction, and inspection costs, out of the State Road Fund:
(1) Preliminary engineering design work associated with utility relocations to be paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall be completed by any of the following methods:
 (1) Preliminary engineering design work associated with utility relocations to be paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall be completed by any of the following methods:(A) The division’s or the utility’s internal forces;
CS for SB 691 (A) The division’s or the utility’s internal forces;
or (C) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:
or(C) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:
Provided, That the subcontractor performing the preliminary engineering design work associated with the relocation is pre-approved by the utility.
Provided, That the subcontractor performing the preliminary engineering design work associated with the relocation is pre-approved by the utility.(2)  Utility relocation construction work paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall be completed by either of the following methods:(A) A contract awarded by the division to the lowest qualified bidder based on an appropriate competitive solicitation:
(2) Utility relocation construction work paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall be completed by either of the following methods:
(A) A contract awarded by the division to the lowest qualified bidder based on an appropriate competitive solicitation:
or (B) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:
or  (B) Inclusion as part of the highway construction contract let by the division as agreed to by the utility:
Provided, That the subcontractor performing the utility relocation construction work is pre-approved by the utility.
Provided, That the subcontractor performing the utility relocation construction work is pre-approved by the utility.(3) All design and construction work paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement is subject to the reasonable inspection and acceptance of the utility, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall be performed in accordance with the specifications and standards required by the utility.
(3) All design and construction work paid for by the division pursuant to a reimbursement agreement is subject to the reasonable inspection and acceptance of the utility, whose acceptance shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall be performed in accordance with the specifications and standards required by the utility.
(4) All relocation work performed pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall conform to applicable state and federal laws or regulations.(5) The provisions of this subsection are completely voluntary and shall not be interpreted to require any utility to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the division or avail itself of the options authorized by this subsection.
(4) All relocation work performed pursuant to a reimbursement agreement shall conform to applicable state and federal laws or regulations.
(5) The provisions of this subsection are completely voluntary and shall not be interpreted to require any utility to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the division or avail itself of the options authorized by this subsection.
of this code and the division may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code in order to comply with this subsection.
of this code and the division may promulgate emergency rules pursuant to the provisions of §29A-3-15 of this code in order to comply with this subsection.(g) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section,(1) Where Federal highway funds are available to reimburse the cost of utility relocation, the commissioner of highways shall include within the cost of highway construction the cost of relocation necessarily incurred by any public utility, and any pipeline company subject to the jurisdiction of the federal energy regulatory commission, in relocating any public utility line, pipeline or facility.(2) Where Federal highway funds are not available to reimburse the cost of utility relocation, the division may, in its discretion, provide partial or full reimbursement for the relocation of a utility if the physical utility relocation is successfully completed to the satisfaction of the division on or prior to the deadline established by the division.
CS for SB 691 (g) Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, the division may, in its discretion, provide partial or full reimbursement for the relocation of a utility if the physical utility relocation is successfully completed to the satisfaction of the division on or prior to the deadline established by the division.
A utility is not eligible to receive any reimbursement pursuant to this subsection unless the division notifies the utility in writing of the following:(A) That the utility is eligible for reimbursement for utility relocation at a specified location or locations;(B) The deadline for completion of the utility relocation;(C) The percentage or monetary amount the division offers to provide for partial or full reimbursement at the division’s project expense if the utility completes physical relocation at the location on or before the deadline set by the division;
A utility is not eligible to receive any reimbursement pursuant to this subsection unless the division notifies the utility in writing of the following:
and(D) Additional requirements, if any, that the division specifies the utility must meet to receive reimbursement.(E) Any such reimbursement shall be subject to a written agreement entered into by the division and the utility that specifies reimbursement terms in advance of the relocation.
Show all 46 changed rows (6 more)
Previous
Latest
(1) That the utility is eligible for reimbursement for utility relocation at a specified location or locations;
This subsection does not affect a utility’s eligibility for reimbursement when the utility has the right of occupancy in its existing location because it holds the fee, an easement, or other real property interest, the damaging or taking of which is compensable in eminent domain. AdoptedRejected  
(2) The deadline for completion of the utility relocation;
(3) The percentage or monetary amount the division offers to provide for partial or full reimbursement at the division’s project expense if the utility completes physical relocation at the location on or before the deadline set by the division;
and (4) Additional requirements, if any, that the division specifies the utility must meet to receive reimbursement.
Any reimbursement shall be subject to a written agreement entered into by the division and the utility that specifies reimbursement terms in advance of the relocation.
This subsection does not affect a utility’s eligibility for reimbursement when the utility has the right of occupancy in its existing location because it holds the fee, an easement, or other real property interest, the damaging or taking of which is compensable in eminent domain.
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Filed for introduction

  2. To Transportation and Infrastructure

  3. Introduced in Senate

  4. To Transportation and Infrastructure

  5. Committee substitute reported

  6. On 1st reading

  7. Read 1st time

  8. On 2nd reading

  9. Read 2nd time

  10. On 3rd reading

  11. Read 3rd time

  12. Passed Senate (Roll No. 238)

  13. Ordered to House

  14. House received Senate message

  15. Introduced in House

  16. To Energy and Public Works

  17. To House Energy and Public Works

  18. Markup Discussion

  19. With amendment, do pass

  20. On 1st reading, Special Calendar

  21. Read 1st time

  22. On 2nd reading, Special Calendar

  23. Read 2nd time

  24. Amendment reported by the Clerk

  25. Committee amendment adopted (Voice vote)

  26. On 3rd reading, Special Calendar

  27. Read 3rd time

  28. Passed House (Roll No. 550)

  29. Communicated to Senate

  30. House Message received

  31. Senate refused to concur; requested House to recede (Voice vote)

  32. Communicated to House

Sponsors

  • M. Maynard · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 151 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • M. Maynard

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (151)

151 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 151 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

PASSAGE

Passed 92 Yea · 0 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 81007
Democrat 9000
Unaffiliated 2000
Total 92007
% of votes cast 93%0%0%7%
How each member voted (99)
Member Party Vote
Flanigan — Yea
Linville — Yea
Anitra Hamilton Democrat Yea
Evan Hansen Democrat Yea
Hollis Lewis Democrat Yea
John Williams Democrat Yea
Kayla Young Democrat Yea
Mike Pushkin Democrat Yea
Rick Garcia Democrat Yea
Sean Hornbuckle Democrat Yea
Shawn Fluharty Democrat Yea
Adam Burkhammer Republican Yea
Adam Vance Republican Yea
Andy Shamblin Republican Yea
Betsy Kelly Republican Yea
Bill Bell Republican Yea
Bill Ridenour Republican Not Voting
Bob Fehrenbacher Republican Yea
Bryan Smith Republican Not Voting
Bryan Ward Republican Yea
Carl "Bill" Roop Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Charles Sheedy Republican Yea
Chris Phillips Republican Yea
Christopher W. Toney Republican Yea
Chuck Horst Republican Yea
Clay Riley Republican Yea
D. Rolland Jennings Republican Yea
Dana Ferrell Republican Yea
Dave Foggin Republican Yea
David Cannon Republican Yea
David Green Republican Yea
David McCormick Republican Yea
Dean Jeffries Republican Yea
Doug Smith Republican Yea
Elias Coop-Gonzalez Republican Yea
Eric Brooks Republican Yea
Erica Moore Republican Yea
Evan Worrell Republican Yea
Gary G. Howell Republican Yea
Geno Chiarelli Republican Yea
George Miller Republican Yea
George Street Republican Yea
Gregory A. Watt Republican Yea
Guy Ward Republican Yea
Henry Dillon Republican Yea
Ian T. Masters Republican Yea
James Robert "JB" Akers II Republican Yea
Jarred Cannon Republican Yea
Jeff Campbell Republican Yea
Jeff Eldridge Republican Yea
Jeffrey Stephens Republican Yea
Jim Butler Republican Yea
Jimmy Willis Republican Yea
Joe Ellington Republican Yea
Joe Funkhouser Republican Yea
Joe Parsons Republican Yea
Joe Statler Republican Not Voting
John Jordan Republican Yea
John Paul Hott Republican Yea
Jonathan Kyle Republican Yea
Jonathan Pinson Republican Yea
Jordan Bridges Republican Yea
Jordan Maynor Republican Yea
Josh Holstein Republican Yea
Kathie Hess Crouse Republican Yea
Keith Marple Republican Yea
Laura Kimble Republican Yea
Lisa White Republican Yea
Lori Dittman Republican Yea
Margitta Mazzocchi Republican Yea
Mark Dean Republican Yea
Mark Zatezalo Republican Yea
Marshall W. Clay Republican Yea
Marty Gearheart Republican Yea
Matthew Rohrbach Republican Yea
Michael Amos Republican Not Voting
Michael Hite Republican Yea
Michael Hornby Republican Yea
Mickey Petitto Republican Not Voting
Pat McGeehan Republican Yea
Patrick Lucas Republican Yea
Phil Mallow Republican Yea
Ray Canterbury Republican Yea
Rick Hillenbrand Republican Yea
Roger Hanshaw Republican Not Voting
Roy Cooper Republican Yea
Ryan Browning Republican Yea
S. Chris Anders Republican Yea
Sarah Drennan Republican Yea
Scot C. Heckert Republican Yea
Stanley Adkins Republican Yea
Tresa Howell Republican Yea
Tristan Leavitt Republican Yea
Vacant1 Republican Yea
Vernon Criss Republican Not Voting
Walter Hall Republican Yea
Wayne Clark Republican Yea
William Anderson Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Roll Call

Passed 34 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 29000
Democrat 4000
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 34000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (34)
Member Party Vote
MR PRESIDENT — Yea
Anitra Hamilton Democrat Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Mike Woelfel Democrat Yea
Rick Garcia Democrat Yea
Ben Queen Republican Yea
Carl Martin Republican Yea
Chris Phillips Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Yea
Chris Rose Republican Yea
Dean Jeffries Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Eric Tarr Republican Yea
Glenn Jeffries Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jack Woodrum Republican Yea
Jay Taylor Republican Yea
Jimmy Willis Republican Yea
Mark R. Maynard Republican Yea
Mike Oliverio Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Patricia Rucker Republican Yea
Robbie Morris Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rollan A. Roberts Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Rupie Phillips Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Ryan Weld Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Tom Takubo Republican Yea
Tom Willis Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea
Trenton Barnhart Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 691 do?
Authorizing DOH to provide reimbursement for timely relocation of utilities
Who sponsors SB 691?
SB 691 is sponsored by M. Maynard.
What is the current status of SB 691?
This bill died with 2026 Session. It reached “Introduced” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 691?
Track SB 691 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 691

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 691

Last checked for changes 7 days ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →